• On TechRepublic: Why VISTA HATERS will love Windows 7
December 29, 2008 3:59 PM PST

HP upgrading Home Server lineup, Apple may follow suit

by Rafe Needleman

HP MediaSmart Server

(Credit: HP)

Hewlett-Packard announced Monday that it is upgrading its MediaSmart server lineup with new, more powerful hardware and, more importantly, with software support for Macs and improved over-the-Net streaming of users' media files. (A software update will allow users of existing MediaSmart boxes to access some of the new features.) Also Monday, 9to5Mac speculated that one of the Macworld announcements in January will be an expanded Time Capsule product with similar features.

Currently, HP's MediaSmart servers, running Microsoft's Windows Home Server software, cannot serve as backup platforms for Macs running the Time Machine backup software, and data stored on a WHS product is available only in a very limited fashion over the open Internet. Similarly, Apple's current Time Capsule backup appliance does not come with backup software for Windows PCs, and does not support media sharing over the Net.

The time is right for products like these, and more so for those that don't presume that families are running homogeneous environments. Any household with more than one computer and one digital camera is likely suffering from confusion in organizing and finding media, and centralized home hubs could be a big help. The living-room side of the equation still needs to be figured out, though. People want to get their photos and videos onto the big screens in their living spaces. While there are several decent digital media options for the home media center, many are too expensive or too complex for the mainstream audience (the Xbox 360 being perhaps a notable exception, as my colleague Josh Lowensohn has reminded me repeatedly).

My personal take: I own a first-generation HP MediaSmart server and have been very frustrated to find that my new MacBook couldn't access it to do a Time Machine backup. I blame Apple for this, primarily--without a hack, its software will only back up over the network to its own overpriced Time Capsule appliances. So I'm glad to see support coming for my particular configuration. I'm also really looking forward to having better access to my media files when I am not at home.

There's an in-depth review of the new HP MediaSmart server on the fan site MediaSmartServer.Net.

Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.
Recent posts from Webware
Firefox 3.5 and the potential of Web typography
Sites that help you lodge complaints
Google App Engine misfires
Microsoft: Bing needs to improve when news breaks
Google finally sued by makers of Finally Fast
Google Toolbar for IE speaks your language
Bing brings out the tweets
Google Search optimized for a mess of phones
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by bob_dango December 29, 2008 5:25 PM PST
Rafe, You just publicly criticized Apple, inviting yet another inane, and mostly inapplicable, Apple-Microsoft debate. You FOOL! WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?
Reply to this comment
by bakedpatato December 29, 2008 5:35 PM PST
Well, since WHS is a MS product, Apple is under no obligation to support it,nor is HP obligated to support OS X, but it would be nice...
Reply to this comment
by regulas1 December 29, 2008 5:55 PM PST
"Currently, HP's MediaSmart servers, running Microsoft's Windows Home Server software, cannot serve as backup platforms for Macs running the Time Machine backup software"

I beg to differ, yes it can as long as the Mac platform can see/access one or more of the server hard drives time machine will work. OS X can read but not write to NTFS file system, probably because of some back room door agreement or just because Apple is to arrogant. All you need to do is partition one of the server hard drives or better yet add another one and format it as a Mac OS or Unix or FAT 32 and time machine can use it. I know because I have a Mac.

On the other hand Microsoft is so arrogant it will not even recognize a Mac OS, linux or unix partition. I am not sure about their server software (It probably can out of necessity) but I know for a fact Millennium II, I mean Vista will not.
Reply to this comment
by DrtyDogg December 29, 2008 6:11 PM PST
with WHS you cannot partition a hard drive to FAT.
by getwired December 29, 2008 7:17 PM PST
OS X can read but not write because NTFS read/write support is reverse engineered, and the write performance is horrible (NTFS3G) or unreliable. Hence, read-only. But that has nothing to do with the UNC share. Windows SMB shares are totally visible and usable (read and write) from Mac OS X.
by Hep Cat December 29, 2008 9:04 PM PST
getwired is right - the disk's format on WHS makes no difference - as long as a Mac is on the same subnet and can see the SMB share from the WHS machine, it can use that WHS as a Time Machine volume.
by Mr. Dee December 29, 2008 5:59 PM PST
Rafe, that is what happens when you buy a platform that only 2 to 3% of the world uses. Send the Mac back to Apple and by a cheaper, decent Windows notebook. Or, buy a Windows license and shrink the Mac partition to 10 GBs and install Windows Vista.
Reply to this comment
by Galaxy5 December 29, 2008 10:42 PM PST
So, your solution to his confusion about using a WHS machine as a Time Machine backup is to have him go out and spend the money all over again?

