Over the past year, a flurry of bills were introduced in the U.S. Congress that targeted pretexting. But each of the 10 bills identified here remains stuck somewhere in the legislative process. Not one has been sent to President Bush for his signature.
S2177 Using or selling confidential phone records would be a crime. Law-enforcement pretexting is largely exempt. Introduced: January 2006 Status: In committee
S2178 Pretexting would be a crime unless done by police or government contractors. Covers voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) calls. Introduced: January 2006 Status: Approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee; waiting for a Senate floor vote.
Scandal coverage breathes new life into all-but-forgotten legislation.
S2389 Pretexting for phone records would be punishable by fines. Law-enforcement pretexting is largely exempt. Individuals can sue for damages. Introduced: March 2006 Status: Approved by Senate Commerce Committee; waiting for a Senate floor vote.
HR3997 Prohibits pretexting of any kind by "information brokers." Part of broader legislation dealing with security breaches. Introduced: October 2005 Status: Approved by House Energy and Commerce Committee; waiting for floor vote.
HR4127 Pretexting of any sort would be illegal, including pretexting to obtain telephone records. Part of a massive bill on data security. Introduced: October 2005 Status: Approved by three House committees; waiting for a House floor vote.
HR4657 Selling someone's confidential phone records would be a federal crime, even if a private investigator is selling records to police. Introduced: January 2006 Status: In committee
HR4662 Obtaining or attempting to obtain phone records would be a crime. Not applicable to law enforcement or government contractors. Introduced: January 2006 Status: In committee
HR4678 Pretexting to obtain telephone records would be illegal, including if it's done on behalf of law enforcement. The Federal Trade Commission could file civil lawsuits. Introduced: January 2006 Status: In committee
HR4709 Pretexting would be a crime unless done by police or government contractors. Covers voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) calls. Introduced: February 2006 Status:Approved by House; in Senate committee.
HR4714 Using confidential phone records would be a crime. Law-enforcement pretexting is largely exempted. Introduced: February 2006 Status: In committee
HR4943 Pretexting to obtain telephone records would be illegal. The Federal Trade Commission could file civil lawsuits. Introduced: March 2006 Status: Approved by House Commerce Committee; waiting for House floor vote.
I was just reading about all the Bills that were started when people were "upset and complaining" about "being spied upon". Seems people forget mighty quickly; just the way the "Powers that be" want us to do and the way they "forget or overlook" things that WE CITIZENS wanted done, but forgot about BEFORE THEY GOT DONE! I don't know about all of you, but I plan on making some phone calls and e-mailing my "representatives in DC----You know, the ones that are SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING FOR ME/US!!! Don't know how much good e-mail will be because some of our "faithful servants" are starting to block or not pay any attention to e-mails. BUT, snail-mail letters or phone calls are a lot harder to ignore!
Prominent corporate governance organization says Facebook's dual-class stock structure gives CEO Mark Zuckerberg too much control over the company's future.
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
When the sun goes down, that's when the iPad gets busy for folks with news readers. The iPhone? It's more of a daytime habit. If you're building an app for both devices, heed the lesson.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
I don't know about all of you, but I plan on making some phone calls and e-mailing my "representatives in DC----You know, the ones that are SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING FOR ME/US!!!
Don't know how much good e-mail will be because some of our "faithful servants" are starting to block or not pay any attention to e-mails.
BUT, snail-mail letters or phone calls are a lot harder to ignore!