Microsoft expected to announce layoffs
In past downturns, Microsoft has been able to trim around the edges and avoid large, widespread layoffs. But, as Steve Ballmer made clear in an interview with me last week, this is no ordinary downturn.
"The fact of the matter is, this is not a downturn, this is a bit of a reset," he said. "Those are quite different and we're trying to really suss through what we think that means for us."
For some weeks now, the company has been considering whether it would need to cut a significant number of jobs, with some analysts predicting layoffs of anywhere from 10 percent to 17 percent of Microsoft's 95,000 employee workforce, though I am hearing the number could be significantly less than those figures.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that cuts could come as early as next week; the company is scheduled to deliver its earnings report on Thursday.
Microsoft has cut jobs in a particular area or product group in the past, even in the hundreds of jobs, although it has never had companywide cuts in the scale currently being contemplated.
A Microsoft representative declined comment.
In our interview and others last week, Ballmer didn't specifically guarantee layoffs, but that seemed the logical inference.
"Revenue will be lower in aggregate in our industry than it would have been, and that will (affect) Microsoft, Cisco--you name the company--Intel," he said. "We'll all be affected by that."
I have spoken with a number of other Microsoft executives in the past week, all of whom have talked about adjusting their plans to deal with the downturn, though none would comment specifically on layoffs.
The company has already been cutting costs in other areas, including vendors and contractors. It has also significantly slowed hiring, though it has stopped short of an all-out freeze.
Meanwhile, Google said Wednesday that it is cutting 100 recruiters from its payroll as the company significantly slows its once torrid hiring pace.
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina. 



/P
Heh - prolly polishing their resumes....
Seriously, you need to get a life.
Sorry if I struck a nerve, Dan... just that you don't see too awful many MSFT cheerleaders hanging around this story (unless they're called out), now do you?
As for the original comment, I defy you to show me who (or which group) would be more deserving of a layoff at Microsoft. You know the joint... c'mon, speak up. Who should get the axe in Redmond if the axe must fall?
Apple laid off staff.
Cisco laid off staff.
Red Hat laid off staff.
CNET laid off staff.
Microsoft laid off staff.
Yeah, perhaps there is a trend here that some people here haven't spotted yet like... oh, I don't know... perhaps the economy is taking a downturn? Nah, that can't be it- it's much more fun to blame Microsoft than to actually be current in events worldwide.
Sheesh, people. Get a clue.
RedHat laid off 20 (yes, twenty) employees, seven of which were not redhat employees in the first place (they were merger victims when RH bought Atomic Vision). So, even assuming 20, out of RH's 550 employees? 3% of the workforce.
Cisco... about 129 (confirmed - Austin office) people out of 65,000... no other confirmed numbers or anything beyond rumor. This means that Cisco laid off 0.1% of its workforce.
Dunno about CNET, don;t care... they're not in the tech industry per se.
So - this leaves us Microsoft.
MSFT expects to lay off 10-17% (est.) of its workforce - basically, MSFT is dumping (at the high point of 16,000) more employees than Apple and RedHat have in total headcount... combined.
Everyone else you mentioned in the tech industry are laying off, at most, less than 5% of their respective staffings. Combined, the layoffs come to 649 victims, vs. Microsoft's est layoff victim range of 9,500-16,000.
Long story short? Dan... the attempt of relativism on your part, once investigated, turns into a rather huge shipload of FAIL (yes, in all caps...)
How's this for a witty retort? "Ef off" all of you and find something else to do with your life other than ***** about a software manufacturer. Maybe you could redirect those energies with doing something that would benefit our society. Do something nice for someone today. Start there. Just do something useful for Ef's sake!
It is painfully obvious now, even to MSFT, that with their failing marketshare (yes, it's dropped over the past few years) and failed Vista launch (count XP installs as Vista licenses all you want - they're not Vista installs), and an even lousier round of marketing, leads to the fact that maybe a few heads should roll.
Now seriously? The laid-off folks are not going to die. They're instead going to be doing something else... something that will likely contribute to growth, instead of sitting around in MSFT's offices and (for lack of a kinder way to put it) feeding idly at the largess of a large corporation.
Overall, assuming MSFT is smart about this, it's a good move for them (motivates those remaining to be more sensitive to the market, leans things up a bit which allows more money for R&D, etc...), and it's actually (believe it or not) good for those who get the axe (by pushing them into other industries, into working for competitors, etc...)
"Do something nice for someone today."
Do something nice for someone every day. Makes gestures into habit, and makes the world a kinder place overall.
- by Mikal2004 January 22, 2009 9:18 AM PST
- I just hope that Microsoft lays off their HB1 Visa holders first before laying off American Citizens. They are one of the largest employers of HB1 Visa holders and have lobbied congress to increase the limits of importing tech labor for years.
- Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)