• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
March 24, 2009 11:31 AM PDT

Apple hit with lawsuit over iPhone as e-book reader

by David Carnoy
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 7 comments

There's some speculation that the Kindle for iPhone app may have sparked the lawsuit.

(Credit: CNET)

Earlier this month Apple got hit with a lawsuit over an "exploding" iPod Touch. Now it appears to be getting hit with a suit over the exploding e-book market.

A couple of blogs, including Apple Insider, are reporting that a Swiss communications firm, Monec Holding, has filed suit in a Virginia district court. Monec accuses the iPhone maker of "patent infringement, unfair trade practices, monopolization, and tortious interference for allegedly treading on its January 2002 patent No. 6,335,678 titled 'Electronic device, preferably an electronic book.'"

We've never heard of Monec, but the mission statement on its rather austere Web site claims it's "a leading innovator for mobile, globally usable communication solutions...with user-friendly products and pioneering solutions, Monec provides companies and users with secure, wireless access solutions which offer highest degree of flexibility, functionality, speed and independence."

Apparently, last year Monec also sued HP for patent infringement.

Apple Insider says Monec's beef centers on "Apple's move to distribute digital book reading applications through the App Store, which it subsequently sees as an endorsement by the Cupertino-based company that its touch-screen handset can serve as a capable eBook reader."

According to Monec, that violates a patent it filed for a "lightweight" electronic device with a "touch-screen" LCD display having the "dimensions such that (...) approximately one page of a book can be illustrated at normal size, this display being integrated in a flat, frame-like housing."

It's unclear what exactly set off the lawsuit but there's some speculation that it may have been prompted by Amazon's Kindle for iPhone e-book reader software appearing in Apple's App Store--even though Apple has had other e-book reader applications in the App Store for a while.

Apple had no comment about the lawsuit. How about you?

Originally posted at iPhone Atlas
Hunkered down in New York City, Executive Editor David Carnoy covers the gamut of gadgets and writes his Fully Equipped column, which carries the tag line "The electronics you lust for." He's also the author of "Knife Music," a novel. E-mail David. Follow David on Twitter.
Recent posts from Crave
Robot roller skates less bulky than Segway
Pay less for world's best headphone?
Apple's 2009 Black Friday deals: all MacBook Pro models $101 off
Thanksgiving poll: What are you most grateful for?
Note to hospitals: The pen is mightier than the data entry worker
Crave giveaway of the day: LG 32-inch LCD TV
Gadgettes Podcast 86: The Body Episode (a FLASHBACK episode!)
Windows Starter Kit refreshed for 2010
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by vonscoot81 March 25, 2009 6:32 PM PDT
Really? If patents can be that broad, it's no wonder there are patent infringement lawsuits all over. The wording is such that any potential touch screen device that could display a full page of a book would be infringing on the patent.... That's ridiculous....
Reply to this comment
by BrendanK March 29, 2009 12:57 PM PDT
There's a lot of patent rediculousness going around. Apple for instance recently was granted a patent who's wording would apply to prety much any touchscreen interface.
by ZetaZeta_ March 25, 2009 6:36 PM PDT
iPod Touch's and iPhone's display are not the exact same aspect ratio as a book. Their argument is invalid.
Reply to this comment
by jshort76 March 26, 2009 8:13 AM PDT
I've never heard of Monec. No Mystry there. It just sounds like one of those outfits that buys up patents and copyrights and sits on them until someone inadvertently stumbles onto an idea that is vaguely similar. I don't know about international patent and copyright laws but isn't there something that says you have to produce a product using the patent or copyright within a set time? I've never seen a book reader or a component thereof with the Monec name on it.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 March 26, 2009 9:09 AM PDT
It seems Monec does not hold a patent on a organic based thinking device about the size of a small loaf of bread and capable of making intelligent and independent thought processes... but I bet the patent office would be stupid enough to issue them one without even examining their own brains as prior art.
Reply to this comment
by jljacobi March 26, 2009 4:58 PM PDT
Patents are supposed to reflect a new and important idea that would not occur to the average person, or even the average person in a particular field. Now tell me--who among us could not, or even hasn't had this idea? Money-grubbing leeches.
Reply to this comment
by big.mouth March 29, 2009 12:25 PM PDT
Monec is just another ********* patent squatter like those clowns who sued RIM.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Most Popular

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.