November 12, 2007 1:09 PM PST

U.K. lawmakers skeptical about Europe GPS project

U.K. lawmakers skeptical about Europe GPS project
Related Stories

Google must woo mobile app developers

November 8, 2007

Help! I can't program my car

October 26, 2007

The age of the satellite

October 2, 2007

For handset makers, it's all about location

October 2, 2007

Nokia to buy Navteq for $8.1 billion

October 1, 2007

New chip promises to track kids from miles away

September 6, 2007

Thousands of miles, tons of tech

August 14, 2007
Related Blogs

Getting back on track


November 7, 2007

You are here, sort of: Fire Eagle and Urban Mapping


November 9, 2007
A committee of Parliament members has called for a full review of the U.K.'s involvement in the European Galileo satellite-network project.

In a statement released on Monday, Gwyneth Dunwoody, chairperson of the Transport Sub-Committee in Parliament, said that it would be "folly" for the U.K. to pursue the project until a review is completed.

The cost of Galileo was planned to be $4.38 billion but the Transport Sub-Committee believes that this could spiral to $20.73 billion.

The European Commission "is poised to spend billions in taxpayers' money on a satellite system, without any realistic assessment of its costs and benefits," Dunwoody said. "We must have independent and up-to-date evidence that proceeding with Galileo is worthwhile."

Full development of a network of 30 satellites, to act as a replacement for or supplement to the satellite networking supporting the U.S.'s own Global Positioning System, has already slipped from a planned completion date of 2008 to 2013 and could be delayed longer and go millions over budget. The U.K. is one of a number of European countries that make up the Galileo consortium.

But Septentrio, a satellite-navigation company based in Ghent, Belgium, is promoting the technology as a supplement to the U.S. GPS system, which is operated by the U.S. Department of Defense and includes a constellation of 24 satellites. As Septentrio's chief executive and founder, Peter Grognard, pointed out at a meeting with the press last week, "GPS alone gives access to signals from four or five satellites, and Galileo possibly seven, but, with both signals available, you can access up to 12." This makes the signal much more reliable, he said.

The solution offered by Septentrio is to create a processor that integrates with GPS and Galileo for use in navigation systems such as those used in cars and other vehicles.

Along with others in the satellite community, Grognard had been lobbying Dunwoody and other U.K. MPs in the Transport Sub-Committee. He said that Dunwoody had "listened" to what he had to say, but would not elaborate upon that.

The issue now for the European satellite community is: if the U.K. stalls its involvement in Galileo, that may, combined with indifference from countries like Germany, kill the project altogether.

Grognard believes that, whatever the reservations of the committee of MPs, Galileo comes at a modest price. "We are talking about 1.5 euros (about $2.20) for each European citizen for the next four years, and that represents very good value for the money," Grognard said.

Colin Barker of ZDNet UK reported from London.

See more CNET content tagged:
involvement, satellite, U.K., committee, GPS

2 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
US is loggying to keep GPS monopoly. UK is bending in
GPS is controlled by the US military. GPS is old and the positioning and not sufficiently precise for civil navigation, road tolls etc. The new Galileo network will give EU states guaranteed access to a space-borne precise timing and location service independent of the United States. The US is lobbying hard to keep their global monopoly, as all modern warfare depends on their GPS. UK politicians are dancing to Sam's tune again. How sad and short-sighted.
Posted by kbrumann (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
bb bald for once
Well this such short sighteness, this is not the time to delay the project more, infact this is the time united Kingdom should become more involve in the project, and take a bigger slice of the cake, and profits at the end of the day. Our Mps should be position Britain to take a leading role and not always being cautous and it certainly not the time redraw our support or show any sign of such, the overall project is small change, it way least than what our goverment wasts tax players cash every year, and a project which will most likely bring in billions to our econmy and more if we can position ourselves to be primary leader and supporter and funder of the project.
Posted by knowles2 (1653 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.