ie8 fix

Digital kids

Web firm tries to create safe haven for tweens

By Stefanie Olsen
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: June 15, 2006 2:00 PM PDT

Younger kids now have their own online club for blogging, sharing photos and socializing--without the privacy hazards parents worry about in connection to hip communities like MySpace, where children under 14 aren't welcome but often sneak in anyway.

On Thursday, Industrious Kids, a privately held company in Emeryville, Calif., introduced Imbee.com, one of the first social networks for kids aged 8 to 14, and one that promotes security and parental controls. The network requires parents to authorize a child's membership with a valid credit card, by first authenticating their own identity. Information posted to the site by children is viewable only to invited friends and family, and not available for indexing by search engines like Google.

For a membership with a personal blog, Imbee costs $3.95 a month (for two kids and one adult). It's free for members who want just to e-mail.

Industrious Kids said this summer that it will promote Imbee in partnership with Paramount Parks. It plans visits to three Paramount amusement parks, including Great America in San Jose, Calif., to sign up kids and parents and give away prizes.

With Imbee, Industrious is aiming to appeal to "tweens"--a booming portion of the population, with an estimated 30 million kids between the ages of 8 and 14--while also attracting parents with a viable safe haven on the Web.

Awareness of the perils the Internet can present to impressionable minds has heightened with the rising popularity of sites like MySpace and YouTube, and the knowledge that ever-younger kids are attracted to them. Despite enforcing decency standards, sites like MySpace have had trouble with risque material being posted, predators taking advantage of children's personal information, and underage children masquerading as adults in order to join.

Take Olivia, a 13-year-old from Seattle--she spends one to two hours a day online during the week and between four and five hours a day online on the weekends.

"Most of the time I spend working on my own page and commenting on other people's pages" on MySpace, Olivia said this week at the Piper Jaffray Global Internet Summit in Laguna Beach, Calif.

There's a question as to whether kids like Olivia would be attracted to a secure, parent-authenticated community.

With Imbee, parents can have an active or passive role in their child's membership, meaning they can choose to be notified of, and retain approval power over, new-friend invitations, e-mails and blog posts. Or, by maintaining the default setting, they can choose to just monitor the activity in the background, via a daily Imbee e-mail. In the intermediary role, parents must decide to approve or disapprove blog posts, for example, before they go up on the site. If the child doesn't like a parent's decision, it could be what Tim Donovan, a founding member of Imbee, called a "teachable moment."

"It becomes a tool for parents to engage in dialogue with the child about online etiquette, like what to post and who to talk to, so that when they've grown out of it, they go out of it with some real fundamental skill sets," said Donovan.

"To some degree, parents have been hands-off to their kids online, probably because they don't know when things happen. This makes it immediate," he added.

Like many social networks, Imbee's benefits include libraries of graphics such as avatars and "skins" kids can choose from to personalize their pages. Children can also upload their own graphics, as well as pictures, and the site will eventually host motion graphics and instant messaging.

The site also lets members print personalized cards to hand out to friends, and even earn "points" for blogging, which can add up to prizes like limited-edition skins or skateboards.

Video frenzy
In related news, TiVo introduced its Kidzone feature, software controls that act as a digital nanny for TV viewing. Parents can program their TiVo digital video recorder to block certain channels or programs. Or parents can choose the specific programs their kids are allowed to watch, like those recommended in TiVo's specialized kid-friendly menus. The software controls are now covered by TiVo's standard service fees.

Meanwhile, more organizations are warning parents about the dangers that popular video-upload sites can present to kids.

This week, the New York State Consumer Protection Board issued a statement about how simple it is for kids to find and watch racy videos on Google Video, which hosts video submitted by users, entertainment companies and others. Despite policies against violent or pornographic clips, such material still ends up on Google Video, according to the Consumer Protection Board. One video it described, labeled as "funny," depicted a man setting himself on fire.

"It may surprise parents that Google openly presents videos--with many containing strong sexual content and violence--without a child having to first search for these videos," Teresa Santiago, executive director of the board, said in a statement.

According to Santiago, Google had said it would restrict its "Top 100" list and its most-popular video section to only family-friendly videos. And Google said it is working on a safe-search feature for videos that would restrict viewing by kids, if parents applied the filtering tools.

The concerns are real. But judging from this week's Global Internet Summit, many older kids say they aren't watching much at Google Video.

Zach, a 17-year-old from Newport Beach, Calif., said he largely visits YouTube and wasn't even aware of Google Video. What's more, Yasmin, an 18-year-old from the area, called sites like MySpace "overrated," indicating that MySpace could be a fad for younger kids.

So what's the latest fad for college-bound kids? Ravelinks.com, according to CK, a 17-year-old headed to Chapman University next fall.

"That's where I find out about parties," he said.

Send insights or tips on this topic to stefanie.olsen@cnet.com.

10 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
One Solution
Though Children's Privacy Rights people may say this is evil or wrong.....

