June 5, 2006 4:55 PM PDT

Wi-Fi: Coming soon on board U.S. airplanes

Air travelers starved for in-flight Internet access may soon find solace, thanks to a Colorado company that wants to offer Wi-fi service aloft.

AirCell said Monday that it plans to use a newly acquired radio spectrum license to offer "affordable" broadband service aboard commercial airplanes. Formed in 1991, the company already sells satellite-based voice and data services to the general aviation sector, primarily the corporate jet set.

In the style of cafe hot spots, AirCell's idea would let passengers link up any computer or handheld using the 802.11b or 802.11g wireless standards while in the air. The network, which the privately held company hopes to begin testing and deploying on commercial aircraft next year, would work by channeling communications from at least one miniature cell site--called a "picocell"--on the plane to special cell sites on the ground.

roundup
Crunch time for wireless?
RIM's chief tells carriers to be wary of bandwidth-hungry data apps. Also: Wireless on the road.

AirCell's plan would not conflict with a federal ban on in-flight cell phone use because the proposed network operates at a different frequency than that which could pose interference threats to aircraft navigational systems, according to a Federal Communications Commission official.

But offering Wi-fi service also means that air travelers could use voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) phones and applications like Skype to make voice calls--a development sure to vex seatmates.

Frontier Airlines, which ranks 11th or 12th in size among carriers, is definitely considering a Wi-Fi network for its next phase of in-flight entertainment, but it would likely block VoIP conversations and continue to prohibit cell phone calls, said company spokesman Joe Hodas.

"Unless we hear strongly otherwise from our passengers, our stand is we don't think it has a place right now in our cabin," he said. "We're running pretty full planes...If you're not sitting next to two people, you're sitting next to at least one person, and it just would be a difficult experience."

Responding to news that the FCC was considering relaxing the cell phone ban, U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican, quipped in a speech earlier this year: "It would be five hours of perfect hell from Dulles to Los Angeles--a rising, deafening chorus of 'Can you hear me now?' in multiple languages."

AirCell, for its part, doesn't have any takers yet. It plans first to cover planes traversing the continental United States and later expand the network to the rest of North America.

Got views on Vista?

The company said it will be able to keep traditionally high installation and operating costs low by using "commercially available" technology and a direct air-to-ground link, rather the than bulky, expensive satellites used by some existing in-flight communications systems.

"We want to encourage wide adoption," AirCell CEO Jack Blumenstein said in a telephone interview Monday.

Precisely how much the company will charge consumers remains unclear. Blumenstein said the company would aim for a price "well below what one has seen historically in these premium aviation services" in hopes of luring not only business travelers but also the general public.

Prices for Boeing's Connexion system, which bills itself as the first-ever recipient of a Federal Aviation Administration certificate for in-flight broadband, range from $9.95 for one hour of access to $26.95 for an entire flight. Those satellite-dependent offerings so far are available only on longer international flights operated by carriers such as Lufthansa German Airlines, Scandinavian Airlines System and Singapore Air.

US Airways, which ranks fifth among the nation's largest airlines, said it would also support the idea of a wireless network on its planes in the long term but would first need to ensure "we can find a way to make it cost-effective and add value to our service without driving up our costs or ticket costs for passengers," said spokesman Morgan Durrant.

FCC's turbulent auction
News of AirCell's Wi-fi plans follows an FCC announcement that the company and JetBlue Airways emerged as the top bidders in an auction of two wireless bands that concluded Friday. A JetBlue representative declined to provide details on the airline's proposal at the time. Both bids remain subject to final approval by the FCC.

Under the license, AirCell would launch its service in the 800MHz spectrum currently occupied by Verizon's Airfone service, which permits air-to-ground telephone service but never proved wildly popular because of its high price tag. Once favored to win the auction, Verizon dropped out of the running early. Its license expires in 2010, but it must relinquish its part of the spectrum within two years of when AirCell receives its own license.

The idea of in-flight Internet use is hardly new, although its adoption hit snags during the airline industry's post-Sept. 11 financial struggles. But like any new in-flight add-ons, AirCell's proposed network would also have to earn the FAA's stamp of approval before going live. Any airline wishing to install the system would have to demonstrate to the FAA that it wouldn't interfere with the aircraft's communications or navigational systems.

"They would have to show us what kind of tests they ran; they would have to show us the test results; and it would have to be specific for each model and series of aircraft that they wanted to allow use on," said FAA spokesman Les Dorr.

AirCell ran several tests of the planned network on a high-end business jet last fall and claims it is capable of delivering Internet access at 600 mile-per-hour speeds and 40,000-feet altitudes. Users on that "flying prototype" were able to send and receive e-mail, surf the Web, and even watch live video feeds of the confirmation hearings for now-Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, CEO Blumenstein said.

See more CNET content tagged:
airplane, traveler, VoIP, carrier, aircraft

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
"Can You See Stars Now?" ...
will be my greeting after applying a friendly "gesture" if I wound up next to some jabberwockey who used any kind of vocal interface to a laptop on a plane that's got broadband access, and talked for more than a few minutes. Where is Agent 86 - Maxwell Smart's dreaded Cone of Silence when we really need it?

There are about 30,000 flights a day over a good chunk of the U.S. Someday, when every commercial wide-body, regional, and puddle-jumper aircraft has WiFi, what will happen as they pass in proximity to each other? That wasn't part of the test that was reported here, but it would have to be before a full-fledged roll-out could be allowed. Also, when aircraft are within 1,000 feet, or so, of the ground, there is the potential for interference with terrestrial WiFi networks. Even with a commercial jet doing 200 mph, it would be momentary, at worst, but at a fixed location along the approach path to an airport, it might be get as bad as every 30 seconds during the busiest times of the day, with the passing of each plane. And who knows what the RF power "splatter chart" would look like radially for various airframes, given all of the windows that would be slicing and dicing the signals, both coming in and going out.

It would be ironic if, somehow, all that RF did somehow affect an aircraft's systems, and it turns out that, because some idiot was playing with Microsloth Flight Simulator, the real plane crashed. Maybe this will become an Al Qaeda technique, where they are able to remotely access the computers on a given airplane to carry out their nefarious goals.

All the Best,
Joe Blow
Posted by Joe Blow (175 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I could handle it without voice...
I have to agree with Frontier that I just wouldn't want somebody next to me talking up a storm when I'm TRYING to sleep on a flight.

If it's just somebody who needs Internet access and needs it so bad (in their opinion) that they're willing to waste from $10 - $27 bucks on it 'cause they just can't wait - let 'em.

Personally, I'd rather spend the bucks on anything other than airlines that nickle and dime you for whatever they can.

Charles Whealton

Chuck Whealton @ pleasedon'tspam.com
Posted by chuck_whealton (521 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.