• On The Insider: Dennis Hopper Diagnosed with Cancer
May 13, 2009 3:36 PM PDT

Chrome extensions draw near, but advanced HTML 5 features recede

by Stephen Shankland

A new developer version of Chrome takes some significant strides to adding the top-requested feature--the ability to accommodate extensions that customize what Google's browser can do--but programmers also pushed back support for a collection of significant advanced Web features.

Google Chrome 2.0.180.0 emerged Tuesday night for people willing to try the developer preview version. The new version installs some of the plumbing necessary to support the feature, according to the release notes.

"The extensions posse would like to point out that as of today's dev channel release, extensions are starting to be a bit more useful. We can now put little bits of UI (user interface) in the chrome of Chrome, and some of the APIs (application programming interfaces) are starting to come together," said Google programmer Aaron Boodman in a mailing list post Tuesday. "There is still quite a ways to go, but if you're interested in building extensions for Chrome, this might be a good time to start taking a look."

Extensions are a big advantage Mozilla's Firefox has over rival browsers, not just because the browser supports them but because thousands are available.

A lightweight sample Chrome extension shows how many Gmail messages you have.

A lightweight sample Chrome extension shows how many Gmail messages you have.

(Credit: Google)

Google also updated its extensions how-to page and provided some sample Chrome extensions. To use extensions, people must launch the browser through the command line with the "--enable-extensions" option.

Extensions work has begun. Cleeki has a Chrome extension, for example, that lets people select a word and then perform various actions with it such as searching for it without leaving that page.

The new version also lets you allow pop-ups from a specific Web site, fixes a few bugs, and upgrades to the latest versions of two major components, WebKit for rendering Web pages and V8 for handling JavaScript.

At the same time, though, it looks like more waiting for fans of a handful of new features arriving in HTML 5, the upcoming revision to the Hypertext Markup Language that's used to describe Web pages. Chrome developers had planned support for several HTML 5 features in a forthcoming main incarnation of Chrome, version 2.1, but now they've been pushed back to 3.0. (That's still a ways out: Even version 2.0 has yet to arrive in Google's mainstream "stable" version of Chrome.)

The HTML 5 features pushed back include the following:

• Local storage, technology for storing information on a person's computer. That's good for using your Web-based e-mail system while offline, storing browser extension preferences, and other more sophisticated aspects of Web usage.

• Video support that permits easier embedding of video on Web pages and better integration than is possible with current video technology such as Adobe Systems' Flash.

• Web workers, which let a browser perform processing chores in the background. This technology enables more sophisticated Web applications that can get work done without bogging down the user interface.

A Chrome programmer noted the change in a terse note Wednesday. "Moving out of Mstone:2.1 (milestone 2.1) as there just isn't enough time to work on this issue," said a Chrome programmer in a status update note about the local storage feature on Wednesday.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Webware
Popular iPhone movie app flops on BlackBerry
Opera Mobile 10 beta browser: First Look video
Google trying not to cross 'the creepy line'
Integrated retweet on its way to Twitter
Mozilla's e-mail group looks toward the cloud
Facebook: We're going after scammy ads, too
Alterna-browsers Firefox, Chrome get quick fixes
Offerpal Media mess gets stickier
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (26 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Angmarr May 13, 2009 4:01 PM PDT
As Firefox 3.5 is about to make a grand entrance with batter speed/ performance! I don't see Chrome having any chance.

