• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
December 4, 2008 4:10 PM PST

A closer look at Nokia's would-be iPhone killer

by Marguerite Reardon

NEW YORK--Nokia's new N97 smartphone is cool, but it's still no iPhone.

Nokia N97

(Credit: Mark Licea/CNET)

I got a chance to look at Nokia's latest smartphone, the N97, on Thursday at the company's annual Capital Markets Day here. While Nokia's marketing team wouldn't actually let me play with the phone, since it won't officially go on the market until 2009, I got a demonstration of some of the phone's features and functionality from Jukka Heiska, director of product management for the N97. A video of the phone demonstration will be posted Friday on CNET News as well as on CNET TV.

In some ways it's unfortunate that every touch-screen phone that comes out these days is compared to Apple's iPhone. But given the popularity of the iPhone, especially here in the U.S., it's difficult not to do the comparisons.

My first impression of the new N97 is that even though it has impressive specifications, like a total of 48 gigabytes of potential storage and a 5-megapixel camera and video recorder, the phone seems more like an evolution of Nokia's N-95 or N-96 smartphones rather than a ground-breaking new touch-screen device that could potentially be the next iPhone killer.

For one, the touch-screen wasn't terribly sophisticated. Icons could be dragged and dropped using a finger, but unlike the iPhone, which allows you to pinch text to magnify it or reduce it, or even the new BlackBerry Storm that allows you to double click on text or images to make them bigger, the N97 didn't offer these features.

Nokia N97

(Credit: Mark Licea/CNET)

Design-wise the phone looked more like Sony Ericsson's Xperia X1. It has a slide-out QWERTY keyboard and a tilted screen. In this way, it's an improvement over the N95 or the N96, which offer tons of features and functionality, but lack full QWERTY keyboards.

That said, there are a few key features that the N97 offers that the iPhone doesn't. For example, the Nokia Web browser on the N97 supports Flash and Flash video, something that Apple's Safari browser doesn't support. And of course, heavy texters and e-mail enthusiasts, will like the full QWERTY keypad. I've had several iPhone owners tell me that they still carry around a BlackBerry for sending e-mails on the go, because they don't like the iPhone's virtual keyboard for typing longer messages.

The phone, which Nokia's marketing team calls a "mobile computer" also offers a whopping 32GB of storage on the device with the option of adding up to another 16GB of storage through a microSD card. And then there is the 5-megapixel camera, which also records DVD-quality video.

By contrast, the iPhone only offers up to 16GB of storage and users are unable to add additional storage via microSD cards. Also, the iPhone's camera is only 2 megapixels, and it doesn't offer video recording.

The N97 also offers assisted-GPS services, which improves accuracy over regular GPS receivers, such as the one offered in the iPhone. The device also uses Nokia's mapping technology and virtual compass that allows the device to actually point users in the direction they need to go when they're using the turn-by-turn navigation.

Unfortunately for North American consumers, who might prefer the N97 over Apple's iPhone, they won't be able to get the phone on this side of the Atlantic for some time. Nokia will initially launch the device in Europe and then to the rest of the world beginning in the first half of 2009 for the unsubsidized price of 550 euros, or about $695. Heiska said the device would be offered in North America sometime after the first half of 2009, but he wouldn't specify when.

Smartphone enthusiasts here in the U.S. will likely find a way to buy unlocked N97s, but because the phone only supports 3G HSDPA wireless frequencies that are used in Europe and other parts of the world, they won't be able to access 3G service on either of the two U.S. carriers' networks that support HSDPA. AT&T and T-Mobile USA use different frequencies for their 3G service that are not yet supported by the N97. That said, users could still access AT&T's or T-Mobile's slower 2G networks.

