Report: AT&T to cut iPhone service plan by $10
AT&T may slash the price of its iPhone service plan by $10 when a new version of the touchscreen smartphone is launched this summer, according to a story on TheStreet.com.
The article cited analyst Michael Cote of Cote Collaborative saying that there is a "strong possibility" that AT&T will drop the entry-level price of its service plan to $59 from $69. Apple is expected to unveil the latest iPhone on June 8 during the company's World Wide Developers Conference in San Francisco.
(Credit:
Apple)
AT&T declined to comment for this story, and Michael Cote did not respond to an e-mail request for an interview.
The price cut would likely help make the iPhone, which now retails for $200 with a two-year service plan with AT&T, more appealing to more mainstream customers. I've been saying for quite some time that the biggest hurdle to widescale adoption of the iPhone or any other smartphone in the mainstream market is the high price tag of the service contracts.
Consumers have shown that they are willing to pay anywhere between $100 and $200 for a sophisticated smartphone device. But the monthly service charge, which starts at $69 for the iPhone, is much harder to swallow.
It puts the real cost of the iPhone 3G over the life of the two-year contract at a whopping $1,856, which includes the price of the 8GB phone and 24 months of the most basic iPhone voice and data plan. It doesn't include the activation fee or taxes and other fees associated with the account. For subscribers who need more voice minutes or unlimited texting, the price tag is even higher.
Still, a $240 reduction in the overall cost of the phone over the life of the contract could entice some cost-conscious consumers.
AT&T and Apple have slashed the price of the iPhone twice already. The first version of the device introduced nearly two years ago was originally priced at $599 for the 8GB version. A couple months after the release, Apple reduced it to $399. When the new iPhone 3G was introduced, AT&T subsidized the cost of the phone and offered it for $199 with a two-year contract. The price cut likely helped the companies sell about 17 million iPhones last year, compared to about 4 million devices in 2007.
For the most part, Apple and AT&T have managed to keep the subsidy and sale price of the iPhone constant over the past year, while other carriers and smartphone makers have been forced to slash prices to attract customers.
Only a month after it hit the market, T-Mobile's G1 started selling for $148 from Wal-Mart. And three months after it launched the Storm, Verizon Wireless started offering a special buy-one-get-one free promotion that allowed customers who bought any BlackBerry device, including the Storm, to get another one free.
But as competition heats up in the smartphone market, AT&T and Apple could be forced to address the affordability issue to gain new customers. This is especially true as Research In Motion's consumer-focused BlackBerry Curve surpasses the iPhone in sales. And with the Palm Pre also set to launch in early June on Sprint Nextel's network, Apple and AT&T will face even more competition.
Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie. 





It also proves that pigs can fly.
Rubbish. What they're REALLY afraid of is market stagnation at the higher price level. There's only so many Apple fanboys willing to pay just about anything to satisfy their pent-up iPhone luv.
-Jose
From <a href="http://dietswonder.com/">Diets Wonder</a>
However, even if I didn't have an iPhone 3G, whatever phone I'd purchase, I'd still get the data plan so the costs are always going to be comparable. For me, price is a small part of the battle, as I know over the long haul, even $100 difference in the phone's cost is not such a big deal, especially if you plan on using it longer than 2 years.
I guess if this would make a drastic difference between 2 year plans with other carriers, it could sway people. It will at least make a bigger difference than if they cut off $50 from the phone's price tag.
I woulnd't use ATT and I wouldn't use any Apple product!
I don't have a smart phone, so I primarily text. My wife has a Blackberry, but her company doesn't pay for texts on her phone. So we are at a bit of an impass when we want to communicate on the go. I suppose we could just talk to each other :)
Amen
I had the very first one the first week it came out (yes, I was one of those that spent $599 - and then got my $100 credit refunded), got the 3G when it came out and will get the new version in June/July. I may be exactly the demographic Apple is targeting, but everything else out there just pales by comparison.
Maybe the competition will help improve their service
However, If Verizon were to offer the iPhone at a price comparable to AT&T and/or some other added benefit yea... I admit it. I would switch. I like the phone for me carriers are pretty much carriers. They are are all going to screw you.
The iPhone isn't really a monopoly, it's just a better phone than other companies could come up with. Verizon has the BlackBerry Storm, the G1 is on T-Mobile, and the Palm Pre is coming to Sprint. I would prefer to choose any phone I want with any carrier, but that just isn't the case right now. Also, different companies have different signal areas. I have AT&T and I don't have a problem where I work. I'm sure there are areas where Verizon doesn't work as well too. This will all hopefully change when Verizon and AT&T turn to the 700 MHz spectrum for their service. Sprint and T-Mobile kinda dropped the ball in that area.
As far as price, they all rip you off. And my Verizon signal may be good, but they still haven't unlocked the GPS on my Omnia like they said they would. This may be enough for me to take a chance with someone else next round. Too bad the Nokia N97 isn't CDMA.
All depends on what market one lives in. Companies have different plans at different rates for different markets.
And don't get me started on why texting costs extra when it's free on a normal computer, but that's with any phone. They just kept the texting pay plan from before they had internet on phones and people still pay for it. Texting should be included in any web service plan. Stop charging us twice for using the internet.
I'm just too busy reading my comment about the comments from commentators who didn't read the comments from the guy who didn't read the article and then commented.
because currently i pay 59.99 plus 30 for data and thats for a two line plan
thats definitely a mistake.
"Android is cool, but nobody has an Android phone. Blackberry is OK but the hardware is inconsistent and WinMo straight-up ***********." Trent Reznor - Nine Inch Nails
...be careful who you choose for your quotes. Reznor is an idiot and a loser - he needs to realize it's not 1998 anymore.
sorry my fault. so they are gonna drop the data plan back to 20 probably. to make it 59.99 incl. data. for 1 line with 450 minutes
Woo hoo!
Btw, if the typing kinks to get ironed out, the Blackberry Storm will trump the iPhone in my opinion. A blackberry is a blackberry and businesses need them for the Blackberry exchange. I hope the Pre can have the exchange!
The iPhone is truly a handheld laptop in my opinion also. So it doesn't show flash or some particular video type, etc. Well our home computers don't do that natively either except for their own brand (i.e. apple = mpeg or mov and MS = AVI, etc.) so what's the big deal? Stop being a snobbish geek and wake up.
I no longer need a $3,000 laptop because quite frankly my iPhone 3G does everything I "NEEDED" my laptop to do on the go. The stuff I can't do (which is very little indeed) is stuff that can wait till I get back to the office anyway. So I can't watch certain movies like DiVx on my iPhone? big freaking deal! I wouldn't want to spend 8 hours doing my programming on an iPhone either because it is a handheld.
Do we all pay too much for it and any other data plan...YES and that is NOT my opinion that is a FACT! The main thing that pisses me off is:
1. Do not force me to get your data plan if I do not need it (I do, but do not force me)
2. If internet bandwidth is truly unlimited then YES it SHOULD most certainly include unlimited texting!
Well, that's my two cents for the day...
- by jtaylor475 May 7, 2009 3:06 PM PDT
- That funny: Apple's "scared" about the Palm Pre. HAHAHAHAHA!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (91 Comments)