• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
February 27, 2009 12:48 PM PST

Hearst developing e-reader, charging for e-news

by Dong Ngo
and
Zoë Slocum
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 17 comments

Updated at 12:25 p.m. on Saturday with notes about Hearst's plans to charge for some content online.

It looks as if the e-paper revolution is really about to start.

Hearst, one of the largest media conglomerates in the world, announced on Friday that it has developed an electronic reader for newspapers and magazines, the way Amazon.com's new Kindle does for books. The publisher is also planning to put at least some of its online content behind a pay wall, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.

Soon you'll be able to read magazines and newspapers on an e-reader.

(Credit: Theoprahmag.com)

The e-reader news, first reported by Fortune magazine, is really significant, as Hearst owns about 16 daily and 49 weekly newspapers, and has a strong influence on hundreds of magazines. Examples of those include the San Francisco Chronicle, Oprah Winfrey's O, and Cosmopolitan.

It's unclear if the device Hearst has been working on has anything to do with the eReader that Plastic Logic unveiled recently, but its principle seems the same. It's a handheld device used to read digital content, much like the Kindle. The main difference would be that Hearst's e-reader has a much larger size to accommodate the format of newspapers and magazines.

At the same time as it is developing the device, Hearst is hoping for success in charging for access to at least some of its online content. A pay model for online content, as opposed to an advertising-supported free-access model, is something few publishers have managed to pull off.

Of the leading New York-based papers alone, The New York Times and News Corp.'s The Wall Street Journal have adopted, and backtracked on, both models. Cablevision's Newsday on Thursday also announced that it is implementing a pay-for-access model.

"Exactly how much paid content to hold back from our free sites will be a judgment call made daily by our management, whose mission should be to run the best free Web sites in our markets without compromising our ability to get a fair price from consumers for the expensive, unique reporting and writing that we produce each day," Steven Swartz, the president of Hearst newspapers, wrote in a staff memo obtained by the Journal.

Certainly, during a time in which papers right and left are folding under economic pressures or otherwise struggling to stay in operation, finding ways to profitably embrace digital media has become imperative for major and minor publishers alike.

"Our cost base is significantly out of line with the revenue available in our business today," Hearst's Swartz concluded, as he noted other advertising initiatives, such as partnering on advertising with real-estate site Zillow and Yahoo, and raising prices for print subscriptions and mobile-phone access to its content. "It is equally inescapable that during good times, our industry developed business practices that were, at best, inefficient."

It's also speculated that Hearst's e-reader is going to be physically flexible and even foldable. The first version would come in black and white, with a later model coming in color and even with video playback capability.

Once implemented, this would change the way newspapers and magazines are published. Instead of getting a print copy, you can just download the newest issues on the e-reader, wirelessly. No printing or paper is involved. Besides the environmental factor, this would cut down about 50 percent of the cost to circulate a periodical.

It's also not clear when you can get the first issue of Cosmopolitan on this new e-reader, but considering the recent launch of the Kindle 2 and the upcoming e-reader from Plastic Logic, Hearst's e-reader will probably be launched in 12 to 18 months.

Originally posted at Crave
Recent posts from Digital Media
eBay launches holiday deals app for iPhone
Police arrest exec for not using Twitter
Google picks up ad company Teracent
'Technical issue' downs eBay search over weekend
Economics dooming free streaming sites?
IBM taps into group language translation
Report: Wikipedia losing volunteers
'Jurassic Park' kid cast as Facebook co-founder
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by TomMariner February 27, 2009 2:37 PM PST
One man's magazine reader is another's medical device.

You guys should kinow better than to wave red meat technology in front of the hungry jaws of folks that make things for doctors. Gimme. Now. So I can help make you healthier tomorrow!
Reply to this comment
by Fil0403 February 28, 2009 2:38 AM PST
Cool, now they just need Oprah to advertize it.
Reply to this comment
by didir1010 February 28, 2009 9:13 AM PST
This is ridiculous. Why start from scratch and create your own e-reader when the Kindle already has subscriptions to newspapers and magazines on it? Why not just have your subscriptions available on the Kindle? I can't imagine buying their e-reader just to read magazines and newspapers when I already own the Kindle and can read magazines, books and newspapers there instead.
Reply to this comment
by abogey February 28, 2009 11:57 AM PST
The reason the Kindle won't work for them is, among other factors, advertising.

They need a screen large enough to show adds along with the content, and coor would also be important.