Genius.
by FireyIce01 December 29, 2008 7:20 PM PST
The solution to the time machine problem is simply for Apple to allow time machine to backup to an SMB or NFS share. It doesn't matter what filesystem the server is using, all that matters is that the server can properly handle the network file sharing protocol. There is a hack somewhere to make time machine allow this, but it is not supported. Google knows the way.

SMB is the ideal cross platform solution. I use SMB shares on my linux server (with 3tb of storage in XFS filesystems, for those that care) to allow my mac and (my friends') windows computers to use the space. Collectively we keep our photos, music and videos on this system, which also records all our TV using MythTV software. The living room and big screen solution is also MythTV, though my PS3 (and I presume my friend's xbox 360) also is able to access the uPNP server that is built into MythTV, and thereby any of the recordings, videos, music, and pictures stored on the server.

The complexity is only in initial setup, and due to massive development efforts by the entire open source community, the complexity has continued to decrease significantly in the last couple years.
Reply to this comment
by Kalama December 29, 2008 7:37 PM PST
When discussing the Mac side of things, please do not forget that one of the "hardware" items that Apple is pursuing is ZFS < zeta file system > from Sun. Without getting into the "them vs. us" stuff, in general it might be worth while to take a gander at the operational specs. And, if Apple just happened to get over the boot up issues in ZFS, these prior conversations may not matter. 10.6.x is going to most likely be involved with the hardware issues rather than new whistles & bells. M$ might just have to take a look at that part of the business plan.
Reply to this comment
by toddlorensinclair December 29, 2008 8:25 PM PST
Wait a minute ... from the comments you'd think this was all about MAC?

I have a windows home server... Microsoft makes the software ... HP makes a box that uses the software ...

HP's last media server came with a 500gb drive ... (mine was $300 on Black Friday - OfficeMax) ... new ones have a 750gb or 1tb and in the $600 range .. not such a great deal with 1tb drives going for $80.

That's about all there is to the story right .. bigger drives and higher price?

Anyone can make apps and plugins for the Home Server so I am kind of surprised to see hoopla about MAC ... now if it was Netflix and Hulu integration THAT would be a story.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan December 29, 2008 8:37 PM PST
I do it the old fashioned way- I just copy the files I want to back up from the system I'm on to the file server on the network. That server has its own redundancy.

I have never liked automated backup solutions as they give you a false sense of security thinking your files are backed up only to find out after a failure that the files you thought were backed up were not actually configured originally to be included.

Nope, a simple backup is done manually for me. Or a cron job on the linux boxen. But I always go back and verify that backup is valid on the server *before* I am in a position to need it.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo December 30, 2008 12:30 AM PST
They might as well follow...and while they are at it they could copy PC`s and put card readers in their PC`s as well as TV tuners and have a 5 second boot time like my Asus MOBO does by booting into "mini-Linux" to Skype , chat , email , internet.
Apple already copied us and went with regular PC innards. Oh I forgot...it`s a walled-garden Jobs controls so you DON`T GET PC choices like we do ;)
Reply to this comment
by solitare_pax December 30, 2008 2:52 AM PST
Choices like viruses, installed bloatware that will work 30-60 days, and untested hardware that's DOA out of the box - unless you configure something from a reliable source an build it yourself of course.

While this item seems like a good solution, I don't know how PRACTICAL it is, PC or MAC - I mean, every house is probably blessed with at least one tech geek, but showing everyone how to do it - then letting the kids loose to really screw it up?

