• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
October 17, 2008 5:01 AM PDT

Hands-on with the new MacBook Pro

by Peter Glaskowsky
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 34 comments

When Apple announced its new notebooks on Tuesday, it said the new machines would be in the company's retail stores the next day.

So I went to the Apple store at the Westfield Valley Fair mall in Santa Clara, Calif., after work on Wednesday. I got there a few minutes after 6 p.m. and discovered that an Apple technician was in the process of replacing an old MacBook Pro with the first one of the new models.

I positioned myself authoritatively about a foot from the tech's left elbow, so when he was done, I was the first customer to get my hands on the new machine.

Apple's new MacBook Pro

Apple's new MacBook Pro.

(Credit: Apple)

It looked as good in real life as it does in the pictures. The tapered edges make it look thinner than it really is, considerably more svelte than the older MacBook Pros like mine.

A few things struck me about the new design. There's no latch for the lid, but some kind of cam in the hinge keeps it snugly closed unless it's opened on purpose. I don't think this would work as well with the old lid style because there's enough of an edge on there for incidental contact to overcome the hinge tension. But with the new extra-thin edge, the lid seems to resist accidental opening.

Unfortunately, like older MacBooks and PowerBooks, the machine starts to turn on when the lid is opened only slightly. I've never understood why these switches are so sensitive. It seems to me it would be better to wait until the machine is opened more like two or three inches to avoid accidental actuation, especially when there's no latch.

The trackpad was very nice, easily the best I've ever used. It also doesn't look or feel like glass. I can confirm that Apple thought of the same thing that I did in my previous post--a click with one finger generates a left-click, and a tap with two fingers generates a right-click. Awesome. So now Apple has the world's only two-button mouse that doesn't have any buttons at all, and it isn't even a mouse!

(I also tried three- and four-finger taps, but I couldn't see any difference in the behavior of the Finder. I wonder if that's something applications can detect, though.)

Too glossy
As for the new glass-face display: I'm sure it'll be great for watching movies in a dark room. I'm sure it'll be fine for most purposes, if you're in a dark room. And wearing dark clothing, and nothing shiny. But wow, I really don't like to see windows or lights or my clothing reflected in glossy displays, and the only way this new machine's display could be any more glare-prone is if it were mirrored like a highway cop's sunglasses.

I picked the machine up and turned it around in my hands, somewhat constrained by the attached power and Ethernet cables. It felt good in my hands. The surface finish is good-- not slippery, but not rough either. I gave the machine some light tweaking between my hands--both the lid and the base separately, as well as the whole machine with the lid closed--and in all tests, the new machine seemed to offer more torsional rigidity than my old MacBook Pro. So that says the new manufacturing techniques have paid off, at least in that respect.

The bottom covers for the battery/HD and RAM felt very securely attached, not rattly, and the seams were remarkably tight. I hope they stay that way over time, always a difficult thing to achieve with sheet aluminum, which is not the most stable material. (Cars, for example, could be built with even smaller gaps between doors and frames, but makers don't do that because the inevitable shifts over time would then be more conspicuous--and most cars are made out of steel.)

Apple used its snazzy technology for nearly-invisible indicator lights on the sleep indicator; you basically can't see the light unless it's on. (The same technology is used for the "on the air" light next to the Webcam on older MacBook Pros like mine, and it's really almost like magic.) Oddly, however, there's a short slot next to the indicator on the new machine that compromises the clean look Apple was presumably seeking with this design feature. I don't even know what the slot is for! My only guess is that it might have the infrared receiver for the Front Row remote control behind it.

Out of respect for the store, I didn't pop the battery cover off, though I am curious how that latch works. The latch is at one side, but it has to seal tight across a very long edge. That's usually difficult to arrange.

Sharper feel
The edge of the aluminum around the keyboard and palm rests does, indeed, feel sharper than the plastic on the older MacBook Pros. Not physically sharper, but the low friction of the old plastic makes the edge feel smoother because skin is less likely to hang up on it. Skin doesn't slide over the new aluminum edge nearly as easily.

Since the new machine had accumulated quite a crowd within just a few minutes while I examined these elements, I turned to a couple of guys on one side who had arrived shortly after I did, rubbed my palm across the edge of the new MacBook Pro a few times, did the same on the older model next to it, and asked them to do the same. Then I asked "does the new one feel sharper?" Both said yes. But we all also agreed that visually, they appeared to be about the same, so I think the answer is that Apple ought to round over this edge just a bit more.

