A closer look at Nokia's would-be iPhone killer
NEW YORK--Nokia's new N97 smartphone is cool, but it's still no iPhone.
Nokia N97
(Credit: Mark Licea/CNET)I got a chance to look at Nokia's latest smartphone, the N97, on Thursday at the company's annual Capital Markets Day here. While Nokia's marketing team wouldn't actually let me play with the phone, since it won't officially go on the market until 2009, I got a demonstration of some of the phone's features and functionality from Jukka Heiska, director of product management for the N97. A video of the phone demonstration will be posted Friday on CNET News as well as on CNET TV.
In some ways it's unfortunate that every touch-screen phone that comes out these days is compared to Apple's iPhone. But given the popularity of the iPhone, especially here in the U.S., it's difficult not to do the comparisons.
My first impression of the new N97 is that even though it has impressive specifications, like a total of 48 gigabytes of potential storage and a 5-megapixel camera and video recorder, the phone seems more like an evolution of Nokia's N-95 or N-96 smartphones rather than a ground-breaking new touch-screen device that could potentially be the next iPhone killer.
For one, the touch-screen wasn't terribly sophisticated. Icons could be dragged and dropped using a finger, but unlike the iPhone, which allows you to pinch text to magnify it or reduce it, or even the new BlackBerry Storm that allows you to double click on text or images to make them bigger, the N97 didn't offer these features.
Nokia N97
(Credit: Mark Licea/CNET)Design-wise the phone looked more like Sony Ericsson's Xperia X1. It has a slide-out QWERTY keyboard and a tilted screen. In this way, it's an improvement over the N95 or the N96, which offer tons of features and functionality, but lack full QWERTY keyboards.
That said, there are a few key features that the N97 offers that the iPhone doesn't. For example, the Nokia Web browser on the N97 supports Flash and Flash video, something that Apple's Safari browser doesn't support. And of course, heavy texters and e-mail enthusiasts, will like the full QWERTY keypad. I've had several iPhone owners tell me that they still carry around a BlackBerry for sending e-mails on the go, because they don't like the iPhone's virtual keyboard for typing longer messages.
The phone, which Nokia's marketing team calls a "mobile computer" also offers a whopping 32GB of storage on the device with the option of adding up to another 16GB of storage through a microSD card. And then there is the 5-megapixel camera, which also records DVD-quality video.
By contrast, the iPhone only offers up to 16GB of storage and users are unable to add additional storage via microSD cards. Also, the iPhone's camera is only 2 megapixels, and it doesn't offer video recording.
The N97 also offers assisted-GPS services, which improves accuracy over regular GPS receivers, such as the one offered in the iPhone. The device also uses Nokia's mapping technology and virtual compass that allows the device to actually point users in the direction they need to go when they're using the turn-by-turn navigation.
Unfortunately for North American consumers, who might prefer the N97 over Apple's iPhone, they won't be able to get the phone on this side of the Atlantic for some time. Nokia will initially launch the device in Europe and then to the rest of the world beginning in the first half of 2009 for the unsubsidized price of 550 euros, or about $695. Heiska said the device would be offered in North America sometime after the first half of 2009, but he wouldn't specify when.
Smartphone enthusiasts here in the U.S. will likely find a way to buy unlocked N97s, but because the phone only supports 3G HSDPA wireless frequencies that are used in Europe and other parts of the world, they won't be able to access 3G service on either of the two U.S. carriers' networks that support HSDPA. AT&T and T-Mobile USA use different frequencies for their 3G service that are not yet supported by the N97. That said, users could still access AT&T's or T-Mobile's slower 2G networks.
All in all, the N97 is a very cool phone packed with lots of features. And I'm sure it will appeal to many consumers. But the lackluster touch screen didn't do much for me. As for its ease of use and Internet surfing capabilities, users will have to wait until the device is in full production mode to truly test those features.
Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie. 



"since when is copy/paste a "basic feature" of a phone...?? How many phones have this? "
This is one of the qualifications of a smart phone and all smart phones on the market .... *except* the iPhone have it built in.
As for the review ccomparing it to an iPhone and finding it short of that goal, I don't see it. The lack of a pinch/twril movement to navigate is a disappointment, but it is rather an iPhone specific thing. The rest of the review is all about the things that the phone does that the iPhone does not. It's interesting, but if it's not available in the US, it's just an interesting comparison.
