• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
April 15, 2009 8:30 AM PDT

The frumpy virgin who's slaying them on YouTube

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 104 comments

She has the eyebrows of a Roman Emperor. She has the square shoulders of one of his centurions. And she walks like a bouncer who had one too many years in the NFL.

When Susan Boyle stepped onto the stage of "Britain's Got Talent" this past weekend, the audience laughed and the judges could barely stop their cheeks from bulging through a guffaw.

Here was a self-confessed, never-been-kissed, unemployed 47-year-old Scotswoman who, when she saw herself on television, said she was mortified that she "looked like a garage."

She told the judges she wanted to be a professional singer. Simon Cowell (yes, he) looked like he wanted to ask her to clean his car.

Susan Boyle has become an overnight sensation on YouTube.

(Credit: YouTube/"Britain's Got Talent")

She insisted she wanted to be like Elaine Page, a diminutive English singer who has starred in "Evita," amongst other musicals. The audience choked.

Then Susan Boyle began to sing.

Frankly, she hasn't stopped. More than 6 million people have already turned to YouTube to see what all the fuss is about. They're crying in Calcutta. They're bawling in Brussels.

Why? Because watching someone so far removed from anyone's physical conception of a star finally get an audience for her extraordinary voice is as moving an experience as you're likely to enjoy this year.

Here all the unrealized hopes and dreams that so many harbor till their death are laid bare in an operetta of just a few minutes.

Here is a woman who suffered mild brain damage at birth, who was laughed at in school, and who has probably been laughed at for most of her 47 years because she lived with her mother, because she lives with her cat, and because she doesn't look like friends are supposed to look.

Yes, she is now famous. She will get a recording contract. And, one suspects, she might not enjoy it all as others might.

But if, on watching the YouTube clip, you do not spontaneously burst into tears (I give you at the most 30 seconds into her performance), then you are either an alien creation of Ray Kurzweil or you should pop along to your local shrink for some considerable surgery.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Man loses job after searching too hard for aliens
A slightly unfortunate Twitter billboard
Droid does, iPhone doesn't: The porn app store
How can Dell Netbook be 'perfect for tweeting'?
Black Friday at Best Buy: What's the big deal?
AT&T gets Luke Wilson to hit Verizon again
NBA star won't tweet until he has 1 million followers
Man marries video game character
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (104 Comments)
by Gabey8 April 15, 2009 9:17 AM PDT
The reason I didn't burst into tears was that I was too busy applauding. WOW, what a voice!

It doesn't say much in favor of our society that we've come to expect our stars to be 20-something eye candy. When a middle-aged, ordinary-looking person comes along, nobody gives them a second glance. That's awfully shallow of us, to put it mildly.

It reminds me of Paul Potts, another ordinary-looking individual who made his ordinary-looking way onto the same program, and bowled everyone over with a rendition of Nessun Dorma.

Good for Britain's Got Talent for not requiring their contestants to be eye candy. Ordinary-looking people have talent, too.
Reply to this comment
by jamorama April 16, 2009 4:18 PM PDT
Sadly, I can't say she is "ordinary-looking" but her voice is amazing, that's for sure.
by profdavidson April 19, 2009 6:01 AM PDT
This just totally reveals what shallow **** the audience of this show and Simon and co. are. They can hurry and save face, but this woman stands above their level and above their scorn. This clip is a good test of whether your a cattle-driven *******, or someone who actually feels and thinks. If you reacted with the audience in the beginning, your'e as shallow as a puddle!

See 0:54 for Simon looking back at the audience and realizing he's going to have to cover his A$$.

[CNET editors' note: Prohibited content edited out.]
by jlwagner0928 April 20, 2009 4:43 PM PDT
I am thankful that I was not the only one so moved by her performance. She truly is incredible, and it shames me to admit that I assumed she would be horrible, and watched the video for a good laugh. I was stunned. She gets the last laugh now
by ikramerica--2008 April 21, 2009 10:47 PM PDT
I'm sorry, but there are way, way, WAY too many self-righteous hypocrites out there who want to lambast society as if they were not just as surprised.

The REASON we are surprised? NOT because she's rather unattractive. There are plenty of unattractive singers out there.

