• On mySimon: Gifts for the Outdoor Enthusiast
February 4, 2009 10:20 PM PST

Gates spreads malaria message with mosquitoes

by Steven Musil
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 55 comments

Bill Gates opened a jar of mosquitoes on stage at an elite tech conference Wednesday to draw attention to the plight of malaria victims.

Bill Gates releases mosquitoes at TED on Wednesday.

(Credit: James Duncan Davidson for TED)

The Microsoft co-founder released the insects, which are notorious for spreading the deadly disease, during the Technology, Entertainment, Design (TED) Conference in Long Beach, Calif.

"Not only poor people should experience this," Gates told the audience before assuring them that the insects were malaria-free.

The insect release, which was first reported on Twitter by Facebook's Dave Morin, was initially characterized in some reports as a swarm, but some in the audience reported seeing just a few.

TED curator Chris Anderson reportedly quipped that the video of the talk posted at TED.com will be headlined "Gates releases more bugs into the world."

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced last year that it would provide $168.7 million to develop a vaccine for malaria.

Originally posted at Microsoft
Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers. E-mail Steven.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Cutting Edge
IBM taps into group language translation
Atlantis astronaut's wife gives birth 220 miles below
NASA signs 'The Rock' to make it seem cool
Large Hadron Collider up and running again
Fortified rice, fuel cells among Tech Award winners
Shuttle Atlantis completes smooth station linkup
U.S. and China agree to explore space cooperation
IBM chip to speed medical diagnostic testing
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (55 Comments)
by jdriv February 4, 2009 10:55 PM PST
Amazingly, the mosquito release occurred just after a presentation on military 'robot flies'. Coincidence?
Reply to this comment
by assman February 4, 2009 11:11 PM PST
Haha, that is a really clever way to get people to pay attention.
Reply to this comment
by psychlones February 7, 2009 8:56 AM PST
Let's take a second look at that...

negligent action + one of world's richest men as agent provocateur (who knew or should have known that someone in the audience might be allergic to the proteins in the mosquito's saliva) + blood sucking attorney =

lawsuit for intentional infliction of emotional (induced fear) and/or physical (being bitten by Gates' mosquitoes) distress
by cnet-buff February 5, 2009 1:32 AM PST
He must have been wearing a bug repellant
Reply to this comment
by Get_Bent February 5, 2009 12:13 PM PST
No, Bill Gates is just naturally repellent....
by odzer February 5, 2009 2:02 AM PST
Thank heavens he did not release another 10 versions of some new windows OS. That is far worse!
Reply to this comment
by topgunb2 February 5, 2009 3:27 AM PST
did you even donate 10c in ur life, have some appreciation for the work he's doing, or tell me some one else who's donated more for philanthropic work than him
by gdod25 February 5, 2009 10:11 AM PST
Hey top gun. Shutup. You don't know how much other people give and Gates has so much it does'nt hurt him. Its like the widows mite. Of coarse you probably don't know what that is. I hope he doesnt take up eboli as a cause!
by JDShots February 5, 2009 2:04 AM PST
It's not enough to sell buggy software. Now you have to physically release them into the crowd to get your kicks?
Reply to this comment
by stenchio February 5, 2009 9:15 AM PST
HAHAHAHA I can't wait for Windows 7 to put you in your place you fool. Macs can't do ****.
They can't get viruses right?
by Seaspray0 February 5, 2009 9:28 AM PST
Quote: The Macintosh and base Linux kernel operating systems have dominated the top spots for vulnerabilities by operating system over the past three years.

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10154662-83.html
by Dalkorian February 6, 2009 8:43 AM PST
Then go ahead and write a virus to own them Seaspray0. There are tons of them in the wild for the winblows platform, so it should be easy to write one for Linux or OS X, right?

We're waiting.

