CFO Magazine is running a great story about the cost savings available from open-source software. This is a topic that you'll hear open-source vendors crow about, but it's somewhat rare to actually get a CFO on the record about her benefits from open source, so it's notable.
Open source is gaining at proprietary software's expense.
(Credit: Gartner)Recent Gartner research suggests that over 27 percent of enterprises will deploy open-source software in 2009. (Note: the remaining 63 percent will, too, but Gartner must have asked the CIO, and the CIO is the last to know.) That's up from 25 percent in 2008, while the share of proprietary software deployed will actually go down.
That is perhaps the scariest data point for proprietary vendors who have to grapple with former safe havens like InterContinental Hotel Group, which CFO Magazine notes is adopting Red Hat, Alfresco, SugarCRM, and MySQL, among other open-source products, for its mission-critical systems going forward.
Against this backdrop CFO Magazine calls out the benefits of open source in a tight economy:
One of the initial raps against [open source] was that, while the idea of free and continuously modified software had a certain appeal, it also inspired a certain terror; what business would hitch its technological star to software that was pulled off the Web and unsupported by a major vendor? Who knew what lurked in the code, or how easily that code might be cracked into?
Today, the recession and its attendant impact on IT budgets have prompted companies to live with a certain level of anxiety. And, as well, years of experience by those on the cutting edge have shown that many applications within the [open-source] world may now be ready for prime time. Vendors do in fact play a role in supporting [open source], and while their fees have been rising, overall cost of ownership is still substantially lower; often that vendor support feels more like a security blanket than a shakedown.
This isn't a Payless Shoe Store commercial, either ("You could pay more, but why?"), promoting goods of generally less quality. Open source has hit its stride, and often the open-source competition is actually better for enterprise requirements than the proprietary alternative. For example, if an enterprise is running Web applications, it would be daft to not at least consider using the leading Web database: MySQL.
Better software, lower price. What's not to love?
If you're a CFO, there's much to love in open source. If you compete with open source, well, perhaps you won't be so enamored. Sorry about that. Competition has returned to software.
Disclosure: I am an Alfresco employee, and an adviser to SugarCRM.
Maybe IT doesn't matter, after all. At least, not as much as it should.
A recently released survey of chief financial officers and their views on technology spending found that roughly 57 percent say they are getting an acceptable return on investment (ROI) from their tech spending. Lest you think that the CFOs are too distant from the chief information officer to have a true grasp on ROI, keep in mind that the survey found that 41 percent of organizations have CIOs reporting to CFOs. The Computer Sciences Corporation conducted the annual survey of 629 CFOs in association with the Financial Executives Research Foundation.
Other data from the "Technology Issues for Financial Executives" study was equally interesting:
- Among those surveyed, IT spending has increased over the last three years, and is expected to grow in 2008, as well.
- Greater than 50 percent suggest medium to high ROI on technology investments but only 11 percent reported a "high" ROI. ... Read more
- prev
- 1
- next
