Kepler: Finding a 'Goldilocks zone' in the Milky Way
NASA's Kepler satellite will scope out a section of the Milky Way in hopes of finding planets similar to Earth.
(Credit: NASA/JPL)In the vastness of the universe, there are likely to be nearly countless planets. The big question for humans, of course, is whether even a single one of them could support life.
NASA's Kepler satellite, which is scheduled to lift off at 10:49 p.m. EST tonight, is headed out to keep watch on a patch of the Milky Way for at least three and a half years. Unlike the Hubble space telescope, Kepler won't be taking brilliant pictures suitable for framing. Instead, it will look for minute changes in the brightness of stars--some 100,000 of them--that would indicate a planet passing in front.
Of all the planets Kepler eventually finds, what NASA is most interested in are planets like Earth. That is, it's looking for rocky orbs--from half as large to twice as large as our big blue marble--in the habitable zone around a given star where conditions might be amenable to folks like us, or at least some of our fellow earthly organisms.
"The habitable zone is where we think water will be," Bill Borucki, Kepler principal investigator at NASA Ames, says in a video on the space agency's Kepler site. "If you can find liquid water on the surface we think we may very well find life there. So that zone is not too close to the star, because it's too hot and water boils, and not too far away where the water is condensed...a planet covered with glaciers. It's the Goldilocks zone--not too hot, not too cold, just right for life."
To scope out the interstellar terrain, Kepler will use its photometer--essentially, an oversize light meter--equipped with 42 charged coupled devices, or CCDs. Your digital camera uses CCDs, too, though they're much smaller. And where your pocketable camera might be rated at 8 megapixels, Kepler's telescope weighs in at 95 megapixels.
Kepler's unblinking eye will scan a wider area than most astronomical telescopes, according to NASA. Where those devices see an area equivalent to a grain of salt held at arm's length, Kepler sees the whole hand at that distance.
According to a report issued this week by the Government Accountability Office, the Kepler project's total cost as of December was $595 million. Yes, that's more than was originally budgeted for it, and yes, it's launching about nine months behind schedule.
But for the moment, let bygones be bygones. Friday morning, NASA reported that the weather forecast in Florida is auspicious for tonight's launch: a 95 percent chance of favorable conditions, with a temperature of 64 degrees.
Jonathan Skillings is managing editor of CNET News, based in the Boston bureau. He's been with CNET since 2000, after a decade in tech journalism at the IDG News Service, PC Week, and an AS/400 magazine. He's also been a soldier and a schoolteacher. E-mail Jon. 









Excellent observation! And I only say that because people don't generally bother to know that much about it.
The Goldilocks Enigma constrains the parameters to a balance of extremes... so it only applies to the ecosphere of galaxies that formed on the same evolutionary time/location "plane" as we did. Planets orbiting stars in galaxies that are too old or too new, too large or too small, do not fit the "coincidentally balanced" nature as the average of extremes... etc... etc... ect... all the way down to the local ecobalances of the ones that do, and life will only arise on planets in galaxies, (and universes), where ALL of the anthropic coincidences are simultaneously in effect.
Please go to my linked page and tell me everything else that you know about it that I may have missed:
http://evolutionarydesign.blogspot.com/2007/02/goldilocks-enigma-again.html
Thanks!
@ emag - What I meant is that in sci-fi and even science a few decades ago, it was popular to believe the universe was just teeming with intelligent life (or even life at all).... think of, for example, Carl Sagan or the SETI project. But, with what we have learned in the last few years is that this is just not likely the case. Even strong proponents of extraterrestrial life like Geoffrey Marcy (the guy who discovered the first, and many of the extra-solar planets) has backed way down on finding at least intelligent life.
Basically, if we looked at what science was saying a couple decades ago... and then what we know today.... the empirical evidence seems to be heading towards no other life. However, we aren't going on that much data yet, and the thoughts from a couple decades ago weren't really based on any evidence.... so we need more data points. Kepler should start to provide those data points.
http://www.daviddarling.info/images/galactic_habitable_zone.jpg
It also predicts that life will not be found on Mars or Venus, even though "Venus, Earth, and Mars are approximately at the same distance from the Sun - formed out of the same material, and had approximately the same initial temperatures 4.5 billion years ago.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Habitable_zone-en.svg/491px-Habitable_zone-en.svg.png
This is a "must-read":
http://evolutionarydesign.blogspot.com/2007/02/goldilocks-enigma-again.html
@ island01 - I think we're likely to find life on other planets in our solar system... but it will turn out to be remnants of earlier earth life. Think of how much debris has been thrown off earth which would end up in these places.
- by kmguru March 7, 2009 6:36 PM PST
- The CCD imager may be too small. Somewhere I read, it is 95 Mpixels. Perhaps we need a GigaPixel
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(12 Comments)