Report: First Android Netbook to cost $250
The first Netbook running Google's Android operating system is expected to be available in the next three months and cost about $250, according to a Computerworld report.
The Alpha 680, as the laptop is known as, is going through final testing at Guangzhou Skytone Transmission Technologies, Skytone co-founder Nixon White told the site.
The Netbook uses a 533MHz ARM 11 CPU and sports a 7-inch LCD screen, keyboard, touchpad, and built-in Wi-Fi, according to the report. However, the Alpha 680's 2-cell battery will last only two to four hours while surfing the Internet, much lower than the expected 12 hours.
Android is a Linux-based operating system originally designed for cell phones, but now experts are predicting that the open-source operating system could be used on other devices, such as the emerging low-cost laptops known as Netbooks. In fact, market research firm Ovum recently predicted that Android-powered Netbooks will emerge in 2009, as manufacturers attempt to drive the price of Netbooks to around $200 or less.
Hewlett-Packard is also reportedly considering using Android on its low-cost Netbooks, though an executive declined to say for certain whether HP plans to sell Android devices. Asustek Computer has already said it is considering using Android, and Dell is also considering the software for its upcoming smartphone.
Linux-based software such as Android is attractive because it is free, while Microsoft charges a hefty licensing fee for the Windows operating system. In order to hit super low price points, manufacturers need to cut costs wherever they can and that means ditching Microsoft's Windows software.
Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers. E-mail Steven. 

Errr..did you entirely miss the point?
You're clearly unaware of XP embedded..
One bit that is apparent - if the cost of Netbooks drops to ~$250 or less, the cost of Windows will be frickin' huge in teh margin, and unless Redmond pulls an ARM version out of their backsides, may find themselves excluded entirely.
Im writing from one right now using Mandriva 2009 with KDE4.2 and its not only stunningly beautiful but its a workhorse on the road. I have FF, OO, Thunderbird, Kopete, Skype, Amarok, Dolphin open right now and will be using later on Digikam to DL/edit photos and Audacity to edit some interviews I did for a science podcast.
Im pretty sure I couldnt do as much with the arm processor but instead of buying a portable DVD player for the kids for 100-150$, I would rather get them each their own netbook for 199$.
My wife uses hers for web-email as well as viewing pictures at her mom's so she would also be a good candidate for one too. (wifey and kids didnt miss a beat when we switched to KDE desktops)
Of course, we all expect these prices to drop eventually, but its just the starting price is too close to what we paid for the.... beefier (!) netbooks .
Still, 250$ this summer could very well be 199$ by Xmas which is what we almost paid for the Wii Board and that snowboard game last Christmas.
By the time Microsoft is ready with a slim OS, the market has moved on already!
Slim and flexible is not in MS's vocabulary!
PS: I have just MS, so relax ;-)
I'm running a desktop with comparable specs to any netbook around (yes it's ancient). Running it with Ubuntu 9.04 and no lag for video. Even have a video card with worse specs than Intel imbedded (NVidia Geforce 4000, wasn't even top of the line 3 years ago when I bought it).
@DarkHawke
Win 7 runs fine on netbooks, won't say it runs great until it can run Aero at the specs provided along with every other bell and whistle the OS has to offer. I'm not saying it has to run high end games but the OS itself should have no trouble, that includes those new little perks that are the reason most people want the newest thing out.
I doubt it could run a flash game without choking.
A netbook is designed to SURF THE NET, if you want to play games, thats what laptops or computers are for... :)
So...they designed for 12 hours and only got 2-4?!?! Hope they fired their battery designer.
Its a MAJOR disapointment.
A underpowered netbook that can barely only pull 2 - 4 hours? LMFAO
And who said it was supposed to kill Windows and Intel? It's providing a small form factor and helping to lower the price of the netbook.
- by nsmoly April 27, 2009 12:43 AM PDT
- I wonder how these netbooks differ from original netbooks that were shipped with Linux flavors on them? When netbooks with Windows XP hit the market all Linux netbooks quickly disappeared because no one wanted them. Android may see the same end (this time Win7 will help though).
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by tm_anon April 27, 2009 2:27 AM PDT
- Just in case you haven't realized it yet. Here's a link to disprove your comment that nobody wants Linux on netbooks.'
- Like this
-
- by celticbrewer April 27, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
- "However here is an interesting fact--when customers are offered choice on equally well-engineered computers around a third will select Ubuntu over XP"
- Like this
-
- by gggg sssss April 27, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
- why would any sane person buy linux at the same price as XP? or even better, a lite version of XP
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (54 Comments)http://blogs.computerworld.com/ubuntu_accuses_microsoft_of_linux_netbook_fud
"LaBlanc opened by claiming that almost all netbooks sold today are sold with Windows. Well, no, not really. The numbers LaBlanc cites are from NPD's sales survey. NPD focuses on brick-and-mortar U.S. sales, not overall sales. Notice how many Linux systems you see at Best Buy? NPD numbers say a lot more about retail channel sales than it does over-all sales. Besides, as Canonical's director of business development Kenyon wrote, "However here is an interesting fact--when customers are offered choice on equally well-engineered computers around a third will select Ubuntu over XP." "
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/mowi/article.php/3782266/The+Netbook+OS+Question:+Windows+XP+vs.+Linux.htm
Just the fact the second article was written proves at the very least that the author was considering Linux and yes, the author counts against that blanket statement you made.
Is the price the same? A similar report said that yes, people purchased linux versions in surprisingly high numbers mostly because they were cheaper. And a vast majority of those people then returned the netbooks because they didn't like Linux.
Hey, I'm a Linux fan, so don't get me wrong. But the vast amount of computer users (which is just about everyone these days- including grandma) still haven't figured out Linux. Maybe android will fare better since google is good at dumbing things down.