Crave

In my previous blog posts titled "Disappointed with DirecTV" (part 1, part 2) I described the problems I've had getting my DirecTV equipment upgraded for compatibility with the company's new MPEG-4 satellite broadcasts.

Today, I'll be reviewing the centerpiece of this upgrade: DirecTV's HR21-700 digital video recorder (DVR).

Since there's a great summary of the features of this product in this PDF from dbstalk.com, I won't try to rehash all the details. But I do want to describe my experiences using this gizmo, and compare it directly to my older HR10-250 TiVO DVR.

First, the "-700" in the model number is pretty much irrelevant. As I understand it, these numbers distinguish units made for DirecTV by different contract manufacturers. On the HR10-250, the "-250" part referred to the size of the hard disk. That certainly isn't true on the HR21-700, so don't be misled. According to that dbstalk.com review, the HR21-700 comes with a 320GB hard drive, but I suspect the particular model of hard disk may vary. I haven't opened mine up, and I don't know how to get the software user interface to tell me the size or type of hard disk inside.

On the outside, the HR21 is a handsome product. It has a nice "piano black" finish and appropriately dim blue LEDs on the front panel. I hate it when consumer electronics gizmos use bright LEDs, especially for home-theater applications; DirecTV got this right. The center control has a blue-lit ring around it, and the lighting appears to spin when the DVR is performing certain functions, like resuming play after a pause.

The remote control, on the other hand, is relatively colorful. The face is white and gray; the buttons are mostly white, black, and gray, with a bright-orange SELECT button in the center, an orange dot on the REC button, and a set of red, green, yellow, and blue buttons that serve various special functions in the user interface. It isn't as comfortable to handle or use as the HR10's TiVo "dogbone" remote, though, and I think it has more buttons than it really needs... three to turn things on or off, separate BACK and EXIT buttons, etc.

The user interface on the HR21 is a mix of good and bad. A lot of the features are just awkward-- odd mixes of hierarchical menus and commands associated with all those buttons on the remote. There are some very nice features, such as easy access to a list of the last several channels viewed-- the HR10 could pop back and forth between the current and last channel, but that was never quite good enough for me.

My disappointment with the HR21 comes from the major features it doesn't have. The biggest failing is the inability to assign the two tuners in the unit to different channels and flip back and forth between them. I used this feature all the time on the TiVo HR10, since it was so convenient. I could take advantage of commercial breaks or boring sections of one show to use the other tuner to look for other shows, pausing and resuming one channel or the other as I flicked back and forth.

The HR21 can record two shows, or record one channel while watching another, and it's possible to switch between the tuners in these modes, but it's much more awkward than the TiVo solution and in practical terms it isn't worth bothering with most of the time. Since this is one of the most attractive features of the HR10, and the HR21 has all the hardware needed to implement it, I can only assume that this feature was deliberately omitted by DirecTV. My guess-- and it's only a guess-- is that the feature is patented by TiVo. Of course, it seems to me that many of the features of the HR21 could be covered by TiVo patents, so I've often wondered if DirecTV got some kind of patent license from TiVo as part of the two companies' earlier cooperative development efforts. I just have no idea what the real situation is.

Another major missing feature is the lack of tuners for local digital TV broadcasts. The older HR20 had these, but the HR21 dropped them, presumably for cost reasons. DirecTV will soon introduce another gizmo called the AM21 that hooks up to the HR21 via USB and provides those missing digital TV receivers. It looks like this is probably how I'll get this capability back after DirecTV (or its local contract installer) screwed up this part of my upgrade, but since the AM21 isn't shipping yet, I can't get DirecTV to tell me for sure whether they'll be able to send me one.

Other features, such as slow-motion playback, are badly implemented. The slow-motion feature sometimes takes several seconds to engage, making it virtually impossible to play back a specific scene in slow motion. When it works, it's also not nearly slow enough. It's so bad that I've basically given up on this feature entirely, relying instead on the freeze-frame and frame-advance features, which work quite well-- even a little better than on the HR10. Similarly, skipping to the beginning or end of the recording buffer often doesn't work as documented.

One thing I find very strange is the way the HR21 implements multiple video formats. The HR10 was very limited in this respect; it can output in 480i (standard-def interlaced video), 480p, 720p, and 1080i (the major modes of digital TV broadcasts) but it gave no further control over letterboxing or stretching the video to help it display properly on the TV. The HR21 offers all of these extra capabilities, but most of them don't do anything useful. Sometimes the standard modes-- the ones that correspond to the basic modes in the HR10-- clip off parts of the active area of the TV program. This is very noticeable and irritating when captions are clipped off in commercials or news programs.