(Hint: Unix has suffered viruses before, in fact the very first virus was written for Unix I believe. So it's not like it's not possible, the question is can you do it in a few hours the way some people can for winblows.)
by xcal78 February 6, 2009 10:02 AM PST
The only safe system is an unplugged system.
by xcal78 February 6, 2009 10:06 AM PST
Elk Cloner is one of the first known microcomputer viruses that spread "in the wild," i.e., outside the computer system or lab in which it was written. It was written around 1982 by a 15-year-old high school student named Rich Skrenta for Apple II systems.
by xcal78 February 6, 2009 10:13 AM PST
Reference:
First virus hatched as a practical joke
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/09/01/1188671795625.html

A 20-year plague
http://news.cnet.com/A-20-year-plague/2009-7349_3-5111410.html?tag=item

A History of Viruses
http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1286

http://www.elkcloner.com/

http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid14_gci989616,00.html
by solitare_pax February 5, 2009 2:51 AM PST
Let's hope he doesn't release an upgrade on those bugs.
Reply to this comment
by joetesta70 February 5, 2009 5:20 AM PST
Unlike $teve Job$ who is hoarding his billions and does NOTHING philanthropic and is a jerk, you can see where Bill Gates' heart is. All the "PC" crowd, Gates, Dell, etc. are all big philanthropists.

[CNET editors' note: Prohibited content deleted.]
Reply to this comment
by mrwater February 5, 2009 8:53 AM PST
I can also see where your heart is.
by gdod25 February 5, 2009 10:13 AM PST
Jobs just doesnt advertise. He doesnt need the 'pat on the back'.
by cwlqwp February 5, 2009 10:41 AM PST
Jobs doesn't need a pat on the back, he needs a new 8k gold suit to wear to work every day.
by wesisw_ February 5, 2009 12:56 PM PST
What would Steve do with a gold suit? Perhaps a gold mock turtleneck though.
by psychlones February 7, 2009 8:48 AM PST
Gates never gave a dime until he married Melissa who was able to get him to understand that by giving money away he would actually be able to improve his position vis a vis the Taxman (and therefore hang on to more of his money) What is it they say about a great woman behind every great man?
by JadedGamer February 15, 2009 10:13 AM PST
Historically, big philantropists made their oodles of moolah on shady business practices - 18xx Robber Barons and present-day Microsoft included. So it is no wonder when they eventually grow a conscience they start using the money their monopolies brought them for good causes. Steve Jobs is not in that group. Yet.
by thinkerthinker February 5, 2009 5:40 AM PST
Research the use of DDT--and not all the hype about it's "destructive" influence on the environment. Bill is a smart man--just afraid to take a scientifically sensible approach to the problem of malaria. Kill the bugs, prevent the spread of the disease, save lives--it can all be done now, right now, and for a lot less money than what he'll spend on attempting to develop a vaccine.
Reply to this comment
by mb332902 February 5, 2009 5:48 AM PST
You can't just kill all mosquitoes. Do you know how much wildlife that affect? There's no telling what type of disasterous effect that might have.
by JM_Brazil February 6, 2009 8:13 AM PST
Good call. And then we'll kill all the honey bees so we can't get stung.
by menty666 February 5, 2009 5:42 AM PST
I get what he was doing, but I feel bad for the venue operators, who now have to deal with mosquitoes in the room, and potentially in the food service prep area.

Nice gimmick, but jeez, for a philanthropist he's not thinking of other people ;-)
Reply to this comment
by thinkerthinker February 5, 2009 6:34 AM PST
"You can't just kill all mosquitoes. Do you know how much wildlife that affect? There's no telling what type of disasterous effect that might have."

Do you? Have you researched it at all? There is no telling because there is no "disastrous" effect. The idea is to make safe the living area of fellow human beings, not eliminate a species.
Reply to this comment
by stenchio February 5, 2009 9:14 AM PST
It would destroy the environment you idiot. There is this thing called a food chain you know. Kill all the mosquitos= killing all the food for spiders= killing all the food for lizards etc. Finding a vacine would be the easiest most humane way of finding a solution, next to a cure.
by ralfthedog February 6, 2009 5:48 AM PST
China tried it. They killed every pollinating insect in one of their orange growing regions. They can't get them to come back either. Now the people of this region spend most of their time during pollinating season with little brushes going from tree to tree.

PS. the pest bugs did come back, just not the bugs they want. What would have happened if it had been a rice or wheat region? Without bugs we all starve.
by Mr. Dee February 5, 2009 7:32 AM PST
You should see my sealing after the rainy season. Its like a mosquito collage.
Reply to this comment
by JM_Brazil February 6, 2009 8:14 AM PST
Your sealing?
by dslaw February 5, 2009 9:46 AM PST
What next, spreading AIDS awareness by throwing blood on the audience?

Or pointing a rifle at audience members' heads to discuss the merits of gun control?

