• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
April 16, 2009 11:49 PM PDT

Ashton outmaneuvers CNN to 1 million on Twitter

by Daniel Terdiman
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 43 comments

Moments after Ashton Kutcher became the first to a million Twitter followers, the actor touts his win over CNN.

(Credit: Twitter)

This had to be one of the weirdest pieces of media I've ever seen: watching actor Ashton Kutcher, streaming live on the Web, and Anderson Cooper, broadcasting live on CNN, each pimping their Twitter accounts, trying to exhort the world to help them become the first to reach 1 million followers.

As Kutcher--as well as a host of guests at what I presume was his and wife Demi Moore's house, and even P. Diddy, who was on speakerphone at the house--put it, this was a battle between old-guard TV and newer-kid-on-the-block Web.

In the end, the battle to a million was about as close as it could be. And the winner late Thursday was Kutcher and the Web--never mind that Kutcher himself is a creature of old-guard TV and film.

Ashton Kutcher pops a bottle of champagne just seconds after realizing he'd won.

(Credit: UStream)

He won by less than 2,000 total followers.

The race started heating up Wednesday when CNN acquired the @cnnbrk Twitter account--the largest Twitter account at the time with 947,000 followers. Kutcher was in second place at that point, with 917,000 followers.

Personally, I could care less about Kutcher's celebrity and his ability to get tons and tons of people to do the almost unbelievably easy task of clicking "follow" on his Twitter account. Rather, it was seeing this real-time face-off between Kutcher, streaming live on UStream, and Cooper, working it hard on his evening broadcast of "AC 360."

To be fair, Kutcher had an advantage: he was able to stay totally on message on his Web stream, while Cooper had to limit his exhortations to short bursts of enthusiasm sandwiched between, you know, real news stories.

Still, given the fact that there were clearly large numbers of people actively watching the battle, I have to admit that I'm surprised Cooper didn't cut to a report--and a live interview--with Kutcher once the victor was known.

So, variously, this was pure round-number stat cotton candy for the eyes, a down-to-the-wire, nail-biter race, and, I think, most importantly, a truly interesting and profound moment of genre vs. genre. Grassroots, democratic do-it-yourself Web streaming vs. big media at its most polished. Both reaching to the masses, referencing each other, live.

To be sure, the mixing of media is nothing new. But to me, and I'm certain many others who were watching the action live, there was something surreal about witnessing the urgency being expressed by both the guy in his living room and the guy on the professional news set, both being able to speak to theoretically unlimited numbers of people (well maybe not unlimited, but you know what I mean) and both standing tall for their medium.

Captivating stuff.

While CNN did not immediately report the news of Kutcher's victory, the network did offer congrats on its Twitter account.

(Credit: Twitter)

Oh, and while I said I was surprised that Cooper didn't do an instant report on CNN about Kutcher's victory, that seems to be due to the limits of what TV allowed him to do. Like I said, he had news to report.

But over on the Web, where the linear constraints of TV don't apply, CNN's Twitter feed offered the network's well wishes.

"Congrats @aplusk," CNN's tweet read. "Ashton Kutcher is the first twitter account to reach 1MM followers."

Congrats, Ashton. And congrats, Web.

Daniel Terdiman is a staff writer at CNET News covering games, Net culture, and everything in between. E-mail Daniel.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (43 Comments)
by inbedwithben April 17, 2009 12:07 AM PDT
Congratulations Ashton... Love your work...

You guy's must check out a chick called http://twitter.com/ijustine she's almost at half a million mark.

I'm a mere mortal and not quite at 1000.... but addicted to the damn thing.

Ben Angel
http://twitter.com/Benangel
Reply to this comment
by Jeff-Jackson April 17, 2009 12:10 AM PDT
I could not figure out if I should be excited or sad about the situation. No question Twitter has hit the tipping point. I recorded the 1MM moment and you can find it here http://jeffjackson.tumblr.com/post/97096387/kelso-takes-down-cnn
Reply to this comment
by oassaf April 17, 2009 12:23 AM PDT
Its more a situation of that unlike facebook, twitter was really meant for news and media outlets, a place to get important news out quickly, not to inform the world you have a wierd back itch and are eating tuna salad. So for Ashton Kutcher to beat CNN at this is pretty remarkable. Now the real test is to see if this actually does change anything twitter and web tv, thats the real test.
Reply to this comment
by elucidmarketing April 17, 2009 12:26 AM PDT
This was an amazing battle, I wonder who won amongst the other celebs. Twittering has grown tremendously, sorry for myspace. Facebook is great, add me at elucid marketing or

Add me on twitter@ elucidmarketing

Join us, while we share ideas and resources to build great social media sites. Our group consist of entrepreneurs, developers, and marketers in a friendly, open sharing web community. Contact us for more, Good Luck CNN, lol.
Reply to this comment
by vahanavagyan April 17, 2009 1:15 AM PDT
Ashton vs CNN battle last minutes (illustrated)! http://tinyurl.com/c7b6tc
Reply to this comment
by rafe01 April 17, 2009 1:35 AM PDT
Yawn.... free advertising... both "new" and "old" media (and up to 2m others) fell for it... well done Twitter!

