• On TV.com: Julie is HOT (and so is TV in a FLASH)
March 4, 2009 6:43 AM PST

Halo Wars: Real-time strategy for the rest of us

by Dan Ackerman

This is what happens when the EZ Pass lane isn't working.

(Credit: Microsoft )

With the March 3 release of Halo Wars for the Xbox 360, one of gaming's most popular brands took a potentially risky step into uncharted waters. Instead of a twitch-based first-person shooter, Halo Wars is a real-time strategy game. This complex genre, perhaps best described as Stratego meets the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, has befuddled mainstream gamers for years, even with occasional hits such as Command & Conquer and Starcraft. (Despite having covered the video game business off-and-on for the past 10 years, I'm still an RTS novice.)

Having had a chance to get some serious hands-on time with Halo Wars during the week before its release, we were actually kind of shocked to find that the game was, for the most part, simple enough that even we could understand it. Most real-time strategy games require players to move lots of little soldiers around a big map, controlling a whole army rather than a single character. But to get those soldiers, one must first gather natural resources, construct buildings, and even research new technology. Of course, this all happens in "real time," so while you're trying to figure out how to do one thing, the rest of your miniempire is getting blown up somewhere across town.

Halo Wars automates much of the tedious resource gathering and construction, to instead focus on the combat, which is what Halo fans want anyway. Most of the game's levels involve building new soldiers and tanks, waiting until you have dozens of them hanging around your base, and then telling everyone to blindly rush the enemy while you sit back and hope for the best. That said, the simplified gamepad-friendly controls may even be a little too stripped down. Telling everyone to attack one target is easy, getting some guys to go right and some other guys to go left is much more of a challenge.

While Halo Wars has gotten a mostly positive critical reception during its first few days of release, we'll have to wait and see if the millions of gamers who bought 2007's Halo 3 are willing to try a Halo game without a first-person point-of-view and without a star turn by series protagonist Master Chief.

The following product mentioned is available.

On Sale Now: $39.99 - $61.50
View the latest prices for Halo Wars (Xbox 360)

New York native Dan Ackerman, a former radio DJ turned journalist, has written about technology and music for publications including Spin, Blender, The Hollywood Reporter, and USA Today. He hosts the weekly Digital City podcast and the New York edition of Editors' Office Hours. Dan's new album, Tales Out of Night School, is available now. E-mail Dan.
Recent posts from Crave
How your cell phone can diagnose disease
Apple Store opens in the Louvre: Where next?
OOMouse has more buttons than a shirt
Gigaware remote adds HD radio to the iPhone and iPod Touch
The 404 463: Where we're not that funny, but at least we try
Hands-on: Netflix streaming on the PS3
Sony Eco TV turns off when you leave the room
New Atom Netbooks coming for CES?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by checodaman March 4, 2009 8:22 AM PST
I think it's safe to say Starcraft hit the mainstream.
About Halo Wars though, I cant imagine trying to play an RTS w/o a keyboard and mouse...seems...tough.
Reply to this comment
by docparkny March 4, 2009 8:49 AM PST
The greatest game not yet on iPhone -

The simplest reduction of the RTS game is Spaceward Ho!, which took the nerdboy book keeping of the boxed game ancestors and took it into the background. It is available for the MacOS X, but at a fairly high price for a game where the most complex graphic is a laser shot shooting across the screen. Even so, the graphics and sound are still fresh and hilarious. I contacted the writer, and begged for an iPhone game and he says that one is in the works!

Here is a link to my blog entry and Joe Williams' comment:
http://golfism.wordpress.com/2009/02/23/spaceward-ho-the-greatest-game-not-yet-on-iphone/
Reply to this comment
by Blaess March 4, 2009 9:41 AM PST
"last year's Halo 3" ?

try

"2007's Halo 3"

:-)
Reply to this comment
by John_Johnson March 4, 2009 9:52 AM PST
Dear lord in heaven, I have no idea how someone could call this game more mainstream than some pretty stripped down RTSs on PCs. Using a joystick for precision moving would test Gandhi's patience, while using a mouse for those same actions is a thousand times easier. I think what makes this game most accessible to "mainstream gamers" is that they are the people who are told what to like, and Microsoft will put a lot of advertisement dollars into telling them to like this.
Reply to this comment
by tcr071 March 5, 2009 10:27 AM PST
Dear lord in heaven, I have no idea why someone would embark upon a continuous upgrade cycle so that they play the most modern PC games. I buy a console once every 5 years and I do not have to purchase anything else ever again but I do pray for the people who decide to buy or build PC's. Every year they need to upgrade their hardware or play the newest games at reduced settings while I just enjoy the games they are released. I pray for those that must wait months for exclusive console titles to be ported to the PC while I have already played the game, beaten it a couple times, and grown tired of it.