(And were those clean mosquitoes? Would said blood be clean? And don't warn people beforehand, especially if they have open wounds or like to scratch their eczema...)
Reply to this comment
by Qtechbg February 5, 2009 1:17 PM PST
Next thing should be imprisoning him for doing that!
by rapier1 February 5, 2009 9:10 PM PST
More than likely they were males. The male mosquitos don't eat blood or bite huamns.
by ralfthedog February 6, 2009 5:59 AM PST
rapier1 , think of the poor guy who had to sort the male mosquitoes from the female.
by JDShots March 19, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
LOL! ..or toss out copies of Windows ME, DOS 4 or Vista to raise awareness of poor design practices and a lack of customer focus.
by ComputerSecurityAbroad February 5, 2009 9:55 AM PST
Want some facts on this? Here's a Tale of Two Rich Folk...
I work with NGO's, some of whom work in Africa. I also have a personal friend, who's spent their life among the poorest and castoff in Kenya, Ethiopia, and Eritrea teaching transformational community development.

On their last trip back here, this person met with our family at a friend's home for dinner, and we asked about the influence of western money, and what works and what doesn't.

This person grew quiet, and told us a Tale of Two Rich Folk and their money... BillG and Oprah.

Remember Oprah's fancy girl's school? She tested and picked the best and brightest, the future leaders, she called them. And the privileged status that inferred to those kids families have ripped their villages apart socially.

BillG's money, however, has mostly gone to provide 1) thousands and thousands of mosquito nets, and 2) lots of malaria medicines (and some for AIDS) ; which enable people to live without fear of invisible insect killers.

Oprah created dissention and division among the people and significantly entitled a chosen few.
BillG has enabled families and communities to live and continue to work to improve their situation without fear of malaria.

Guess which one is regarded as a savior of the people?

You may not like Windows, you may hate Microsoft, you may be jealous of BillG and think he has more money than the Almighty (...so why not share some with me, right?)

Well, If you lived through the early 80's (pre-Windows) and spent weeks writing drivers to talk to 50 different printers, you can at least give the guy a nod. Windows and the Mac unified the chaos.

But if you had malaria, or almost lost children or a spouse to a freakin' mosquito, and BillG's nets and medicine saved your life, you'd shake his hand and thank him with tears in your eyes.

I don't agree with all he does, but he deserves our respect for the thousands of lives he's saved.
Reply to this comment
by J.G. February 5, 2009 10:34 AM PST
You seem opposed to increasing the size of the African middle-class, and educating black people in general. Gates' wonderful mosquito net program helps prevent malaria. But, the children who survive because they don't get malaria or get effective treatment shouldn't stop with being healthier. They need good educations. That is why Oprah Winfrey's school is important. Those South African girls will become educated professionals and increase the ranks of the able, and the middle-class significantly. If one were to poll the American professional class, the best private schools would be seen to have a disproportionate impact. The process has been delayed in most of Africa because of slavery, colonialism and imperialism.

I believe I saw you make similar racist comments on OLPC sites. Saying Africans should receive medical help, but not educational assistance, is racist because it is anti-equality. People like you do not want the status quo, continuing dominance by white Westerners, disturbed.

Both Gates and Ms. Winfrey are doing great things in Africa.
by scifiend February 5, 2009 10:40 AM PST
I do applaud some of bill gates' activities but its still ok to dislike windows and call it monopolistic.
I have heard that the amount of money being given by Gates to the malaria cause actually has negative consequences too. It tends to reduce the number of other NGO's involved and reduce funding from other sources, this leads to a lack of diversity in the types of ideas and actions taken to deal with it. It might be worth looking into what I'm talking about instead of just taking my word on this one if you find the comment interesting.
by bmn_1213 February 6, 2009 5:36 AM PST
J.G. educating Africans and increasing the size of the middle-class? Really? People in Africa are having trouble with getting enough food and medicine to survive day to day, you think they care about the science behind it, or how to prevent it? They know that their kids, their parents, their brothers and sisters are dying because of diseases, they don't care how to stop it again, they care how to stop it now and reverse the effects on the affected people. Increasing the middle class? How? Make cities? Pay how? Charity money? No that would be just a waste. That money would be better spent buying mosquito nets, vaccinations and research for cures.
by ComputerSecurityAbroad February 7, 2009 9:13 PM PST
(Actually, J.G., at best you've confused me with someone else and revealed your ignorance. You see, I'm white, my wife's not. I grew up here an only child, my wife's the youngest of 12 from a Spanish-speaking third world country. Still no electricity in her village. And I've never posted on the OLPC sites that I can recall, but I do think they're a great idea. I've proposed a medical triage project for disaster response based on OLPC XO machines using the built-in video cameras and mesh networks.)

