- Related Stories
-
AT&T to buy BellSouth for $67 billion
March 5, 2006 -
BellSouth, 8x8 launch VoIP service
December 9, 2005 -
eBay to nab Skype for $2.6 billion
September 12, 2005 -
Cable raises its voice
March 3, 2005
Anyone who's followed the emergence of IP services since the late 1990s has endured a steady diet of hype surrounding voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP. The dream for VoIP enthusiasts has always been the retirement of the dinosaur-age public switched telephone network in favor of a more dynamic, connectionless network using the Internet Protocol.
It's fair to say that at least part of this dream has been fulfilled. New companies such as Vonage, which offer residential phone service over IP, have become household names thanks to hefty marketing budgets that splash the company's logo all over the Web, in magazines and on TV.
Skype's free PC-to-PC calling service has also gotten significant traction, with more than 75 million subscribers. And the $2.6 billion acquisition of the small European company by eBay has definitely raised VoIP's profile. Other Internet companies, such as Google, Yahoo and AOL, are also introducing voice capabilities as part of their most popular products.
Then there are the cable companies, which are likely to become the biggest threat to the old telephone network. Time Warner Cable added 880,000 voice subscribers last year, for a total of 1.1 million voice subscribers in 2005. No one can deny that's huge.
At the Voice On the Net (VON) conference in San Jose, Calif., this week, more than 300 companies selling VoIP products and services gathered for a semiannual pep rally, claiming that VoIP is already hitting the mainstream market.
But is it really true?
Though traditional phone companies are losing access lines at an alarming rate--5.7 million in 2005 alone--the culprit stealing their customers is wireless, not VoIP.
"We don't see VoIP as a major threat to us losing residential customers," said Steve Zimba, director of converged services for BellSouth. "We see more degradation of the business due to wireless substitution. However, we think VoIP will be an important part of the future."
Problems of perception
The reality is that VoIP has still got a long way to go before people see it as a true replacement to their old telephones. Lingering questions about the technology's reliability still haunt it, as average consumers try to wrap their head around what voice over IP really means.
BellSouth's Zimba said residential consumers are confused about the technology. They don't see enough value in the new services that VoIP providers can offer, because many of them don't believe they need the features they currently have from the traditional phone company.
"There is a perception problem with VoIP," he said. "People think, 'You are going to put my voice on the Internet? I don't think so.' We are urging the industry to get away from selling VoIP as a technology and to start calling it something else, like broadband voice, in order to get mass adoption."
In fact, it is hard to detect whether the phone companies have moved toward residential VoIP at all in the past year. AT&T and Verizon each have their own residential IP telephony services, but neither company has been marketing them much.
Representatives of these companies were sent to the VON conference to provide an update on what they're doing, but they barely even mentioned residential VoIP products. AT&T talked more about its business VoIP service, while Verizon touted its Fios fiber-to-the-home network, which is costing the company billions of dollars to build.
"We're still selling the VoiceWing service," said Link Hoewing, vice president of Internet technology policy for Verizon. "But we're very focused on developing our Fios platform. That's the most important thing we're doing right now."
BellSouth hasn't introduced its own service, and likely won't, since it will soon be acquired by AT&T, which has agreed to pay $67 billion in stock for the local phone company. Late last year BellSouth announced an agreement to resell 8x8's VoIP service to consumers, but what happens to that deal after the merger with AT&T is still a matter of speculation.
At least one of the big phone companies has plans to move aggressively into the VoIP market. Sprint, which is spinning off its local phone business in the next few months, plans a phased rollout of new VoIP services.
But supporters of IP technology at the VON conference say VoIP is only one piece of the entire IP services market. And they're already focusing on the next big thing: video over the Net.
"While we've been watching VoIP mature and go mainstream, we're now seeing another opportunity arise," said Jeff Pulver, co-founder of Vonage and president of Pulver.com, the company putting on the VON conference. "I think that video on the Net will be even bigger than VoIP. I predict that within five years video on the Net will be more disruptive than VoIP has been in the past 10 years."