All in all, the N97 is a very cool phone packed with lots of features. And I'm sure it will appeal to many consumers. But the lackluster touch screen didn't do much for me. As for its ease of use and Internet surfing capabilities, users will have to wait until the device is in full production mode to truly test those features.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Wireless
New Verizon ad calls iPhone 'misfit toy'
Apple said to be working on 'world-mode' iPhone
Is Verizon's new early-termination fee anti-consumer?
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Slow start for the Motorola Droid?
Smartphone market unfazed by recession
eBay's Skype sale gets go-ahead with settlement
GetJar: The unknown app store leader
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (50 Comments)
by superswiss December 4, 2008 5:11 PM PST
What's up with these useless biased reviews? The only thing the iPhone has going for it is the finger flick/pinch UI. All the recent phones that have been compared to the iPhone, blow it away on the feature side of the equation, big time. The G1, the Storm, the N97, even the Bold. Yes, the finger flick/pinch is cool, but c'mon! At the end of the day what counts is what you can do with the phone and not how pretty you look holding it. I mean the 2 megapixel camera of the iPhone is a sorry excuse for a camera. This thing has 5 megapixels and takes DVD quality videos. The virtual keyboard of the iPhone sucks. I've tried it many times and I'm still hitting 3 wrong keys per 5 letter word and that's not counting the stupid changing of correct words to something else just because it's not in the dictionary. Not to mention the lack of basic features like copy/paste and full support of all Bluetooth profiles and MMS. At least the 2.2 firmware upgrade this time didn't corrupt all the applications that my wife had installed on her iPhone. It only took a dozen 200+MB firmware downloads to get it fixed.
Reply to this comment
by G|Net December 4, 2008 5:50 PM PST
since when is copy/paste a "basic feature" of a phone...?? How many phones have this?
by mecon11 December 4, 2008 6:02 PM PST
Sorry, but I found the article to be a lot less biased than your comment.
by superswiss December 4, 2008 6:09 PM PST
G|Net. Name one smartphone other than the iPhone that doesn't have copy/paste?
by DaveHartley24 December 4, 2008 6:14 PM PST
You think a 5 megapixel camera is a good camera? If i want to take good pictures, I use a camera not my phone. My friend just got the Storm, and I think it sucks, really slow and glitchy, the iphone is the first Apple product I have ever used, and I am very impressed. Every body is talking about iphone killers, because th iphone is the standard in Smartphone quality right now, when somebody actually comes out with something better I will buy it. I am not biased for any company, I could give a crap about a company, I just want a good product.
by superswiss December 4, 2008 6:35 PM PST
5 megapixel is a more than adequate snapshot camera and actually makes it worth taking a picture with your phone when you don't have your real camera on you. Better is all relative. I use my smartphone to communicate in multiple languages via email, text messages and voice. That's what a smartphone is for to communicate and I must say my Treo 750 beats the iPhone in that department several times over. I can't even type up an email in German on the iPhone w/o it auto-correcting every other word to a similarly spelled English word. Not to mention that it takes at least three times as long to type anything on the iPhone.
by Vegaman_Dan December 4, 2008 7:49 PM PST
GjNet wrote:

"since when is copy/paste a "basic feature" of a phone...?? How many phones have this? "

This is one of the qualifications of a smart phone and all smart phones on the market .... *except* the iPhone have it built in.



As for the review ccomparing it to an iPhone and finding it short of that goal, I don't see it. The lack of a pinch/twril movement to navigate is a disappointment, but it is rather an iPhone specific thing. The rest of the review is all about the things that the phone does that the iPhone does not. It's interesting, but if it's not available in the US, it's just an interesting comparison.
by 7aji88 December 4, 2008 11:34 PM PST
about the copy/paste thing: I had a Nokia 6630 more than 4 years ago. It used to be one of Nokia's good phones and although it wasn't a smart phone, it had a copy/paste feature in its textpad and messaging. I think other Nokia's S60 phones had the same thing too. Also 5 MB camera in a Nokia's phone with CZ optics can shoot a good photo, and I don't mean a decent photo, I mean a good photo that looks a bit better than a 3.2 MB old digital camera's photo.
by kelmon December 5, 2008 5:23 AM PST
@Vegaman_Dan

"[Copy/Paste] is one of the qualifications of a smart phone"

Don't be silly. Aside from the fact that there isn't an accepted definition of a "smartphone", the only qualification seems to be that it is extendible via the provision of an SDK.