And no, I'm absolutely not opposed to educating black people at all, nor of increasing the middle class; in fact, I'll educate everyone who will listen. But I fear you have little actual experience with what you're talking about when it comes from Africa.
You can't go to school when you're dead. You can't go to school when you're working to provide for your brothers and sisters when your parents are dead (from either AIDS or Malaria.)
My friend teaches transformational development, as do many there; because cultural transformation is necessary before significant advances can take place.

My friend in Africa also teaches the people to read. Young, old, rich, poor, black, purple, it doesn't matter.

My friend also transforms the people not to urinate and defecate in their drinking water supply.
You get that?

You see, native beliefs are that sharing a toilet mixes peoples souls and they won't do it. "What if an enemy or my mother-in-law uses the same toilet?" So they poop on the ground, or in the drinking water supply. Now *that's* a cultural problem!!!

Like bmn_1213 said, they're having trouble with food and water and basic life needs. In the meantime, while they're *alive*, then they go to school (or school comes to them) and they get an education and work to earn money for food.

Look... I myself attend a local white middle class educated protestant church, where my wife is the token foreigner. We have a friend who attends also, she's from Kenya, an adult, been here two years. She's true African black, and her English is far, far better than mine... or yours for that matter. She's world-wise and well read...
...and she's continually astounded by the people here in the US who can't find their own nation's capital on a map, but expect her to be speaking broken English and swinging half-naked through the trees. She speaks 4 languages, as do most of her peoples (two tribal plus English and French.) She's been my table guest from time to time, including at Thanksgiving and Chrstmas two years in a row. She's not privileged or rich. And I've sat overnight with her baby in the hospital so that she could go home and get some sleep; I've held him and rocked him and loved him as if he were my own. He's a baby, doesn't matter what color he is. Or hers.

Our friends come from around the globe...the USA, China, Africa, Europe, Russia, South America, Mexico, even the Middle East! Some aren't educated...but for sure, none are idiots! And Idiots come in all colors too.

I'm all for educating people, you should try it yourself sometime.
It costs about $3000 to visit Africa for two weeks. Get your shots and yellow card and go. Leave the tour bus and get out into the field. Deep. Work with the people whose sole possessions in life are a layer hen and a hut made from grass and dried cow poop; people who walk 10 klicks twice a day for dirty water.

I'd honestly love to hear what you have to say... then.
Until then, be careful what you say.
by ally423 February 5, 2009 10:53 AM PST
Maybe gates could submit his project to get Stimulus funding everybody else has
Reply to this comment
by Joe_America February 5, 2009 10:54 AM PST
Malaria was erradicated from North America via DDT.

The liberal eco-nuts that banned DDT and doomed the rest of the world to live with or should I say die from Malaria.

Malaria can be erradicated from anywhere in the world in an extreamly short period of time if you just allwed DDT to be used again.

North America is still here after all of those years of DDT use, so will the rest of the planet.
Reply to this comment
by thinkerthinker February 5, 2009 12:17 PM PST
Thank you, Joe.
I'm glad to hear the statements of someone who is reasonable and not prone to restating the falsehoods of others. Assuming that using DDT would eliminate an entire species of mosquito and "destroy the environment" is like assuming that throwing an ice cube in the Atlantic ocean will set off the next Ice Age.
If, and it is only if, a vaccine can be developed, I'm all for it. And, if Bill Gates wants to risk his Foundation's money on it's development that's his choice. But 1% of the money he's committing to the development of a vaccine could be spent to save lives today.
by rapier1 February 5, 2009 9:28 PM PST
DDT was very effective - of course, it almost drove the bald eagle, condor, and other birds to extinction. The problem is that DDT was being used far too freely - people literally bathed in it. Kilotons were released into the environment through indiscriminate spraying and ended up moving up the food chain being concentrated at each step. Mosquitos also ended up rapidly developing a resistance to DDT - cf Sri Lanka which had to turn to Malthion. Any interruption in the spraying schedule only serves to accelerate the growth of the resistant population.