See more CNET content tagged:
VoIP, BellSouth Corp., AT&T Corp., IP, IP telephony




Anyone else agree?
There are NO problems. I am well pleased with my connection when I talk to my daughter in Alaska.
SBC (now ATT) charged me 37 cents a minute to call her. With my Vonage plan I pay $24.99 a month plus tax to talk all I want in the USA and Canada.
I can't figure out why people buy the Time Warner VOIP. In my local area they charge $39.99 plus tax for exactly the same service that I get from Vonage for $24.99 from Vonage. This "discounted" price is only available if you subscribe to all three, VOIP, Cable and Road Runner.
By the way I am not a young Geek. I turned 64 last December.
Oh wait. If enough tech illiterates gets on Skype, it might get bogged down. I RETRACT what I'd just typed. PLEASE. Use Vonage. PLEASE.
Skype phones I have used suck. It is always not comfortable to use skype from computer.
To use skype atleast your computer should be on. Even the phones should be connected to computer. May be things have changed!!!
I agree with you that Skype is great. The problem is that its only great for Nerd-to-Nerd Communication. If everyone was on broadband and felt like being plugged into their computer to answer a phone call, then Skype will have a glorious future. But, there are 9 billion people on the planet and only a very tiny amount even have computers, let alone internet connection.
It's not being a newbie to buy Vonage; just realistic.
That said, I installed Vonage for my girlfriend and in my many hours of calls to her, it sounds every bit as good as regular phone service.
Besides, who wants to have to sit at their computer to talk on the phone?
As for Skype, what's the difference between that, MSN, Yahoo, Google, etc. etc. etc. chat service? Nothing. It's a fun chat toy, not a communications service.
If you're having jitter problems with your Vonage, it may be your Vonage device. Stay away from the Linksys routers, try the D-Link stand-alone.
Consumers were also slow to adopt cell phones in years past, that is until issues of service quality were addressed.
Consumers will be slow to adopt VoIP as long as it's painfully obvious that you're talking to someone using it. A recent conversation with a client of mine who uses VoIP was like talking into an echo chamber! UGH! He didn't have to tell me his company was using it.... I could figure that out quite easily!
Fix the quality issue and you'll see people flocking to VoIP providers in DROVES!
Ken
After trying Charter Digital Cable for a month, I dropped it because the TV picture was so bad compared to satellite. If I could stand the loss of quality in TV, I would drop Verizon altogether and go with cable but that's not likely any time soon. Satellite broadband is too expensive and unreliable in our area, so there's no way I'm going to swith to that service. As long as I have to keep paying for Verizon local service in order to have broadband, no naked broadband means no VoIP for me.
I think this situation may be affecting many people in the same way, thereby delaying the acceptance of VoIP.
First, how many ISPs want you to use their VOIP service? And how would they "force" you to use it? Cripple the other services, reduce routing priority to third party servers, and sometimes just outright blocking access.
Then, mix that with broadband requiring other services, its tough on consumers. They tell us its to "subsidize" the cost, but that is just a line. In the end, you pay more for "subsidized" hardware and connections.
Even bellsouth has managed to block the "no phone line required" DSL providers by using proprietary SLAMs, and in turn charge you $5 to $15 more for access depending on the service you get in comparison to the other providers.
This is where fighting the restrictive practices is important. Remove the bundling requirements, remove the proprietary crap, and make it unlawful to block access to other companies' services. This way, I can get my internet connection my way, use my own phone service, and not run into the crap. And with proper configuration for routing, no problems.
Right now, I am going through Earthlink, with Vonage. People tell me its clearer than my line with Bellsouth used to be. Then again, I managed to track down the few problems and screamed at them to fix em.
now its golden, but it should be this way from the start for everyone. Until that happens, its going to be a limited market.
http://www.buckleupnow.om
www.lucafiligheddu.com
Whoever reads this, stay away from it!
Andy
- CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
- by ENCHANTEDMERMAID August 31, 2007 1:49 PM PDT
- There have been two class action lawsuits from investors and another one from customers
- Reply to this comment
-
(28 Comments)http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/03/vonage_class_action.html