This 2007 Ford Mustang has been converted to an electric vehicle by start-up Plug-in Motors.
(Credit: Plug-in Motors)A fully electric passenger vehicle from Ford is still a couple years away, but in the mean time, Plug-In Motors --a Missouri-based start up-- has been developing the process and technology to convert existing Mustangs and F150 trucks their current conventional powertrain to one that's all-electric.
But the cost of this environmentally conscious move doesn't come cheap. These comprehensive conversions can cost $75,000 for a Mustang or F150 with an 85-mile range or $125,000 for a 200-mile range.
The high price tag is a result of the top-of-the-line components used by Plug-in Motors, says CEO Kurt Neutgens, who spent 17 years as engineering manager at Ford. The powertrain parts are sourced from the same company that Telsa uses, and the selected batteries are expected to last approximately 200,000 miles for the 85-mile range conversion and 400,000 miles for the 200-mile range conversion. The company's electric motors will last approximately 1 million miles, Neutgens claims, and the regenerative braking is affixed to the accelerator, which extends the life of the brakes.
These durable components don't come cheap, and Neutgens is hoping economies of scale kick in soon. But in the mean time, you have to start somewhere, he says.
Closing the affordability gap are state and federal tax credits, he points out. Colorado grants an 85 percent tax break on the cost of conversions, and Oklahoma grants a 50 percent tax break. Factor in the $7500 federal tax credit, and the cost to convert a Mustang or F150 is reduced to $14k and $28k respectively.
That means that the payback can be less than 50,000 miles at $3 per gallon of gasoline, and even sooner if fuel prices rise in the near future. Neutgens maintains a list of many of the electric and plug-in vehicle tax break incentives on his website.
For early adopters who can't wait for Ford to roll out an all-electric product of their own, he's arranged partnerships with three Ford dealerships in Colorado and Oklahoma willing to sell and service his converted vehicles.
Source: Cleantech Group
San Francisco will offer up to $6,000 for homeowners installing solar panels.
(Credit: Elsa Wenzel/CNET)Aggressive plans to expand renewable energy in San Francisco moved ahead Tuesday as the city's lawmakers approved grants to help homeowners, businesses, and nonprofits add solar panels to their buildings. Solar power companies are gearing up to meet an anticipated jump in demand in the city.
Over the next decade, between $3,000 to $6,000 will be available to each homeowner to cover the installation of solar panels, as well as $10,000 for businesses and nonprofits, and $30,000 for nonprofit affordable housing.
"This rebate program further establishes San Francisco as America's solar energy leader and symbolizes the commitment of the city to make affordable solar power available to those who want it," Mayor Gavin Newsom said in a statement.
He hopes the incentives will launch in July with some $3 million in annual funding, and touts their potential for attracting more businesses and green jobs.
However, the city has a long way to go before becoming a solar capital, regionally or nationally. The San Francisco Solar Task Force ranked the city last in the Bay Area for the number of solar installations, with panels on only 744 of 195,000 rooftops.
The subsidies would support some 50 megawatts of solar power across 10,000 buildings within a decade, if the mayor has his way. Political wrangling had delayed his planned April launch for solar incentives.
Lyndon Rive, CEO of installer SolarCity, joined others in the solar industry in praising the city's program.
"It's simple, easy to understand, and easy to implement," said Rive, who anticipates the number of solar panels to triple in San Francisco, where SolarCity is the largest solar installer, with 40 employees. It's also developing a "green" job training academy in a low-income neighborhood.
Rive noted that until now, his company's solar panel-leasing program was too pricey for the majority of San Francisco residents.
With the city incentives added to federal tax credits and state rebates, costs for a homeowner who might otherwise spend $30,000 to install solar panels would drop to near $6,000.
This map marking rooftops with solar panels is likely to get more crowded in the coming years.
(Credit: San Francisco Solar Map)"This is just gonna spur the industry," said Kevin Gage, sales director for San Diego-based installer Borrego Solar. "The market was essentially shut down in San Francisco. Now a lot of companies like ours are gonna move into San Francisco."
Solar installers and equipment makers are increasingly pitching their services to people seeking to escape or offset rising energy costs. San Francisco utility Pacific Gas & Electric on Tuesday announced a proposed 6.5 percent electricity price hike.
The city incentives are bright news to San Franciscan Sylvia Ventura, whose condominium has 2.5 kilowatts of rooftop photovoltaics. However, she foresees a "feeding frenzy" among solar installers and start-ups that could confuse consumers.