DDT may be effective in acting as a deterrant even amoung resistant mosquitos but it depends on a couple fo issues - including societal practices. If you spray interior rooms with DDT the mosquitos generally move to the outdoors. If you have a population where a significant percentage generally sleep outdoors (as in some part of India) then you aren't accomplishing that much.

The correct and judicious application of DDT may prove to be an effective element of a control campaign but carpet bombing the world with DDT isn't going to have the effect you might believe it will.

Oh, as for why malaria receeded from the United States? Well, it was in decline before the widespread use of DDT in the United States. Most of the researchers in the field attribute it to changing land use patterns and the reduction in the total amount of swamp lands in endemic areas. Less standing water means fewer mosquitos. Its actually more coimplicated than that - but its a good place to start.
by ralfthedog February 6, 2009 5:55 AM PST
DDT has lead to failure of food crops in china. If you don't have polinating insects you don't have food. A little DDT may be a good thing. Allot is bad.
by Mackasmiel February 5, 2009 11:08 AM PST
Chill up people! Just a few mosquitoes in a large conference room?!?! May be they won't get a chance to bite anyone!! Imagine a grass thatched house with a thousand mosquitoes loaded with MALARIA, singing on top of a one day old baby, in a poor village in Africa, or elsewhere where malaria kills so many people.

If you are scared of a little jar of mosquitoes that Gates released, then you should be pitying those people who on a daily basis face these bugs before, during, and at times after their daily night's sleep. That is the message Gates is passing across!

Anyway, malaria can and should be ERADICATED worldwide. The steps for doing so are easy and practicable. I can implement an ERADICATION program using far less money than what Gates and others are using now. The problem with malaria eradication is that some researchers have hijacked the process for their FINANCIAL benefits. If malaria is ERADICATED, some of them will be without JOBS or financial gains they currently enjoy. They are not interested in getting rid of the scourge!!!! It is in someone else's backyard, who CARES.

Gates and others should find a better way to ERADICATE malaria. The current approach is WASTEFUL and EXPENSIVE.
Reply to this comment
by bstan70rr February 5, 2009 11:12 AM PST
insects. bugs. the first thing i thought of was how microsoft keeps releasing software succeptible to bugs and viruses. how appropriate for him to do it on stage. everyone seems to have their own "stage" right in front of them, and we are constantly seeing bugs and viruses released right in front of our eyes.

i cannot believe a company has not been able to outduel a company with such a poor product.
Reply to this comment
by again9 February 5, 2009 11:13 AM PST
And the Ted conference is in beautiful Downtown Long Beach :)

Sorry for the shameless plug but here is a website.. ..http://www.downtownlongbeach.org/
Reply to this comment
by Pendant21 February 5, 2009 11:32 AM PST
DDT doesn't just kill the bugs, it weakens the entire eco-system. If people are still ignorate enough to consider it, then use it in your OWN house first and see what happens, see if you survive and like the effects.
Reply to this comment
by thinkerthinker February 5, 2009 12:48 PM PST
Actually, many people alive in this country, and other countries, are alive because of DDT and not in spite of it. Using it as a vector control agent to make living areas safe is very effective and can save lives now. So why gamble only on a future vaccine at the expense of those that are facing death now, when lives could be saved today through means that have been proven effective.
The cost of a future vaccine isn't measured in millions of dollars--it's measured in the millions of lives that are lost each year. Perhaps we should go to the mothers who have lost infant children to malaria and ask them about surviving the "effects" of DDT.
by pc1980 February 5, 2009 2:00 PM PST
I wonder what he will do to bring attention to AIDS in africa. Maybe if he wasn't playing philanthropist in africa (wife's idea) his company wouldn't be going to s***. But then again microsoft has always been s*** for quite some time, but Gates absence doesn't help. Bill Gates' and everyone else that pours money into Africa does it in vain. Sooner rather then later handouts will cease after they prove fruitless.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 February 5, 2009 9:30 PM PST
Goodness, you are quite Africa expert aren't you? Please continue to educate us all from that prodigous font of insight you seem to have at the ready!
Showing 1 of 2 pages (55 Comments)
advertisement

E-tailers linked to 'scam' blame customers

Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

About Cutting Edge

Keep up-to-date on cutting-edge research and what's new in a wide range of areas from robotics, space ventures and general science to automobile design and solar energy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Cutting Edge topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right