• On The Insider: Bruno Film Edited Due to Jackson's Death
October 27, 2008 10:08 AM PDT

Microsoft launches Windows Azure

by Ina Fried

LOS ANGELES--Microsoft on Monday announced a version of Windows that runs over the Internet from inside Microsoft's own data centers.

Dubbed Windows Azure, it's less a replacement for the operating system that runs on one's own PC than it is an alternative for developers, intended to let them write programs that live inside Microsoft's data centers as opposed to on the servers of a given business.

"It's a transformation of our software and a transformation of our strategy," said Ray Ozzie, a computing industry pioneer who now serves as Microsoft's chief software architect. (For a play-by-play account of Ozzie's speech, see "PDC 2008: Windows Azure live blog.")

Ray Ozzie at PDC.

Ray Ozzie delivers his keynote address at Microsoft's Professional Developers Conference.

(Credit: Robert Vamosi/CNET News)

Microsoft first outlined a shift to "Live Services" at an event in San Francisco in 2005. The company has released a few things piecemeal, such as Live Mesh, but Monday's announcement marked the first real discussion of how Microsoft's disparate Internet strategies fit together.

The announcements come at the start of Microsoft's Professional Developer Conference here. On Tuesday, Microsoft plans to go into more detail on Windows 7, the successor to Windows Vista, due out by about January 2010.

With the launch of Azure, Microsoft will find itself in competition with other providers of Internet storage and computing services including Amazon, Salesforce.com, and Rackspace.

Ozzie said he was tipping his cap to Amazon founder Jeff Bezos for innovating the hosted computing model. Amazon "established a base-level design pattern, architecture models, and business models that we'll all learn from," he said.

Microsoft is making Windows Azure in preview form to developers, with a limited subset of the features that it plans to have in the product before its final release.

There weren't many details on how Microsoft will charge for Azure, saying it will be free during the preview period. Final pricing, Ozzie said, "will be competitive with the marketplace."

The company itself plans to offer businesses the option of running over the Internet the kinds of software that have traditionally run on a company's own servers. Microsoft already sells its Exchange corporate e-mail software in this way, but that is just the beginning, said Microsoft vice president Dave Thompson.

"All our enterprise software will be delivered as an online service as an option," Thompson said.

CNET News' Elinor Mills contributed to this report.

Bob Muglia

Server and Tools senior VP Bob Muglia talks about the benefits to businesses of Windows Azure.

(Credit: Robert Vamosi/CNET News)
Microsoft's cloud computing team discusses how a common set of tools can be used for developing applications for traditional Windows as well as for Windows Azure.

Microsoft's cloud computing team discusses how a common set of tools can be used for developing applications for traditional Windows as well as for Windows Azure.

(Credit: Robert Vamosi/CNET News)
Microsoft's Dave Thompson tells attendees at the Microsoft Professional Developer Conference that all of the company's enterprise software will be offered as an online service over time.

Microsoft's Dave Thompson tells attendees at the Professional Developer Conference that all of the company's enterprise software will be offered as an online service over time.

(Credit: Robert Vamosi/CNET News)
Federated Identity platform

One of the biggest challenges in business software, whether it lives inside a company or is part of a hosted service, is making sure that only properly authorized employees have access to the data and applications. Microsoft discusses how its Federated Identity platform will work with the new hosted services.

(Credit: Robert Vamosi/CNET News)
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Microsoft
Windows 7 may get a 'Family Pack'
Microsoft chucks vomit ad
Microsoft 'mega data centers' to support Azure, Bing
Some Vista users say they're getting the Ultimate shaft
Microsoft resorts to vomit to market IE 8
Touch in Windows 7: Just for show?
Looking to browse the Web and get a Nickleback?
FAQ: Making sense of Windows 7 upgrade options
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (61 Comments)
by iertry October 27, 2008 10:19 AM PDT
can we access azure yet. Did they announce when it will go live?
Reply to this comment
by someguy999 October 27, 2008 10:34 AM PDT
So other than the app engine and the hosted server products, everything else on Windows Azure's site looks like a take 2 from .NET My Services of 7 years ago.
Reply to this comment
by Tony McCune October 27, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
Somehow I think I will feel more secure running Windows Server 2003 VMs at Amazon (AWS) than putting my business into a Microsoft controlled data center. Amazon has the Web 2.0 hosting business "virtually" locked up and businesses are unlikely to give up their ELAs for utility based systems at the mercy of Microsoft. Who's their customer?