I totally understand that copy/paste is a "big deal" but it really isn't that much of an issue that everything else can be ignored.
by quadj December 5, 2008 5:32 AM PST
I'm afraid you are falling into the same mindset people had with the iPod. Features are not what defines a good smartphone (nor was it what defined a good MP3 player). What people REALLY care about is the complete seamless, integrated experience. If you don't believe me, then look back at the iPod. Everyone complained how the iPod didn't have the same features as other MP3 players. They all stated that these other players were far superior because they offered features the iPods did not. But what happened? The iPod is still the standard for MP3 players. Why? Because of its features? Hardly. It is because of its seamless, integrated environment. The problem with most companies is that they still have an old tech mindset that features equate to superiority. That didn't work for MP3 players so why would you think it would work with smartphones?

I happen to agree with the article. She unbiasly praises the N97 from a feature perspective, but in the category that really matters (seamless, integrated environment), she stated the truth. (At least her version of the truth based solely on a demonstration which, by the way, she explained as well.) I don't care if a product has 10 more features than the iPhone. If it can't get the seamless, integrated environment right, it will always be playing second-fiddle. Companies need to start focusing on usability first, and then features second. In fact, I would bet the reason why copy/paste is not on the iPhone is because Apple hasn't been able to figure out a good way for that "feature" to be "seamlessly integrated" with the rest of the phone.

Just my two cents...
by SactoGuy018 December 5, 2008 5:38 AM PST
Actually, the biggest threat to the iPhone right now on the business users' side is the new BlackBerry Storm. That device works very typing messages on a touchscreen (far better than what you can do with the iPhone) and I expect Apple's third-generation iPhone to incorporate a lot of what the BlackBerry Storm pioneered in terms of a typing interface for both email and SMS messages.
See more comment replies
by billmosby December 4, 2008 5:51 PM PST
There is no iPhone but iPhone, and CNET is its prophet.
Reply to this comment
by gtdmouse December 5, 2008 4:03 PM PST
that was funny
by katatonic7 December 4, 2008 6:44 PM PST
N97 - my dream phone.
Reply to this comment
by shamisattar December 4, 2008 6:55 PM PST
too bad nokia didn't try to come up with something unique. it's all in in the user interface and how we use it, not just features.

iPhone is THE phone to this date.
Reply to this comment
by katatonic7 December 5, 2008 2:33 PM PST
from a technological stand point, you are the biggest moron i have ever encounter.
by oassaf December 6, 2008 9:58 PM PST
From a grammatical standpoint point, you are the biggest moron I have ever encountered.


Sorry I had to...
by oassaf December 6, 2008 9:59 PM PST
Clearly I am the moron...
by Pishkado December 4, 2008 7:32 PM PST
Getting hung up on megapixels in a camera is as senseless as getting hung up on processor GHz rating without considering instruction set, internal architecture that determines how much work it can get done per clock cycle or number of cores. All other things being equal, more is better - but more isn't equal when you compare the quality of the CCD, lens and everything in a phone versus a real camera. Among cameras, the HP PhotoSmart M737 and Canon EOS 30D both have 8 megapixels, but the Canon can produce near-professional results while the HP takes marginally acceptable (if that) snapshots. Given the constraints of putting a camera into a phone-sized device, especially but not only as regards its lens, and how far down Nokia's priority list photo quality had to be, 5 MP are more a marketing feature than something to let people leave the camera home.
Reply to this comment
by ozoneocean December 4, 2008 8:03 PM PST
Probably still better than the teeny one in the iphone that it's compared to ;)
by johnqh December 4, 2008 9:30 PM PST
The key to the photo quality is the lens, not MP.

I have no double the N97 will have better photo quality, because it is thicker - yes, I said it, the thickness of the phone is a better indication of the photo quality. With thicker phone, a better lens can be put in so it actually can use the pixels.

Among all the camera phones I have used, Sony W580i (also 2MP) beats iPhone's on contrast and color. However, both of those can be fixed with software - for example, Photo Lab on iPhone.

TMobile's SDA (1.3MP)'s color has too much saturation. Again, this can be fixed in software.

Blackberry Pearl's camera is so horrible that no software can fix it. Basically, color photos look monochrome! OK, I guess turning the pictures to B/W or Sepia is a reasonable use.

Given iPhone's thickness, I don't think its camera can be improved by more pixels. However, with a little bit adjustment on color and contract, it is a pretty good snapshot camera.
by katatonic7 December 5, 2008 2:34 PM PST
johnqh got it right on.
by Vegaman_Dan December 4, 2008 7:55 PM PST
This phone looks like it's similar size if not smaller than the iPhone and still has a slideout keyboard?

