• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
March 30, 2009 11:20 PM PDT

Cheating husband caught on Google Street View?

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 19 comments

Editors' note: Some readers have pointed out that the Sun's story appears to have been debunked.

Further update 1.58pm PST: The Times of London quoted an esteemed lawyer a couple of days ago who related the broad facts as being true.

He didn't even say he was working late. No, no. He said he was away on business.

However, his wife, bathing in uncontrollable suspicion, decided to do the only thing she could. She dialed up the local detective agency. Yes, Google Street View.

In the story as related by the Sun newspaper (and which still, as of 7.50am PST sits proudly on the Sun's Website), the unnamed woman seems to have had some sense of whom her errant husband might be squiring.

She Google-zoomed in on the woman's house and discovered that her husband's Range Rover proved that he was, indeed, roving.

Whatever will they pick up next?

(Credit: CC Byrion)

Yes, its distinctive shape, and its even more distinctive fancy hubcaps, were parked exactly where they shouldn't be.

Divorce appears to be proceeding.

Britain has already been shaken to what remains of its foundations by Google Street View's unerring ability to discover people and things where an idealist might wish they weren't: from the vomiting man to the man walking out of a sex shop. Yes, not even the same man.

One can only hope for some form of reconciliation in the sad Google Street View divorce. At the very least, wouldn't it be nice if Google picked up the legal bills? Or if the company offered to pay for counseling? On the other hand, will the poor husband threaten to sue Google?

And now, despite some confusion as to whether this whole story is nothing more than a street legend, perhaps some doubtful wife will today be inspired to leap to Street View to find evidence of her husband's philandering.

Unlike with marriage, the possibilities with Google Street View are endless.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Man loses job after searching too hard for aliens
A slightly unfortunate Twitter billboard
Droid does, iPhone doesn't: The porn app store
How can Dell Netbook be 'perfect for tweeting'?
Black Friday at Best Buy: What's the big deal?
AT&T gets Luke Wilson to hit Verizon again
NBA star won't tweet until he has 1 million followers
Man marries video game character
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by coryschulz March 31, 2009 12:31 AM PDT
Ha ha, that was funny.
Reply to this comment
by bugma302 March 31, 2009 2:28 AM PDT
Oh dear Chris, this is The Sun we're talking about - a quick guide to British Tabloid speak for you "unnamed woman" = made up person, "a close friend said" = I just thought this up, "a source who wished to remain anonymous" = the cleaner.
Reply to this comment
by donpp March 31, 2009 3:46 AM PDT
Kind of a long shot. It isn't like the street view van comes by every day! Most residential streets it has been by only once ever, or (more likely) not yet at all.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease March 31, 2009 4:31 AM PDT
"Divorce appears to be proceeding"

That probably was in the offing before the husband got off with another woman.
Reply to this comment
by henebry March 31, 2009 4:39 AM PDT
I agree with the others. This story (and the woman in the story) both seem to assume that Google Street View offers something like real-time surveillance. It doesn't, and I'd expect you to know better.
Reply to this comment
by JCPayne March 31, 2009 5:37 AM PDT
CNN does this all the time with GoogleMaps then they seem confused why a building or something that is reportedly on fire isn't from the "satellite view".... Too bad the poor soul don't know most of those photos are actually taken by high altitude aeroplanes.
by JCPayne March 31, 2009 5:35 AM PDT
How will she prove tha actual date that the drive-by photo was snapped? Good luck to her and him... I hope he doesn't think about suing Google... Because In the words of the comedian wanda sykes that would be like suing your prostetute for causing your divorce.
Reply to this comment
by keislerj March 31, 2009 5:42 AM PDT
I don't believe it. Sounds like an urban legend.
Reply to this comment
by SeanMurricane March 31, 2009 5:49 AM PDT
Ha!

http://idiotforever.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/how-i-duped-the-sun/

Morons.
Reply to this comment
by dave_cross March 31, 2009 5:54 AM PDT
You really don't want to believe anything you read in the Sun.

http://idiotforever.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/how-i-duped-the-sun/

It's a complete hoax.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk March 31, 2009 7:45 AM PDT
@dave_cross,

The thing is, I DON'T believe everything I read in the Sun. Which is why I wrote "in the story as related to the Sun newspaper." But I should have looked at the calendar more closely. Always thought April Fool's nonsense happens on the day, not the day before.

Chris
by biffhenerson March 31, 2009 5:57 AM PDT
B as in "B", S as in "S"
Reply to this comment
by teraguru1 March 31, 2009 6:25 AM PDT
This writer is very hard to follow.
Reply to this comment
by Blacksheep1982 March 31, 2009 6:32 AM PDT
Yeah I figured it was a hoax. Like others pointed out, the Google Street view van probably drives down a street once, the end. What are the odds of it catching you or anyone you know doing anything? Very low. It just seems to ridiculous to think that the Google van managed to drive by this "cheating woman's" house right when her husband was parked in front of it.

The odds of catching someone you know doing something on Google Street View has to be like 1 in 10 million. I know Google van will never even drive down my street, I live way out in the country lol. Well, not waaaaaay out, but far enough from the cities in an already obscure state.
Reply to this comment
by henebry March 31, 2009 8:49 AM PDT
On the other hand, the odds of the Google van catching someone (anyone) doing something embarrassing are quite high. You're looking at it from the perspective of the husband, but you should be looking at the probability from the perspective of the millions of internet viewers.

It's like when there's a program that invites people with some rare disease to call in for a discussion. The individual people who call in were really unlucky. "What were the odds that I might catch Leprosy?" they might ask. But the odds that you, sitting at home, will get to see/hear someone on TV who has leprosy are close to 1.
by gazblue March 31, 2009 7:10 AM PDT
Funny story probably Sun hot air though, I actually drove behind a MPV from Stirling to Tillicoutry a few weeks ago that hads the exact set-up on top and only now realize what it was, I thought at the time it was yet another speed trap device so stayed behind until i had to turn off the road.
Reply to this comment
by man_w_balls March 31, 2009 7:14 AM PDT
I hope that van doesn't catch me whacking off in Tom Anderson's trailer. Heh heh, heh heh
Reply to this comment
by Atomic1fire March 31, 2009 7:13 PM PDT
the story appears to be fake,
the person who made up the story even used a image that wasn't on street view,
and made up two names (one which happened to have some credibility, as it shared the name of a media lawyer, though the prankster didn't realize it, or care)
and the fact that the story spread is more of a check your facts type thing, then a haha on sun, since other news sources seem to fall for the story
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk March 31, 2009 9:20 PM PDT
@Atomic1fire,

Please check the link from the Times of London and see what you think.

Chris
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

S.F. hacker space: Heaven for the DIY set?

The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
• Photos: Circuits, code, community

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right