June 2, 2006 4:44 PM PDT
Video games in Congress' crosshairs
- Related Stories
-
Senate panel OKs video game study
March 8, 2006 -
Judge blocks California video game law
December 22, 2005 -
Senators target 'graphic' video games
November 29, 2005 -
Illinois video game law challenged in court
July 25, 2005 -
What's behind the video game witch hunt?
June 13, 2005 -
More states target violent games
March 4, 2005 -
Illinois seeks to restrict violent games
February 28, 2005
A U.S. House of Representatives committee on consumer protection says it will hold a hearing on the topic later this month, with a focus on "informing parents and protecting children" from the alleged dangers of those types of games.
A committee schedule originally listed the event for next Wednesday. But that date has been postponed because of scheduling conflicts, Jack Seum, chief of staff for Rep. Cliff Stearns, the Florida Republican who chairs the panel, said on Friday.
Game bills in play
| Bill No. | Chief sponsor | What it would do | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. 2126 | Clinton (D) | Bars sale or rental of "mature" video games to minors | still in committee |
| S. 1902 | Lieberman (D) | Orders Fed study on effects of "electronic media" on kids | approved by committee |
| HR 4124 | Markey (D) | Orders Fed study on effects of "electronic media" on kids | still in committee |
| HR 5345 | Matheson (D) | Bars sale or rental of "mature" video games to minors | still in committee |
| HR 1145 | Baca (D) | Requires study of computer game rating system and recommendations for new laws | still in committee |
| H.RES.376 | Upton (R) | Instructs FTC to investigate "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" | passed by House |
| S.RES.212 | Brownback (R) | Instructs FTC to investigate "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" | passed by Senate |
Source: CNET News.com research
A witness list for the hearing, which the committee hopes to reschedule for June 14, had not been finalized by Friday, Seum said.
Representatives from the Entertainment Software Association, which lobbies for the video game industry, and the Entertainment Safety Ratings Board, which oversees the labeling of games, said the organizations expect to testify.
An ESA representative declined to comment on the group's planned testimony, except to say it views it "as an opportunity to talk about the tools available to parents," such as parental control technology.
For his part, Seum said that Stearns is not currently planning any additional legislation. "There's nothing we're planning to do immediately as a result of this hearing," he said.
There's hardly any shortage of video game proposals, with many already pending in Congress. Just last month, a little-noticed bill called the Video Games Ratings Enforcement Act was referred to Stearns' panel for consideration.
Introduced by Rep. Jim Matheson, a Utah Democrat, the proposal would make it illegal for anyone to sell, rent, or attempt to sell or rent video games rated "adults-only" to minors under age 18, or "mature" video games to anyone under age 17. The Federal Trade Commission would be permitted to levy fines of up to $5,000 per violation.
That approach is nearly identical to a bill unveiled last December by U.S. Senate Democrats Hillary Clinton and Joseph Lieberman. They propose imposing fines or community service hours on any business that sells or rents video games with a "mature," "adults-only" or "ratings pending" tag to anyone under age 17. That measure has not yet gone up for debate.
Both longtime foes of the video game industry, Clinton and Lieberman have publicly lashed out against "graphic, violent and pornographic content" in video games. They were among those who pledged new action after a flap last summer over a sexually explicit scene embedded in "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas."
Earlier this year, the two politicians and a handful of other supporters secured a Senate committee's approval of a bill that would bankroll a sweeping study of the "impact of electronic media use." That measure, called the Children and Media Research Advancement Act, or CAMRA, does not propose any restrictions, but it is viewed as a way to justify new regulations down the road. An identical bill is pending in the House but has not yet proceeded to a vote.
If the experience of states that have attempted to enforce their own laws restricting violent and sexually explicit video games is any indicator, the federal proposals aren't likely to go far without legal challenges.
In April, a federal judge tossed out a Michigan law that criminalized the sale of violent video games to children under 17, deeming it a violation of the First Amendment's guarantees of free expression. During the past few years, federal courts have declared similar laws in California, Illinois and Washington--along with the cities of St. Louis and Indianapolis--to be unconstitutional.
That hasn't stopped other states from continuing to pass new laws. Just last week, the Oklahoma Legislature gave final approval to a bill that would make it a crime to sell violent video games to anyone younger than 18. It heads next to the governor's desk.
See more CNET content tagged:
committee,
video game,
mature,
minor,
Human Resources




You parents need to monitor/ parent your children. There is no piece of legislation they will ever pass that will properly raise you're kids!
These politicians as of late love to play the video game card or the terror card to distract the public from their inadequate job performance on the real issues. The truth be told they have no business legislating publications of any kind.
We have pornography, yet parents seem to be able to keep that medium in check (at least I would hope). I do not see these politicians outraged about the latest Penthouse or porn site, yet they attack video games with such vigor.
Don't they have a war to fight or a deficit to cut or some highways to fix? Why are our tax dollars being wasted to control our first amendment just because Hillary (and others)thinks she can raise you're kids better than you?
idealistic fools. I wish that they would start trying to work on how
to stay out of our lives instead of on how to protect us by limiting
our choices.
Nice to know the DemocRat's have a well placed cadre of idiots to balance out the (already accepted the chimp is an idiot) Bush boosting neo-con and fundamentalist non-islamist nanny-stateists.
Hillary and Liberman are proof positive that all of the sheep towing the line accusing the Bush administration of hideous constitutional abuses, are firmly denying their own kitchen pantry full of black kettles.
Here's to the United States of Hysteria.
The problem was discovered when knowledge workers using the first prototypes of close-spaced movable office workstations began to have mental breaks.
Subliminal Sight and peripheral vision reflexes had operated in the special circumstances those workstations created to cause the mental breaks. The cubicle solved that problem by 1968. Cubicles are designed to block side or peripheral vision to limit the subliminal detection of threat movement while the worker is concentrating.
The situation is so simple that video game players can accidentally create the circumstances and will have the same mental break if a threshold of exposure is reached.
The Redlake shooter left a journal entry that shows what he did to cause exposure.
VisionAndPsychosis.Net is a private psychology project about the 'conflict of physiology' that allows this to happen.
http://VisionAndPsychosis.Net (There is nothing being sold there and there is no charge for the information to prevent exposure.)Follow the instructions to start with the psychology demonstration page.
This is like Clinton speaking right after Columbine, saying that violence is not the answer. The same day he approved a bombing run.
How contradictory eh?
This must be the exception because it protects us from terrorists some how or another. Right? Right!
Sure as night follows day, the usual swarm of shills, hacks, crooks and self-publicists in DC come out of the woodwork during election season, with the same old wagonload of tired crap they hope we'll get so offended about that it will make us go insane and vote for them.
Once they get elected, they'll settle down and return to doing what they do best: spend our money on pork-barrel projects and figure out new ways of hiding all the bribes they get.
goverment is pretty much saying we know whats best for you and we have your safty in mind so yets take away your freedom to portect you from your self.
this is not goverments job it was never setup to be like this. and till people start standing up and telling goverment what they think and saying hay we want our presonal freedoms back or till they pass some law to portect peoples presonal freedoms so that goverment dosent have the right to use presonal safty as an excuse we will just keep losing our presonal freedoms little more every day.
- The MORALS police are at it again
-
by GrandpaN1947
April 24, 2008 5:48 PM PDT
- and YOU voted them in!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 27 Comments >>Now do something about it!