It's because she's nearly 50!

Why is this surprising? Because it is very, very, VERY unlikely that someone who sings that well could make it 47 years without being discovered. That's why. In our media driven society, this is a true rarity. Most singers start out much younger, no matter what they look like.

And of course her complete lack of self confidence didn't help. People don't expect much from people who lack confidence. Even after she finished, as everyone was floored, she thought she had lost and tried to leave the stage. That says a lot about why we didn't expect anything from her in the first place.

That's why it shocked Simon, and Piers, and the lady judge who I don't know. That's why it's shocking when we watch. It's not about some unfair bias against the ugly, it's because, given her total package, it is highly unlikely that she would be that good.

And please, she is NOT perfect. She needs some work in the voice department before her album is cut. But she's much better than the vast majority of people and should be easily trainable to fix the few issues with her delivery.

So, feel good about being pleasantly surprised. Don't let others make you feel guilty for your modest expectations.
by StarlightRose April 22, 2009 7:17 AM PDT
In response to ikrameria... that's a load of bull. Plenty of amazing talent goes unrecognized--it's the nature of the business. A lot of people want to be stars and only a very small number of people ever do--and a lot of those people are necessarily all that talented-- and even further more the fame rarely ever lasts. So if you're trying to ease your conscience by making a bunch of excuses as to why people (including you) responded the way they did--don't bother. we all know what we thought and there's no excusing your way out of it.
by databaselvr April 28, 2009 9:37 AM PDT
In response to idramerica--2008, I would strenuously disagree with your characterization of Susan Boyle as lacking in confidence. You're also not a mind-reader, I'm sure. I found Ms. Boyle to be very self possessed and confident about her voice. She calmly stood there smiling as the judges reacted to her answers before she sang. Seemed to me she may have been thinking, "just wait until you hear this!"

I'm very happy for her and for us: hers is a voice that should be heard!
by applediddy April 15, 2009 9:18 AM PDT
Totally agree. I learned of her on another website. Totally floored!
Reply to this comment
by tank67 April 20, 2009 3:45 PM PDT
I bet she owns 5 cats !
by gregorytga April 15, 2009 9:24 AM PDT
This is reminiscent of (was it Britian's got talent?) where a portly office worker always wished to be a opera singer, where ordinary Joe proved he had an unnatural gift. This seems to be a more extreme version of the aforementioned. I'm not one for reality TV but every once in awhile seems like one of these makes the rounds and manages to be interesting.
Reply to this comment
by kcotham April 16, 2009 6:56 PM PDT
Paul Potts, a cellular phone salesman.
by rahja April 15, 2009 9:46 AM PDT
she has the talent and should study, and practice, and she could make something with her voice, but she's not THAT good yet.
c'mon Chris, therapy just because we don't get caught up in the hoopla?
Reply to this comment
by mikestatic1 April 16, 2009 4:49 AM PDT
Someday you might find something that you are equally as proficient at, a natural gift. Beyond being a wank, that is.
by michaelolenick April 16, 2009 5:56 PM PDT
She's nothing short of extraordinary; an instant world star, and deservedly so. She needs a great agent: studios have likely been in a bidding war since 30 seconds into her song.
by kcotham April 16, 2009 6:58 PM PDT
While I enjoyed her performance, I have to agree, she isn't THAT good. But in comparison to what passes for talent these days (the pretty young things they propel to stardom now), she's fantastic.

Everyone should watch "Before The Music Dies".
by Inconnux April 17, 2009 9:13 AM PDT
I would completely disagree... as someone with 13 years of classical training I will say that she IS that good.

Her pitch was perfect. Her range was outstanding and her breathing control was amazing. During the 'long' portion of her song where she had to hold that note, she never wavered. She is a world class singer who could easily out sing 99.9% of today's so called 'musicians' that the cookie cutter onto the radio.

The biggest difference with her is she knows how to sing from the heart, and that combined with her skill makes her a world class singer. She reminds me of Paul Potts and should win this contest by a landslide.
by Brian1943 April 20, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
ranja

When you say "she's not THAT good yet. " Doesn't make your mind hurt?
by RickRussellTX April 20, 2009 4:41 PM PDT
"she's not THAT good yet"

Actually, i agree; several spots in her song were somewhat shaky. If it was an American Idol audition, she probably would have gotten complaints from the judges before they passed her to the next round. But of course it was not an American Idol audition, and she was clearly nervous and not at all accustomed to being in front of an audience. With training and confidence, she clearly has the natural talent to go very far.

