• On TV.com: Why Is Everyone in TV High School SO OLD
November 11, 2008 2:52 PM PST

Google now tracking flu trends via search

by Josh Lowensohn
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments

Google on Tuesday unveiled a new site to track the progress of the common cold.

Using the same keyword tracking technology found on Google Trends, it keeps an eye on people searching for queries involving the word "flu" and tracks them both by date and location.

What makes the technology so fascinating is that its data set goes back to 2003, and has been cross-referenced with the last several years of survey data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Google says that because its own system is based on a constant flow of searches as opposed to surveying techniques it's able to provide results one to two weeks faster than the CDC.

The same trending technique could be used in tandem with other organizations to track contagious viruses or threats besides the common cold, including AIDS, bird flu, and Africanized honey bees.

One limitation of the current system is that it does not track worldwide flu traffic. There is, however, quite a bit to discover from data from years prior--especially when you get several years that stack up on top of each other with similar rises and falls during certain parts of the year. According to Google's chart, we're about three weeks from hitting the heavy season, which goes until early January.

Google Flu Trends tracks flu activity across the United States.

(Credit: CNET Networks)
Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ballmerisanape November 11, 2008 3:11 PM PST
The "common cold" and the "flu" are very different things.
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn November 11, 2008 3:17 PM PST
Sure--but the search terms aren't. Runny nose, cough, fever, are all things which are being tracked to make this possible.
by zeboone November 11, 2008 3:44 PM PST
What if your son calls you in California from North Carolina saying he thinks he has the flu, and you, naturally, search for it? I guess there are anomalies in every bunch that are probably accounted for, but still something to consider....
Reply to this comment
by Broward Horne November 11, 2008 7:27 PM PST
I posted models of this almost three years ago.

http://www.realmeme.com/Main/dailymeme/2005/Aug/coughcoldDejanews.png

Web searches are co-incidental indicators.


Want to see something that Google hasn't shown you?

http://www.realmeme.com/roller/page/realmeme/?entry=sars_versus_avian_flu_meme

It's quite likely that the Internet retains knowledge and alters its behavior over time. Compare the group reaction time between the SARS and avian flu viruses.
Reply to this comment
by sailhome November 11, 2008 7:33 PM PST
It is frequently repeated in news articles that 'the flu' causes at least 36,000 deaths each year in the U.S. A more accurate number is 140, with more than 100 of those deaths in people at least 75 years old. The CDC's own data shows it. See http://www.sailhome.org/Concerns/Vaccines/Flu_Myth.html
Reply to this comment
by wiggerstolemybike November 11, 2008 10:32 PM PST
Quick Everyone search for "flu symptoms"
it'll be hilarious
Reply to this comment
by November 12, 2008 1:52 PM PST
What are the limits and controls over the information gathered and the use made of it? What if I search for "assault weapon?" Will Google pass my name along to ATF?
Reply to this comment
by lewismd November 12, 2008 4:33 PM PST
This only works when the searcher uses the correct ?medical semantics? and specific clinical terminology. ?Muscle aches? do not equal ?flu outbreak.?

There was actually a task force sponsored by Consumers Union and HHS/Disease Prevention several years ago that studied this, found Google searching was too uncontrolled and random to actually predict an outbreak (see: http://www.urac.org/savedfiles/URAC_CWW_Health_Search_White_Paper1203.pdf).
Reply to this comment
by ManticMan November 12, 2008 10:10 PM PST
Clearly just an excuse to put monitoring mechanisms in place. We should be very alarmed at the breach of privacy here.

I once tested a theory about telephone monitoring (back in the mid-90s, not long after the Waco incident) by staging a conversation about acquiring seeds for planting marijuana. Sure enough, that summer I saw a good deal of black helicopter activity over my property. Not only validated my paranoia, but explained what those helicopters were really about back then.

That was a kooky thing to do, but disturbing that it got results.
Reply to this comment
by bhopal39 November 13, 2008 7:23 AM PST
As an earlier poster noted, it would be all too easy to skew the Google tabulated flu results. I've subscribed to to flustar.com for the past 4 years; seems that their method of determining the number of local/regional flu cases is based more on actual reported cases than, at least, simple curiosity on the part of the googler.
Reply to this comment
by eysenbach May 1, 2009 7:48 AM PDT
Please stop positioning Google Flutrends as a "Google invention" and regurgitating Google press releases.

The idea to look at search data as early warning systems for flu outbreaks is not a Google invention, but was actually already proposed over 3 years ago (published 2006), by researchers from the Centre for Global eHealth Innovation and University of Toronto.


Eysenbach G. Infodemiology: tracking flu-related searches on the web for syndromic surveillance. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:244-248
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=17238340

Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Framework for an Emerging Set of Public Health Informatics Methods to Analyze Search, Communication and Publication Behavior on the Internet
J Med Internet Res 2009;11(1):e11
URL: http://www.jmir.org/2009/1/e11

The Virus Chasers
http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/35061.html
CIHR Newsarticle (2007) about the infodemiology / infoveillance work at the Centre for Global eHealth Innovation in Toronto
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

With eye to the future, try raw photos today

Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right