Huh.
Reply to this comment
by lookitsron December 5, 2008 7:43 AM PST
Not so much. I think it's longer and thicker. Flickr for "n97 iphone" to get the visual evidence.
by davidmcelroy_dotmac December 4, 2008 8:38 PM PST
Why, why, WHY do stories keep mentioning other phones having QWERTY keyboards when they really mean PHYSICAL keys? QWERTY just refers to the key layout. The iPhone has a virtual QWERTY keyboard. The N97 has a physical QWERTY keyboard. The correct dichotomy is virtual vs. physical, NOT QWERTY vs. virtual.
Reply to this comment
by Pishkado December 5, 2008 12:59 PM PST
The point of saying QWERTY (which is technically not always correct; it's probably configured as AZERTY in some markets) is to distinguish it from twelve-key (3 x 4, digits plus *, #) keyboards. Once you have a QWERTY keyboard, then you can get into whether it has discrete keys or is touch screen-based, but either can be QWERTY and QWERTY can be either. With improvements to touch screens the difference will probably soon narrow. (The BlackBerry Storm implementation of tactile feedback from a touch screen is flawed, as many reviewers have pointed out, but that doesn't mean that all future implementations of the concept will be flawed too.)
by Al_Pavangkanan December 4, 2008 10:29 PM PST
The N97 has a 900/1900/2100 3G radio. at&t uses 3G 1900. Most people will be able to use the N97 with no problems.
Reply to this comment
by loose_screw December 5, 2008 4:29 AM PST
Wrong. AT&T 3G uses 850/1900, and T-Mobile uses 1700/2100. The N97 is missing 2 critical frequencies, 850 and 1700. So no, American customers are screwed on 3G with this phone. Especially without wifi.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10110873-1.html
by Al_Pavangkanan December 5, 2008 4:18 PM PST
The N85 has 900/1900/2100, just like the N97
There are plenty of people who are able to use 3G with it.
by Mark_Anderson December 5, 2008 4:40 AM PST
This phone is for Euerope and Asia. Nokia have little presence in the US so don't really care about usability over the pond.

Also you actually can increase text size by double tapping. Just thought I'd point that out.
Reply to this comment
by UKStory1355 December 5, 2008 7:30 AM PST
Nokia actually does sell a lot of dumb phones in America. However, they find the American business model for mobile phones offensive; so they refuse to work with any carriers to roll out their smartphones. Since people can buy subsidized RIM and Apple devices, they won't pay $800 for a smartphone that could do the same stuff. I also don't think that Nokia can use a capacitive screen because Asian Markets require a older-style touchscreen for their writing applications.

The iPhone, which I own, is a near great device. The UI is amazing and is overall pretty zippy, especially compared to WM or the Storm. I am annoyed that the iPhone won't do basic things like MMS or voice dial, however.

I played with a Storm, and it was just plain awful. It was slow, laggy and unresponsive. I like the idea of click-through and the features, but the execution on this phone is terrible.

I refuse to buy another WM phone, I am tired of getting pinwheels instead of e-mails.
Reply to this comment
by therealgeeves December 5, 2008 8:40 AM PST
Untill I can print directly from my phone, it will only be a phone - one way data in, voice in/out.
When a wifi phone prints to portable printer I am first time buyer. thx
Reply to this comment
by oassaf December 6, 2008 10:03 PM PST
Actually you can do wireless printing from some phones. In the Case of Nokia and Sony Ericsson you can download software onto them to allow them to communicate with printers, although you do need bluetooth
by robertorosco December 5, 2008 9:03 AM PST
meh.
Reply to this comment
by Henry Fresbugh December 5, 2008 6:42 PM PST
stupid article
Reply to this comment
by Uzbekistani December 5, 2008 7:31 PM PST
It's funny, but before what seems to be becoming a global Apple mania and before each and every reviewer started to compare every other touchscreen phone to Iphone, I kind of used to like Apple...