The fact is that Firefox has SHEER ### in terms of addons, and although theres a lot of junk, there still is a large amount of invaluable addons. Therefore, while Chrome boasts speed and simplicity for now, it will never match Firefox in addons.
And whatever feature that Chrome or any other browser has, an addon for that comes to Firefox sooner or later!
Reply to this comment
by knowles2 May 14, 2009 2:08 PM PDT
well fire 3.5 beta is no where near as fast as beta of chrome. And firebox beta crashes more than chrome beta does, way more.
by Randomweirdo May 16, 2009 3:19 AM PDT
The only reason I stick with Firefox is for the addons. If Chrome got a lot of addons (which it probably will) then I'd probably consider switching.
by firefoxluva95 May 16, 2009 7:19 AM PDT
Really? What is this crashing you speak of because I don't have crashes on Firefox but Chrome beta crashes a lot more often. As for addons, the following addons must make it to Chrome before I even consider a switch:

- Adblock Plus along with the Element Hiding Helper
- Tab Mix Plus
- Mouse Gestures
- Down Them All
- Firebug
- Web Developer Toolbar
- Xmarks (formerly Foxmarks)
- FoxyTunes
- URL Fixer
by joelasaro June 20, 2009 10:20 PM PDT
Why does everyone seem to think it is either or? Chrome is amazingly fast, so for most web browsing I love it. I use IE still for sites that work best in that (some stuff for work for example) and frankly they keep improving that browser too. If I needed a plugin or I am using my Ubuntu installation I use Firefox. I am thinking of checking out Flock too for social sites. I prefer Coke, but will enjoy a Pepsi occasionally and a root beer or Dr. Pepper is tasty too!

The point is all the competition is good and drive the development of better browsers. We should be encouraging this competition and hoping Chrome is successful as it will drive Firefox, IE, etc. to improve their products too.
by indiemixer May 13, 2009 4:19 PM PDT
When Chrome gets Ad-Block, I don't think I'll have to turn back to Firefox.
Reply to this comment
by xinnianhao May 13, 2009 8:33 PM PDT
You can already download ad-block to Google Chrome. The beta and dev channels work. Go to adsweep.com and follow the instructions. Works like a charm.
by firefoxluva95 May 16, 2009 7:24 AM PDT
Correction: Adsweep.org but again...Adblock Plus has updated filters which keeps things simple. It's not as simple to edit or add/delete Adsweep filters and then you have exceptions because sometimes Adsweep can break a page by removing an ad.
by Aaron Kempf May 13, 2009 4:20 PM PDT
I agree-- I don't think that Google has any business trying to compete in 100 different markets at once. the kids running google remind me of napoleon.. they get too stretched out all over europe -- they over extend themselves.. and then they fail. I hope google goes titsup!
Reply to this comment
by AlphaZeta May 13, 2009 5:27 PM PDT
Never say never... The good news is that open source is making inroads into the stronghold of MS world...
Reply to this comment
by Pointedly May 13, 2009 6:41 PM PDT
I think its just as well (and better for the entire planet) if Mozilla takes the lead in implementing HTML 5.0. Mozilla will make Firefox highly compliant with HTML 5.0 standards. Other browser makers should either follow Mozilla's lead exactly or get out of the way.
Reply to this comment
by forever4now May 14, 2009 3:53 AM PDT
It would be great, to have an HTML5 compliant Firefox. Then web developers would be able to seriously consider rolling out web sites that implement some of its cool features. The biggest obstacle is IE, which is likely to be the last to support HTML5, but has the largest market share.
by firefoxluva95 May 16, 2009 7:27 AM PDT
Don't forget CSS3 too.
by RCHOBO May 13, 2009 6:59 PM PDT
I have a genius idea. How about my browser is just a browser.

I adopted Firefox early in its development phase and for years thought I could not live without all my extension and add ons. When Google Chrome made the scene suddenly I realized all I really needed was a simple and speedy browser that did the simple things better. I haven't looked back.

Google should let Firefox have the users who love to customize and make their browser do everything under the sun. Google should focus their more browser more on what they started out the focus to be, a browser that was fast, used low resources, and was meant to integrate with the Google "cloud" apps that exist currently and that are planned for the future.