The most simple way to maintain a watchful eye on your child's online experiences is to install monitoring software (e.g iambigbrother.com or something similiar). It runs unobtrusively in the background and monitors email, IM, websites, screen shots if activated etc etc etc. While this may not stop a child from doing something online at a friend's PC or elsewhere you can never fully monitor your kid. Like smoking, sex or drugs if they are going to do it at the park or a friend's then they are going to do it period. But at least this s/w works when they are at home, and for most kids in school thats probably where they do MOST of their computing from. The only question left is do you TELL them you are monitoring (not spying! lol) them or keep it hidden (which would probably be spying lol)

sidenote: this type of software works so well that I was able to secretely monitor (via the stealth settings which made it not even show up in the 'program files') my girlfriend's budding romance (and later bust her a$$ with hard proof when she wanted to know WHY I was calling it off!) with her co-worker even though my job required me to travel 27 days/month!

Needless to say the moment was priceless when her jaw dropped and all she could say was "uhh...but....uhhh...well..." as I walked away. LMFAO
Posted by The user with no name (259 comments )
Reply Link Flag
stupid solutions to a bigger problem
it'll sound weird coming from the mouth of a 25 year old, but
software can't take the place of parenting. it's just a stop-gap
for already bad relationships and a need to know what your child
is doing. maybe instead of installing software to spy on your
children, how about you get to know them?

and who's to say that parents need to know everything about
what their kids are up to. if they can't see their childrens have
been drinking, smoking, or whatever else, then they're pretty
clueless anyway.

there's gotta be a balance between letting kids grow up and not
being completely out of the loop on their lives and installing
software or reading their emails will not do it.
Posted by regan2 (29 comments )
Link Flag
Baby syndrome
While I think that this might sound like a good idea to parents, I'm afraid that it will just add further to culture of overansious parents treating their children like babies.

The best way to protect a child from an internet predetor is to treat the child more like an adult. Sit down and explain things to them, don't put restrictions on what they can and cannot do in this way.

I can see a lot of kids becoming frustrated that their parents are putting them on a restricted service while their friends parents are letting them use MySpace or a dedicated blogging service, and then either to find ways to rebel against the system, or giving up.

Personally, if I had had to have waited for my Mom to approve everything that I did, while my friends had unlimited access to their homepage and contacts on an open service, I would have become extremely frustraited, told her to stop treating me like a baby, then gotten an illicite MySpace account, and I'm certain that a lot of kids out there in the real world would do just the same.

Closseting children just leads to a generation of kids who don't know how to deal with the real world.
Posted by perfectblue97 (326 comments )
Reply Link Flag
you just made my previous point
thank you
Posted by The user with no name (259 comments )
Link Flag
Baby syndrome
While I think that this might sound like a good idea to parents, I'm afraid that it will just add further to culture of overansious parents treating their children like babies.

The best way to protect a child from an internet predetor is to treat the child more like an adult. Sit down and explain things to them, don't put restrictions on what they can and cannot do in this way.

This is fine for 8 year olds, but I can see parents trying to get a 13 year old to ditch their MYSpace for this and ending up with a blazing row.

Closseting children just leads to a generation of kids who don't know how to deal with the real world.

I can see a lot of kids becoming frustrated that their parents are putting them on a restricted service while their friends parents are letting them use MySpace or a dedicated blogging service, and then either to find ways to rebel against the system, or giving up.

Personally, if I had had to have waited for my Mom to approve everything that I did, while my friends had unlimited access to their homepage and contacts on an open service, I would have become extremely frustraited, told her to stop treating me like a baby, then gotten an illicite MySpace account, and I'm certain that a lot of kids out there in the real world would do just the same.
Posted by perfectblue97 (326 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Seems Pointless
Look, what they need to do is have a Xanga or MySpace like thing that is 100% free like MySpace or Xanga, but the parents can read over everything they put. Monitoring private messges, all posts that are up and the ability to edit. That's what they need, it also needs to be kept enough under wraps so the kids don't know, I mean, why would I use that over Xanga if I knew my parents could watch and edit.
Posted by MrEggsalad (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
perfect!
My nieces have Xanga and were given free reign over what they did with it. The only condition was that the parents had to have access to the site and could veto posted pics and whatnot.

One of the girls, having fun like most kids do, put up some innapropriate pics...know she already is a real beautiful girl but what she posted would have made some predator flip out! Then it was also seen that Xanga has places to list your IM contacts (which also reveal emails) and she had filled these in with her REAL info!

The pics went, the contact info went as well. Now their are more appropriate pics on her site. She's happy the parents are happy.
Posted by The user with no name (259 comments )
Link Flag
Monkey see, Monkey Do
Little kids like to do what big kids do. Big kids use services like myspace, so little kids want the same, but myspace is a sewer. Solution? Make a kid friendly myspace. The problem? How to make money off the site. Their solution, get the parents to pay a monthly fee to have their kids talk to their friends while they monitor everything they say and do.

Personally, the best way to monitor them is to sit with them as they use the computer. Kind of hard to do something naughty when your mom is watching and receiving IMs from girls that like to flash you on their webcams is definately out of the question.
Posted by thedreaming (573 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Almost a good idea
It's a nice idea and as the parent of a two year old who has her own e-mail address and loves to mash gibberish on the keyboard every chance she gets, kids are getting more and more connected.

But I gotta balk at another monthly charge. At some point I'm gonna have to stop being so stingy, because I would also complain about ads targetted at my child, but for now, another monthly charge is hard to take. I hope that when they hit critical mass then they start to reduce the cost. Or sell out to Disney and it becomes part of a larger package.
Posted by TV James (680 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.