A giant human billboard on a frosty January morning marked the long-anticipated mainstream launch for Microsoft's two flagship products--Windows Vista and Microsoft Office 2007.
"The 'wow' starts now," the software maker promised. However, response outside of Redmond was more muted. Reviews for the software were decidedly mixed, while consumer demand for Vista remained tepid, prompting some computer makers to bring back Windows XP, while other PC makers started including XP discs in the box with Vista machines. Microsoft also agreed to let big-name PC makers sell XP longer than originally planned.
The company also missed its goal on the business side, with business uptake for Vista roughly on par with that of XP in its first year. Microsoft had hoped to see an adoption rate double that achieved by XP in its first year.
Meanwhile, Microsoft continued to move ahead with its "Live" services push. On the Windows Live front, the company finally hit send on a new version of Hotmail that was years in development. After spending much of 2006 launching a range of disparate services to see what stuck with consumers, Microsoft attempted to unify and refine many of the tools it launched over the past year. It also began opening up a bit about its longer-term plan to offer developers the ability to build their own applications on top of core Microsoft services such as storage and authentication.
On the Office Live front, Microsoft moved beyond small businesses and in December started testing Office Live Workspace, an online tool for viewing, storing, and sharing--but not editing--Office documents.
Even as it looked to find ways of taking its existing software online, Microsoft continued to branch into new areas. In May, the company took the wraps off its surface computing effort, a product that it had worked on for years, in uncharacteristic secrecy.
In business computing, the software giant continued its move into telephony. In October, the company released its Office Communications Server, a move that put the company in competition with Cisco System and others in the "unified communications" market.
Microsoft was also busy on the acquisition front. In March, it bought Tellme Networks.
That deal was followed up by the company's largest-ever purchase, its $6 billion bid for Aquantive, an online advertising company that few outside the industry had ever heard of. Late in the year, the company beat out Google to take a stake in Facebook.
During the year, Microsoft also continued to strike deals with the open-source community, including agreements with Samsung, Fuji Xerox, and TurboLinux. However, the company continued to raise the hackles of the Linux world, particularly with its claim that open source violates 235 of its patents.
special report As Vista hits store shelves after a long five years, Microsoft veteran Jim Allchin heads for retirement.
Company veteran Jeff Raikes talks about how Microsoft plans to make its big investment in telephone technology pay off.
special coverage After long delays, Microsoft is finally releasing the Windows update to consumers. See all of News.com's stories and more.
special report Microsoft embarks in a years' long redesign of its Web mail program only to find most of its users like things the way they are.
Spending spree on advertising companies continues, as the software giant issues a rejoinder to Google's plan to purchase DoubleClick.
Years in the making, company's new tabletop computer is controlled entirely through touch--there's no mouse or keyboard.
Software maker says it's seeing unacceptable number of repairs; investigation finds several factors could lead to hardware failures.
Once ethereal, Microsoft's plans to try to replicate its desktop position on the Web are starting to become clearer.
Microsoft taking a stake in Facebook, as well as gaining the right to sell ads for Facebook internationally.
In an interview, Windows Live exec Chris Jones talks about what the 2-year-old is up to and comments on another youngster--Apple's iPhone.
special report Security practices at Microsoft have been transformed since threats like Slammer and Blaster first wormed their way onto the scene.
Making sense of Redmond's $6 billion buy
Mystery surrounds Microsoft's virtualization flip-flop
Microsoft looks to improve its name game
Gates still has long to-do list
I maintain IT systems for health care providers and I see two interesting trends:
One is the total lack of support by practice management systems a year after launch. When asked about Vista support last month, 4 out of 5 vendors replied No!. The 5th? We have one doctor's office that reports he has our client running on Vista, but we won't support that PC if you do the same. The hospitals that I have to interface Dr.'s with, such as for PACS systems or VPNs, are also strongly resisting Vista hoping it 'just goes away' like Windows ME.
