Manipulating the Palm Pre supply is just wrong
The Palm Pre: in short supply?
(Credit: Palm)Bloomberg reported Wednesday that the Palm Pre might be in short supply when it's made available later this year.
Citing estimates by six market analysts, Bloomberg says the Pre will "debut with about 375,000 units in stock." According to the report, that relatively small number (Apple sold 1 million iPhone 3G units in the first three days of availability last year) might have little to do with Palm's output capacity and quite a bit to do with its desire to live up to the Pre's hype.
"It's important to have a success like selling out," Hugues de La Vergne, a Gartner analyst, told Bloomberg. "The Pre has to live up to the hype or else they'll lose their momentum to rival products coming out soon after."
Neither Palm nor Sprint has confirmed plans to use a stock shortage to sell more Pre units. And don't look for either company to confirm such a claim.
But what if this really is the company's plan? Wouldn't that annoy you?
Though companies won't admit it, stock shortages are used often to build hype for a product. Claims of intentionally shorting supply have been a constant nuisance for Nintendo as it battles to keep the Wii on store shelves.
Intentional stock shortages might seem like a poor financial move for a company, since it's essentially leaving revenue on the table as consumers search for products and can't find them. But popular opinion contends that when products are sold out, opportunities for higher revenue are greater. Those who own the product will boast. News organizations will constantly discuss stock shortages. And those who don't have the device will be talking about the sellout with others. All the while, more people will become aware of the product and want to buy it.
I understand the business logic. I know that if a company needs to make a product work, hype and desire are two powerful effects to have on their side. But I think it breaks the social contract between the company and the consumer.
Business is all about maintaining a strong, mutually beneficial relationship with the customer. The company needs to know that consumers have a desire for its product. The consumer needs to know that the company is doing everything it can to deliver an outstanding device. How is that possible when it employs a policy of intentional stock shortages?
But it goes beyond that. There's a real chance that if Palm employs this tactic, it will backfire. What if Palm really does leave revenue on the table? And what if a Pre competitor captures the hype as Palm continues holding Pre units for the "right" moment?
I don't see the value in Palm employing a stock shortage to sell more Pre units. I realize there's a lot riding on this one device, but ostracizing consumers through a manipulation of supply isn't the way to success. Just ask Nintendo.
Palm needs to produce as many Pre units as possible and make them all available on launch day. If they sell out, then the company knows it created a great product and it will profit from that. If they don't, then it didn't. But playing games with the consumer is not a smart move. Especially for Palm.
Check out Don's Digital Home podcast, Twitter stream, and FriendFeed.
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.





While I am not a financial expert nor a shareholder, considering Palm's negative EPS, EBITDA, gross profit, operating margin, book value, revenue growth (loss), return on assets, return on equity, and practically every other key financial statistic, I suggest to Palm management that they rethink this strategy.
Thus, If I were them, I would ensure that I had in the supply chain the number of units that I was damned sure that I could sell, then add a few. And given that the supply chain is probably 16-18 weeks long on this product, look at how things are going in the early days and make the decision to push the pedal to the floor.
While stating the obvious "Palm's negative..." does it occur to anyone to remember that:
(a) they are launching it on Sprint (50.5M subs) - not VZW (83M subs) nor ATT (76M)
(b) more biz customers on Sprint - who stick to their contracts, unlike consumers.
(c) 375,000 units at $150 each (assumption based on component break down websites and $349 no rebate price) = $56M.
While they may have ordered on the low end of their estimates from Chi Mei, they certainly didn't order an unreasonably low number.
If they want to have some capital for marketing, returns, customer service and tech support - not to mention MORE phones should demand in this weakened economy exceed their conservative estimates, then I too would burn around half my capital on the units and use the rest to promote and support the launch.
Go back to the "Obama planted swine flu while in Mexico" conspiracy boards...
oh4real
PS Apple = apples, Palm = oranges...
As for iPhone, if they ever did go out of stock, it wasn't for more than a week, they were practically giving it away in some cases...
This won't work for the Pre, IMO. Too many consumers are just going to get another phone. The G1, the iPhone (which will probably have a new version by then), and all the other phones out there.
Please read in the future.
The Bloomberg statement is nothing more than fluff to fill up some space and get a few clicks on a slow news day. Of course, market analysts are never wrong. I always following their advice because their research is so perfect.
Product availability at launch is determined by the delay between production start and sales start. The challenge is balancing how much product is available at sales start with the sales start date. If there is a fixed sales start date and either production or design delays then product availability at sales start date will be reduced.
This is basic manufacturing/logistics 101
They were never going to sell 1 million units ala Apple because Palm/Sprint just doesn't have the apple/AT&T customer base.
But if they should be prepared to deliver as many as possible. The ultimate sucess of the Pre will be driven by how good the phone actually is, not the perception of excess demand created by artificial shortages.
- by obmot May 1, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
- Unfortunately, despite columns like this (which inevitably occur before a big product launch), the last thing Palm wants is articles that there are still unsold units sitting on the shelves after launch, which will then be "interpreted" by bloggers as a "failed product."
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- by nowimcool May 4, 2009 1:02 AM PDT
- i agree, but it's kind of a no win situation. produce less and the stats come out and they are behind the competition, produce more and they may not sell them all ...
-
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (41 Comments)Thus, companies like Palm will likely create a fake shortage. It really isn't their fault, but really, the fault of tech bloggers who will instantly (ald also inevitably) write over and over that a product "failed" because it didnt immediately sell out like the iPhone or Wii whatever. Bloggers did it to the Xbox. They did it to the PS3. If Palm produces excess units which don't sell out on launch day, the bloggers will predictably do it also to the Pre. Mark my words.
either way the bloggers are going to tear them down.