Why would anyone with eyes, fingers and a pulse bother with Lolcats when they can go to AwkwardFamilyPhotos.com?
Yes, cats do the cutest, silliest things. But nothing compared to some of the examples of extended human exceptionalism on this extraordinary site.
The creation of two Los Angeles writers, Mike Bender and Doug Chernack, AwkwardFamilyPhotos celebrates the sheer nonsense that is the family.
It also may provide new sources of business for those photographers who set up studios in malls and hang pictures in the window that look like the subjects were drugged for the sake of art.
At least it should, given that it only launched in April and is apparently getting 2 million hits a day.
This shot is not from the site. But I would dearly like this family to invite me to tea.
(Credit: CC Vagawi/Flickr)My personal favorites include the Bon Family Blowout, a sweet-looking threesome whose hair was teased by some appalling bullies.
My feelings are also radically altered when I look at a photo called Sweater Weather. This features a family of 11, all wearing matching sweaters.
Why would anyone think of doing this? And, having thought of doing this, why would anyone actually go through with something that makes a large family look like Moldovan masons?
But the most bafflingly joyous of all the shots on the site is taken, it seems, by a professional photographer whose camera should be taken away. For some astounding reason, the four family members in the Group Hug shot are posing with their arms along each other, creating an effect not entirely dissimilar to that of a cult with seriously eccentric proclivities.
It would be lovely if Technically Incorrect readers might make their own contributions to AwkwardFamilyPhotos and mark themselves as being visitors here. That way, I might more readily appreciate some of the formative moments that made you committed absurdists.
It's a wonderful headline for a wonderful life: "Technology found to strengthen U.S. families."
Technology doesn't allow people to ignore their parents, siblings and pet rats and disappear into their own hugely self-referential, self-reverential world, otherwise known as Facebook.
No, technology promotes family love.
So, at least, say the headlines from a survey published by the Pew Internet and American Life Project, an organization that "creates and funds academic-quality research."
Because life and love interest me greatly I decided to look at the report, which was prepared by two researchers from Pew and two from the University of Toronto.
Here is the good news: "American spouses often go their separate ways during the day, but remain connected by cell phones and, to some extent, Internet communications. When they return home they often have shared moments of exploration and entertainment on the Internet."
Thankfully, despite the immeasurably positive headlines this report has already enjoyed, it doesn't actually avoid honesty. The next paragraph is headlined: "Busy and tech-using families are less likely to share meals and less likely to report satisfaction with their leisure time."
But let's not think about that for now. Let's stick with the positives. Thirty-three percent of those Internet users surveyed said that the Web had improved their connection with friends "a lot." Meanwhile, only 23 percent said it had increased the quality of communication with family members with a similar intensity.
Ah, well, hmm. So where do headlines such as "Technology found to strengthen U.S. families" come from?
They don't seem to come from the 11 percent who said that the Internet has increased the amount of time they spend working at the office. Or the 19 percent who said it made them spend more time working at home.
Here it is. Barry Wellman, one of the research team and a sociology professor at the University of Toronto said: "There had been fears that the Internet had been taking people away from each other. We found just the opposite." Indeed, the report claims that a majority of adults said that technology allows their family to be as close or closer than they experienced in their own families when they were growing up.
I can hear you cheering. You are cheering very loudly. But wait, I have just rummaged to Part 5 of the Report, where it says quite clearly that 60 percent of respondents actually thought that cell phones and the Internet "hadn't made much difference" in bringing their families closer together. Only 25 percent actually said it had made relations better.
Perhaps sociologists have a different interpretation of "just the opposite"
What would you like to conclude from all this? Here's an entirely unscientific attempt.
Life is harder. Employers are using technology to make you work harder. You feel like you don't see your families as much. You feel that sometimes the only way you can connect to them is with an amusing e-mail ("Hey, did you see this funny picture of the elephant kissing a baboon?"), a text or a quick phone call as both you and they are on their way to somewhere else. Life has changed. And technology is perhaps the only thing that keeps families from going just very slightly nuts.
The survey, which was very light on single-parent respondents, concluded that married families with children are far greater users of technology than either single-person households or married people without children. But aren't single-person households now the majority in America?
Oh, I don't know. Research is such a difficult thing to interpret. So I thought I'd go check out divorce rates. Seems like they're pretty steady.
So perhaps this might be evidence that technology is actually keeping families together. How are things in your family?
By the way, I forgot to tell you how they did this research. On the phone, naturally.
- prev
- 1
- next





