Ashton outmaneuvers CNN to 1 million on Twitter
Moments after Ashton Kutcher became the first to a million Twitter followers, the actor touts his win over CNN.
(Credit: Twitter)This had to be one of the weirdest pieces of media I've ever seen: watching actor Ashton Kutcher, streaming live on the Web, and Anderson Cooper, broadcasting live on CNN, each pimping their Twitter accounts, trying to exhort the world to help them become the first to reach 1 million followers.
As Kutcher--as well as a host of guests at what I presume was his and wife Demi Moore's house, and even P. Diddy, who was on speakerphone at the house--put it, this was a battle between old-guard TV and newer-kid-on-the-block Web.
In the end, the battle to a million was about as close as it could be. And the winner late Thursday was Kutcher and the Web--never mind that Kutcher himself is a creature of old-guard TV and film.
Ashton Kutcher pops a bottle of champagne just seconds after realizing he'd won.
(Credit: UStream)He won by less than 2,000 total followers.
The race started heating up Wednesday when CNN acquired the @cnnbrk Twitter account--the largest Twitter account at the time with 947,000 followers. Kutcher was in second place at that point, with 917,000 followers.
Personally, I could care less about Kutcher's celebrity and his ability to get tons and tons of people to do the almost unbelievably easy task of clicking "follow" on his Twitter account. Rather, it was seeing this real-time face-off between Kutcher, streaming live on UStream, and Cooper, working it hard on his evening broadcast of "AC 360."
To be fair, Kutcher had an advantage: he was able to stay totally on message on his Web stream, while Cooper had to limit his exhortations to short bursts of enthusiasm sandwiched between, you know, real news stories.
Still, given the fact that there were clearly large numbers of people actively watching the battle, I have to admit that I'm surprised Cooper didn't cut to a report--and a live interview--with Kutcher once the victor was known.
So, variously, this was pure round-number stat cotton candy for the eyes, a down-to-the-wire, nail-biter race, and, I think, most importantly, a truly interesting and profound moment of genre vs. genre. Grassroots, democratic do-it-yourself Web streaming vs. big media at its most polished. Both reaching to the masses, referencing each other, live.
To be sure, the mixing of media is nothing new. But to me, and I'm certain many others who were watching the action live, there was something surreal about witnessing the urgency being expressed by both the guy in his living room and the guy on the professional news set, both being able to speak to theoretically unlimited numbers of people (well maybe not unlimited, but you know what I mean) and both standing tall for their medium.
Captivating stuff.
While CNN did not immediately report the news of Kutcher's victory, the network did offer congrats on its Twitter account.
(Credit: Twitter)Oh, and while I said I was surprised that Cooper didn't do an instant report on CNN about Kutcher's victory, that seems to be due to the limits of what TV allowed him to do. Like I said, he had news to report.
But over on the Web, where the linear constraints of TV don't apply, CNN's Twitter feed offered the network's well wishes.
"Congrats @aplusk," CNN's tweet read. "Ashton Kutcher is the first twitter account to reach 1MM followers."
Congrats, Ashton. And congrats, Web.
Daniel Terdiman is a staff writer at CNET News covering games, Net culture, and everything in between. E-mail Daniel. 



You guy's must check out a chick called http://twitter.com/ijustine she's almost at half a million mark.
I'm a mere mortal and not quite at 1000.... but addicted to the damn thing.
Ben Angel
http://twitter.com/Benangel
Add me on twitter@ elucidmarketing
Join us, while we share ideas and resources to build great social media sites. Our group consist of entrepreneurs, developers, and marketers in a friendly, open sharing web community. Contact us for more, Good Luck CNN, lol.
I wonder if this media paid for bore-fest had more people joining the service (as I'm sure Twitter wanted) or if the subscribers... oh I'm sorry "followers"... were people who already had accounts.
Anyway... a non event for anyone with a life.
Oh well, at least a mill+ people will get ashton's retarded info popping up on their accounts.
Plus it's probably rigged and defintely a joke that Ashton won anyway.
Besides if "everyone" were to be in this contest, it sure as hell wouldn't be any of those 4 at the top or anywhere near.
I'm guessing that the only reason twitter is so popular right now is simply because there are so many people out of work, sitting at home with literally nothing to do. Do a study on the rise of unemployment vs. the rise in twitter's popularity and the results will shock you.
1) twitter - its name alone says enough about its usefulness, like the sprint commercial yep, I am in the 26% who don't know, and more importantly don't care. And its blocked by me at work :) .... CRACK! Get back to work!
2) CNN - boring, little to no tech news, or in depth tech, please bring back the old TechTV!
3) ashton kutcher - claim to fame is dating some old hag actress and the same old dreck movies and shows........
Obviously there was a serious shortage of real tech news the past few days.
I wasn't aware that Twitter had turned into a popularity contest.
And CNN, thanks for stooping to a new low. You've actually found a way to discredit yourselves while making FoxNews look that much more journalistic. Congrats.
And I am not just hating on CNN.. all the US News outlets do the same thing. You have to look outside the US to get an objective view of what is going with our country or the world. The news comes with either an extreme liberal (CNN) or conservative (Fox News) slant.
I also love the comment that poor Cooper had to occasionally report the, you know, ahem, news, while Kutcher had the huge advantage of being able to post non-stop. You're saying right there that the Internet is a better medium than television. Game, set, match.
- by abcd9009 April 17, 2009 8:59 AM PDT
- I love tweeting. The best part about Twitter and Facebook (from a celebrity/media prospective) is now you are in control of your story/news and NOT TMZ.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by B-McGee April 17, 2009 9:38 AM PDT
- Yeah, until some enterprising individual hijacks your account or like in the case of Shaq, someone signs up as you (a celebrity/athlete) and starts posting fake information about you for everyone to read.
- Like this
-
- by HayesMyers April 17, 2009 12:33 PM PDT
- You are twitting not tweeting. Just so you are aware. You are in control of something bigger than you can imagine. it is great.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (43 Comments)At least TMZ has a sustainable business model, a business plan, a revenue stream, and a television program. You cannot say the same about any of the social networking sites, especially twitter.