News Blog

Read all 'Kevin Martin' posts in News Blog
July 26, 2007 9:38 AM PDT

Is Verizon's flip-flop on the 700MHz auction rules for real?

by Marguerite Reardon
  • 11 comments

Verizon Wireless says it will go along with proposed Federal Communications Commission rules for the upcoming 700Mhz spectrum auction that would require the company to permit subscribers to bring any device to its network.

The company's CEO Lowell McAdam told The Wall Street Journal (registration required) in an article published Thursday that the company is now prepared to accept a set of rules proposed by FCC chairman Kevin Martin that would require winners of certain licenses in the 700MHz auction to allow any legal device to connect to networks using this spectrum.

On the surface, this looks like a pretty big deal. Verizon Wireless has the toughest policy of any major U.S. mobile operator when it comes to certifying new phones or allowing third-party applications on its phones. Many developers and even some consumers have complained that Verizon's "walled garden" is too restrictive and hurts innovation.

So for Verizon to say that it will go along with rules that would force it to allow any device on its network is a pretty big deal. The change in position also looks to be a compromise with Google, which last week said it would bid $4.6 billion in the auction if the FCC adopted several open-access rules.

AT&T made a similar policy reversal last week after Google announced its intention to bid on the spectrum.

But are AT&T and Verizon really compromising anything?

Combined, they have more influence in Washington, D.C., than any other set of technology or communications companies in the entire country. They don't need to be making conciliatory gestures that could hurt their businesses.

So why are they doing it? My guess is because the proposal that Martin has touted won't have much impact on the market anyway.

Martin's proposal, which few people have actually seen yet, only would require the "any device rule" to apply to a small sliver of the 700MHz spectrum. So if Verizon won these licenses, the requirement would be only for areas where those licenses are used.

The rest of the Verizon Wireless network would be just as closed off as it always has been. What would this mean for consumers? Well, if you're a Verizon customer, you could theoretically bring your own phone to the network, but it would only work in regions where Verizon has won and built out its network using the 700MHz licenses.

If you want to use the rest of Verizon's nationwide network, you'd still have to use a Verizon phone, because the company is not required to adhere to this rule for any other spectrum licenses that have been used to build its nationwide network. So at the end of the day, this rule by itself is completely meaningless for the average consumer, and it does nothing to promote true open access for devices.

What Google and others, like Frontline Wireless, really want to see is for the FCC to also adopt rules that would guarantee open access to wholesalers. This way, a new entrant like Frontline could buy 700MHz spectrum licenses, build a network and then lease capacity to someone like Google, which would then offer a nationwide service that would compete against Verizon and AT&T. Google would allow any device to be used through its service, which would then put pressure on Verizon and AT&T to also open up their networks.

This would be the phone companies' worst nightmare. As a result, it should come as little surprise that this requirement is not included in Martin's proposal. As anyone who follows the FCC closely could attest, Martin has never been described as an enemy of the phone companies. In fact, some might say he's their best friend, pushing through mega-mergers and supporting policy changes that favor their business interests.

In reality, the phone companies will get to protect their turf. They'll likely be the big winners in the spectrum auction slated for early next year. And average consumers will still be getting their cell phone and broadband services from the same companies that offer it to them today.

I'd love to hear your thoughts, so please let me know what you think in the discussion attached to this blog.

July 16, 2007 9:51 AM PDT

FCC wireless auction for police and fire departments too

by Donnie Fowler
  • 1 comment

There's a tremendous amount of attention focused on whether the Federal Communication Commission's September auction of new wireless spectrum in the 700 MHz band will be "open access," available to many mobile providers and applications, or be limited to whatever the auction winner wants to do with it.

There is also an important public safety issue in this debate that is not getting as much attention. That is whether some of this valuable wireless real estate should be reserved by the FCC for our first responders--the people who drive our ambulances, show up for fires, and are around to solve and prevent crimes.

Our police officers, firefighters, and public safety workers deserve an integrated communications network so they can talk to each other. Remember when police and firefighters were unable to effectively communicate in the middle of the September 11 disaster? Firefighters' radios failed, and many could not contact their brothers and sisters in the NYPD. The disaster was worse because of it.

The FCC plans to decide in the next week or two what rules will apply to the winners of the upcoming auction. CNN describes the public safety rule this way: "(It would) combine some spectrum acquired through the auction with some that will be controlled by public safety to build a broadband wireless network for use by the country's fire, police and emergency services workers."

Anything wrong with that, in the midst of all the money that the auction winner stands to make on commercial uses of these airwaves? Write, call, or mail FCC Chairman Kevin Martin with you views. As an FCC veteran, I can tell you that these communications matter and that the big corporate interests are not short on expressing their own views.

Chairman Kevin Martin
Federal Communications Commission
445 Twelfth Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Phone: 202.418.1000
Fax: 202-418-2801
Reference: WT Docket Nos. 06-150, 06-169, and 96-86; PS Docket No. 06-229

- - -
News stories:
CNET News.com: Unlock the cell phone? It's a high-stakes debate
CNN: FCC Draft Auction Rules A Win For Google, Hi-Tech Industry
KQED Radio's Forum: Net Neutrality

Originally posted at Politics, Policy, and Technology
Donnie Fowler worked as vice president at TechNet in Silicon Valley and at the Federal Communications Commission, served in the Clinton White House, and served as national field director for Al Gore's 2000 campaign. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network.
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader



advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right