• On ZDNet: Why Linux isn't enough

News Blog

Read all 'Stage6' posts in News Blog
March 12, 2008 3:00 AM PDT

Did DivX close Stage6 to duck copyright litigation?

by Greg Sandoval
  • 3 comments

DivX, parent company of defunct video-sharing site Stage6, on Tuesday disclosed how it came to the decision to shutter the service rather than to sell.

"Potential copyright litigation" was one of management's top considerations leading up to the shuttering of Stage6, Dan Halvorson, DivX's chief financial officer, said during a conference call to announce the public company's fourth-quarter earnings. There was reason for concern. Turns out DivX, a maker of Internet-video technologies, had lost a bid to avoid fighting costly copyright suits just a few weeks before Stage6 was closed, records show.

Halvorson almost certainly explained the reasoning behind the shutdown because of questions raised by Brad Greenspan, the MySpace co-founder. Greenspan, who operates online entertainment network LiveUniverse, attempted to acquire Stage6's assets last month. When he was rebuffed, he went public.

Greenspan suggested in a press release that DixX managers failed to look out for shareholder interests by choosing to close Stage6 instead of selling.

"DivX could have bought its way out of the mess. Universal Music offered the company a chance to license its content for $30 million. The offer was turned down."

The controversy illustrates some of the financial and legal risks involved in operating a video-sharing site. YouTube, buoyed by Google cash, can afford to challenge entertainment conglomerates in court. Not everybody else can.

DivX's problems started this way: last fall, Universal Music Group, the largest of the top four labels was making noise about unauthorized copies of its content posted to Stage6. In a bid to head off a lawsuit from the record company, DivX filed first. In September, DivX sued Universal Music to try to win a favorable ruling that Stage6 was not responsible for illegal acts committed by users under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

It didn't work.

On February 5, just three weeks before Stage6 went dark, U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw (PDF) dismissed DivX's action against Universal Music, according to court records. (Blogger Davis Freeberg was first to report the judge's decision.)

Not surprisingly, a month after DivX filed suit against Universal Music, the label responded by filing against DivX. That copyright case still hangs over DivX's head. One interesting side note is that DivX could have bought its way out of the mess. Universal Music offered DivX a chance to license its content for $30 million, according to papers filed with the court. The offer was turned down.

Beyond the legal questions, DivX also said the "significant costs" of running Stage6 was a factor in its closing.

"Our previous indication regarding the cost of running Stage6 remained accurate," Halvorson said in the conference call. "While the traffic to Stage6 did help generate some revenue...the continued operation of the site would take substantial financial investment."

March 7, 2008 1:56 PM PST

Brad Greenspan miffed over thwarted attempts to acquire Stage6

by Greg Sandoval
  • Post a comment

Brad Greenspan, the highly unpredictable MySpace cofounder, continues to go after distressed Web video sites.

Fresh from acquiring troubled video site Revver, Greenspan said in a press release on Friday that he recently made an $11 million bid to acquire video-sharing site Stage6, operated by DivX. The problem is that the DivX board never responded to his offer before simply shutting down Stage6. Greenspan's miffed.

"After LiveUniverse makes its first offer, DivX Board refuses to engage in any direct dialogue with LiveUniverse for over 5 days," according to the release issued by Greenspan's company Live Universe. "During this time, DivX shuts down Stage6...Directors of public companies have a fiduciary duty to shareholders to try to get the best deal and represent their interests, first and foremost."

LiveUniverse, an online network of entertainment sites, said in the statement that DivX continues to rebuff its offers and has yet to state publicly why it's better to shut down the site, which it did last week, rather than accept LiveUniverse's bid.

That bid, which includes $3 million in cash and $5 million in online advertising, is still on the table, according to the announcement. Los Angeles-based LiveUniverse said that if DivX would agree to the terms, it pledged to close the transaction within 72 hours.

Taking the issue public is obviously an attempt to embarrass DivX's board into negotiating. But Greenspan's accusations do highlight some curious decisions made by DivX's administration.

TechCrunch cited unnamed sources last week who said that DivX was recently preparing to spin off Stage6 and had amassed about $24 million in venture funding but "a ridiculous battle of egos at the DivX board level caused most of the team to simply quit."

DivX, a publicly held company that creates and licenses digital-video technologies, said that it closed Stage6 because of cost concerns. Techcrunch reported that the company was paying about $1 million per month for bandwidth. Stage6 offered users the ability to upload high quality video to the Web.

A DivX representative said executives could not comment but would make a statement about their Stage6 decision on Tuesday, when they reports quarterly earnings.

  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Five New Year's resolutions for Google

Stakes are high as Google attempts to maintain one of the Internet's greatest cash machines while pushing into new and risky markets.
• Android event set for Jan. 5

For eBay sellers, a holiday hamster hangover

The gift frenzy over Zhu Zhu Pets leaves some power sellers feeling like they've just run a marathon--but the steep price tags lead to some impressive profits.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader



advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right