May 23, 2007 4:00 AM PDT
Perspective: Who says security breaches are small potatoes?
See all Perspectives
- Related Stories
-
Banks file data breach suit against TJX
April 25, 2007 -
T.J. Maxx parent company sued in credit card hack probe
March 21, 2007 -
ID theft remains top concern for consumers
February 7, 2007 -
AT&T hack exposes 19,000 identities
August 29, 2006 -
Loan company reports loss of data on 1.3 million
June 1, 2006
The economic cost of unauthorized computer intrusions is illustrated in the first-quarter earnings report posted by TJX Companies.
By way of background, TJX refers to itself as the leading off-price retailer of apparel and home fashions within the United States and globally. TJX operates 830 T.J. Maxx, 763 Marshalls, 271 HomeGoods, 127 A.J. Wright stores, and 35 Bob's Stores in the United States. TJX also states that it operates 185 Winners and 69 HomeSense stores in Canada, as well as 211 T.K. Maxx stores in Europe.
According to its first-quarter earnings report, TJX suffered unauthorized intrusions into portions of its computer systems that process and store information related to credit card, debit card, and check and "unreceipted" merchandise return transactions that were discovered during the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year.
TJX has been investigating the intrusions with the assistance of computer security and incident response experts. Management believes customer information was stolen and that this information primarily relates to portions of transactions at its stores (not including Bob's Stores) from 2003 through part of 2004, and from mid- to late 2006.
The financial upshot is that TJX recorded an after-tax charge of approximately $12 million for costs incurred during the first quarter relating to the intrusions. That's in addition to an after-tax charge of approximately $3 million for costs recorded during the prior fourth quarter.
The charges include costs to investigate and contain the intrusions, as well as to strengthen computer security and systems. It also includes costs relating to communications with customers and for technical, legal and other related charges. The company continues to experience ongoing costs related to the intrusions, but still cannot estimate a range or its potential exposure. Such costs and losses, it says, could wind up being material to TJX's results.
Without knowing whether TJX took adequate steps to try to prevent the intrusions before they occurred, there are obvious lessons here. Plainly, companies of all types should want to avoid the costs of investigations, customer communications, and technical, legal and monitoring costs--not to mention potential exposure for related losses--which arise from computer system breaches.
Thus, companies should educate themselves now, if they have not done so already, as to how best to strengthen their computer security. Breach prevention bears a cost. But that expense pales in comparison to what a company will spend after a breach takes place. Better to be penny-wise rather than pound-foolish, and companies would be smart on the front-end to take steps that prevent breaches from ever occurring
Biography





hackers at security conferences are being allowed to release their information and tools to script kiddies and cyber terrorists, under the assumption the hackers are legitimate "security researchers", the problem is the information and tools these security researchers think are going to force people to be more secure and be more aware to a particular attack vector doesn't work in reality, what you get is certain areas of corporate america is security breaches like TJX, and no legal action is taken back to the original hacker/researcher at the international security conference who aided the script kid and cyber terrorists from carrying out the breach.
these security researchers are supplying the bad guys with guns to do their malicious actvity, and no one is stopping them.
if this was arms in the real world, like iran supplying terrorists with guns to attack america is iraq, something would be done, but when its computer hackers at security conferences putting the electronic guns into the hands of script kiddies, cyber criminals and cyber terrorsits, everyone sits back and let it happen.
when is cyber terrorism and the supply of tools and information cyber terrorists need to carry out these breaches going to be stopped by heavily restricting the release of tools and information at high profile international security conferences, which in turn end up being hosted by hundreds of sites across the world for any would-be cyber terrorist to download and launch attacks against the western economy.
The problem is not that security people are exposing weaknesses - it?s not being able to keep black hats from finding them first.
Harlan
http://windowsir.blogspot.com
Author: "Windows Forensic Analysis"
As the article said:
>>>companies should educate themselves now, if they have not done so already, as to how best to strengthen their computer security.<<<
It MUST be done in-house if it's to be done properly.
Walt