"[Copy/Paste] is one of the qualifications of a smart phone"
Don't be silly. Aside from the fact that there isn't an accepted definition of a "smartphone", the only qualification seems to be that it is extendible via the provision of an SDK.
I totally understand that copy/paste is a "big deal" but it really isn't that much of an issue that everything else can be ignored.
I happen to agree with the article. She unbiasly praises the N97 from a feature perspective, but in the category that really matters (seamless, integrated environment), she stated the truth. (At least her version of the truth based solely on a demonstration which, by the way, she explained as well.) I don't care if a product has 10 more features than the iPhone. If it can't get the seamless, integrated environment right, it will always be playing second-fiddle. Companies need to start focusing on usability first, and then features second. In fact, I would bet the reason why copy/paste is not on the iPhone is because Apple hasn't been able to figure out a good way for that "feature" to be "seamlessly integrated" with the rest of the phone.
Just my two cents...
iPhone is THE phone to this date.
Sorry I had to...
I have no double the N97 will have better photo quality, because it is thicker - yes, I said it, the thickness of the phone is a better indication of the photo quality. With thicker phone, a better lens can be put in so it actually can use the pixels.
Among all the camera phones I have used, Sony W580i (also 2MP) beats iPhone's on contrast and color. However, both of those can be fixed with software - for example, Photo Lab on iPhone.
TMobile's SDA (1.3MP)'s color has too much saturation. Again, this can be fixed in software.
Blackberry Pearl's camera is so horrible that no software can fix it. Basically, color photos look monochrome! OK, I guess turning the pictures to B/W or Sepia is a reasonable use.
Given iPhone's thickness, I don't think its camera can be improved by more pixels. However, with a little bit adjustment on color and contract, it is a pretty good snapshot camera.
Huh.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10110873-1.html
There are plenty of people who are able to use 3G with it.
Also you actually can increase text size by double tapping. Just thought I'd point that out.
The iPhone, which I own, is a near great device. The UI is amazing and is overall pretty zippy, especially compared to WM or the Storm. I am annoyed that the iPhone won't do basic things like MMS or voice dial, however.
I played with a Storm, and it was just plain awful. It was slow, laggy and unresponsive. I like the idea of click-through and the features, but the execution on this phone is terrible.
I refuse to buy another WM phone, I am tired of getting pinwheels instead of e-mails.
When a wifi phone prints to portable printer I am first time buyer. thx
I wonder why reviewers don't compare every candy-bar form-factored phone to "the brick" -- the first commercially available cell phone? Just like billions of cell phones that followed it, "the brick" had a rubber button keypad and yet no one gives a damn about that similarity, so why, tell me why, every touchscreen phone should be compared and found inferior to Iphone? Since when Iphone with its lame 2mp camera, no video capturing, no Flash support and its simplistic ways, has become the industry standard? Iphone and N97 are two absolutely different products -- the former for show-off yuppies and the latter for people who truly care about technology -- so why compare? And honestly, the fact that N97 is not going to be offered through the US carriers is not a missed opportunity for Nokia, it's a missed opportunity for the US consumers, who, if you are to believe the reviewers, still live in 2005, where flash-less 2mp camera is still a king of the show.
Nokia, just keep on doing great work, never mind Apple-obsessed bloggers.
Possibly by having about 20 times the market share that Apple do?
Silly boy.
Tink *~*~*
1. Bluetooth can't be used for file transfer, it's for Headset ONLY.
2. No video camera
3. Camera quality sucks
4. You have to do everything through i-tunes
5. no card slot
6. no mms
7. closed OS
N97 coming home baby!
- by DoubleVI December 19, 2008 11:53 AM PST
- To be honest, I am soo glad a company is finally offering a phone/mobile device that has all or most of the features costumers need/ want, I think I will be satisfied with this phone till it gets one-uped, instead of buying these crap phones3-6 times a year, or drooling over the next hot thing only to have modifications done to the device which made it to drool over in the first place. Basically if this device comes to the US market as is , it totally has the potential to out sell the Iphone in years to come and make a commercial difference, the price tag almost seems worth it...
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (50 Comments)