• On MovieTome: Keanu updates COWBOY BEBOP!
April 2, 2009 6:37 PM PDT

Robo-scientist makes gene discovery--on its own

by Leslie Katz
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 15 comments

Adam (shown in background) may not look like its two colleagues in the white coats, but it's starting to act like them.

(Credit: Aberystwyth University)

Earlier this week, we told you about a robot that could be controlled by human thought alone. Now comes news of a bot that doesn't need to bother with any human thought at all, thank you very much. It's a "robot scientist" that researchers believe to be the first machine to independently come up with new scientific findings. Aptly, the bot is named Adam.

While we've become accustomed to robots built to repeat a given task many times over, scientists at Aberystwyth University in Wales and the U.K's University of Cambridge designed Adam to take a more human approach to scientific inquiry. And while it may not win the Nobel Prize for physics just yet, Adam appears to be doing impressively well for a young scientist, carrying out scientific research automatically, without the need for further human intervention.

As reported in the latest issue of the journal Science, Adam autonomously hypothesized that certain genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae code for enzymes that catalyze some of the microorganism's biochemical reactions. The yeast is noteworthy, as scientists use it to model more complex life systems.

Adam then devised experiments to test its prediction, ran the experiments using laboratory robotics, interpreted the results, and used those findings to revise its original hypothesis and test it out further. The researchers used their own separate experiments to confirm that Adam's hypotheses were both novel and correct--all the while probably wondering how soon they'd become obsolete.

"This is one of the first systems to get (artificial intelligence) to try and control laboratory automation," Ross King, a professor of computer science who led the research at Aberystwyth University, told Live Science. Current robots, he noted, "tend to do one thing or a sequence of things. The complexity of Adam is that it has cycles."

Adam is a still a prototype, but King's team--which is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council--says they believe their next robot, Eve (don't leave those two in the lab alone together) holds promise for scientists searching for new drugs to combat diseases such as malaria and schistosomiasis, an infection caused by a type of parasitic worm in the tropics.

"Ultimately," King said, "we hope to have teams of human and robot scientists working together in laboratories."

Leslie Katz, senior editor of CNET's Crave, covers gadgets, games, and most other digital distractions. As a co-host of the CNET News Daily Podcast, she sometimes tries to channel Terry Gross. E-mail Leslie.
Recent posts from Crave
Kia unveils voice-driven auto infotainment system
$229 vacuum tube amplifier wows audiophiles
Smartphones continue to surge
iHome introduces portable iPod/iPhone clock radio, the iP49
iHome unveils the iP2 for iPod and iPhone
Spring Design's e-reader taps into Google Books
Get 160GB of National Geographic
Skype reaches the living room via HDTVs
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by lesliejs April 2, 2009 8:36 PM PDT
great write-up Leslie! love your name too :)
Reply to this comment
by James Anderson Merritt April 2, 2009 9:33 PM PDT
I had to look at the dateline to reassure myself that this wasn't an April Fools' hoax. VERY interesting development.
Reply to this comment
by vanzway April 2, 2009 11:30 PM PDT
Very soon robots will be probing human beings to find the best way to generated electricity... Wait till there is a wage dispute, then we are all f#ked... How many U's in 'Singularity'... Maybe a giant asteroid will save the world!
Reply to this comment
by George_Marenco April 3, 2009 12:38 AM PDT
Skynet anyone?
Reply to this comment
by Mikey0001 April 3, 2009 8:56 AM PDT
That's what I thought!
by fleurya April 3, 2009 9:10 AM PDT
At least now we know the name of Skynet's e-leader!!
by henebry April 3, 2009 5:56 AM PDT
Helps to explain why I found basic research unfun when I tried it as a summer job back in college. A robot could do the job!
Reply to this comment
by styymy April 3, 2009 11:20 AM PDT
This robot will get too powerful and demand to be called HAL. Unplug it now for all of our sakes.
Reply to this comment
by Noneyabeeswax April 3, 2009 12:57 PM PDT
Hello Terminator!
Reply to this comment
by Stang5150 April 3, 2009 1:28 PM PDT
Next it will hypothesis on how many ways to kill a human....
Reply to this comment
by NoVista April 3, 2009 5:51 PM PDT
Soon, it'll be the "military-industrial-congressional-robot complex"!!!
Reply to this comment
by MMcCubbing April 3, 2009 8:20 PM PDT
Robots like this will help to take a lot of the tedium out of research. I think these would also be excellent tools for use in research into dangerous (radioactive, bio-hazardous, etc) materials. By limiting human exposure (an access) to potential terror weapons we limit the possibility of a rouge individual "borrowing" dangerous samples, such as anthrax, for use or sale.
Reply to this comment
by t8 April 4, 2009 4:12 AM PDT
We are robots too. The first was Adam. Now we don't even acknowledge a/the creator. We think all our code, DNA etc came about by chance. Our model must be breaking down.
Reply to this comment
by halfbloodme April 4, 2009 4:52 PM PDT
I'm feeling dubious about this, whilst I agree that it's a good thing Adam has enabled scientists to make leaps and bounds, a part of me wonders what else an AI like Adam is capable of. Other comments have mentioned Terminator, I'm also thinking of Cylons. The idea that we are using technical advances in this manner and creating machines so they can think and take on complicated tasks that at present humans can't with our limited use of the brains we have, are we setting ourselves up for something in the future that we're not prepared to handle? Perhaps I'm pondering too much, but if human beings are at a stage of evolution where we're not ready to use the entirety of our brain capacity, is it a good idea to be creating machines that potentially could create smarter machines which in turn will create smarter machines? What happens when potentially those machines eventually leave us behind on the evolutionary scale?
Reply to this comment
by November 11, 2009 4:49 PM PST
Have this robot increase the intelligence of the next robot and within a few generations of robots you will have the singularity...

Then its time to consider merging human and robot technology into cyborgs or just become obsolete...
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Five New Year's resolutions for Google

Stakes are high as Google attempts to maintain one of the Internet's greatest cash machines while pushing into new and risky markets.
• Android event set for Jan. 5

For eBay sellers, a holiday hamster hangover

The gift frenzy over Zhu Zhu Pets leaves some power sellers feeling like they've just run a marathon--but the steep price tags lead to some impressive profits.