Tony - DigitalChalk.com
Reply to this comment
by ase004 October 27, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
This is simply awesome...very good future ...very good future

http://www.livbit.com
Reply to this comment
by jeromatron October 27, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
The problem I usually have with MS products like this are, well...

if you take a look at the last photo, how many times does it say Microsoft?

Microsoft continues to try to be the gateway keeper. That's why I don't like to work with MS technologies as a developer. I could apply Steve Ballmer's words in this case - it could be compared to a cancer - it's a whole ecosystem designed to exclude competitors so if you're using Team Foundation Server, what about subversion, hg, git, and other VC systems... just as an example. Everything is so tied together that it makes integrating with it yourself into suicide.

Beyond that, it just seems like MS usually tries to cultivate its own solution for everything - they always have their own solution to everything, their own terminology for everything, it's like an ivory tower. Why not put svg into IE? Why not develop a decent javascript engine for IE8 - it's going to be pretty sad to see all sorts of cool web applications running painfully slow as SpiderMonkey (firefox) and V8 (chrome) and SquirrelFish (webkit) completely trash IE8's javascript performance.

They are getting better over time, but I would still rather not be part of this walled garden.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan October 27, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
I think you may have forgotten that Microsoft is a company who is in business to make money. Yes, of course they will try to control what they can to maintain an income flow.

Microsoft is the company trying to make money.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the group that gives money away.
by maverick_nick October 27, 2008 11:49 AM PDT
Microsoft is a proprietary company that you're judging by open standards. When Google, Yahoo, or anyone else offers a developer platform, then it's no big deal, but the cynics always have it in for Microsoft.
by Penguinisto October 29, 2008 6:54 AM PDT
"Microsoft is a proprietary company that you're judging by open standards."

...because open standards insure that you don't get locked in to any one vendor, stuck with stagnant tech, and raped by that vendor's invoices.

The Internet is built on open standards - without them, you'd still be stuck with the likes of CompuServe and paying $5/hr to access the damned thing.
by sythara October 27, 2008 11:43 AM PDT
Run software online but have comcast cap your transfer amounts.
Reply to this comment
by inachu October 29, 2008 5:22 AM PDT
Yeah it really bites. Comcast working against the goals of Microsoft.
by Penguinisto October 29, 2008 6:55 AM PDT
To be honest, you're right - that does suck.
by rcardona2k October 27, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
Microsoft and Target should partner on this because if you think Windows as an OS is a big target for hackers, wait till they get their hands on these distributed services. Somehow that Red Target logo would be apropos for the new data centers.
Reply to this comment
by Lumiseon March 11, 2009 5:53 AM PDT
Why Target? Target's not so great...>.>
by kwhsy82 October 27, 2008 1:14 PM PDT
Umm, when? Nice slides. Glad to have another big blue. But did they say: "When?"
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 October 27, 2008 1:40 PM PDT
Its available now.
by contentcreator--2008 October 27, 2008 2:02 PM PDT
It's just a toy for programmers with a little downtime until they announce more details --- like pricing. How much engineering time is anyone going to spend developing anything real to run on it until you know what it's going to cost? Nothing like a big "???" in your business plan to send it to the end of the queue.
Reply to this comment
by mrkorndude November 12, 2008 1:18 PM PST
where is it available? i have registered with ms on plenty of sites, but havent actually found out how to get it and use it. maybe in the future, it this does work, i could use azure for some of my main files storage and personalized interface, skydrive as my secondary files storage, and google docs as my primary document storage and creation. but i really need to know how to get what is available now. can you help?
by mtoc October 27, 2008 2:27 PM PDT
I can undestand CLOUD if you paid for it.. and information you "sent up" was encrypted etc. and not "mined" and no ads. the bargain you get may not be worth the negatives. much like the cellphone and other wireless/roaming devices and services, portability and contact is the way of the future. but to expose your privacy to save a few bucks does not make good sense! also, future technology will allow enormous storage, fast retrieval and ultra fast transmission from on site. needed are better apps. in the first place.
Reply to this comment
by jtjt145 October 27, 2008 2:36 PM PDT
Micro$soft again coming in second...
Interoperability for their latest baby? Not a thought! (Just listen to M Guiterrez, the M$ lawyer drone, threatening ip-infringement suits)
Superioriority in performance? Nobody really knows yet, but it already looks pretty much an established fact that Google Chrome/Docs have already taken the cream, looking at speed and performance statistics. What remains for Micro$soft? Yet another mediocre platform, nobody really will want to entrust their data to, not even the IT-eunuchs steadfastedly clinging onto their dwindling Micro$oft safe heavens.
Robert Wakeland
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher October 27, 2008 2:36 PM PDT
So now Windoze users can look forward to the 'azure screen of death?'
Reply to this comment
by RighteousSoutherner October 27, 2008 7:05 PM PDT
That's a good one! I have to admit it being a Microsoft fan.
by dark_cyber October 28, 2008 2:08 AM PDT
Yeah... say goodbye to BSOD (Blue Screen of Death) ... and say Hello to ASOD (Azure Screen of Death)...
Hehe... i think ASOD will be the new standard of "Death Screen"... I wonder, do they change the look & color of ASOD... Maybe with some AJAX on it... hahaha...
by Seaspray0 October 28, 2008 3:33 PM PDT
I haven't seen a blue screen of death in years. When was the last time you saw the apple bombs cross your screen?
by opposite225 October 27, 2008 2:41 PM PDT
I'm convinced this is the future of virtual desktops. Personal computing hardware will become obsolete as computing is done on large , centralized, prepaid services. All applications will be maintained by the administrators, end users will not loose any time or resources with virus protection, system or application updates, operating system re installation, rebooting, security, or backing up data. People will no longer need to be technologically capable to have a fully functioning computer workstation just with a terminal, monitor, keyboard, mouse, and high speed internet connection. Not even a hard drive is needed. You will be able to access your entire desktop from any internet connection.