Although people make a big deal about her appearance, some of the greatest names on the stage have been "average" looking in their later years: Ethel Merman, Beverly Sills, etc. She's no worse looking than most 50-year-old ladies who can't afford to spend $$$ on their appearance.
by Random_Walk April 15, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
When my wife first rang that video up, we both were thinking the same thing: "it's like that Korean dude..." (the one on American Idol long ago who had a voice that could curdle molten lead). It was a very pleasant surprise to find out differently.

Usually I avoid watching any kind of show of this genre... but damn - that woman can sing!
Reply to this comment
by darkpoet25 April 15, 2009 2:48 PM PDT
You are thinking of William Hung from China.
by Ramon366 April 15, 2009 9:59 AM PDT
I can't stop watching her performance, and choking up.
Reply to this comment
by Moeamoe April 18, 2009 4:02 PM PDT
I don't know who Elaine Page is, but I know now who Susan Boyle is, and won't be forgetting her for a while. I was hooked when she said she's always wanted to perform in front of a large audience, that she was going to that audience rock.
Then she sang and it brought a tear to my eye. How inspiring to see someone who is salt of the earth have so much confidence in herself and her talent and not be a primadonna about it. Totally awesome ! !
by totalmonkey April 15, 2009 10:04 AM PDT
I agree with rahja about the hoopla: the people most likely to cry are probably the ones that need therapy for setting expectations for others so low. Chris, why should a bland, middle-aged Scots spinster beautifully belting out showtunes be so much more a moving experience than when some post-teen pinup model does? Have you really bought into the mass-media-promoted idea that only the young and beatiful are talented, smart, and good? Time to wake up, Mr. Award-Winning Creative Director. (sheesh!) ;-)
Reply to this comment
by pjhenry1216 April 15, 2009 10:46 AM PDT
I think its because virtually no post-teen pinup model sounds as good. If you use pop music as your standard, this woman is far above it. Granted, I didn't cry or anything either, but I was floored not because of how she looked but because she's friggin' fantastic. She's destroyed anybody I've seen on American Idol (though, to be fair, I've probably only seen a couple episodes from a few seasons.
by pshefski April 15, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
I suggest, totalmonkey, that if you have an extra couple minutes in your highly evolved day, that you browse around the net and see some of the horrifying non-sense that is being spewed about this woman's ability to get seen and heard (too many people are going a lot further than you - just making the ugliest comments) Also, talk to some singers that have tried and failed to get seen and heard. What you will find is that the world is rigged by some incredibly superficial, soulless individuals to work against others that don't fit the mold. To see someone overcome that is more than just about what she did on this one show with her voice. Someone with an unnurtured gift like this comes along only every once in a blue moon and shows the rest of us how off the mark our surface view of the world is. And by the way, she covers like four, or five octaves somewhere in the middle (with nerves of someone who is being viewed by millions) Those five octaves were heard by a couple hundred people in her village - now they are being heard by the whole world, and that is mostly because the whole world is just now starting to realize that Brittany Spears is SO much "uglier" than this woman - if people tear up over that, it's their bussiness. A lot of the tearfullness is coming from a place that is just not a part of this pop culture world. You are just as responsible for that as the rest of us who have contributed to it over the last fifty years. I bet you're a big Elvis fan. Look at the whole picture before yoou throw out your narrow opinion.
by Noneyabeeswax April 16, 2009 3:21 PM PDT
Heck yeah, pshefski. Agreed

But there are an awful lot of people who have talents that have never been given the opportunity to use them, because the media moguls decide who they promote. And these quite ordinary people, or those who aren't deemed 'attractive enough', because they can't be packaged and sold to make the industry tons of money.

Talent doesn't really matter to them as long as they can sex up the image of the 'star' and mass market it. I'm so tired of cookie cutter singers and actors. They're all alike, with just a few minor differences.

