April 21, 2006 4:54 AM PDT
eBay's Google guard: Yahoo or Microsoft?
- Related Stories
-
Google Base service goes live
November 15, 2005 -
Google wants your car listings, events
October 25, 2005 -
Google plans trademark gambit
April 13, 2004 -
Google ads a threat to eBay trademark?
August 8, 2003
Wall Street Journal report says online-auction site has been talking with the companies about turf defense.
The story "eBay's Google guard: Yahoo or Microsoft?" published April 21, 2006 at 4:54 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.
11 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
Since both Yahoo and MSN got creamed in auctions by the Ebay juggernaut...I'd say screw em and start up again...put some real pressure on ebay from Google/Yahoo/MSN. If ebay is looking for an alliance they must be scared.
In fact...isn't ebay forgetting <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://expo.live.com/" target="_newWindow">http://expo.live.com/</a>
and
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://auctions.shopping.yahoo.com/" target="_newWindow">http://auctions.shopping.yahoo.com/</a>
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://classifieds.yahoo.com/" target="_newWindow">http://classifieds.yahoo.com/</a>
They're coming for YOU ebay.
this is much more interesting.
Problem is that i don't want my personal information going over
to MSN, i signed up with Ebay and not some chat service. :(
Another problem is that since eBay bought PayPal it has become far too easy as a seller to get scr*wed their too. PayPal's protection policies protect the buyer at the cost of the seller. They are only interested in tracking information when their is a dispute and nothing else. Including information that would be accepted as evidence is a court of law. PayPal wants to act like a Bank, but they don't have to follow the same rules. I also don't like the fact that when there is a dispute you only get a couple of canned responses to choose from and one of them doesn't fit the problem your are scr*wed again. Dispustes should be handled by people not machine.
These are the problems I see with eBay.
Robert
And for those that whine about shipping, yes, I agree some folks have ridiculous rates. I must ask that if folks look to make money while selling items at cost, well good for them. Many ebay buyers are compulsive anyway ('Why no buy it now?' 'How much to ship?'...) but there are many sellers that have to buy packing supplies and take time out to pack, transport and mail items. $20 for 1lb item via express next day is not bad. But $20 for 1lb via USPS or UPS ground is a rip.
I jsut feel nickel and dimed by ebay. Fees to list. Fees to sell. Fees fom paypal. Taxes. upcharges on fuel costs from UPS/Fedex. Fees to host images. I've practically stopped selling. Too much work for little return on selling items that are a loss anyway (one's junk, another's bargain).
Now, I refuse to use ebay and I refuse to use paypal. I truly hope that Google comes along and wipes the floor with them. And yes, I am sure that should that happen it will not be long before people are having the same experience with Google that I did with ebay/paypal... but that is when someone new will need to come along and wipe the floor with them.
Thanks for letting me rant and disagree.
There are too many safer and sometimes cheaper selling and shopping options on the Internet for eBay to remain a giant in the arena. One good example is I listed something on Craig's List for free and got straight profit from it. No fees at all. Pure and simple.
And that is Anoox search engine. Because unlike Google & Yahoo anoox promises not to be in any other business but the search engine business.
You can read this here:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.anoox.com/in-search-engine-business-only.jsp" target="_newWindow">http://www.anoox.com/in-search-engine-business-only.jsp</a>
Anoox can do this because it is a Community based business, which means essentially not-for-profit business, that is it is run for the benefit of the
community members and not share holders, and community members are advertisers, voters, etc.
You can read about this here:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.anoox.com/community-based-model.jsp" target="_newWindow">http://www.anoox.com/community-based-model.jsp</a>
And of course on top of all this, anoox search results are better than Gooloo & Yahloo because anoox search results are powered by the "People",
which is us.
Go People power, Go AnooX :)
It is better for search users because it lets us to vote for the search results. and search results are then optimized by majority vote of the people.
I like Democracy over dictatorship (of Google & yahoo).
It is better for advertisers, because PPC ad rates are like 90% less on anoox compared to Y & G. because of anoox community based business
model.
Only complain I have is that search results are too slow. But I understand that is because anoox is a small business and running on few servers only. So I hope they can address this slowness soon, otherwise I agree, anoox is better search engine for people (small businesses), Y & G
are better for Fortune 500.
Anoox?
I had a guy buy a product from me off my web site. I have all of my return and refund policies clearly stated on my site right on the order page. The ordered my product. I delivered electronically (that is how he wanted it, not the CD version that I also offer). He contacted PayPal and said he didn't get it. He never contacted me, just right to PayPal. Once PayPal contacted me I contacted him and offered to resend it. He said that wasn't required. I did everything I could to fight it with through PayPal because I didn't feel he was being fair. After PayPal said that because it was delivered electronically and I had not shipping information they gave the guy his money back. A day after he got his money back to sent me an e-mail and said thanks for the free product. He did get it but wanted it for free and said what a chump I was. Well, I contacted PayPal and sent them his e-mail. They told me that it didn't matter because I didn't have delivery confirmation and that anytime something is delivered in such a way that there is no delivery confirmation I would loose.
So the guy screwed me and PayPal let him. Any place else I would have gotten my money. I even asked PayPal if e-mail confirmation recipts would do and they said no. I know for a fact that these as well as e-mails themselves have been used in courts.
I also know that real credit card companies don't have the "delivery confirmation" requirement. They look at all of the evidence and then decide. PayPal is unfair and they thing they can do what they want. Something needs to be done and I think sooner or later something will be done. A lawsuite will hit them sooner or later. I would file one if I had the money.
If they want to act like a bank and a credit card company and an investment company (since you can use your PayPal balance in with their Money Market option) then they should have to follow all of the same rules. But, they don't.
Robert