Two, the doctor's and staff I support range in age the full spectrum from 'just out of college' to 'could have retired 5 years ago'. The younger set, as in <35, are interesting in that barely a single one of them owns or uses MS Office and many avoid IE at all costs. A large percentage own Macs or are considering one. Just yesterday one clinical staff says to another "MS Media player sucks, I use WinAmp" and another chimes in about a player in AIM. Anyhow, I can see a revolution happening here. Give the younger set a smaller device that does what they want, does it well without the problems and overhead a legacy Microsoft product brings with it, and the full Microsoft PC is history faster than MS could ever rewrite or fix Vista.
In the xp campaign, they showed lots of close ups of the os as it helped people get their computing tasks done. They also ran more frequently.
I haven't seen a vista commercial lately, but I've seen plenty of "I'm a mac, I'm a pc" commercials.
Maybe Microsoft should do what Apple is doing and actually advertise their product more. They want to show us the Wow, then SHOW US THE WOW!
See, the problem my coworker is having is that she is trying to edit a simple word doc but apparently all the built in MS auto stuff (to supposedly help her) is actually hindering her work.
She's spending more time fighting with word than it would have taken to simply rewrite the document. That's not a productivity improvement, so you have to wonder why we spent $250 on a product that actually making our work harder.
Now I suppose some word expert might have gotten the job done quickly, but how many of us have time to become word experts? and as she just told me, you just get to the point where you know how to use office and they put out a new one and change it all around.
So at the end of the day, you have two people sitting here wishing MS would stop "improving" office. That's all I really have to say...
My new MicroSoft Mantra. STFP. Solve The F*^#ing Problem.
big differences between the two companies, is that MS wants
you to do it the MS way, wheres Apple allows you to do it your
way.
Yes there are lots of examples contrary to that statement in both
OS's, but generally, I think it's true.
I use both OSX and XP, and still fine XP gets in the way of work
all the time.
So I guess their marketing slogan did success after all... sorta.
/P
Having used DOS and windows machines for almost 25 years, I really didn't want to waste all that acquired knowledge by moving over to a mac or linux, but that's what's happening. I have one system that runs Vista, and if it was the only system I had to use every day, I will have a stroke, so I will not buy any more of them, as strokes are bad for you.
MS has just become another giant company, with no ability to innovate, which must convince consumers to buy their products, rather than sell products that people want to buy. They have a lot of inertia, but eventually that will all be overcome by indifference and disgust.
MS basically has no more "wow" than IBM did, back in the days when MS was "cool".
Let the flames begins.
No wonder manufacturers everywhere are giving downgrade options to customer so they can get back to XP which is at least stable and kind of usable.
Hilarious.
And it's not your father's Oldsmobile. To make that analogy stick the car would have to burst into flames and kill all the occupants a mile and a half from the dealer's lot.
Roberto
Mac=Slick and Pretty interface refined. Winning over the users that want easier to use software
Linux= Pure utilitarian. But, they are taking that easy utilitarian market with newer more friendly distributions. Could have already put a huge crunch on Microsoft if they were more organized and combined several good distro features instead of having hundreds of variants.
For instance new computer users when faced with pop up warning messages in vista may think. What does that mean? Are you sure? Maybe not.
Power users will say ugh this is annoying get out of my way. Are you sure? H*ll yes now move!
This also is bad for them that they bent over backwards to kiss Big Entertainment's butt by sticking much more DRM on the whole OS. Customers learn from experience that when DRM doesn't work right they are the ones going to get burned because neither Microsoft nor Big Entertainment care when your fancy new dap dies and all the content is lost. You are S.O.L.
I did not like XP at first, but it had nothing to do with performance. I hated their "disneyland" GUI make over.
- Why there is no Wow.
- by thedreaming December 27, 2007 7:27 AM PST
- There's no Wow in Vista because other than some eye candy, security features which hinder the user rather than protect him/her, a high price tag, multiple versions, and an incredibly long development cycle, Vista doesn't bring anything new to the table.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(73 Comments)On top of this, Microsoft isn't exactly advertising Vista heavily. When is the last time you saw a competing ad for Vista? I've seen plenty of "I'm a mac, I'm a pc" ads, but no ads showing what vista can do for both the home user and business users.