Chrome extensions draw near, but advanced HTML 5 features recede
A new developer version of Chrome takes some significant strides to adding the top-requested feature--the ability to accommodate extensions that customize what Google's browser can do--but programmers also pushed back support for a collection of significant advanced Web features.
Google Chrome 2.0.180.0 emerged Tuesday night for people willing to try the developer preview version. The new version installs some of the plumbing necessary to support the feature, according to the release notes.
"The extensions posse would like to point out that as of today's dev channel release, extensions are starting to be a bit more useful. We can now put little bits of UI (user interface) in the chrome of Chrome, and some of the APIs (application programming interfaces) are starting to come together," said Google programmer Aaron Boodman in a mailing list post Tuesday. "There is still quite a ways to go, but if you're interested in building extensions for Chrome, this might be a good time to start taking a look."
Extensions are a big advantage Mozilla's Firefox has over rival browsers, not just because the browser supports them but because thousands are available.
A lightweight sample Chrome extension shows how many Gmail messages you have.
(Credit: Google)Google also updated its extensions how-to page and provided some sample Chrome extensions. To use extensions, people must launch the browser through the command line with the "--enable-extensions" option.
Extensions work has begun. Cleeki has a Chrome extension, for example, that lets people select a word and then perform various actions with it such as searching for it without leaving that page.
The new version also lets you allow pop-ups from a specific Web site, fixes a few bugs, and upgrades to the latest versions of two major components, WebKit for rendering Web pages and V8 for handling JavaScript.
At the same time, though, it looks like more waiting for fans of a handful of new features arriving in HTML 5, the upcoming revision to the Hypertext Markup Language that's used to describe Web pages. Chrome developers had planned support for several HTML 5 features in a forthcoming main incarnation of Chrome, version 2.1, but now they've been pushed back to 3.0. (That's still a ways out: Even version 2.0 has yet to arrive in Google's mainstream "stable" version of Chrome.)
The HTML 5 features pushed back include the following:
Local storage, technology for storing information on a person's computer. That's good for using your Web-based e-mail system while offline, storing browser extension preferences, and other more sophisticated aspects of Web usage.
Video support that permits easier embedding of video on Web pages and better integration than is possible with current video technology such as Adobe Systems' Flash.
Web workers, which let a browser perform processing chores in the background. This technology enables more sophisticated Web applications that can get work done without bogging down the user interface.
A Chrome programmer noted the change in a terse note Wednesday. "Moving out of Mstone:2.1 (milestone 2.1) as there just isn't enough time to work on this issue," said a Chrome programmer in a status update note about the local storage feature on Wednesday.
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 



The fact is that Firefox has SHEER ### in terms of addons, and although theres a lot of junk, there still is a large amount of invaluable addons. Therefore, while Chrome boasts speed and simplicity for now, it will never match Firefox in addons.
And whatever feature that Chrome or any other browser has, an addon for that comes to Firefox sooner or later!
- Adblock Plus along with the Element Hiding Helper
- Tab Mix Plus
- Mouse Gestures
- Down Them All
- Firebug
- Web Developer Toolbar
- Xmarks (formerly Foxmarks)
- FoxyTunes
- URL Fixer
The point is all the competition is good and drive the development of better browsers. We should be encouraging this competition and hoping Chrome is successful as it will drive Firefox, IE, etc. to improve their products too.
I adopted Firefox early in its development phase and for years thought I could not live without all my extension and add ons. When Google Chrome made the scene suddenly I realized all I really needed was a simple and speedy browser that did the simple things better. I haven't looked back.
Google should let Firefox have the users who love to customize and make their browser do everything under the sun. Google should focus their more browser more on what they started out the focus to be, a browser that was fast, used low resources, and was meant to integrate with the Google "cloud" apps that exist currently and that are planned for the future.
I am a big boy now. I wear big boy pants. I have out grown the need for Firefox and the need to constantly tweak my browser. I want to float in the clouds and not feel bogged down. Firefox lost its path and became a resource hog. Why does Google now want to follow?
(There is always a way to improve a browser, an so far Firefox is the only browser to offer that option. Do you have any idea how many things addons can do?? the possibilities are limitless!!)
2. True Firefox is a hog, but thats what the updates keep improving. And yes Chrome is more smoother!
3. Agree, Chrome should stick to its guns (Speed, Performance, Clean, Speed). If it tries to beat Firefox on its own turf ... gonna get annihilated (a majority of extension creators are already onboard with Firefox)
4. However, without addons Chrome isnt gonna improve its numbers. the remaning people who use IE are not gonna switch ... lets face the way things are moving it IE will have the majority for years to come (sad)! the only group that will bother to switch to Chrome are from Firefox ... and they want Addons over speed (Firefox is still pretty fast!)
5. Google should use its muscles to get Chrome preinstalled in computer! So that it can take on IE instead of Firefox!
I was just looking at The Laws of Simplcity (see http://lawsofsimplicity.com/)
which comes from someone out of MIT Media Labs.
Yes, I too used to enjoy fiddling with the technology of my personal computer
and web browsers and home network. Well, that thrill is definitely gone,
now I am more interested in what works for everyone, not just the geeks.
Kinda like what Cooper talked about in the "Inmates are running the asylum".
Chrome hasn't yet become a major force, but it's certainly on my short
list of what I'm watching...
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=3
But look how Firefox is kicking ass ... Chrome is still kinda slow ... but @ least IE 6 is dying (thank GOD)
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=1&qpcustom=Firefox
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=1&qpcustom=Chrome
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=3&qpcustom=Microsoft+Internet+Explorer+6.0
FireFox is plenty a slim speedey browser, its what you make of it, with whatever add-ons are installed. No mention of Opera 10, build -1413 anywhere on download.com. Chrome will not pass acid3 the way it stands, an by the way, i`m on win7-RC1 while writing this, i`m not impressed. Crashes mIRC constantly. No easy way to close the side bar. Sidebar does not have auto-hide an it goes on...
>Haiku< Get Ready!
Google Reader Notifier for Chrome (http://www.vasanth.in/software/google-reader-notifier-for-chrome/)
Page Rank for Chrome (http://www.vasanth.in/software/page-rank-for-chrome/)
Pass it on to your readers if you find it interesting.
- by kyac May 15, 2009 11:02 PM PDT
- what will u, firefox users, will do if u read "Firefox Addons now compatible with Chrome"¿....
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- by firefoxluva95 May 16, 2009 7:26 AM PDT
- I won't do anything because it won't happen.
-
-
(26 Comments)