Version: 2008
  • On GameFAQs: The top 10 forgotten RPGs

May 2, 2006 4:58 PM PDT

X-Men may be closer than you think

  • 25 comments
Related Stories

Playing science's genetic lottery

April 12, 2006

Smokers' genes basis for next nicotine cure

January 25, 2006
Small damages to sequences in the human genome are causing evolutionary changes in our DNA, according to a group of Japanese geneticists.

Their recent findings prove that a common form of DNA damage caused by oxidation (called 8-oxoG) is a primary cause of mutagenesis, damage to DNA during the genome replication process that causes mutations in the resulting DNA molecules.

Succinctly, the human race is genetically mutating, and we now may know how and why--at least in part.

Japanese geneticist Yusaku Nakabeppu of Kyushu University and his team released their findings Monday in Genome Research.

"Our findings suggest that 8-oxoG is one of the main causes of frequent recombinations and SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in the human genome, which largely contribute to the genomic diversity in human beings," the researchers concluded in their Genome Research journal article.

DNA is made up of four nucleobases: adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine. Combinations of these four bases make up the human genome. Among the four bases, guanine is the nucleotide most susceptible to oxidation, and the most common oxidation product of guanine is known as 8-oxoG (8-oxoguanine). It is this prevalent substance that is thought to cause SNPs.

SNPs are subtle changes in chemical pairings found in the DNA sequence. SNPs and frequent recombination of code result in genetic mutation.

These changes in chemical pairings sometimes cluster in one area of the DNA sequence but, until recently, scientists were unsure of why. Nakabeppu and his team have found a causal link between 8-oxoG and clusters of sequence variations in the human genome.

While the specific environmental factors causing the mutation were not part of the research, the study established that the change is not happening in a closed system. The scientists agree with previous studies that have seen exposure to ionizing radiation and other environmental causes as genetic threats, according to their article.

Previously, SNPs were thought to be natural occurrences caused by internal byproduct releases from chemical reactions.

The Japanese researchers used genetic material from two healthy men and two healthy women (all unrelated genetically) in the study.

Scientific American originally disclosed Genome Research's release of the findings.

See more CNET content tagged:
genome, DNA, study, sequence, cause

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
cool
by tipper_gore May 2, 2006 5:32 PM PDT
I would like to grow big bat wings and have adamantium eye lashes that can kill with a wink.
Reply to this comment
Message has been deleted.
by dondarko May 2, 2006 6:04 PM PDT
I was just saying...
by JFDMit May 2, 2006 5:35 PM PDT
...to my other head last week, "I'm sure there are more mutants around than there used to be." He just said "moo."
Reply to this comment
Comments are appropriate to quality of story
by S E M 1 May 2, 2006 6:26 PM PDT
I'm not sure why this is news, except for the part about oxidation.

Darwin figured out that without mutation, there can be no evolution. Its been happening for millions of years. So this shouldn't be interesting to anyone but kids that missed 9th grade biology (because they were probably playing video games or going to the movies.
Reply to this comment
evolution isnt mutation based
by littyshac May 3, 2006 12:03 AM PDT
evolution is the gradual change of a species into other species by survival of the fittest. Lesser beings died off and the more fit continued to live, and yes mutation has created some more fit beings to outlive and survive against others, it's not the basic means of evolution.
View all 2 replies
Grade 9
by sanjayb May 6, 2006 5:56 AM PDT
During our 9th grade biology classes I was conducting my own biology class with my girlfriend - if you know what I mean, heh heh heh.

So this article all news to me! :-P
LOL
by fakespam May 2, 2006 8:28 PM PDT
Nice piece of fiction.
Reply to this comment
Why fiction?
by drewbyh May 3, 2006 7:40 AM PDT
Do you have some sort of evidence this is not happening? Any studies, research or proof? Perhaps you know more than the scientists that did the research. If you do know more I would just like to know what. Maybe you can shed some more light on the issue.
View reply
"Viking I" was my intro into this data 'DNA' prodegy. "Pluto or Bust!"
by Pop4 May 3, 2006 6:07 AM PDT
No Alien abduction here. Pure logic and science hit me blind; sometimes I blame pharmacutical drugs like "Tom Cruise"; well all the time. But, these programs never end. Blame the English for there anthropology and skeletal profiling I guess?
Reply to this comment
Of concern
by sctparker May 3, 2006 6:22 AM PDT
The majority of gene mutations are either GNDN (Goes nowhere, does nothing) or detrimental. If there really is an increase of gene mutation, it's a matter of some concern.
Reply to this comment
not quite...
by mnemophobe May 3, 2006 1:51 PM PDT
It is true that most mutations are neutral, so in a very technical sense, your "or" comment is not wrong -- but only in the sense that it would also be true to say most mutations are neutral or helpful. You're perilously close to making the incorrect statement that most mutations are harmful; this is a better description of the situation: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/mutations.html
You need to go back to school
by aka_tripleB May 3, 2006 12:27 PM PDT
Evolution cannot occur without mutation. While evolution has become synonomous with being a good thing, mutation is the basis of evolution. The only difference between evolution and mutation is evolution focuses only on beneficial mutation, while when someone says mutation, it can be good or bad.
Reply to this comment
Dumbest headline ever
by mnemophobe May 3, 2006 1:46 PM PDT
The story itself is fine, if unexciting, but the headline was clearly written by someone with absolutely no understanding of evolution. Where are the science editors who actually understand science, and try to honestly communicate it to the public?
Reply to this comment
Damage?
by Robert Claypool May 3, 2006 8:00 PM PDT
Calling it damage, as opposed to merely change reeks of design. If there's damage, might there also be restoration of the design? How does one distinguish damage from restoration? Without that ability to distinguish, it is merely change.
Reply to this comment
X-Men? Point & laugh @ Cnet
by Bob_Barker May 5, 2006 7:15 PM PDT
Yeah, instead of no longer growing wisdom teeth or an appendix we'll get laser beams shooting out our eyes and the ability to control weather.

Completely unrelated to the story and a bad attempt to gain page views.
Reply to this comment
what about the laws of physics?
by newcreation May 11, 2006 5:27 AM PDT
i bet the next xmen will be great but in reality
its impossible to get those sort of things reguardless of so called mutation.as if any ever seen such a mutation yet?...next thing they will say is the enterprise is closer to realtiy :P
beam me up lol
(25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.33%) -34.84 10,416.11
S&P 500 (-0.22%) -2.45 1,103.79
NASDAQ (-0.54%) -11.67 2,164.34
CNET TECH (-0.34%) -5.42 1,598.73
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement