• On The Insider: Bruno Film Edited Due to Jackson's Death
October 16, 2008 11:52 AM PDT

Android: An upsell attempt for Google services

by Stephen Shankland

Android may be a freely available open-source operating system, but Google hasn't shied away from the idea that it hopes to profit by subsidizing its development. And with Google's first Android phone, the T-Mobile G1 built by HTC, nigh upon us, it's becoming clearer exactly how.

T-Mobile's G1, aka the HTC Dream, is the first phone to go on sale with Google's Android operating system.

T-Mobile's G1, aka the HTC Dream, is the first phone to go on sale with Google's Android operating system.

(Credit: Corinne Schultz/CNET)

Google executives have spoken about Android's indirect benefits: the company wants to use it to accelerate the use and sophistication of mobile Internet browsing. "If the Internet is widely available, that's good for us," co-founder Sergey Brin said.

But judging from my testing of a G1 phone, it appears Google wants a more direct benefit, too: more users of Google's online services. Although there's nothing stopping a G1 owner from using online services from Google rivals such as Microsoft and Yahoo, Google technology is built deeply into the G1 and featured prominently as well.

Search ads are of course Google's bread and butter. Android's Web browser can use others' search engines, but a secondary part of the G1's home screen features a prominent Google search box. There's no option to change the search box to use search from Microsoft or Yahoo.

The hooks get a little deeper when things get more personal. The Android phone asks you for your Google account information when you first start it up, and if you have an account, it immediately slurps in your contacts, calendar appointments, and Gmail messages. At this stage of Android development at least, Yahoo and Microsoft don't get that kind of treatment.

The tie-in to these personal services is telling. Google has trounced its competition when it comes to search, a relatively anonymous act, but it hasn't made as much headway when it comes to more deeply personal uses of its services such as e-mail, photo sharing, and social networking. With Android, Google apparently hopes to establish more of this direct contact with Internet users.

E-mail comes in two tiers on the G1. The upper tier is given to Gmail, which gets its own application; others get relegated to the generic e-mail application. I could connect fine to Yahoo Mail, but lacking a Plus account for free POP access, I couldn't try Microsoft Live e-mail.

Personally, I think the two-tier approach makes sense because Gmail fans (I'm among them) can get accustomed to features not commonly available in ordinary e-mail client software, such as conversation view, the ability to archive and star messages, and sophisticated search abilities. Other e-mail services don't need their own applications.

Google also gets a direct link to its online map service. Here again, though, Google has a bit more to offer than its rivals when it comes to online services. As with search, mapping use is a fairly generic activity at this stage, but geographic information can be very personally useful, especially while on the road, and I wouldn't be surprised if Google Maps became much more tightly tuned to each user's needs and account settings.

With instant messaging, Android is neutral. The software can handle Yahoo, AOL's AIM, MSN Messenger, and Google Talk with equal aplomb.

There are of course other possible places that Google could create direct Android ties to personal services. Orkut, iGoogle, Google Reader, and Picasa Web albums spring to mind.

But it's still early days for Android. At the same time Google or others could write applications that dovetail with these services. And by the same token, given Android's free software development kit and unfettered Android Market for offering new applications, I'd expect mobile applications from Google rivals, too. Whether they'll get prime real estate on future Android phones, though, is another matter entirely.

Click here for CNET's review of the T-Mobile G1.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Wife exposes chief spy's personal life on Facebook
Seattle fire knocks out service to Bing Travel, other sites
DOJ opens formal investigation into Google Books settlement
Ad industry groups agree to privacy guidelines
Microsoft chucks vomit ad
Jammie Thomas will appeal, lawyer says
Usenet.com ruling, a 'whittling down' of Betamax defense
Microsoft resorts to vomit to market IE 8
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by forever4now October 16, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
Google deserves a lot of credit for trying to open up the mobile phone industry so consumers can use their mobile device the way they want to use them. Do ADSL providers tell you what you can install/run on your PC? With all the money/influence Microsoft has, why didn't they do this? Probably because they don't care about consumers, as long as money is going in their bank. All internet company boats will rise (not just Google), as more people gain access to the internet. Hats off to Google!
Reply to this comment
by skrubol October 17, 2008 7:26 AM PDT
Why didn't Microsoft do what? Make an OS for phones? My phone runs Windows Mobile, and can run something like 10,000+ apps written for WM/PPC over the last 6 or so years. WM is also very customizable, just not open source.
by jolymathew October 16, 2008 1:30 PM PDT
I think its Android is a fantastic product from google. Its realy opened up the market on mobile platforms.. I hope in future we will see simple, elegant , fast and consumer friendly apps on this platform.. bye bye to those beautiful , unuseful fat apps and its grand welcome to google era where consumers wins....

3 cheers to google for making this happen...
Reply to this comment
by illbits October 16, 2008 2:46 PM PDT
Although Google's first Android phone appears to be googcentric at first glance, lets not forget that the platform is truly open to developers regardless of whom they pledge their allegiance to. If Yahoo wants to have a killer e-mail app for Android devices, they need only write one. The door is open, come on in peoples!
Reply to this comment
by t8 October 16, 2008 6:02 PM PDT
Good one Google.