I wonder if this media paid for bore-fest had more people joining the service (as I'm sure Twitter wanted) or if the subscribers... oh I'm sorry "followers"... were people who already had accounts.

Anyway... a non event for anyone with a life.
Reply to this comment
by MrZook April 17, 2009 7:35 AM PDT
agreed. I didn't know there was a race until I saw this article. I'm shocked that nobody had made it to 1M before. I mean, that myspace skank got famous years ago for having millions of followers.

Oh well, at least a mill+ people will get ashton's retarded info popping up on their accounts.
by DADSGETNDOWN April 18, 2009 3:26 PM PDT
I TOTALLY Agree.
Plus it's probably rigged and defintely a joke that Ashton won anyway.
Besides if "everyone" were to be in this contest, it sure as hell wouldn't be any of those 4 at the top or anywhere near.
by niyyie April 17, 2009 2:21 AM PDT
Good thing the social media won. :)
Reply to this comment
by dascha1 April 17, 2009 3:48 AM PDT
The real test is what to do with Voice and Personality Preservation when the trend ends. In other words, direct support of the old with the new fans for the profession of being "live". Take for instance, Walt Disney, whose showmanship lives on in recordings. But how does the voice endorse say Google or even the word Twitter?
Reply to this comment
by iPhoneUser April 17, 2009 5:03 AM PDT
If you are one of the 1 million people following Kutchar's twitter account, you really should be ashamed of yourself. Sucking up valuable bandwidth for the rest of us. It's just extremely sad that there are this many people who are so bored with their own lives they have to live vicariously through movie stars' twitter accounts. Completely pathetic. All the internet seems to produce lately is these worthless social networking sites that can only generate income through advertising or subscriptions.

I'm guessing that the only reason twitter is so popular right now is simply because there are so many people out of work, sitting at home with literally nothing to do. Do a study on the rise of unemployment vs. the rise in twitter's popularity and the results will shock you.
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok April 17, 2009 7:19 AM PDT
I'm with you! Who cares about this celeb that will be replaced once he's no longer hip enough for MTV?
by MrZook April 17, 2009 7:37 AM PDT
what are you talking about? Ashton is a timeless comedic genius... oh, wait, he makes fart jokes.
by Super2online April 17, 2009 6:02 AM PDT
Some people really do need to GET A LIFE!
Reply to this comment
by rec9140 April 17, 2009 6:20 AM PDT
Lets see.... three things in this that have no meaning to life

1) twitter - its name alone says enough about its usefulness, like the sprint commercial yep, I am in the 26% who don't know, and more importantly don't care. And its blocked by me at work :) .... CRACK! Get back to work!

2) CNN - boring, little to no tech news, or in depth tech, please bring back the old TechTV!

3) ashton kutcher - claim to fame is dating some old hag actress and the same old dreck movies and shows........

Obviously there was a serious shortage of real tech news the past few days.
Reply to this comment
by thelemurking April 17, 2009 7:08 AM PDT
I feel alone here in my hatred towards Twitter. I just can't figure out why people love it so much. I've maybe logged in 10 times total in 3 years. OK, so maybe hatred is to harsh of a word, but seriously, I would rather post on Orkut than I would twitter and hardly no one in the northern hemisphere uses Orkut ;) Pretty much everyone I know is on Facebook or Myspace and I can update my status on both very quickly and easily from my phone, my iPod Touch, and so on. Why would I need to put updates on a 3rd site?

I wasn't aware that Twitter had turned into a popularity contest.
Reply to this comment
by B-McGee April 17, 2009 8:19 AM PDT
Nope, I've hated twitter, myspace and facebook from day one. They are not social networking sites...they are social loitering sites. Networking implies you'll eventually be trading services or be using those people for business contacts, etc. Having 1 million followers that you'll never see, let alone never talk to face to face just shows how egotistical that ass-clown is. People, if this guy saw you in the street, he'd spit on the ground and try to drown you in it.