Integration of work desktop w/ personal desktop.

Target audience: mobile businessmen/women, students, older (less advanced) generation, technologically frustrated individuals, large businesses (total outsourcing of IT), people who don't own computers,
Reply to this comment
by Imalittleteapot October 27, 2008 7:55 PM PDT
I think you'll always have a hard drive even if it's just for caching, but I think it'll always be a mix of both. Maybe not a 50/50 mix but you'll always have some client apps and some cloud apps in my opinion. I just couldn't say what the ratio would be, but it would probably be continually changing anyway.
by eng_bahi October 28, 2008 12:14 AM PDT
I agreed with ur point of view , MicroSoft try to be the master of all thins and forgett to take care of its products that have many malfunction espisielly if we compare that with SUN microsysytems and Linux .
MicroSoft should try to increase performance of its core application and then try to open new gates.
I remember MicroSoft with "The Master Of Nine ,is The Master of none"
by m3mn0n October 28, 2008 1:12 AM PDT
Well Azure has absolutely nothing to do with thin-client architecture, but the sort of architecture your describing would be extremely vulnerable and risky for anyone to really buy into. Especially when you take into consideration privacy, information security in both their data centres and while it's being beamed to client computers. And the biggest concern of all, down time.

Imagine being on a tight schedule and having no way to work on your computer because the MS servers and doing "routine maintenance." Or if you're just not internet connected and want to work on an essay or play some solitaire.
by sureshgarre October 27, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
interesting stuff from Microsoft after a long time...

Anyone know when its gonna live...World is slowly moving itself to online from desktop..

http://www.comparecontractmobiles.com
Reply to this comment
by bugfreezer October 27, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
You mean the 20% (may/not be correct - that was the last number I heard...) of the world that is online.

I still think centralized computing as an end unto itself is a bad, bad idea. Sure it is convenient to access your data and programs from anywhere, but I still believe in controlling my own data and apps.
by jvc08 October 27, 2008 3:02 PM PDT
what the heck is all this???? what is windows azure? is it a new operating system?
Reply to this comment
by ushere23 October 27, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
and when every man and his dog is downloading porn, and the kids d/l tv series, and mom the same, and the net slows to a crawl....

all very nice in principle, but i think i'd wait to see how well it works in practice.

