• On BNET: Apple's insanely great marketing
May 8, 2009 2:31 PM PDT

Mozilla's Prism hits 1.0, gets new goodies

by Josh Lowensohn
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 16 comments

Mozilla's "Web application as a desktop application" service Prism has hit version 1.0 (download Prism). On Friday, the company released it with its own standalone site, and an updated API that lets developers tack on Prism-specific features to their Web applications.

This version also comes with a few niceties like tray icon notifications, application-specific settings, and automatic updates. As with Prism for Firefox, you're also now able to clear private data like user names and passwords, along with any browsing history. What's neat in Prism's case is that it's just for that application, and not all the sites you've visited in other Prism instances.

It's safe to assume Prism will eventually make its way as a built-in feature of the next Firefox release. Competitor Chrome already has a feature that lets you do this on any site; however it does not offer things like taskbar and badge notifications.

As a refresher, here's how its Firefox version works. The video for the standalone desktop app can be found here.


Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by blacksky21 May 8, 2009 6:44 PM PDT
ill wait till it comes in my next update
Reply to this comment
by Freiheit13 May 8, 2009 7:04 PM PDT
Maybe it's just me, but I fail to see the difference between this and simply creating a shortcut/weblocation for the website on your desktop from the normal browser (which has worked since Firefox 0.something). Can someone explain why this is significant?
by MafiaPenguin May 8, 2009 11:33 PM PDT
Because some people think that 30 pixels of screen space is worth the hassle caused by doing this.
by htcstech May 8, 2009 10:04 PM PDT
I agree... I can't see the advantage, unless Prism+site uses less memory and perhaps a cleaner interface.
Reply to this comment
by Angmarr May 9, 2009 6:54 PM PDT
cant agree more. I don't see the advantages of application shortcuts. Maybe in a few years/moths when somebody add some feature but as of now i don't see the use to just launch either facebook, or youtube.
by 3rdalbum May 9, 2009 6:25 AM PDT
It runs in a separate instance, so is unaffected by your main browser crashing (and vice-versa). Your Prism will appear in the taskbar rather than in your set of tabs, so it makes the website appear to be more of a natural application than a website.

A Prism definition can be copied between computers, too; so I can make a Prism shortcut for my home server's Transmission web interface, and chuck it onto my other two computers too.

You can set a window size that will always be in use for that application, so your Meebo window will be the size of your buddy list and IM windows, and your Facebook instance will be larger to deal with the feed. It saves more than 30 pixels on browser chrome; it saves a lot of screen space because each application is in a window that's exactly the right size.

Also, the people who can't see an advantage should READ THE ARTICLE!:

an updated API that lets developers tack on Prism-specific features to their Web applications.

tray icon notifications, application-specific settings,
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 May 10, 2009 12:13 PM PDT
I totally agree. Prism is almost along the same lines as Adobe AIR. If you've ever used an Adobe AIR application, you'll understand that it's not just a simple "shortcut to the webpage". Instead, the AIR app has it's own individual features that you don't see in a typical browser window. Prism can be seen as the "open source adobe AIR".
by FreekyMage May 9, 2009 4:25 PM PDT
Are people to lazy to type? Or just create a bookmark/favorite?
IE's favorites have been shortcuts for like 15 years. You could change the icon on them to and put them on your desktop... This isn't new people.
Reply to this comment
by kelleydr May 11, 2009 7:54 AM PDT
Its obvious from most of these comments that Mozilla's big challenge is to communicate to the ignorati why there is value in an application such as Prism.

I've been using the app since it was known as WebRunner, and, as one commenter previously stated, the underlying value of Prism is that it creates separate instances of an isolated browser session. This means that I can have multiple accounts of Gmail, Remember the Milk, or any number of other web apps open at the same time, since user credentials are not passed between sessions. I cannot do this within Internet Explorer or Firefox. I can have multiple Prism apps open, and still be opening and closing Firefox to add or update extensions, etc., without affecting the Prism sessions.

My experience with Google Chrome's implementation of this leads me to believe that even Chrome does not accomplish this, because I can only be logged into one account at a time. Apparently Chrome apps share user credentials, although I may be wrong on this understanding.
Reply to this comment
by karan_shh1 May 12, 2009 12:35 AM PDT
i'll try it
Reply to this comment
by yogi.hammerhead May 12, 2009 2:46 AM PDT
Can anyone explain what this software is for....
Reply to this comment
by axis_304 May 12, 2009 4:09 AM PDT
Why is it that all these people are willing to type into this comment box and ask for an explanation, but not willing to read the ones already provided for them?

Its stated at least twice above in the comments, and I'm fairly certain in the article (if not then on the website?)
Reply to this comment
by ibelieve01 May 12, 2009 6:10 AM PDT
I stated this when Chrome first offered a similar feature: I think this gets precisely backwards the way most people use their computers. The idea is that, with such applications, the Web becomes invisible....You're using it without ever knowing you're using it. So you use the Web to listen to the radio, to write a letter, to create a spreadsheet, yet you don't know you're on the Web. But most people aren't looking for a way to stay off the Web. Most people spend most of their computing time in their browsers. The future of the Internet and computing is not to be found hiding the fact that you're using a browser, but recognizing the fact that most people keep their browser up 99% of the time they're on their computers....and therefore, what SOMEONE EVENTUALLY NEEDS TO WAKE UP AND DO is turn the browser into a computer OS....that is, make it just as easy to accessess your desktop apps from your browser as you can from your desktop.
Reply to this comment
by johnny_ray3g May 12, 2009 8:57 AM PDT
seems ok if you need to create more than one instance of a web location which is unaffected by the browser performance. i just don't see where i would use it personally. i do like the fact that they've relaesed an API that my prove useful.
Reply to this comment
by May 12, 2009 9:48 AM PDT
totally useless. By clicking on the shortcut you start some mini-browser that opens the webpage. I can code such application in Delphi in less than a minute with publicly available components.
Reply to this comment
by bcgreen24 May 12, 2009 4:35 PM PDT
I agree with the majority of other posters...this is pretty much pointless.
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right