The other problem with the HR21 is that it's not very reliable. Although all the signal-strength measurements are very high, I get frequent video and audio errors. For a second or two, all or part of the screen will dissolve into green blocks and noise, or the audio will stutter. In some cases, I can be sure these errors are not caused by problems receiving the signal, because I can rewind five or ten seconds and the program plays through normally. Since it's playing the same bits the second time, any problems have to lie in the playback circuitry and software.

The HR21 has also recorded entire programs without an audio track. It doesn't help to stop and restart the playback; there's just no audio there as far as the HR21 can tell.

On the other hand, the HR21 hasn't yet rebooted spontaneously, as the HR10 used to do once every month or two. So that's good.

There are some other things I like about the HR21. For example, I record the local and network evening news programs and watch them when I get home. The HR21 is smart enough to treat these recordings as part of the live recording buffer, so as long as the unit is still tuned to the same channel, I can watch one program followed by the other without having to dip into the list of recorded programs.

That list is very well organized on the HR21, with similar programs being grouped together. The HR21's hierarchical list still has room for improvement, but it's better than the HR10's flat list.

The HR21 also makes it easier to select a program in the guide for recording one or all upcoming episodes. With four speeds, rewinding and fast-forwarding are more useful than on the HR10, and the HR21 matches a traditional TiVo feature: after fast-forwarding through commercials, hitting Play causes the unit to back up a few seconds so no part of the program is missed.

I've taken a lot of detailed notes about the behavior of the HR21, but I think I'll skip all of that for now and just deliver the bottom line: the HR21 has some nice features, but the key features it's missing, and the unreliability of basic functions like recording and playback that I've observed on my brand-new model, make it a less than satisfactory product.

I'll continue to accumulate notes on the HR21 and I'll probably post a follow-up in the next few months, especially as I gain experience with some of the unit's advanced features and I get that AM21 or some other way to restore local digital-TV broadcast capability.

I posted the general outline of my problems with a DirecTV upgrade a few days ago. Now for some of the details.

DirecTV logo

(Credit: DIRECTV, Inc.)

When DirecTV called me in February to talk me into upgrading my hardware, I had three pieces of equipment in operation: a dish antenna configured to receive signals from DirecTV's three older satellites, an RCA DTC100 HD receiver in my bedroom, and a Hughes HR10-250 HD TiVo DVR (digital video recorder) in my living room.

DirecTV made a simple offer: if I simply said "yes," they'd send out a professional installer with a new dish, a new HD receiver (the H20 or H21 models capable of receiving the new MPEG-4 channels), and a new HD DVR (the HR20 or HR21 models).

I really didn't want to lose all the great features of my TiVo box, but I knew there'd be no choice; eventually I'd have to switch. So I said yes. I got an appointment for the next week-- February 28, as it happened. When I asked about the differences between the different models of receiver and DVR, the DirecTV representative said I could get the information on the Internet. He gave me the phone number of DirecTV's service department and encouraged me to call to verify the appointment and find out what equipment would be installed.

Over the next few days I looked into these model numbers for the receiver and DVR to see if there was any basis for choosing between them. It turns out the "21" models are newer but lack the internal tuners for local digital broadcasts. That was a problem for me, since I regularly watched these broadcasts on my HR10-250. So on Feb. 25, I called the number I was given and spoke with a Molisha. She verified the appointment schedule, and I asked if she could specify that I wanted to get the HR20 DVR instead of the HR21. She responded evasively, but eventually I got her to admit that she could do that.

On Feb. 28, the installer showed up... with a new antenna and an HR21-700 DVR. His work order didn't say anything about the HR20 (though I learned later that DirecTV's version of the service request did mention it), and it didn't mention the new receiver for the bedroom at all (though again DirecTV's records show this was part of the order).

The installer placed a call to his dispatcher to see if he could get an HR20 and went up to the roof to install the new dish. I asked him to leave the old dish in place, just in case, and he agreed. He eventually heard from his dispatcher that no new HR20 models were available, only customer returns, and he recommended I take the HR21 and work it out with DirecTV. That seemed reasonable, since DirecTV was going to have to send me the missing receiver anyway.

So the installer and I hooked up the HR21, he made the call to get it activated, and that was that.

