January 20, 2006 10:00 AM PST

Week in review: Google, the defiant one

Related Stories

Week in review: Seeds of Apple's speed

January 13, 2006

Week in review: Glitches, gadgets rule

January 6, 2006

Week in review: Googly eyes

December 23, 2005
Federal prosecutors defending a controversial Internet pornography law are trying to force Google to hand over millions of search records--a request that the search giant is rejecting.

The Bush administration asked a federal judge to force Google to comply with a subpoena for the information, which would reveal the search terms of a broad swath of the search engine's visitors. Prosecutors are requesting a "random sampling" of 1 million Internet addresses accessible through Google's popular search engine, and a random sampling of 1 million search queries submitted to Google over a one-week period.

The Bush administration's request is part of its attempts to defend the 1998 Child Online Protection Act, which is being challenged in court by the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU says Web sites cannot realistically comply with COPA and that the law violates the right to freedom of speech mandated by the First Amendment.

An attorney for the ACLU said Microsoft, Yahoo and AOL received identical subpoenas and chose to comply with them rather than fight the request in court.

Google said in a statement sent to CNET News.com that it will resist the request "vigorously."

CNET News.com readers were divided on Google's actions.

"You'll let Google read your email to send you advertisements but the government can't request a random non-identifying sample of data to evaluate the effectiveness of its laws?" wrote David Arbogast in News.com's TalkBack Forum.

Other readers championed Google for its actions.

"Slowly we sit here while parents leave parenting to the government and the government seems to think it knows best what is good for me," Tom Eldred wrote. "Here's to Google for resisting."

On one level, the situation involves a straightforward question of whether the department's demands are too onerous and therefore not permitted under federal law. On another, the dispute raises novel questions about search engines' privacy protections and the relationship that four tech giants have with the federal government.

What does it all mean, and what happens next? CNET News.com prepared an FAQ to address some of your questions.

Meanwhile, U.S. senators on Thursday blasted what they called an "explosion" in Internet pornography and threatened to enact new laws aimed at targeting sexually explicit Web sites.

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens, an Alaska Republican, lashed out at an adult-entertainment industry representative, saying that the industry needs to take swift moves to devise a ratings system and to clearly mark all its material as "adult-only."

A lawyer representing companies offering "lawful, adult-oriented entertainment" agreed.

"I think any adult producer would agree," said Paul Cambria, counsel to the Adult Freedom Foundation. It would just be a matter of organizing the industry, he added.

"My advice is you tell your clients they better do it soon, because we'll mandate it if they don't," Stevens said.

Wild, wild Web
Crime is big business on the Internet these days, and it seems to be getting bigger.

A popular advertising site came under a denial-of-service attack this week from blackmailers demanding a ransom. The Million Dollar Homepage site is battling a DoS onslaught that has escalated since it began last week, its owner said. The site, which successfully brought in $1 million by selling ad space for $1 per pixel, was launched by British student Alex Tew and gained notoriety for its unique approach to online advertising.

The blackmailers have demanded a ransom of $50,000, said Russell Weiss, vice president of technical services at InfoRelay, which operates the site. Tew and InfoRelay are working with the FBI on the case, Weiss added.

"There are clues that a Russian group may be involved, but we'll leave that assessment up to the FBI," he said.

Meanwhile, phishing attacks reached a new high at the end of 2005 after growing steadily all year, according to a new study. The number of unique e-mail-based fraud attacks detected in November 2005 was 16,882, almost double the 8,975 attacks launched in November 2004.

Phishing e-mails pretend to come from legitimate companies, such as banks and e-commerce sites, and are used by criminals to try and trick Web users into revealing personal information and account details.

The number of brands targeted increased by almost 50 percent over the course of 2005, from 64 to 93 percent in November. And attacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated, with a quarter of all phishing Web sites hosting keylogging malicious software.

But phishing is far from the greatest threat on the Net. Dealing with viruses, spyware, PC theft and other computer-related crimes costs U.S. businesses a staggering

4 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Google is profiting from porn
Google will resist it because it is profiting from the filthy stuff. Google encourages people doing all these stuff secretly. It is like nuclear energy. You sell this technology to terrorists just because you get money? in the same way they are helping people "sell" bad stuff using their technology. What the judge has done is correct.
Posted by (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
It's not only google...
Sure, google profits from porn. But so does Comcast, Visa, Mastercard, major Banks, Hewlett-Packard, Sun, Microsoft, Software companies, etc. etc.

Who do you think does the banking, printing, hosting, and serving of - and what tools are used to create - porn sites?

If you're going to crucify Google, then you better not be ignorant.
Posted by cagerattler (72 comments )
Link Flag
A wide net
Do you want your IP address included in the data submitted to the US Federal Government in a report classified as "a list of people who searched for porn", when it's very likely that you've submitted at least a handful of innocent google queries that just happened to return results that listed the sites of interest? (You can prevent this, for the most part, by enabling safe search mode on your google prefs.)

Furthermore, how many requests for porn ad pop-ups have come from your IP address? Have you scanned all your computers for malware recently?
Posted by converter42 (10 comments )
Link Flag
well...
since when has porn become illegal? and what is "a random sample" of search requests going to do for them?

I try to stay out of the political debates, but this garbage by the Bush administration is getting out of hand.
Posted by anon.trash (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.