November 13, 2005 9:01 PM PST

U.S. pads lead in global supercomputing ranking

Two and a half years ago, federal officials were alarmed about U.S. competitiveness in supercomputers, which can model global weather, molecular interaction or simulate nuclear explosions, among other things.

But it appears their concerns might have been exaggerated.

In the new Top500 list of supercomputers, 305 of the machines on the list are installed in the U.S., up from 277 six months ago. The number of machines installed in Europe, China and Japan, meanwhile, dipped. Thirty four of the top 35 come from U.S. manufacturers or universities while 479 of the computers have a North American pedigree.

Supercomputers at SC05

IBM remained the dominant company in supercomputers. Big Blue accounted for five out of the top 10 supercomputers in the semiannual Top500 ranking, including the top three computers on the list. Overall, Big Blue accounted for 43.8 percent of the machines on the list, more than any other manufacturer or university.

The company's BlueGene/L, which knocked NEC's Earth Simulator from its top spot in November 2004, remained the top-ranked supercomputer in the world for the third time in a row. Installed in Lawrence Livermore National Labs, the computer has doubled in size in the past six months and now contains 131,076 processors. It will continue to grow.

"The limit is less of an issue of architectural characteristics than....what the customers are looking for," said Dave Turek, vice president of Deep Computing at IBM.

BlueGene/L can now churn 280.6 teraflops, or nearly 281 trillion calculations a second and is the only computer to exceed 100 teraflops.

"This system is expected to remain the number one supercomputer in the world for the next few editions of the Top500 list," wrote the Top500 organization in an outline of the list.

Other U.S.-based companies fared well too. Hewlett-Packard accounted for 33.8 percent of the computers, rebounding to 169 from a dip of 131 computers in June. Dell landed in the top 10 with the fifth-ranked "Thunderbird," an 8,000-processor supercomputer installed at Sandia National Laboratories.

Intel microprocessors were found in 333, or two-thirds, of the machines on the list. The number of supercomputers sporting Intel Itanium chips dropped drastically. Growth, however, was seen in those carrying 64-bit Intel Xeons or Opteron processors from Advanced Micro Devices.

The list, which will be released formally at the SC05 Supercomputing Conference in Seattle on Monday, ranks computers by how they perform on a benchmark, called Linpack. Linpack emphasizes how rapidly a computer performs a dense battery of floating point or decimal calculations.

The test doesn't completely examine performance, but it does provide a functional gauge for ranking supercomputers. Still, officials want to come up with different ways to rank these machines.

Companies and nations fiercely compete for rankings. For two and a half years, the now seventh-ranked Earth Simulator, which occupies a three-story building, sat atop the list. Worried about national competitiveness, U.S. federal officials began to push manufacturers to built even better custom machines.

5 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Apple has more than one machine in the top 500
Even one as high as 15th called the MACH5 with only 3072
processors. System X out of Virginia Tech is 20th.
Posted by wobbble (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
The xServe at 303 is at UCLA, not Bowie State
The Bowie State Apple cluster is ranked 308
Posted by Arthur Young (19 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Apple actually has . . .
. . . two in the top twenty. COLSA is number 15 and Virginia Tech
is number 20. There are others as well, however there's no
Windows on the list.
Posted by rbannon (96 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I thought we were "falling behind"...
Hey this article doesn't fit the journalistic meme du jour that the US is "falling behind" in research, didn't you guys get the talking points fax?

You should at least add a paragraph saying "But American researchers mostly use supercomputers just to download porn."
Posted by MikeDson (50 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Apple and list
The organization lists only one super from apple. It's in the PDF by manufacturer. (it's page seven of the pdf-link on front door of their site.) In the counting, they apparently count the others as self-mades. but can clarify.
Posted by michael kanellos (65 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.