But when I went up to the roof to check out the new antenna, I discovered that not only had the installer not left the old dish in place, he'd left it disassembled in multiple pieces. The big pieces were lying on the roof surrounded by some of the mounting hardware (bolts, nuts, washers, etc.). The other hardware had rolled down into my gutter. I think that's pretty awful.

I emailed DirecTV through its website once while the installer was at the house, and again afterward, but they haven't gotten back to me yet. But in reviewing my account information while researching this post, I discovered that DirecTV marked the Feb. 28 appointment as both "installed" and "cancelled" and entered a new order on March 10 that refers to installing a dish and relocating (not replacing) my existing receivers. Perhaps this means someone got my emails but completely misunderstood them.

I'll give them a call, and post here again when I find out what the company is able to do to rectify these problems. And I'll also be posting a review of the new HR21-700 DVR. The more I use it, the more I discover flaws and shortcomings relative to my trusty old TiVo. It isn't all bad; there are a few features of this unit that work pretty well. I'll cover them all, soon.

DirecTV is in the middle of a long-planned upgrade to new satellite broadcast technology. The company has launched new satellites that use MPEG-4 video compression to carry an ever-increasing number of HDTV stations, both local and national.

I've been a DirecTV subscriber for many years. In fact, I signed up in 2000 because I wanted to take a look at the then-new RCA DTC100 HD receiver. I didn't even have an HDTV, but I did have a high-quality 21" CRT computer monitor that the DTC100 could drive. It wasn't good for large audiences, but for one or two people at a time, it was a real eye-opener. Eventually I got a real HDTV and the Hughes HR10-250 TiVo DVR (digital video recorder) for DirecTV. That was a great combination, one of the best high-tech purchases I've ever made.

Late last year, DirecTV started calling me, inviting me to upgrade my equipment so that I could start receiving the new MPEG-4 channels. The representatives explained that the MPEG-2 HD channels I was watching on the DTC100 and HR10-250 would be phased out, and I would need to get new receivers eventually anyway.

But I really didn't want to upgrade. See, DirecTV and TiVo don't get along any more. DirecTV sells its own DVRs, and all the reports I read online said these non-TiVo models were pretty bad. I wanted to hang onto my HR10-250 as long as possible, hoping there'd be a new TiVo-branded DirecTV DVR before the old MPEG-2 channels were cut off.

But eventually I forced myself to accept that wasn't going to happen, so when DirecTV called again last month and offered to give me a new receiver to replace the DTC100, a new DVR to replace the HR10-250, and free installation of a new dish antenna, I gave in and scheduled the appointment.

I should have held out longer. I had problems getting the appointment set up, big problems with the work done by the installer, more problems with DirecTV customer service, and now I'm stuck with a mediocre DVR, DirecTV's HR21-700, that doesn't do all the things my HR10-250 did.

I'll explain what happened and provide a detailed review of the HR21-700 over the next few days.

(Credit: Sanyo)

Summer's coming, and that means you're going to see plenty of opportunities to get wet. Whether you're swimming in a pool or surfing at a beach, you're probably going to get soaked in the next few months. Unfortunately, most camcorders simply can't take the moisture. The Olympus Stylus 770SW and the Pentax Optio W30 are two of the few digital cameras you can take swimming with you, but even they're not the best choice for shooting video.

Sanyo just announced the Xacti E1, a waterproof pocket camcorder. This new gadget can handle getting dunked up to five feet for an hour, all while recording video to an SDHC memory card. Like the Xacti VPC-CG65 we reported on a few months ago, the E1 uses MPEG-4 h.264 video compression, and can get up to five hours of 30fps VGA footage onto a 4GB SDHC card. The E1 can also snap 6-megapixel still images, if you want to keep more static memories of your underwater antics.

Because it uses an SD card to store all of its videos and photos, the E1 is very small and light. It measures just 4.4 inches high and 1.6 inches thick, and weighs just 8.3 ounces with battery and an SD or SDHC card. Though you'll have to purchase the SD card separately, the E1 will include a copy of Adobe Premiere Elements 3.0 for Windows XP/Vista. Considering that a 4GB SD card can be found for around $50 and Adobe Premiere Elements retails for about $100, that's a pretty good accessories trade-off.

The Sanyo Xacti E1 is hitting stores and shores in mid-June. It will come in blue, yellow, and white versions, each with a suggested retail price of $500.