And CNN, thanks for stooping to a new low. You've actually found a way to discredit yourselves while making FoxNews look that much more journalistic. Congrats.
by sjschaef April 17, 2009 9:33 AM PDT
B-McGee hit the nail on the head.. if CNN didn't already misrepresent the news and lack credibility they certainly cemented it with this..

And I am not just hating on CNN.. all the US News outlets do the same thing. You have to look outside the US to get an objective view of what is going with our country or the world. The news comes with either an extreme liberal (CNN) or conservative (Fox News) slant.
by OneMoreBite_WeightLoss April 17, 2009 7:10 AM PDT
Seriously? Fair contest? I think not. CNN started with an "existing account" where Kushner started with an account just like anyone else. He dreamed up the contest as a way to promote the http://www.MalariaNoMore.net drive to help stamp out Malaria -- plus, it's a huge boon to CNN with everyone following http://www.twitter.com/aplusk also likely now following breaking CNN news with http://www.twitter.com/cnnbrk (why didn't they go with @cnnbn is beyond me -- easier to remember).

I also love the comment that poor Cooper had to occasionally report the, you know, ahem, news, while Kutcher had the huge advantage of being able to post non-stop. You're saying right there that the Internet is a better medium than television. Game, set, match.
Reply to this comment
by HayesMyers April 17, 2009 12:36 PM PDT
Stamp out Malaria. That sounds like a great cause. A twit of a cause. OOps. maybe not. maybe there are consequences for jumping on the 'let's find a cause bandwagon'. what a turkey...although he is funny when he is all stoned on tv...but any other show besides his 4.20 gig sucks.
by biffhenerson April 17, 2009 7:19 AM PDT
What is twitter? Whatever it is, it sounds like a huge waste of time. Fad. Trend. Gimik.
Reply to this comment
by blewis1041 April 17, 2009 7:39 AM PDT
First of all, it's "I couldN'T" or "I could NOT" care less. How is that so many people without basic grammar have become "reporters?" Secondly, the fact this game existed (and even worse, the fact I read 1/2 the article and am now commenting on it), shows how we, as humans, have sunk to the lowest common denominator. Technology is fine, but getting entranced for the sake of "doing something" is a way to escape from (and enjoy) reality.
Reply to this comment
by terminalblue April 17, 2009 7:48 AM PDT
so ******* what.
Reply to this comment
by ducttape36 April 17, 2009 8:07 AM PDT
why is this high-school popularity contest news? I've seen it in all my tech feeds. seriously, whats the story here? lame.
Reply to this comment
by HayesMyers April 17, 2009 12:32 PM PDT
Werd. Bang on the money with this comment. What twitter does is offer a lowest common denominator approach that even KucHa and Oprah can deal with. (well i bet Oprah had someone do it for her..she is quite wealthy). The mayor of Toronto twits as well. (the proper term is twits for the twits that tweet). The only people who seem to listen are the media.
by B-McGee April 17, 2009 8:24 AM PDT
Past tense of tweet: starts with T, rhymes with swat. Need I say more?
Reply to this comment
by HayesMyers April 17, 2009 12:37 PM PDT
What are you saying? Is this some kind of perverse limerick or riddle I am to solve? Tweets twittwat at twill.
by skyscraperjim April 17, 2009 8:58 AM PDT
One of the biggest news outlets in the world vs someone I never even heard of until yesterday- I guess I just don't "get" this whole Twitter thing (even though I've had an account for about 3 months).
Reply to this comment
by abcd9009 April 17, 2009 8:59 AM PDT
I love tweeting. The best part about Twitter and Facebook (from a celebrity/media prospective) is now you are in control of your story/news and NOT TMZ.
Reply to this comment
by B-McGee April 17, 2009 9:38 AM PDT
Yeah, until some enterprising individual hijacks your account or like in the case of Shaq, someone signs up as you (a celebrity/athlete) and starts posting fake information about you for everyone to read.

At least TMZ has a sustainable business model, a business plan, a revenue stream, and a television program. You cannot say the same about any of the social networking sites, especially twitter.
by HayesMyers April 17, 2009 12:33 PM PDT
You are twitting not tweeting. Just so you are aware. You are in control of something bigger than you can imagine. it is great.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (43 Comments)
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

13 games for newer iPhones

So you've got an old iPhone or iPod and want to see what some of the latest games are doing with the newer hardware? We've checked out 11 titles to show you the differences.
• Images: Old vs. new

Intel to pay AMD $1.25B in settlement

Antitrust and intellectual property fights come to an end for now. AMD will drop pending litigation, and Intel will "abide by" a long list of prohibitions.
• AMD: Our claims are 'ratified'

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right