- Related Stories
-
Update to Linux kernel debuts after 'false alarms'
November 2, 2005 -
Torvalds weighs in on Linux trademark row
August 22, 2005 -
Open season at Linux show
August 11, 2005 -
Torvalds unveils new Linux control system
April 20, 2005 -
Torvalds looking for new Linux home
April 8, 2005 -
Linux developers create forum to air core flaws
February 2, 2005
The kernel development team recently set a policy that new features must be added to the next version of the kernel during the two weeks after the release of the previous version.
But James Bottomley, who currently maintains the code for SCSI support in the kernel, said Wednesday that he is finding it difficult to keep to the two-week merge window as contributors are leaving it to him to test whether their patches work with the rest of the system.
"That's a nice theory, except that it's my contributors who drop me in it by leaving their patch sets until you declare a kernel, dumping the integration testing on me in whatever time window is left," Bottomley wrote in a posting to the kernel mailing list.
Torvalds replied that Bottomley needs to get tough on his contributors.
"You tell them to stop it, and stop accepting their patches in that window, so that it's their code that gets delayed, not yours," he said in an e-mail.
Torvalds added that he plans to get tough on people who add things to the kernel too late.
"People always complain that I'm being too soft. Not so this time," Torvalds said.
"If people miss the merge window or start abusing it with hurried last-minute things that just cause problems for -rc1 (the first release candidate), I'll just refuse to merge, and laugh in their faces derisively when they whine plaintively at me, and tell them there's going to be a new opening soon enough," he said.
The latest release of the Linux kernel, version 2.6.14, was released almost a month late due to last-minute mistaken bug reports.
Ingrid Marson of ZDNet UK reported from London.
See more CNET content tagged:
Linus Torvalds, kernel, contributor, Linux kernel, Linux






I'm not sure what kind of point you were trying to make. The best I can come up with is that you feel the Linux development would halt should Linus vanish from the scene for whatever reason. I doubt that would happen, he doesn't tend to create much of the code these days. Instead he just coordinates code being added to the kernel.
As for OS2, I doubt you will see it become Open Source any time soon. Though I would love to see that happen I think IBM has too many licensed portions of source code to make it happen even if they wildly wanted to.
http://www.analogstereo.com/cassette_deck_alpine_mrd_m1000.htm
of a hobby. Good on 'em.
I like Linux and Open Source and I don't believe that Linus is an example of the spirit and community he helped create. However, I think he is trying to help make Linux the best it can be, but did he think it out. You have a community built on the idea of freedom and I think if you try to get tough on those guys (who are working for free) they are going to loose intrest in helping and just go away.
But, I don't know the whole story so it may be nothing like that at all.
- Crude and Unprofessional
- by open-mind November 12, 2005 9:05 PM PST
- Linus should try to be calm and classy like Steve Ballmer:
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)http://news.com.com/2100-1014-5846243.html?tag=tb
http://www.ntk.net/ballmer/mirrors.html
;-)