If you watch old movies, you'll see that it wasn't always this way. There were more ordinary folks in the public eye back then. And there wasn't a set of washboard abs, or a boob job in site, much less bleached teeth and perfect smiles.

And the acting, singing, what have you, was great!
by eadeguzman April 15, 2009 10:06 AM PDT
So all YouTube content is "Tech" stuff now? Chris, go write for a tabloid or something.
Reply to this comment
by dalsanto3 April 16, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
lol
by ddhboy April 15, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
As an aside, I think Simon Cowel's other show, American Idol is suffering at the moment because it doesn't have a you tube moment like this.
Reply to this comment
by kcotham April 16, 2009 7:00 PM PDT
That's because they keep putting all these dramatically untalented people on American Idol. We need to also get away from singing being the only act. There are thousands of very talented instrumentalists out there people.
by btedone April 17, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
American Idol, while supposedly a singing competition, isn't really looking for the best singer. It's looking for ... the American Idol. That is, someone who's good enough (and young enough and looks good enough) that they can package and sell. Think Britany Spears.
by ikramerica--2008 April 21, 2009 10:54 PM PDT
It's because the producers pick a certain type that has nothing to do with their singing talent. When the show was new, the producers hadn't quite figured out what it was yet, so truly talented people got through. But then it became big money, and they micromanaged the top 10/12 to the point of how many of each sex and how many of each race, etc. make it through. And they focus too much on putting the girly males through and the "jazzy" and "country" chick in. And of course this year, they put the blind guy through for a touchy feely story.

It's no longer about the talent, something Jennifer Hudson figured out when she was pushed off the show for being too fat, whoops, I mean by the judges criticism of her singing.
by CrabbyGolightly April 15, 2009 12:13 PM PDT
It is such a joy in these dark days to see such a "Dot In The Universe" to serve the cynics their comeuppance. I hope Susan Boyle makes millions, gets swept off her feet, expands her kitty collection to 20 and gets kissed a million times. She deserves joy.
Reply to this comment
by alegr April 15, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
Luckily Simon Cowell didn't make a joke about "when the fat lady sings" when he saw her.

Her voice is great.
Reply to this comment
by Neumenon April 15, 2009 1:07 PM PDT
Wonderful.
Reply to this comment
by scotishbird April 15, 2009 1:10 PM PDT
go on lass..
Reply to this comment
by MzCassidy April 15, 2009 2:06 PM PDT
Beautiful voice. Reminds me much of Eva Cassidy.
Reply to this comment
by hannahana April 15, 2009 2:13 PM PDT
I am sick of hearing the negative comments about this stunning ladys appearance.A certain broadcaster from the UK (and others)are saying she will need a makeover ..a big one...well ,I think she is who and what she is and is just fine the way she is.She does not need to conform to anyones warped "standards" of what is an acceptable apperance to present to the world.I hope she resists and stays who she is.
Reply to this comment
by boxcarmom April 15, 2009 2:50 PM PDT
Im with you hannahana.. her appearance adds to her beautiful, fun personality!! Leave her as she is, adorable and amazingly talented!!
by alegr April 15, 2009 5:33 PM PDT
It's not like Luciano Pavarotti or Moncerrat Cabalier's appearance conformed to "standards".
by kcotham April 16, 2009 7:01 PM PDT
Thank you alegr, we need to just close our eyes and listen. Music is not visual.
by celticbrewer April 17, 2009 10:23 AM PDT
Amen. I'm never going to meet her. If I do, I'm not going to make a pass at her (I'm married). What do I care what she looks like? I buy music for the music. If I wanted to stare at some airbrushed teen girls, I'd go read playboy. Looks in music are only important when the band doesn't have talent (ie backstreet boys, nsync, etc...)
by Moeamoe April 18, 2009 4:43 PM PDT
My impression of Susan is that she is happy, talented and loved, and quietly confident in her ability and true to herself.
by ikramerica--2008 April 21, 2009 10:56 PM PDT
Moeamoe?