And with that, I stepped back and let the rest of the crowd fight over the new machine. I didn't see any new MacBooks on that visit (and I couldn't get my iPhone power adapter replaced under the recall; they were out). But seeing the new Pro was enough to justify the visit. I love the looks, but I can't justify buying a new laptop right now. So I'll wait for the next refresh and hope those machines still look this good.

Peter N. Glaskowsky is a computer architect in Silicon Valley and a technology analyst for the Envisioneering Group. He has designed chip- and board-level products in the defense and computer industries, managed design teams, and served as editor in chief of the industry newsletter "Microprocessor Report." He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Speeds and Feeds
Wrapping up Speeds and Feeds, part 3: Ruggedness
Wrapping up Speeds and Feeds, part 2: Reliability
Wrapping up Speeds and Feeds, part 1: Efficiency
Tilera's balancing act: 100 cores vs. market realities
The Gizmo Report: WikiReader--simple, singular
Taking a look at Nook
Mulling mobile broadband options
The factor factor, part 3
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (34 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by macmate1 October 17, 2008 6:08 AM PDT
Thanks for a look at the new MBP the way most of us consumers will first see it. I am due for a new Book now and am at a dilemma as to the higher price for a few frills or the bargains on the previous edition. A question no one has as yet answered.
Reply to this comment
by davebarnes October 17, 2008 3:31 PM PDT
I think you find the answer to your question at http://www.macworld.com/article/136214/2008/10/macbookbenchmarks.html?lsrc=top_1

Unless you want to play games, the "old white" MacBook will make you happy. And, it comes with FireWire.
by legend2k October 17, 2008 6:39 AM PDT
This review was very insightful. I'm glad your review wasn't completely bias (at least I think it wasn't.)
I love the line in which you described the display and ended with "a highway cop's sunglasses."
I'm looking forward to get more feedback until I make my ultimate decision to switch to mac.
Reply to this comment
by ballmerisanape October 17, 2008 6:54 AM PDT
I'm interested in trying out the new trackpad... fyi.. you can change it's preferences via System Preferences.. and there are plenty of options to change. Also.. I'd bet my house that there are or will be "skins" for these screens to compensate for the glossy black. For me; however, we have an iMac at work... and I have to say... if the screen looks like that.. my eyes will appreciate the richness that you get with that beautiful glass screen.
Reply to this comment
by grissomb October 17, 2008 6:57 AM PDT
Maybe I missed something...by my older Macbook does the 1 finger left click, 2 finger right click...
Reply to this comment
by utahman.brian October 17, 2008 7:31 AM PDT
Nope, you didn't miss a thing - the older ones do this too.
by gregwsil October 17, 2008 11:53 AM PDT
But there is actually no button this time around... on older macs, they had the button.
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 17, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
That's with tap-click, though-- where the trackpad is detecting finger touches-- which I really don't like, since it leads to spurious clicks from light touches. I dislike tap-click so much it's the first thing I disable on a new machine. I even disable it temporarily when borrowing other people's laptops. :-)

The new machines do this right-click thing in combination with the physical button under the trackpad, which completely eliminates the problem of spurious clicks.

. png
by _Jae October 17, 2008 7:43 AM PDT
Glascowsky, I'd like to tell you that my current MBP is a glossy screen version and most notably, my iPhone is perfectly glossly and in my workplace we use glossy iMacs. All those environments are presented in a very well lit manner and it DOES NOT affect visibility AT ALL.

Am sure you are used to those matte windows screen, am afraid to tell you that your envisioneering group and yourself needs to update to the this century's innovations.

Glossy screen makes everything looks better from a plain CAD to your personal pictures. (even your MS words documents)
Reply to this comment
by sheldonkw October 17, 2008 7:56 AM PDT
From your previous post, "With any luck, Apple will support both one- and two-finger clicking for left- and right-clicking."

I can confirm that Apple thought of the same thing that I did in my previous post--a click with one finger generates a left-click, and a tap with two fingers generates a right-click.

I can confirm that Apple thought of this almost three years ago with the switch to intel. My original original MacBook (2+ years old) has this capability.
Reply to this comment
by bluemist9999 October 17, 2008 8:14 AM PDT
If I used one of these new MacBook Pros in Boot Camp, how would Windows see mouse clicks?