Once again, your business has helped consumers.

Microsoft should focus on keyboards and forget about the Internet and Vista.
Reply to this comment
by DavidJGarcia-dot-com October 16, 2008 7:24 PM PDT
*BlackBerry: An upsell attempt for Google services*

Rim may be the maker of Blackberries, but Google hasn't shied away from the idea that it hopes to profit from them. And with my nifty BlackBerry Curve, it's clear exactly how.

ATT's BlackBerry 8310, aka the Curve, doesn't use Google's Android operating system.

Google executives can easily see BlackBerry's indirect benefits: the company can use it to accelerate the use and sophistication of mobile Internet browsing. "If the Internet is widely available, that's good for us," co-founder Sergey Brin said.

But judging from my testing of a BlackBerry phone, it appears Google wants a more direct benefit, too: more users of Google's online services. Although there's nothing stopping a BlackBerry owner from using online services from Google rivals such as Microsoft and Yahoo, Google technology is easier to integrate deeply into the BlackBerry experience and easier to find, download, and use as well.

Search ads are of course Google's bread and butter. BlackBerry's Web browser can use others' search engines, but a prominent part of the BlackBerry's Google Mobile App is a Google search box. There's no option to change the search box to use search from Microsoft or Yahoo.

The hooks get a little deeper when things get more personal. The Google Mobile App lets you enter your Google account information when you first start it up, and if you have an account, it immediately slurps in your calendar appointments and Gmail messages. At this stage of BlackBerry development at least, Yahoo and Microsoft don't do that nearly so well.

The tie-in to these personal services is telling. Google has trounced its competition when it comes to search, a relatively anonymous act, and it has also made headway when it comes to more deeply personal uses of its services such as e-mail, photo sharing, and (to a lesser extent) social networking. With the BlackBerry's Google Mobile App, Google apparently hopes to establish more of this direct contact with Internet users.

E-mail comes in two tiers on the BlackBerry. The upper tier is given to Gmail, which gets its own application; others get relegated to the generic e-mail application. I could connect fine to Yahoo Mail, but lacking a Plus account for free POP access, I couldn't try Microsoft Live e-mail.

Personally, I think the two-tier approach makes sense because Gmail fans (I'm among them) can get accustomed to features not commonly available in ordinary e-mail client software, such as conversation view, the ability to archive and star messages, and sophisticated search abilities. Other e-mail services don't need their own applications.

Google also has a polished application for its online map service. Here again, though, Google has a bit more to offer than its rivals when it comes to online services. As with search, mapping use is a fairly generic activity at this stage, but geographic information can be very personally useful, especially while on the road, and I wouldn't be surprised if Google Maps became much more tightly tuned to each user's needs and account settings.

With instant messaging, BlackBerry is neutral. The phone can handle Yahoo, AOL's AIM, MSN Messenger, and Google Talk clients with equal aplomb.

There are of course other possible places that Google could create direct BlackBerry application ties to personal services. Orkut, iGoogle, Google Reader, and Picasa Web albums spring to mind. Wait, it already has for some of these.

It's not really the early days for BlackBerry. But others could still write such nifty, free, useful applications for BlackBerry. And by the same token, I'd expect mobile applications from Google rivals, too. Whether they'll get prime real estate on MY future BlackBerry phones, though, is another matter entirely.
Reply to this comment
by iamacyborg October 16, 2008 7:54 PM PDT
"Whether they'll get prime real estate on future Android phones, though, is another matter entirely. "

The answer is yes. Google's open source platform does not make any special distinction between Google's delivered applications and applications developed by third parties. You can replace the home screen, dialer, etc. It is an OPEN PLATFORM. That is the entire point.

Of course Google is not going to waste developer hours writing a native interface for services that directly compete with their own.
Reply to this comment
by Unbaised October 16, 2008 8:28 PM PDT
Wonderful.. Not sure if this guy used his brain before writing this
by Unbaised October 16, 2008 8:26 PM PDT
Dude, What the heck is your problem now? I just don't understand it. Thats what competition is all about. G1 is Google centric. Whats stops you from writing your own application that can use Microsoft or Yahoo stuff. Its lot better than apple which isn't a open source...
Reply to this comment
by hqconvert October 17, 2008 2:45 AM PDT
www.google.com
Reply to this comment
by dp2sholly October 17, 2008 6:41 AM PDT
"There are of course other possible places that Google could create direct Android ties to personal services. Orkut, iGoogle, Google Reader, and Picasa Web albums spring to mind"

I'm waiting to see how the GrandCentral service will eventually tie into Android. A true unified inbox on your handset?
Reply to this comment
by bbftu919 October 17, 2008 7:38 AM PDT
Is this any different than the iPhone? Doesn't Apple do the same thing? Palm? I guess the difference is they openly admit it and don't hide behind an "open source" screen. Still, not a terrible thing to do.
Reply to this comment
by drtyrell October 19, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
Google is in bed with the NSA. All their services are designed to harvest your data. You're all fools to use anything they provide.
Reply to this comment
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Most Popular

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right