I don't see such a device succeding. It will be expensive and there are too many source of 'free' news.
by marc_90292 March 1, 2009 4:59 AM PST
There is another reason why Kindle won't work: black and white doesn't do so good if we talk magazines like O, or any other one using color. Given that the cost for a b&w Kindle is not affordable for most, a color version would be sold at an even higher price. These guys don't see that subscriptions would bring in the money, - like RIAA they are still in the caves.
by jscott418 February 28, 2009 5:42 PM PST
I cannot see the attraction in getting news on these things. Maybe if these things had come out 10 years ago when news papers still had a calling. But free news is all over and their is no real angle for newspapers to charge online for this.
Reply to this comment
by forever4now March 1, 2009 7:46 AM PST
I think the key to success will be in the "packaging". I could potentially see myself flipping through a well produced e-magazine/e-newspaper on the sofa or at the beach on a device like the Plastic Logic reader.
by jimgsf February 28, 2009 9:43 PM PST
Unfortunately this is destined to fail proving AGAIN that media conglomerates do not get it. Lowering the barrier to entry is going to be their quickest path to recovery. Forcing customers in a recession to buy a new piece of electronics to get the news is not going to fly particularly when computers and cell phones are wide spread and easily accessed. I haven't purchased a paper in over 10 years not because I don't like newspapers, but because they haven't kept pace with reader behavior. Sadly they've yet to learn anything over the past 10+ years.
Reply to this comment
by forever4now March 1, 2009 8:00 AM PST
When you consider all time & resources involved to produce newspapers/magazines (cutting trees for paper, ink, electricity for production, gas for shipping, paper collection & recycling, ...), an e-reader seems like a no-brainer solution.

With the e-reader model, once the production of the e-magazine/e-paper is complete, it can be distributed globally, almost instantaneously. Lower cost...less waste...potentially larger subscription base.
Reply to this comment
by mmagliaro March 1, 2009 10:02 AM PST
These news agencies just don't get it. I never EVER pay for any on-line news, and I don't know anybody who does. The current quality of news coming from these media companies is HORRIBLE. They all pick up the same lame feeds from the same pool of reporters, all slip-shod, poorly fact-checked, all rushed to publication without the most important facts because those take too long to get.
And to cap it, their writing, whether on-line or in print, has steadily gone down the tubes because
none of them use real proof-readers (and they haven't for years). Ever since they started relying solely on idiotic spell-checkers, we have had to suffer typo after typo, and phrases and words completely out of context.

In short, they aren't doing a good job reporting and they aren't doing a good job writing. People are tuning out in droves, which is why printed newspapers and magazines are in trouble. When we pay, we expect quaiity. So what makes them think I will pay for the same shoddy quality on-line? Because it's convenient? Don't make me laugh.
Reply to this comment
by evanklug March 1, 2009 2:31 PM PST
The eReader is so cool. I saw them at Wal-Mart. They're expensive though.
Reply to this comment
by evanklug March 1, 2009 2:32 PM PST
idk my bff jill?!
Reply to this comment
by fastfred1 March 1, 2009 5:10 PM PST
Well let's see.... who pays for the eReader ? Me? Then I have to pay for the news.
And if I'm and older person who doesn't have internet savvy no uplink. I should have to pay for that too. For what to read Oprah Windy's Magazine or the San Francisco Newspaper?
Or is Hearst gonna be an IP so he can make money with too. I wonder if he is handling the warranty work on the eReader .......I see more lay offs coming.
Reply to this comment
by UpajOs March 1, 2009 5:12 PM PST
"It looks as if the e-paper revolution is really about to start."

As far as the new business is concerned, the revolution came and went over 10 years ago. As most people know, free online news has been ubiquitous for years. Hearst is very, very late to the party.

Why should I pay for news, especially from Hearst, the company that's responsible for "yellow journalism?" I get a better, fairer overview from AM talk radio stations, and there are plenty of free feeds and blogs to get the details.

Moreover, if their service works as poorly as CNET news, free news providers have nothing to fear. (I had to try several browsers and operating systems before I found a combination that allowed me to type these words -- in this instance, Firefox running on Ubuntu Linux. The CNET site doesn't work at all with SeaMonkey on Windows 98 and several other combinations I've tried. Maybe it works with Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista, but that's not a combination that I use, or ever will use. Pathetic.) The day people find out that they need to buy a new computer and switch to a particular operating system in order to use the Hearst e-book reader is the day that their service will bite the dust, regardless if it is for pay or for free. What do you want to bet that they'll opt for Microsoft Digital Rights Management (DRM) as part of their distribution scheme, locking out users of non-Microsoft systems, or users of earlier Microsoft systems prior to Windows XP?
Reply to this comment
by perumula April 4, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
I respectfully suggest that you Get a Mac! People who remain with Microhard's software know what they're getting into, i.e. virus after patch after virus, not to mention staid styling and gross copying of everyone else's innovations!!
I adore CNET and have never had any problem with comments on the site.
by March 1, 2009 5:54 PM PST
We already have a device for reading electronically it is called a PC or internet capble phone, why not have all media subcription based? There is no cost to print and deliver essentially so why not make it like a $1 a month or less, in mass this would be a huge revenue base plus you could still slip in advertising, you don't think no commercial television doesn't work in branding?
Reply to this comment
by mobilemavy March 1, 2009 6:11 PM PST
It's already unreadable swill. Nobody will buy the device or buy the product.
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

E-tailers linked to 'scam' blame customers

Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right