- Related Stories
-
The slow road to Windows XP
June 14, 2005 -
Microsoft opts against SP5 for Windows 2000
November 29, 2004 -
Windows 2000 fixes released
June 26, 2003
The software maker released what it calls an Update Rollup for the 5-year-old operating system, which is due to shift at the end of this month from receiving mainstream support to extended support. Microsoft does not generally add features to a product under extended support, and the Update Rollup is largely a collection of previously released patches as opposed to a batch of new features.
In addition to already released fixes, the collection "may contain fixes for non-public low- and moderate-level security issues that did not warrant individual security bulletins," a Microsoft representative said.
The Redmond, Wash.-based software maker said last November that it would release the Update Rollup rather than offer a fifth service pack. As a result, the final service pack for Windows 2000 becomes the SP4 release that came out in March 2003.
Although Windows 2000 has been followed by several other Windows versions, the software remains extremely popular in corporations and small businesses. It still accounts for nearly half of all Windows-based business desktops, according to a recent survey by AssetMetrix.
See more CNET content tagged:
Microsoft Windows 2000, software company, service pack, Microsoft Corp., Microsoft Windows




Users who don't need the eye candy / childish look don't need to upgrade.
But if Win98's fate is any indication, we'll be forced to move (buy Windows all over again) pretty soon. Linux is still missing some apps. but looking better every year. My next machine will probably be at least a dual boot.
- Win. 2000 better
- by June 28, 2005 9:27 PM PDT
- The reason most businesses use win. 2000 is becuase it's a better OS then XP, I know because I use them both.The reason for individuals (no activation).
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- and less
- by sanenazok June 29, 2005 5:02 AM PDT
- bloatware, I mean MS features. When I got my laptop in 2002, I had a choice between 2000 and XP. I chose 2000 even though I'm a home user and have been extremely happy with it since. I have a faster CPU desktop with XP on it, and I avoid using it since XP annoys me. Even in Classic Mode, it still slows the system considerably with worthless eyecandy.
- View reply
Processing -
(7 Comments)