• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
May 1, 2009 7:00 AM PDT

Manipulating the Palm Pre supply is just wrong

by Don Reisinger
Palm Pre

The Palm Pre: in short supply?

(Credit: Palm)

Bloomberg reported Wednesday that the Palm Pre might be in short supply when it's made available later this year.

Citing estimates by six market analysts, Bloomberg says the Pre will "debut with about 375,000 units in stock." According to the report, that relatively small number (Apple sold 1 million iPhone 3G units in the first three days of availability last year) might have little to do with Palm's output capacity and quite a bit to do with its desire to live up to the Pre's hype.

"It's important to have a success like selling out," Hugues de La Vergne, a Gartner analyst, told Bloomberg. "The Pre has to live up to the hype or else they'll lose their momentum to rival products coming out soon after."

Neither Palm nor Sprint has confirmed plans to use a stock shortage to sell more Pre units. And don't look for either company to confirm such a claim.

But what if this really is the company's plan? Wouldn't that annoy you?

Though companies won't admit it, stock shortages are used often to build hype for a product. Claims of intentionally shorting supply have been a constant nuisance for Nintendo as it battles to keep the Wii on store shelves.

Intentional stock shortages might seem like a poor financial move for a company, since it's essentially leaving revenue on the table as consumers search for products and can't find them. But popular opinion contends that when products are sold out, opportunities for higher revenue are greater. Those who own the product will boast. News organizations will constantly discuss stock shortages. And those who don't have the device will be talking about the sellout with others. All the while, more people will become aware of the product and want to buy it.

I understand the business logic. I know that if a company needs to make a product work, hype and desire are two powerful effects to have on their side. But I think it breaks the social contract between the company and the consumer.

Business is all about maintaining a strong, mutually beneficial relationship with the customer. The company needs to know that consumers have a desire for its product. The consumer needs to know that the company is doing everything it can to deliver an outstanding device. How is that possible when it employs a policy of intentional stock shortages?

But it goes beyond that. There's a real chance that if Palm employs this tactic, it will backfire. What if Palm really does leave revenue on the table? And what if a Pre competitor captures the hype as Palm continues holding Pre units for the "right" moment?

I don't see the value in Palm employing a stock shortage to sell more Pre units. I realize there's a lot riding on this one device, but ostracizing consumers through a manipulation of supply isn't the way to success. Just ask Nintendo.

Palm needs to produce as many Pre units as possible and make them all available on launch day. If they sell out, then the company knows it created a great product and it will profit from that. If they don't, then it didn't. But playing games with the consumer is not a smart move. Especially for Palm.

Check out Don's Digital Home podcast, Twitter stream, and FriendFeed.

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Recent posts from The Digital Home
Apple rejects MAD artist's iPhone caricature app
EA picks up Playfish for social gaming push
Sorry, kids: No social networking on the Xbox 360
Game Boy enters Toy Hall of Fame with Big Wheel
No Doubt says 'no' to Band Hero depiction
Twitter's contribution to Modern Warfare 2
Wal-Mart unveils tech deals for November 7
Touch-screen phone use soars, iPhone on top
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (41 Comments)
by cvaldes1831 May 1, 2009 7:23 AM PDT
There is probably only one company that could get away with an intentional short supply at launch without long-term consequences. That company's name does not begin with the letter 'P'.

While I am not a financial expert nor a shareholder, considering Palm's negative EPS, EBITDA, gross profit, operating margin, book value, revenue growth (loss), return on assets, return on equity, and practically every other key financial statistic, I suggest to Palm management that they rethink this strategy.
Reply to this comment
by why do i need a name? May 1, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
Considering all of what you wrote, I can't see how Palm's management could do anything BUT temper the supply. From experience, a bad 3rd/4th quarter in the consumer electronics business gives you a hangover that lasts the entire next year.

Thus, If I were them, I would ensure that I had in the supply chain the number of units that I was damned sure that I could sell, then add a few. And given that the supply chain is probably 16-18 weeks long on this product, look at how things are going in the early days and make the decision to push the pedal to the floor.
by oh4real May 1, 2009 9:02 AM PDT
Uh, clueless anyone?

While stating the obvious "Palm's negative..." does it occur to anyone to remember that:
(a) they are launching it on Sprint (50.5M subs) - not VZW (83M subs) nor ATT (76M)
(b) more biz customers on Sprint - who stick to their contracts, unlike consumers.
(c) 375,000 units at $150 each (assumption based on component break down websites and $349 no rebate price) = $56M.

While they may have ordered on the low end of their estimates from Chi Mei, they certainly didn't order an unreasonably low number.

If they want to have some capital for marketing, returns, customer service and tech support - not to mention MORE phones should demand in this weakened economy exceed their conservative estimates, then I too would burn around half my capital on the units and use the rest to promote and support the launch.

Go back to the "Obama planted swine flu while in Mexico" conspiracy boards...

oh4real

PS Apple = apples, Palm = oranges...
by ericyen May 1, 2009 7:45 AM PDT
Nice moral judgment from a person that does NOT have his job on the line for making a tough decision.
Reply to this comment
by Mac User Too May 1, 2009 7:49 AM PDT
Ever since the very real holiday toy shortages of 20 years ago, companies have used this ploy to make their products appear to be more desirable. Human nature, being what it is, creates a desire for something unattainable. That desire can be short-lived however, as it is also the nature of humans to be fickle. If Palm's management does not have faith in the Pre's intrinsic desirability, then this strategy may create a temporary increase in the Pre's 'must-have' factor. In the long run, it would be better to create a compelling product and just sell as many as you can.
Reply to this comment
by roland827 May 1, 2009 7:52 AM PDT
Most people I know who weren't able to get a Wii, just moved on to Xbox360 and PS3 out of desperation... If people needed a phone and Pre doesn't have any stock, they'll just buy iPhones or Blackberry Bold/Storm or some other phone... only the fan boys will wait for it... '

As for iPhone, if they ever did go out of stock, it wasn't for more than a week, they were practically giving it away in some cases...
Reply to this comment
by DVSD91 May 1, 2009 7:53 AM PDT
Don't you fools see it looks like the pantech DUO which is for girls!!! LAMER!!!!
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor May 1, 2009 7:54 AM PDT
Didn't Microsoft do that with the original Zune? Cut production and then claim they were out because of popularity?

This won't work for the Pre, IMO. Too many consumers are just going to get another phone. The G1, the iPhone (which will probably have a new version by then), and all the other phones out there.
Reply to this comment
by James7777777 May 1, 2009 8:05 AM PDT
Seems like you are creating news with baseless claims. There is no evidence of them creating an artificial shortage.
Reply to this comment
by externallain May 1, 2009 8:15 AM PDT
Did you read the first 2 comments? Don cites Bloomberg's report which cites market analysts. I would say the market analysts are making baseless claims. Don, however, goes on to say, "Neither Palm nor Sprint has confirmed plans to use a stock shortage to sell more Pre units. And don't look for either company to confirm such a claim."

Please read in the future.
by Zoobie May 1, 2009 3:23 PM PDT
"Bloomberg reported Wednesday that the Palm Pre might be in short supply..." Then again, it might not be in short supply.

The Bloomberg statement is nothing more than fluff to fill up some space and get a few clicks on a slow news day. Of course, market analysts are never wrong. I always following their advice because their research is so perfect.
by JerryRiggg May 1, 2009 8:18 AM PDT
Either the Pre is a good phone or its not. Why try to manipulate the market? If I were interested in a Pre I would be concerned. Since I'm not they can do what ever they want and even though Sprint is my mobile phone carrier of choice I think they're in a perverbial nose dive anyway. They're destined to remain the number three cell phone carrier in the US continuosly being outpaced, outbullied and outsmarted by Verizon and AT&T who as a result of smarter mergers have almost twice as many customers leaving Sprint to play catch up in a battle it will never win and keeping it on the list of companies most likely not to succeed. I stay with them because they're the only company that works in my hometown in South Carolina and when I go to visit my parents I need to be able to communicate with my world back in Los Angeles. Oh yeah, their rates are pretty good too. Lets face it, the simply everything plan can't be beat.
Reply to this comment
by tim.lsr May 1, 2009 8:21 AM PDT
How about this: Palm is so short of cash they could only afford to build 375,000 units until they started receiving revenue. Or perhaps they do not want to pollute the world with products until they have proof that the world wants them. Chances are they can ramp up production fast when they have proof the product is a success.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 May 1, 2009 8:42 AM PDT
+1
by myles taylor May 1, 2009 9:01 AM PDT
That's not the case. Watch; they will come out with another couple 100k a few days later and same a few days later. It's not a money problem. For launches like this they usually have no problem borrowing the money to manufacture enough.
by gerrrg May 1, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
People are going to ante up $299 for fatboy?
Reply to this comment
by txstubby May 1, 2009 8:32 AM PDT
There is finite production capacity that is scaled for the predicted 'after launch' run rate plus some scalability should sales exceed expectations

Product availability at launch is determined by the delay between production start and sales start. The challenge is balancing how much product is available at sales start with the sales start date. If there is a fixed sales start date and either production or design delays then product availability at sales start date will be reduced.