I am a big boy now. I wear big boy pants. I have out grown the need for Firefox and the need to constantly tweak my browser. I want to float in the clouds and not feel bogged down. Firefox lost its path and became a resource hog. Why does Google now want to follow?
Reply to this comment
by Angmarr May 13, 2009 8:06 PM PDT
1. Just because your a big boy (whatever that means) doesn't mean everyone wants to get rid of addons
(There is always a way to improve a browser, an so far Firefox is the only browser to offer that option. Do you have any idea how many things addons can do?? the possibilities are limitless!!)

2. True Firefox is a hog, but thats what the updates keep improving. And yes Chrome is more smoother!

3. Agree, Chrome should stick to its guns (Speed, Performance, Clean, Speed). If it tries to beat Firefox on its own turf ... gonna get annihilated (a majority of extension creators are already onboard with Firefox)

4. However, without addons Chrome isnt gonna improve its numbers. the remaning people who use IE are not gonna switch ... lets face the way things are moving it IE will have the majority for years to come (sad)! the only group that will bother to switch to Chrome are from Firefox ... and they want Addons over speed (Firefox is still pretty fast!)

5. Google should use its muscles to get Chrome preinstalled in computer! So that it can take on IE instead of Firefox!
by firefoxluva95 May 16, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
In that case I don't want a browser. I want an application that helps be browse the web with enhancements that help me browse the web better.
by daherrhoyman May 26, 2009 10:30 AM PDT
Simplicity may well rule here, yep.
I was just looking at The Laws of Simplcity (see http://lawsofsimplicity.com/)
which comes from someone out of MIT Media Labs.

Yes, I too used to enjoy fiddling with the technology of my personal computer
and web browsers and home network. Well, that thrill is definitely gone,
now I am more interested in what works for everyone, not just the geeks.
Kinda like what Cooper talked about in the "Inmates are running the asylum".

Chrome hasn't yet become a major force, but it's certainly on my short
list of what I'm watching...
by Angmarr May 13, 2009 8:13 PM PDT
Look at people who use IE 7 .... NO SHIFT WHATSOEVER! saddddd (46% -47%) The only reason that its going down is because of the shift to IE 8
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=3

But look how Firefox is kicking ass ... Chrome is still kinda slow ... but @ least IE 6 is dying (thank GOD)
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=1&qpcustom=Firefox
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=1&qpcustom=Chrome
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=3&qpcustom=Microsoft+Internet+Explorer+6.0
Reply to this comment
by queticomn May 13, 2009 8:14 PM PDT
Haiku

FireFox is plenty a slim speedey browser, its what you make of it, with whatever add-ons are installed. No mention of Opera 10, build -1413 anywhere on download.com. Chrome will not pass acid3 the way it stands, an by the way, i`m on win7-RC1 while writing this, i`m not impressed. Crashes mIRC constantly. No easy way to close the side bar. Sidebar does not have auto-hide an it goes on...

>Haiku< Get Ready!
Reply to this comment
by flickrz May 14, 2009 10:17 AM PDT
So, when is the Mac version coming for all mac fanboys?
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 May 16, 2009 7:27 AM PDT
Whenever Google is ready to pwn Safari.
by vasanthdharmaraj May 14, 2009 1:08 PM PDT
I have built a couple you might want to check out:

Google Reader Notifier for Chrome (http://www.vasanth.in/software/google-reader-notifier-for-chrome/)
Page Rank for Chrome (http://www.vasanth.in/software/page-rank-for-chrome/)

Pass it on to your readers if you find it interesting.
Reply to this comment
by Clothahump May 15, 2009 8:36 AM PDT
I have been using Firefox 3.5 beta 3 since it's release. It hasn't crashed once.
Reply to this comment
by Lockjaw May 15, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
firefox supports turning off images.. i'd like to see a similar feature in chrome..
Reply to this comment
by kyac May 15, 2009 11:02 PM PDT
what will u, firefox users, will do if u read "Firefox Addons now compatible with Chrome"¿....
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 May 16, 2009 7:26 AM PDT
I won't do anything because it won't happen.
(26 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right