Seems like a better small-business device than a home-use device, considering the scope and price. I'll stick with my manual backups anyways.
by DrtyDogg December 30, 2008 3:09 AM PST
@Solitare: One of the nice things about WHS is that you don't need to show anyone how to do it. Once the software is installed on the computers, backups can be scheduled and or started from any PC on the network.
by dk jones December 30, 2008 6:58 AM PST
the Home Media Server is about storing & accessing your media files-MOVIES, TV SHOWS, MUSIC & PHOTOS, w/ your tax docs, financial info , etc... all being incidental & a bonus, unless you don't want to have your media on central storage & access. so if HP is now offering Mac support this can be a good thing for those who have multi-platform households as many are. many pro photographers, graphic designers, indie film-makers & musicians use Macs & have spouses that need to use PCs. i know of a couple dual platform households & they might see this device as a genuine blessing for their home server needs. can we move move beyond the useless drivel of Mac vs. Windows--doesn't anyone think 25 or 30 years is more than sufficient for this nonsense. we all should & do use what we like/works for our needs & what we can afford, that's pretty much the reality of any /all of someone's purchases. i can't afford a new BMW so i drive a 5 /6 year old Chevy. or is this "feud" just for cheap entertainment, 'cause sometimes the comments from both sides as well as the occasional Linux poster are so inane & silly i have to laugh out loud!

btw, i'm an all Apple/Mac house & am using an Intel iMac w/ a couple of 500GB FW HDDs as my media server, in the process of ripping DVDs/movies recorded from my HD cable box as WS SD & converting them to add to iTunes so i can put them on my iPod Touch as well as watch them anywhere @ home(via my network> MacBook> MBR TV) or possibly away from home. it's been pretty easy & straightforward. next is to get a 1TB ethernet HDD for Time Machine for my 3 Macs internal drives over my AEBS(n).
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo December 30, 2008 7:14 PM PST
Bloatware ??? Awell-respected Mac lover described iTunes exactly like that...Actually he called it "a bloated , monolithic spreadsheet"
And talk about poorly written software , the latest update to Mac OSX hosed thousands of systems and MobileMe has been a fiasco. The bigger Apple has gotten , the WORSE it has gotten. Numerous hardware and software gaffes lately. Viruses ??? Never have gotten one and I don`t run any AV product. Just use common sense. Apple has all the problems MSFT used to have.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo December 30, 2008 7:18 PM PST
Will your Mac boot in 5 seconds or less ? Mine does , into Express Gate. And I have the choice to run Windows if I need to. Way to go ASUS ! I love my PC ! So many choices when we can build our own ;)
Reply to this comment
by uhnoneemus December 30, 2008 8:08 PM PST
Over the air backup from my MacBook Pro was a headache. Here are two solutions:

1) Have a spare computer lying around? See this article: http://www.kremalicious.com/2008/06/ubuntu-as-mac-file-server-and-time-machine-volume/. I set this up using an old Gateway, USB 2.0 PCMCIA card, and HSF-formatted 500MB G Drive. The initial backup took 13 hours, but after that, my backups are like clockwork... on the hour... 2-3 minutes each time in the background.

2) I haven't tried this, but it is a relatively new product. Imagine an adapter that converts any of your external hard drives to network accessible storage... without the need for a intermediate computer (like in my first solution). Now imagine that for less than 60 bucks. Check it out: http://www.addonics.com/products/nas/nasu2.asp. If it works, this is definitely the easiest/quickest solution. You may need to steal a little bit from the article in my first suggestion to get it working properly. I went with the first option because I was feeling extra geeky and I had the spare parts lying around.
Reply to this comment
by JumpinJappold January 1, 2009 10:05 PM PST
Wow could they make it any uglier? Looks like one-a-them 'alien-like PCs'- oh wait: It IS!

hahahahhaahhahahahahhahahhahahaha
Reply to this comment
by JumpinJappold January 1, 2009 10:33 PM PST
It looks like an air cleaner....
Reply to this comment
(21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right