December 12, 2004 7:25 PM PST

Verizon DSL not ready to go 'naked'

Related Stories

SBC told to unhook phone from broadband

June 11, 2004

Verizon to offer 'naked' DSL

May 26, 2004
Verizon Communications is backing down from plans to sell early next year high-speed Internet service without requiring a local phone line from the company.

A mass market launch near the start of 2005 seemed plausible last February when the carrier tested standalone DSL. But unspecified technical challenges have stretched that timetable, a Verizon representative said recently.

"It's December, and it's not ready at this time," a Verizon representative said. "We're still working on it."

The apparently mired launch highlights how Verizon and the three other major local phone companies are reeling from defections to cellular and Internet-based phone services. Traditionally, the so-called Bell companies sold DSL as part of a package with local phone service, and customers who switched local phone providers risked losing their DSL service.

As Verizon's example shows, the shift from the old business model is taking place at a glacial pace among the nation's four major local phone companies, known collectively as the regional Bell operating companies. The Bells say the plodding pace of change is mainly due to the increasing importance of service bundles, in which satellite TV, broadband, and cellular and local phone services are dramatically discounted if purchased together.

Consumer groups say without standalone broadband--otherwise known as "naked DSL"--the Bells lock customers into services. The groups hail Cox, Comcast and other major cable operators that already sell standalone broadband for about $10 a month more if it's not purchased in a bundle.

BellSouth sells naked DSL in Georgia, Kentucky and Florida, but that is not by choice. The operator is under orders from public utility regulators. "At this point, we just don't believe it's the right move for us," a BellSouth representative said in regards to expanding. "We've looked at it, but we have no plans to offer it at this time."

Not all Bells are resistant. Qwest was the first to sell standalone broadband, charging $32 a month. Broadband with a Qwest local phone line is $27 a month. A Qwest representative said naked DSL is a means of doing business with Qwest customers who are dropping phone lines in favor of cell phones. "They need high-speed Internet access," the representative said.

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
IS this true?
I called every DSL carrier here in Fort Lauderdale FL and all of them said I must have a phone line. How come this article states that BellSouth has to sell me the standalone yet when I contacted Bellsouth they didn't mention this? I cut my landline 3 years ago, as did all of my friends. Years ago I couldn't even get a pizza delivered from Pizza hut until I contacted thier managment and they changed their policy on customers who don't have land lines. NOW I NEED MLB AND DIRECT TV TO ALLOW ME MY MLB PACKAGE WITHOUT A LANDLINE! DIRECT TV SAYS THEY HAVE THE TECH TO PULL IT OFF BUT MLB BALKED AT IT. So I'm not spending 20 bucks a month on a phone line I won't use just to watch the Yankees.
Posted by saleen351 (36 comments )
Reply Link Flag
They "risked" nothing!
"... customers who switched local phone providers risked losing their DSL service."

No, the risked nothing. They could check before switching to see if their new carrier offered DSL.
Posted by (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.