The game is more mainstream because an exponentially larger number of people will pop it into their console and play it than almost ever PC game released within the past 5 years save World of Warcraft.

Stick with your mouse and keyboard. PC gaming is on the way out. If Blizzard wasn't in existence PC gaming wouldn't even exist anymore.
by streamline35 March 4, 2009 11:27 AM PST
Seems just like every other halo game - a bit too simplistic and hurting badly from the lack of a keyboard and mouse
Reply to this comment
by CyberEyes69 March 4, 2009 12:01 PM PST
Got it
Played it
Love it*
Reply to this comment
by March 23, 2009 2:42 PM PDT
'nuff said
by AL-Graphic March 4, 2009 12:16 PM PST
It is not a good news for FPS games like Halo episodes to go or change into RTS, it is a totally different catagory, no wonder Bungie Studio won't make a deal with MS, cuase Bungie can even make the Halo empire games more interesting as Killzone2, but since money issue involved, MS not willing to have patience or strategies to make a good game title, this is not a game for Console Gamers to play(without mention PC gamers!) If you can not play FPS into the game, what excitement you got? Once again, this is not a Halo we knew, it will go in history very soon! Look at PS3's Killzone2, you can tell, one falling, one just rising!
Reply to this comment
by sting7k March 4, 2009 8:07 PM PST
Bungie didn't make Halo Wars, Ensemble Studios did.
by tcr071 March 5, 2009 10:28 AM PST
Halo is one of the best games to make into an RTS. Please remove Ken Kutagari's dick from your mouth.
by jsnowbordr47 March 4, 2009 12:51 PM PST
Just picked up the game yesterday, but have only been able to play the first 3 level, loving what I've played so far. Already it's so much more enjoyable than the C&C games on the console. Normally I would have picked up the C&C games on my computer, but I'm too cheap to upgrade it to play those games at an acceptable rate.

I'm glad that they simplified the tech tree/interface. At least when playing a console strategy game, I'd gladly trade all the micro-managing for playability. I don't even play the C&C games on my console anymore, after beating each of the campaigns once through and watching the cutscenes, these games have stayed on the shelf. But I can definitely see myself playing through Halo Wars several times, because it's so easy to pick up and play, yet there is still enough depth to keep you interested if you like strategy games in general.
Reply to this comment
by March 4, 2009 1:42 PM PST
As a long-time Halo fan AND a long-time RTS fan, I still like Halo Wars, even though it's distinctly different from BOTH of the genres from which it is derived. I swear I'm so sick of people berating games for not being exactly like all the other games that came before it. Then you have games like LOTR:Conquest which get bad reviews for being TOO much like a game that came before it. Just let developers come up with new ways to stretch the boundaries of genres and stop the ridiculous banter about why mice are better than joysticks. They're just different, and Ensemble just tried to make a game here that would be fun to play without a mouse. You know what? They succeeded! It's fun, it's different, and it continues to unfold the excellent Halo story by presenting the story well before Halo 1. If you have a 360 you'll enjoy the game. If you're a PS3 fan rejoice because you finally got your Halo in Killzone 2 (just stop complaining about 360 games). If you're a PC fan don't be dissing on consoles because they don't use mice, just play what you enjoy (personally I'll take the 56" screen, a comfortable couch and surround sound over the control precision the kb/mouse gives me any day).
Reply to this comment
by W1gglesnarf March 4, 2009 2:26 PM PST
Played Halo Wars and i have to agree RTS's Without a mouse is like a grilled cheese sandwich without the bread! But the actual game was okay.
Reply to this comment
by sting7k March 4, 2009 8:08 PM PST
I'm all about Halo and love Ensemble's RTS games but I just can't do it without the mouse/keyboard. If this comes out for PC some day maybe I'll buy it.
Reply to this comment
by tenor1977 March 5, 2009 9:54 AM PST
Good luck. Ensemble's closed. If you like their games this is the last one.

If you have not played the game then you really need to download the demo. At the very least don't say it doesn't work if you haven't tried it. If you give it a few levels and still think it's broken, fine but just becaues no one's really made this work in the past doesn't mean someone can't make it work and for the most part they have.

I've been playing for about a week (preorder shipped early) and there's been very few times I've wished for a mouse and keyboard. This game just works. It does exactly what it was intended to do and they were smart and didn't try to be a full featured RTS. At the heart of it they kept what's great about a RTS: Strategy. There's depth in unit types and upgrades and expands upon the old rock paper scissors meaning one strategy is never going to work 100% of the time if the other person catches on to what you're trying. Most of all it's fun and that's what really matters. I'm not saying it's perfect but I'd give it a 9.5.
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.