I wonder why reviewers don't compare every candy-bar form-factored phone to "the brick" -- the first commercially available cell phone? Just like billions of cell phones that followed it, "the brick" had a rubber button keypad and yet no one gives a damn about that similarity, so why, tell me why, every touchscreen phone should be compared and found inferior to Iphone? Since when Iphone with its lame 2mp camera, no video capturing, no Flash support and its simplistic ways, has become the industry standard? Iphone and N97 are two absolutely different products -- the former for show-off yuppies and the latter for people who truly care about technology -- so why compare? And honestly, the fact that N97 is not going to be offered through the US carriers is not a missed opportunity for Nokia, it's a missed opportunity for the US consumers, who, if you are to believe the reviewers, still live in 2005, where flash-less 2mp camera is still a king of the show.

Nokia, just keep on doing great work, never mind Apple-obsessed bloggers.
Reply to this comment
by Mark_Anderson December 6, 2008 11:23 AM PST
"How could a company like Nokia possibly compete with a company like Apple."

Possibly by having about 20 times the market share that Apple do?

Silly boy.
Reply to this comment
by BellTinkR December 6, 2008 11:57 AM PST
I think it all comes down to what you want the device to do - and notice I did not say "phone", I said "device". What I want the device to do is allow me to mobile photo/video blog and make telephone calls. That means I need it to have a camera that produces at least good quality photographs and videos (excellent quality preferred), I need plenty of storage, and I need it to have really good texting capabilities - which, for me, means a full qwerty keyboard with tactile feedback. I don't do well with the screens due to lack of tactile feedback. Given my requirements, a lot of the Nokia "devices" suit me better than the current iPhone ever could. Touch screen and "pinching" text doesn't mean a lot to me. I'm sure there are others with the same priorities that I have, for whom the iPhone just isn't cutting it. I'm currently using an E71 with an 8GB card, and I'm looking forward to the N97 becoming available so I can get an upgrade in camera quality and storage capacity.

Tink *~*~*
Reply to this comment
by c.Lake December 7, 2008 11:13 AM PST
Nokia is the no. 1 phone manufacture in the world. Way before Apple ever considered making phones. Great love you the iPhone all you want, but let get OUR facts straight.
Reply to this comment
by Benlofton December 7, 2008 9:26 PM PST
Even though Nokia made a phone long before apple did. Apple iPhone can't be "Killed" it can not be out-featured. The iPhone at any time can be updated to a new version, and has enough application choices to have the exact same features of the newest phones coming out.
Reply to this comment
by katatonic7 December 8, 2008 6:06 AM PST
iphone will have the same fate as motorola razr.
by katatonic7 December 7, 2008 10:37 PM PST
iphone is one of the worst and most frustrating phone i've ever used

1. Bluetooth can't be used for file transfer, it's for Headset ONLY.
2. No video camera
3. Camera quality sucks
4. You have to do everything through i-tunes
5. no card slot
6. no mms
7. closed OS

N97 coming home baby!
Reply to this comment
by huntm856 December 9, 2008 3:38 AM PST
Agree totally. People talk about the superiority of the iPhone 'user experience' but it is SO lacking in features that it is not really even a smartphone, to my thinking, and there's no way I could carry one as my primary device.
by rabybon December 19, 2008 5:29 PM PST
I also agree, I'm currently in the market for a nice phone. You dont want to know the phone i currently own, Its embarassing. I think i've been waiting for this phone. I was wowed by the iphones web browsing and ui, but couldnt find myself getting one for many reasons. I even considered the blackberry bold for a lot of reasons, but for the price of this thing, I think I'll wait a little longer. I was actually witing for blackberry to come out with a touchscreen with qwerty keypad, I hear it's actually in the pipeline. I think there are alot of people just like me who've been itching for something a little better than the hype of the iphones pretty multy touch ui. It's gorgeous, but i think we have a lot more power with this thing, now i feel comfortable leaving my laptop at home most of the time, but then again, thats just me.
by DoubleVI December 19, 2008 11:53 AM PST
To be honest, I am soo glad a company is finally offering a phone/mobile device that has all or most of the features costumers need/ want, I think I will be satisfied with this phone till it gets one-uped, instead of buying these crap phones3-6 times a year, or drooling over the next hot thing only to have modifications done to the device which made it to drool over in the first place. Basically if this device comes to the US market as is , it totally has the potential to out sell the Iphone in years to come and make a commercial difference, the price tag almost seems worth it...
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (50 Comments)
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right