Really? She is hardly confident in herself, and to me, the way she came off, she seemed a bit depressed. I hope this will turn her life around...
by boxcarmom April 15, 2009 2:52 PM PDT
I also enjoyed seeing Simon with love and admiration all over his face.. he's much more handsome that way. : }
Reply to this comment
by cillzybabes April 15, 2009 3:04 PM PDT
i think susan was amazing,what a voice,she deserves to sing in front of the queen,she has led a decent life and has this hidden talent,i just hope everyone appreciates her like us scots,you very seldom come across a lady like her,hail hail to her and thanks for to bringing her forward to show how talented scots teally are,hope she wins the competition,she has my vote,hail hail susan,xxxxxxxxxxx
Reply to this comment
by cillzybabes April 15, 2009 3:05 PM PDT
come on susan,you can win this,xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply to this comment
by wcladley April 15, 2009 3:08 PM PDT
I actually find this video to be rather depressing. Yes, the woman is quite talented and it is nice to see that she was given a forum display that talent....But let's consider why this video is becoming so popular.

It is a classic example of a dream coming true against the greatest of odds in the most unlikely of circumstances. A lonely, unloved, conventionally unattractive person takes perhaps her one and only shot at fame and is wildly successful. Great story.

But buried in all of the warmth of this story is a rather sinister implication: The only place such a miraculous example of personal fulfillment and social recognition is possible is in the theater of reality television. Only with Simon Cowell's smug verdict of approval can a dream come true. The awaking of our humanity (and Simon's and that of the audience) is only possible when we operate within the climate of inhumanity that makes a person with this woman's perceived limitations an outcast. Our hearts are warmed precisely because they are generally cold.

And of what the social outcasts who lack a sublime singing voice? Are they to be forever denied the decency of acceptance and recognition because they lack an unnatural talent that can land them before one of pop culture's reality show tribunals?

I suspect that if this woman's voice were as ungainly as her appearance, she would be an internet hit for entirely different reasons.
Reply to this comment
by danielszabo1981 April 15, 2009 5:06 PM PDT
I do believe this comment is as beautiful as the youtube performance. Bravo. *clap, smile*
by guitz April 16, 2009 6:01 AM PDT
Our hearts are warmed precisely because they are generally cold.


Great comment
by hubyD April 16, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
I believe this comment deserves a YouTube appearance - the absence of such precisely reflects the presence of...um...inconspicuousness

Well, I tried.

Great job Susan...guys, don't hate. love a lil.
by April 16, 2009 12:17 PM PDT
The smirks when Susan Boyle walked out onto the stage may have been for her appearance, but not because she was ugly or frumpy, her appearance (and age) just wasn't what they expected of a talented singer. But how many people who would visually fit that category, and could sing like she does, have also not been recognized because they were discouraged by friends or family from pursuing their talent? Or shyness or the economic necessity of supporting a family? Discovery of talent is fraught with so many pitfalls, and the chances so slim, that many just don't take the risk. Be honest - how many of us would do it? Remember "Mr. Tanner" by Harry Chapin?
by Inconnux April 17, 2009 9:18 AM PDT
have you ever gone to youtube? there are TONS of videos of average people who can't sing...
by celticbrewer April 17, 2009 10:31 AM PDT
"And of what the social outcasts who lack a sublime singing voice?"

I like to think that everyone has a talent or something special about them. ...if they care to follow and nurture it, that is. If you don't develop the gifts that were given to you, then you don't deserve the deceny of acceptance you say they do.

Lastly, I don't care what Simon's opinion is. He's a tool who doesn't know a thing about talent.
by ikramerica--2008 April 21, 2009 10:58 PM PDT
blah, blah, blah.

She finally got a forum, and she was able to show her stuff. Throughout life, she likely had many opportunities to sing, but for some reason, didn't take them.

It takes talent, preparation and courage to become and overnight success. All the "outcasts" of which you speak lack some or all of those qualities. That's the sad reality of life.
by logos April 15, 2009 3:23 PM PDT
She looks like what could be just an average Scottish lady that you would bump into while down at the shops and then that voice opens up and you say to yourself, what talent and what a shame that she never got a chance to show it over the years. Best of luck to the Scottish gal from West Lothian.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 3 pages (104 Comments)
advertisement
Click Here

S.F. hacker space: Heaven for the DIY set?

The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
• Photos: Circuits, code, community

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right