I spent part of last week in Washington, D.C., at the annual National Educational Computing Conference. The event, which celebrated its 30th anniversary this year, is sponsored by the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
As you'd expect, there were plenty of workshops on the nuts and bolts of using technology in the classroom. But as technology evolves, so does the way it's used by some creative educators.
There were several sessions, for example, on how to use cell phones within the classroom. Considering that some school districts still ban students from bringing cell phones to school, it's great to see that there are enlightened teachers who are instead trying to figure out how to actually use them in the classroom.
Speaking of things that are banned in schools, I attended a session called "Classroom 2.0: What Is Web 2.0's Role in Schools?" This was particularly refreshing considering that many schools don't allow any use of social-networking sites and some districts actually employ filters that completely ban student and teacher access to MySpace, Facebook, and similar interactive sites.
Rather than fight the idea of students using the Web to communicate with each other, the presenters at this event were encouraging it. Chris Lehman, the principal of Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia, talked about the use of interactive technology in schools as part of a "collaborative culture" that he says is likely to be with us for a long time.
"Whether it's a wiki or Twitter, the notion of a participatory culture--upstream and downstream--is not going away," he told the audience. A wiki is a Web site that can be updated and edited by any of its participants. Unlike traditional publishing tools, it encourages collaboration.
Panel member Vicki Davis, a teacher from Camilla, Ga., demonstrated what could be the ultimate--one could say subversive--tool for changing the nature of participation in the classroom. During the event, she encouraged the audience to sign into what she calls a "back channel," which is basically a chat session going on while the panelists were speaking. People both in the room and those not attending NECC were able to comment, in real time, about what the panelists were saying via the free Chatzy service.
I've seen similar technology used at numerous conferences, but Davis says she uses it in her high-school classes. What a change from when I grew up, when it was an infraction to pass notes back and forth during class. Back then, students were punished for trying to collaborate. Of course, the technology has to be used appropriately with students staying on topic. But that should be true for any subject-oriented chat or forum. Even adults sometimes get mad at each other for going "off topic."
Such back channels also make it possible for people to say less-than-kind things about the person speaking, which can be either good or bad, depending upon your perspective. I've been to conferences where lots of people have used Twitter to comment on what was said at the podium. At one event I heard laughter after someone tweeted a funny, but cutting remark about the speaker. It seemed like the only person in the room not in on the joke was the speaker himself.
If this technology is used in school, I would hope that the students feel free to make critical comments about the subject matter but practice good online citizenship by refraining from insulting the speaker and each other.
Whether in school, the workplace or personal life, the use of interactive technology can sometimes get a little messy. But the same can be said about almost anything worthwhile. Just as we don't avoid physical education because kids sometimes skin their knees or refrain from art projects because kids can get their hands dirty, we shouldn't let the risks keep us from embracing Web 2.0 technology in school.
This post was adapted from a column in the San Jose Mercury News.
SmartyCard, which launches at Demo 09 on Tuesday, is both compelling and disturbing. The well-crafted site, which is aimed mainly at third- to sixth-graders, is compelling because it not only engages children in fun and interesting learning activities, but it adds an element of incentive by rewarding success with points that they can use to purchase virtual or real merchandise.
That very incentive is what also makes SmartyCard disturbing.
(Credit:
SmartyCard)
I'm not saying that the carrot approach--giving kids rewards for doing well--can't be appropriate and effective. But I'm somehow bothered by the idea of an automated system that puts kids through their paces, however enjoyable and educational they may be, and then dishes out rewards with Mom and Dad's money.
When my kids were that age, my wife and I spent lots of time interacting with them at the kitchen table, through reading books and doing homework, and--yes--sometimes in front of a computer. But the rewards our children received for doing well were more emotional than financial.
Sure, there was the occasional trip to the ice cream parlor to celebrate a good test score or a bit of extra effort and, yes, we occasionally bought our kids gifts as a way of congratulating them for a job well done, but there was a decidedly human touch to it, and it wasn't a quid pro quo.
Like most parents, we strived to instill a sense of pride and work ethic in our children without teaching them that every good accomplishment necessarily translates into acquiring more stuff.
That's not to say that there might not be situations in which a service like SmartyCard makes sense. If a parent feels that a bit of extra help from a Web site might be all that a kid needs to put in some extra effort, than I'm glad that SmartyCard is there to serve that family. But I'm not 100 percent comfortable with the idea of a mechanized system for rewarding achievement. At least at younger ages, it would be best if parents played the activities with their children.
Parents buy SmartyCard points that kids unlock by doing well on activities. Ten bucks buys you 5,000 points, but it takes 10,000 points for a kid to buy $10 worth of credit on iTunes. Some deals are better than others. 5,000 points will buy a month's membership on Club Penguin, but the cost of those points is still quite a bit more than the $5.95 fee a parent would pay to buy a month directly from that site.
I wish that SmartyCard could offer parents something closer to a one-to-one value, and make its money from commissions from the vendors that provide the service or sell the merchandise. General Manager Chris Carvalho said the company hopes to negotiate such deals over time. Of course, an argument can be made that the extra money parents are paying is well worth it, if the lure of SmartyCard points gets their kids to study harder
. I like the fact that kids can use SmartyCard for free with access to the educational games, but not the merchandise rewards. That opens up the activities to kids whose parents can't afford to buy points or simply prefer not to. And if the games are compelling enough, that might be all the incentive some kids need.
Besides, if they do well, you can always take them out for ice cream.
Larry talks with SmartyCard General Manager Chris Carvalho.
Listen now: Download today's podcast
- prev
- 1
- next