Is the mouse click logic built in? Or would I need a separate USB mouse for Windows?
Reply to this comment
by sheldonkw October 17, 2008 12:39 PM PDT
As mentioned above, I'm using the first model MacBook w/Boot Camp (once in a while). The trackpad drivers are provided by Apple and all functionality works - including two-finger right click in Windows. Installing Boot Camp installs the proper drivers for the built-in iSight, the trackpad and any other Mac related hardware.
by Jeff Putz October 17, 2008 9:02 AM PDT
Actually, there is a latch... per Apple's site it's magnetic. It isn't secured from the hinge.
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 17, 2008 1:57 PM PDT
Huh. The behavior of the machine I tried didn't seem to fit with a magnetic latch. When opening the lid slowly, for example, there's a point of extra resistance around the one-inch mark. I don't know how that can be done with a magnet. But anyway, you're right about what Apple is saying, so I suppose there must be both a magnetic latch as well as some cam function in the hinge to account for that extra resistance. Thanks for the information.
by Constable Odo October 17, 2008 9:48 AM PDT
As for the glossy screen problem, why don't those that want a matte screen, just go out and buy a anti-glare screen protector or even the type that limit the angle of view so people can't see what you're doing from the side? They're not very expensive and should solve your glare problems. Crying about a missing FW port/conversion cable is one thing, but this matte screen thing is basically a non-issue.
Reply to this comment
by woahjoe October 17, 2008 1:56 PM PDT
how is it a non issue?

screen protectors not only look ugly (non perfect coverage, potential bubbles especially around the isight, obvious seams) but arent the same as a matte finish. the *issue* is that Apple should be giving people a choice like they did with the Macbook Pros of the past.
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 17, 2008 1:57 PM PDT
Well, y'know, I actually have one of those 3M privacy filters. It's glossy! Oh, well.

. png
by mjkphoto October 18, 2008 5:57 AM PDT
Odo, you have got to be kidding! The matte screen thing is basically a non-issue? Wrong. For creative professionals like myself, a matte screen is a necessity that can't be accommodated with an anti-glare screen or by adjusting the display brightness or turning the notebook. Apple made a huge mistake by abandoning the matte screen. Huge.
by MrShirts October 17, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
Here's one thing I really don't understand... Being a long time Mac laptop user (G3, G4, Macbook).

"...the lid seems to resist accidental opening."

"Unfortunately, like older MacBooks and PowerBooks, the machine starts to turn on when the lid is opened only slightly."

Why would you open the lid if you didn't want the machine to turn on?
Why wouldn't you want the machine to turn on as soon as you opened the lid?

This smacks of criticism for the sake of criticism (as a current grad student, I'm guilty of that myself sometimes, but it still displays bad form).
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 17, 2008 1:59 PM PDT
Well, if you're carrying a laptop in a backpack or briefcase, for example, and you reach in to get something and accidentally nudge the lid-release button (on the old machines), the machine starts waking up. Not good. This has happened to me at least a dozen times by now.

. png
by sheldonkw October 17, 2008 7:27 PM PDT
in reply to Peter N. Glaskowsky's reply.

It's true, the old MacBook Pros had an almost spring-loaded latch that when pressed they popped open - even accidentally. The new latch is based on a magnet holding the lid closed and helps prevent accidental openings (as you mentioned). But the instant on is one of my favorite features. On most laptops I'm still waiting for my WiFi to connect when it's open. On my MacBook the screen, computer and Wifi is ready before I can even finish opening the lid.
by howard1695 October 17, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
"always a difficult thing to achieve with sheet aluminum, which is not the most stable material"

Dude, this thing is not made with sheet aluminum.

How did you miss the most hyped aspect of the announcement on these new machines?

One word: unibody.
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 17, 2008 2:00 PM PDT
Oh, no, it's certainly made _with_ sheet aluminum, even if it isn't _all_ sheet aluminum. That's what the covers over the battery and RAM compartments are made of. So those joints have these pieces of sheet aluminum butting up against the solid unibody. The unibody won't flex, but the covers sure will.

. png
by woahjoe October 17, 2008 1:49 PM PDT
Uh, did you just take credit for the double tap right click thing? that's been in OSX since the powerbook...