"This business was done for a long time in the shadows and some installers took advantage of people being intimidated by the data, not understanding metering, wattage, and what to pay," she said.
Ventura wants communities to harness collective bargaining power to further lower residential solar setup costs. She and husband, Dan Barahona, launched One Block Off the Grid, a grassroots effort aiming to coordinate additional, privately funded subsidies for enough homeowners to make up the equivalent of a city block.
They plan to secure free solar installation for the first 50 San Francisco homeowners who sign up. The list is more than half full.
Ventura and Barahona hope that high-tech companies will volunteer to provide the funds, and they're talking with banks about setting up unique financing plans. However, the fledgling effort hasn't at this point secured corporate partners.
I already own a hybrid (a Ford Escape) but am toying with the idea of going for the gusto by trading in the old Ford for a gas-sipping Honda Civic or Toyota Prius hybrid. When I bought my Ford, Uncle Sam sweetened the deal by giving me a tax credit of around $2,000, so my expectation was a similar financial incentive if I went for a more economical model. Not so fast! In its infinite wisdom, the federal government created one of the dumber set of guidelines you could ever imagine.
Once a manufacturer (for instance, Ford, Honda, Toyota, etc.) exceeds sales of 60,000 hybrid vehicles, the IRS phases out tax credits over the course of a year. Since Toyota is killing it with the Prius, it passed the 60,000 mark years ago.
So here's the net effect. If you decide to buy a Prius, decrease the United States' dependence on foreign oil, help improve national security, and do your part to reduce carbon emissions, you get nothing in return because the federal government came up with some lame-brain quota system based on manufacturers and brands of cars. Ridiculous!
I know I'm out on a limb, but I firmly believe that with gas at over $4 per gallon in many areas, the federal government should be reducing the speed limit, pushing states to eliminate tolls, and absolutely persuading taxpayers to buy cars with higher mpg. Given the energy goals we hear everyday from the presidential candidates, the cap on hybrid tax credits is just plain stupid.
A plan designed to help make San Francisco the nation's solar power capital hit a budget snag last week.
The largest residential solar rebates from a U.S. city would have offered up to $5,000 to homeowners who install photovoltaic panels. But the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission has halted launching the solar program, pending the S.F. Board of Supervisors' decision to review funding. Supervisor Jake McGoldrick introduced a proposal Tuesday to freeze $3 million needed for the rebates.
"It's troubling that what appears to be a political debate has gotten in the way of what would help San Francisco maintain its status as a very attractive place for green businesses," said Nat Kreamer, president of Sun Run, which launched last fall in San Francisco as the country's first residential solar-energy provider.
The San Francisco solar incentive was designed to provide $3,000 to $4,000 in rebates to homeowners, plus another $1,000 for those in low-income neighborhoods, as well as up to $10,000 to businesses installing solar power.
Landlords can also apply for discounts through the California Solar Initiative as well as receive a 30 percent federal tax credit.
Adding solar panels to a single-family home usually costs close to $30,000.
Sun Run had projected that the city's rebate program, dubbed GoSolarSF, would potentially double its number of solar installations, Kreamer said. San Francisco counts just 744 sets of solar panels out of 195,000 rooftops.
The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission aims for 15,000 rooftops to be solar-equipped by 2010.
"The incentive levels the playing field for people to do residential installations in the city," Kreamer said. "Definitely there's a lot of support from consumers and people in the industry."
If necessary, Mayor Gavin Newsom hopes to re-introduce solar rebates on the ballot for June and expects overwhelming support from the public, according to his office.
Newsom has been heavily touting the potential to reduce San Francisco's carbon footprint and dependence on foreign oil by expanding renewable energy from solar, wind, and wave and tidal sources.
He accuses politicians of "playing in the margins" with efforts to slow global warming. City supervisors and newspaper writers, meanwhile, have pounced on Newsom for allegedly bloating the budget with climate-change programs.
Although San Francisco's solar rebates may have suffered a local political setback, elsewhere in California efforts have accelerated supporting the state's mandate to derive 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2010.
On Thursday Southern California Edison launched an $875 million plan to build a virtual, 250-megawatt, inland power "plant" of thousands of solar panels across the rooftops of businesses. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger backs the effort.
Last year, demand for help with installing solar power via the California Solar Incentives outstripped the state's current number of solar installations, according to the California Public Utilities Commission.
- prev
- 1
- next