This is basic manufacturing/logistics 101
Reply to this comment
by megustansalchichas May 1, 2009 8:49 AM PDT
another non story about another imaginary issue, and so badly written - 'just ask nintendo'? and your link goes to a story that does not say Nintendo was ostracizing consumers through a 'manipulation of supply'. that's like saying Don Reisinger works for Flowbee Haircut Systems, just as CNET.
Reply to this comment
by Joedoak May 1, 2009 9:07 AM PDT
I'm currently a SPRINT PCS customer, but my two-year contract expired last December. I've remained with Sprint since then and am awaiting the Pre. They know that since that's what I told the marketing/sales droid who called me wanting me to re-up. If Sprint/Palm pull this stuff, I WILL jump ship and buy an iPhone.
Reply to this comment
by avitous May 1, 2009 9:19 AM PDT
Yep[, same here. Before I knew about the upcoming Pre, Sprint's marketbots would call me trying to sell me on upgrading my trusty Treo 650 to something newer (with a new contract, natch); when I told them I was only interested in upgrading to an iPhone they'd just hang up on me. I do expect to be one of the first to get a Pre, and if not, Sprint will lose another customer -- not that I really want to switch to AT&T.
by Grumpyz77 May 1, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
Ditto here too.I've been holding off on a new phone waiting on the Pre. If Sprint was smart (and they're not) they would make the first run available to those existing customers that want want it and permit some sort of registration process for existing customers. I can't get a straight answer out of Sprint on anything one way or the other about the Pre. If my current phone goes out I will be going to T-Mobile for the Android and Sprint will lose a customer that has stuck with them for the last 8 years even in spite of the all you can eat plan. (The all you can eat plan is hard to beat if poor customer service and incorrect billing don't bother you.)
by F_Cloud May 1, 2009 9:07 AM PDT
What if this is a safety measure? Ok, humor me for a second: We all know that the iPhone is the 800 lb gorilla in the room, and smartly Palm insists that it doesn't want to compete with the iPhone. But let's be real; it's competing with the iPhone. Not for people to leave AT&T and jump to Sprint, some gadget heads may actually do so if this device is compelling enough, but for people who want something more than a regular phone, and have no loyalty to one carrier or the other. The Sprint version of this device isn't going to move in HUGE numbers because Sprint itself is having problems holding on to subscribers. And this device isn't going to appeal to everyone. So lets say that in 6 months they only move 200K units. Why create 500K of them? Maybe the 300K number is the safety net, and if the demand is higher, production kicks to 2nd gear. I'm just wildly speculating. As long as they have one for me, I'm good =)
Reply to this comment
by zofo_draziw May 1, 2009 9:55 AM PDT
I couldn't agree more. To this day, I have never bought a Wii, though I tried like crazy to buy one the first Christmas they were out. Now they're on the shelves of every store into which I walk, but Nintendo's early efforts to find new ways to not take my money from me left a very bad taste in my mouth. I will never again waste days worth of hours of my life camping, or aimlessly calling and driving around looking, for another "must-have" product. My time is far too valuable to me.
Reply to this comment
by stigmattaman May 1, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
Palm has done the unthinkable and said they're not trying to be the number one player, instead thinking they can survive off the "fat middle" of the market. With smartphone sales expected to grow at a fine clip over the next few years, this is not an unreasonable idea. Still, I would prefer my companies to want to be king of the hill.
Reply to this comment
by bankerdanny May 1, 2009 10:23 AM PDT
Deliberately shorting supply would be monumentally stupid for a company that needs cash as much as Palm. They are already walking the razor's edge in refusing to announce an actual ship date or pricing despite being 60 days away from the end of the promised release period (1st half 2009).

They were never going to sell 1 million units ala Apple because Palm/Sprint just doesn't have the apple/AT&T customer base.

But if they should be prepared to deliver as many as possible. The ultimate sucess of the Pre will be driven by how good the phone actually is, not the perception of excess demand created by artificial shortages.
Reply to this comment
by npgirl May 1, 2009 10:38 AM PDT
I love when people freak over rumors. Stop your bellyaching it's just a rumor. The likelihood of intentional shortages seems slim from what I know. Besides last company that intentionally shorted us on phones did so with the consequence of losing sales due to the phone's craptasticness. I know I wasn't happily pushing the plastic pieces o crap. If Palm is smart they'll put out every unit they can on launch day and hey if that just happens to be a quarter mil, so be it.
Reply to this comment
by NervClaX May 1, 2009 10:57 AM PDT
Your "artificial shortage" is probably more like responsible production scheduling. My wife's company was hit up with an order for 1.5 million bottles of hand sanitizer. They can't fill it. What would they do with the extra capacity after Swine Flu hysteria went away?
Reply to this comment
by obmot May 1, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
Unfortunately, despite columns like this (which inevitably occur before a big product launch), the last thing Palm wants is articles that there are still unsold units sitting on the shelves after launch, which will then be "interpreted" by bloggers as a "failed product."
Thus, companies like Palm will likely create a fake shortage. It really isn't their fault, but really, the fault of tech bloggers who will instantly (ald also inevitably) write over and over that a product "failed" because it didnt immediately sell out like the iPhone or Wii whatever. Bloggers did it to the Xbox. They did it to the PS3. If Palm produces excess units which don't sell out on launch day, the bloggers will predictably do it also to the Pre. Mark my words.
Reply to this comment
by nowimcool May 4, 2009 1:02 AM PDT
i agree, but it's kind of a no win situation. produce less and the stats come out and they are behind the competition, produce more and they may not sell them all ...

either way the bloggers are going to tear them down.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (41 Comments)
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

advertisement

About The Digital Home

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Digital Home topics

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

Don's links
Don's Facebook account
Don's Twitter feed
Don's Friendfeed account
Don's Google Reader account
Don's Last.FM account
Don's Pownce account
Don's Flickr account
advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right