@howard: I hope you're joking... you think the fabrication process is the most hyped aspect of the announcement? that's like saying the best part of a ferrari is the assembly line. Nobody besides steve jobs and jonny ive care what the macbook is made of-- also you should note that the unibody is indeed made out of "sheet aluminum", which is not the most stable material.
Reply to this comment
by deasyst October 17, 2008 10:01 PM PDT
@woahjoe: I hope you're joking...the unibody is machined from a thick, solid aluminum extrusion, not "sheet aluminum" as you stated.

Check Apple's website for more information.
by LunaticSX October 17, 2008 2:33 PM PDT
"Oddly, however, there's a short slot next to the indicator on the new machine that compromises the clean look Apple was presumably seeking with this design feature."

That's the security cable slot.
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 18, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
No, that's on the right side of the machine. I'm talking about the slot that's roughly 1/2" x 1/16" on the front face of the machine.

. png
by sheldonkw October 18, 2008 12:27 PM PDT
@Peter N. Glaskowsky

You're referring to the infrared receiver for the Apple remote. It could be easily hidden in the black frame of the screen, but then I couldn't hook it up to my stereo and close the lid. Nor could I hook it up to an external monitor and close the lid and still have remote control access. Nor could I hook it up to a projector and control Keynote with the lid closed.
by sjinsjca October 17, 2008 7:06 PM PDT
Nice capsule review, but the author is incorrect on one point. If you check Precision Machine Design by MIT's Alex Slocum, you'll find aluminum extolled for its material stability. That, its machinability, the toughness of its surface when anodized, and its thermal conductivity are three reasons why it's an inspired choice for a laptop structure.
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 18, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
Well, I don't have that book, but I'm sure Slocum isn't contradicting the obvious fact that aluminum isn't an especially strong metal. In thin sheets, like those in both the old and new MacBook Pros, it can certainly be damaged by rough treatment.

I guess I'm just a titanium fan, anyway.

. png
by sheldonkw October 17, 2008 7:21 PM PDT
@Peter N. Glaskowsky,

You said in a reply above,

"That's with tap-click, though-- where the trackpad is detecting finger touches-- which I really don't like, since it leads to spurious clicks from light touches. I dislike tap-click so much it's the first thing I disable on a new machine. I even disable it temporarily when borrowing other people's laptops. :-)

The new machines do this right-click thing in combination with the physical button under the trackpad, which completely eliminates the problem of spurious clicks."

Again, you are wrong. I also hate tap-click and immediately disable it. But that's not the two-finger right click people are talking about. Since the original intel MacBook was introduced almost three years ago, you could:
Open System Preferences -> Keyboard & Mouse and check "For secondary clicks, place two fingers on the trackpad and then click the button." It's written pretty clearly and works even easier in practice. When I have to use my windows laptop, even with two buttons. I continuously miss two-finger right clicking and two-finger scrolling.

See the screenshot at http://appleservedup.com/images/twofingerclick.png
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 18, 2008 12:28 PM PDT
Sure, sure, but how is it a two-finger click if you need three fingers? :-)

Only on these new machines can you click with two fingers to get a right-click, with no extra effort or complication. That's all I'm trying to say.

. png
by sheldonkw October 18, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
Obvious, but funny point.

In my use of the new Mac trackpad, I just operated as normal. If you don't look down at the trackpad and click as if you didn't know the button was absent, the process works the same as ever only it actually feels better in my opinion. Something about the new "click" feel is just right.

I've read of a few people doing as you comment, actually clicking with the finger they're using to point. From what I read most find it easier to click act as if the button were there. Also, as much as I have to use a windows laptop at work, I'd probably end up breaking a finger if I got accustomed to clicking with my tracking finger. :)
by BurtReynolds October 20, 2008 1:38 AM PDT
Alright, really, I can't stand it. All this talk about the design and form of the new MCP. No where, really, NO WHERE, is there any performance reference. Indeed, form follows function. In the "old days", Apple was touted as being superior for advanced image editing. Hmmmm, why are we now focusing on style? I'm a Windoze guy, I admit, but I'm a computer geek first and foremost, and I've never been able to justify the price penalty for a Mac. Looks as if Apple is looking for a new strategy...
Reply to this comment
(34 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.

advertisement

About Speeds and Feeds

Silicon Valley-based computer architect and chip analyst Peter N. Glaskowsky attends a variety of industry conferences throughout the year to meet with industry thought leaders and dig into the future of computing technology. In Speeds and Feeds, he analyzes trends in system architecture and interface design, as well as market and political pressures surrounding those trends. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Speeds and Feeds topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right