i like owning my software, and not being dependent on some nebulous entity who can change whatever at their whim...
Reply to this comment
by haub123 October 27, 2008 6:46 PM PDT
as I read on another PC website. windows 7 will be less bloated. as in (and I didn't fully read this article so it might be in here already) if u want movie maker and media player, u have to download it to ur hard drive. it's more like u buy it u bloat it instead of u buy it, it's already bloated for u. I like that concept. as for azure, Microsoft would compleatly corner the market if they made it Mac compatible. I know that doesn't make sense, but if you can buy azure, and use it from any computer in the world, Microsoft would make a ton more $$ then they do now. because they open the market halfway and leave it there for Mac users to jump into (or back into) a newer and better windows experience that can and will compete with OSX and the troubled MobileMe. my two cents....
Reply to this comment
by opposite225 October 27, 2008 7:02 PM PDT
I'm pretty sure that this whole design revolves around the fact that it is backwards compatible with any system that has the internet?
by Penguinisto October 29, 2008 6:57 AM PDT
@opposite: Actually, I'm willing to bet that with any OS besides Windows, you won't be able to use much of it (hint: ActiveX).

/P
by DrtyDogg October 29, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
@Penguinisto: Actually they have already have a cross platform service running on Azure, see live mesh. A few people have received invites to try the mac client.(hint: works on the iPhone too). Thank you shill again.
by Vegaman_Dan October 29, 2008 2:48 PM PDT
Penguinisto wrote:

"@opposite: Actually, I'm willing to bet that with any OS besides Windows, you won't be able to use much of it (hint: ActiveX)."

It's already available on the Mac through Live Mesh. Silverlight (also on the Mac) integrates with it.

Good try, but your swing was a miss.
by Penguinisto October 29, 2008 8:35 PM PDT
Hey kiddies - can any of you verify that you can get the full experience with it (and no, downloading Silverlight (which is only a half-hearted attempt at cross-platform), or Live Mesh (ditto) does not count).
by DrtyDogg October 30, 2008 3:21 AM PDT
Everything except the remote desktop connection, but it appears to be on the way in a later build.
by Ian_Joyner October 27, 2008 7:57 PM PDT
Microsoft cloud computing.... more MS vapourware. Google and Apple are already providing these services. MS are just positioning themselves so that in a few years they can say they invented this technology.
Reply to this comment
by gggg sssss October 28, 2008 7:31 PM PDT
Apple? Are you sure? And iTunes does not count as an application
by DrtyDogg October 29, 2008 1:55 PM PDT
I haven't seen this from Apple, or Google. . .
by Ian_Joyner October 29, 2008 10:06 PM PDT
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/19785/
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/google-apple-cloud-computer.htm
http://www.apple.com/mobileme/

Perhaps in 40 years time people will talk about how MS invented the cloud platform - like I have corrected people lately who say the IBM 360 of 1964 revolutionized computer architecture. Rubbish - it was beaten by a year by the far more capable Burroughs B5000. Don't let monopolies write history they have very corrupted memories.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B5000

You guys only need to look, or don't you use Google because it doesn't come from Microsoft!
by DrtyDogg October 30, 2008 3:14 AM PDT
again still haven't seen this with apple or google. . . You are comparing online apps to a development platform, Microsoft has given credit to the company who came before them in this effort, Amazon. Get off your high horse and understand what you are talking about before bashing it.
by Ian_Joyner October 30, 2008 5:18 AM PDT
>>>again still haven't seen this with apple or google. . . You are comparing online apps to a development platform, Microsoft has given credit to the company who came before them in this effort, Amazon. Get off your high horse and understand what you are talking about before bashing it.<<<

I can see where your coming from... end of thread, Mr nameless.
by 3rdalbum October 27, 2008 11:53 PM PDT
I just want to know what the point is. Putting your applications in the cloud is only worthwhile if you don't want to leave your computer on with SSH access. Any business that is the target of Azure already has the ability to give its employees access to their programs and data without buying a costly Microsoft service.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 October 28, 2008 9:22 AM PDT
This is assuming that the company already has the infrastructure in place to run the services in question.
by alxnsc October 28, 2008 6:31 AM PDT
Enough is enough. It is high time for Microsoft to get concentrated on one OS and not distract efforts on creating low quality anti - maths products. Keep it simple and make it step by step. Let there be subsets, versions, upgrades, SPs. Let there be temporary failures. These happen all the time and are curable.
Let there be one single line to act along.
Or lose credit and fail!
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (61 Comments)
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Microsoft

Stay up-to-date on news centered in Redmond, Wash., from acquisitions to product updates to leadership developments.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Microsoft topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right