- Related Stories
-
Piecing together Windows Vista
November 8, 2006 -
Jobs to demo Leopard at developer conference
June 26, 2006 -
Windows, Mac OS to run side-by-side
June 14, 2006 -
Mac users still waiting for Intel systems
April 19, 2006 -
Jobs: New Intel Macs are 'screamers'
January 10, 2006
But with Apple Computer's shift to Intel chips, the pool of options has expanded considerably. For one, Apple has its own Boot Camp software, which lets Intel-based Macs boot up with either Windows or Mac OS X. Meanwhile, start-up Parallels has released software that lets the Microsoft operating system run in a separate virtual machine with only a slight loss in performance.
Soon there will be yet another option, which, unlike the current choices, doesn't even require a copy of Windows. A company called CodeWeavers is using an open-source technology called Wine to allow some Windows programs to run under Mac OS X.
CodeWeavers is in early testing with CrossOver Office for Mac now and plans to release a final version of the software in July or August. CEO Jeremy White said he would have liked to have seen his product out before the rivals.
"It's unfortunate we couldn't get it out before," White said in an interview. "We would have loved to have been the only solution out for a while."
Though the move to Intel has already opened up Windows options for Mac users, the planned release of CrossOver Office highlights the fact that Apple's systems are becoming far more compatible with the Windows world.
White said CrossOver Office has one big advantage over those other options: Using it doesn't require the purchase of a copy of Windows. However, it also has significant downsides. Its focus is on application compatibility, not device drivers, so things like printers don't work with the Windows applications.
Also, Wine is a compatibility layer, not a true emulator, so it works with only some Windows programs. ("Wine" used to stand for "Wine is not an emulator"--a mind-bending nonacronym along the lines of the GNU Project's "Gnu's not Unix.") Developers at CodeWeavers and others on the open-source Wine effort have to work on each program they want to make compatible.
"That's why it is so hard, and why not so many applications work," White said.
Getting there
The move to the Mac is new, but CodeWeavers has been trying to find a commercial market for Wine technology for three or four years now. Its main product has been its CrossOver Office for Linux, which uses the Wine technology to run, among other programs, Microsoft Office. White said about 100,000 people use the CrossOver Office product.
White acknowledged that the Wine technology remains imperfect.
"In theory, it's the holy grail," White said. "In practice, it's very promising and great when it works."
While many Windows programs may work with the Mac version of CrossOver Office, CodeWeavers will support only a handful. These will likely include Microsoft Project, Microsoft Outlook and the Windows-only game "Half-Life 2," White said.
CodeWeavers remains a small effort. The company has about 20 people, with half those based in St. Paul, Minn., including White.
White said he has some hope that, despite the competition, Mac users will prove less tightfisted than Linux users. Many of these have been reluctant to pay for the CrossOver product, when the technology is also available free in the open-source world.
"Parting with money is just not part of the Linux way," White said.
Plus, there are a lot of Mac users out there. "There are far more Mac users than there are Linux, at least in North America on the desktop," White said.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
Open source
Programming
Mac OS
Microsoft Windows
Microsoft
See more CNET content tagged:
CodeWeavers Inc.,
wine,
GNU,
Apple Macintosh,
emulator




full blown Windows with all the device drivers. Wine is not a
compatibility layer, it's an incompatibility layer. Just leave it alone
and focus on something else.
http://www.techknowcafe.com/content/view/552/44/
---
Pixel image editor - http://www.kanzelsberger.com
and Macs would be common.
For years, we've wanted more native application, but nothing has been done to increase this number. The only thing that is going to increase the number of native apps is to 1) sell more macs and 2) put more cross platform tools in the hands of developers (Yellow Book)
Apps like this drive point 1 in that they help convert more windows, or really pc users, to mac users. Why buy a pc laptop when you can buy a mac and be able to run BOTH OSes and have the best of both worlds? Then, once the market share of macs goes up, and users like the easer to use OS/X, these two factors will drive the clamor for more native applications.
Add in the factor that Vista, with its huge hardware requirements, is going to force many to choose a new platform soon, and the opportunity is there for Apple to seize.
mac to run one or two windows applications natively, but there
are always going to be downsides.
Whenever you add another layer, everything gets slower. This
kind of software sounds good, but I would think that it would
only work really well on less processor intensive tasks.
I hope that app developers dont see programs like this as an
alternative to developing for the Mac market. They would be
foolish to do so, and it would suck! I bought a mac to enjoy
using a mac, not to pretend its a windows PC!
Also, if there was an option between a mac native app and a
windows app I would choose a mac native app everytime. Nicer
GUI, sleek workings etc. The only apps I would want to use that
come from a PC would be browsers to test web pages.
http://www.answers.com/topic/wine-software
http://www.answers.com/topic/wine-software
- Is anyone awake at C|Net?
-
by DeusExMachina
June 30, 2006 3:10 PM PDT
- In what way is this a "new" option? It is not even necessary to look
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>to Linux. It is difficult to believe that the author bothered to do
even five minutes of basic research? If so, it is difficult to imagine
how he could have missed darwine.
http://darwine.opendarwin.org/