August 10, 2007 4:00 AM PDT

Top Gun lives on in the Nevada desert

Top Gun lives on in the Nevada desert
Related Stories

Road Trip 2007: Science and tech in the Southwest

August 14, 2007

Cold War-era memories meet the future

July 30, 2007

Arizona, heaven for airplane fans

July 27, 2007
Related Blogs

At last, 747s, up close and personal


August 1, 2007
FALLON, Nev.--If you've ever driven west across Nevada on U.S. 50, there's a decent chance you've looked up and seen the odd sight of two or more military jets dogfighting overhead.

I have, at least. Years ago, some friends and I were camped on a small desert a couple hours east of Fallon and, sure enough, there were the planes, dancing overhead, the pilots seeming to show off their skills for us.

In reality, the fighters are from the Fallon Naval Air Station, a training facility for aircraft carrier-based Navy combat pilots that also happens to be home to the service's famous Top Gun academy.

I got to visit the base as the second-to-last stop on Road Trip 2007, and while I was there, I stood for a while atop the air-traffic control tower, watching a succession of F-18 Hornets, F-16s and an F-5 take off, scream into the sky and then return a little later, roar close to the tower, land and finally taxi onto the tarmac. They were so close I could see the pilots.

The Fallon Naval Air Station first opened in 1942 as a place to train pilots for carrier-based combat operations. The Navy chose the location because the weather is consistently clear--there's generally 60 to 70 miles of visibility with little cloud cover--and pilots get 300 or more days of great visual-flight-rules weather every year. Further, the 13,000 square miles of military operating area the base uses to conduct its training runs are sparsely populated.

Top Gun academy

The base's training operations are run by the Naval Strike and Air Warfare Center, which is known on the base as NSAWC. And the pilots who graduate from this command are not just biding their time. My host during my visit, Public Affairs Officer Zip Upham, himself a former Naval Intelligence officer, said that most of the pilots who come out of the program these days--since the original Gulf War, in fact--are soon off to the Persian Gulf and are "in harm's way" within about four months of leaving Fallon.

Four times a year, an airwing arrives, and its personnel spend a month learning many of the tricks they need for successful combat missions.

"It's an extensive graduate-level program to get (pilots) up to speed on flying off carriers," Upham said.

What I see when I look out from the catwalk over the control tower is a tarmac full of planes, most of them F-18s, the twin-tail, twin-engine fighters mainly used by the Navy. Upham explained that the Navy doesn't generally use F-16s--which have only a single engine--because of concerns that if a carrier-based plane loses its only engine while out over open water, its pilot may well have to ditch the aircraft, while a plane with two engines is more likely to get back to the base.

"You name it, we can simulate it and make them figure out how to defeat it."
--Zip Upham
base public affairs officer

The Air Force, on the other hand, has hundreds of F-16s in its arsenal.

So, the few F-16s here--which all seem to be painted with different shades of camouflage coloring--are used as "adversary" planes in combat training exercises since it is considered a bad idea to put identical planes up against each other in exercises. And in general, it's the instructors who play the role of the enemy.

"The instructors have a great job," Upham said. "They get to be the bad guys."

It happens that my visit coincided with an airwing having just departed, so the fighters taking off and landing are piloted by instructors out for some flight hours to keep fresh.

But during about an hour on the catwalk, there's a seemingly never-ending flow of planes taking off, staying out for a little while, and then returning from their runs. To keep their patterns sharp for future carrier missions, the pilots approach the airfield from the south, do a sharp--and very loud--180-degree turn over the control tower, fly all the way back to the end of the runway, do another 180-degree turn, and then land.

Analyzing the details
It is an impressive thing to watch as the fighters come in from the south, do their bank overhead, and then roar off again. The sound is deafening, the planes big and powerful.

Once they touch down, they taxi back in and come back onto the tarmac in pairs, where they are met by a landing crew that directs the planes to their tie-up points.

And from my vantage point, I have a perfect view of the planes as they come to the west end of the tarmac, turn 90 degrees and then head to their parking space.

One of the things that makes NSAWC so useful to the Navy is its Tactical Air Crew Combat Training System, a computer system that allows commanders to track, record, play back and analyze the training sessions in "excruciating detail," Upham said.

Road Trip 2007 promo

The technology, which works because the planes carry transponders in place of under-the-wing missiles, allows technicians to "see" the entire session digitally, all in real time, even with up to 36 planes involved.

And by adding new GPS technology, which will eliminate the need for the planes to carry the transponders, that number should soon expand to around 100 simultaneous planes that can be tracked.

"By using the radar systems we have on our Electronic Warfare range and (on the) aircraft we can put an airwing through its paces," Upham said.

That's especially true because NSAWC can create almost any combat scenario and put the pilots through them.

"You name it, we can simulate it," Upham said, "and make them figure out how to defeat it."

And while the 75 pilots in each airwing who come through Fallon are highly proficient and well-trained, it is the Top Gun pilots who command the most attention.

They arrive in groups of about 15 and stay at the base for around nine weeks. The goal is to train them to be instructors, and the education is rigorous: very intensive tactical training, as well as weapons deployment training, all during as many as three flights a day per pilot.

"The goal is to turn a decent pilot into an excellent instructor," said Upham, "and then send them out into the fleet to be weapons and tactics trainers within their fleet."

Meanwhile, to get Fallon's fleet into the air, the base requires a lot of fuel, and as I'm watching from the catwalk, a giant yellow tanker truck appears after two F-18s return, intent on refueling them.

Upham tells me that the base uses 28 million gallons of fuel a year, all of which gets there via a pipeline from Sparks, Nev.

The base also uses as much as 80 percent of all the bombs the entire Navy drops in training, and focuses much of that destructive power on one 44,000-acre bombing range. That's the one place that administrators can be sure they won't hit anyone, no matter what goes wrong, given that it is big enough to ensure no one can get close to the bombing runs.

"We can guarantee that no matter what goes wrong with that bomb," Upham said, "that it won't land on someone's Winnebago."

See more CNET content tagged:
pilot, plane, training, base, aircraft

13 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Nice picture of an F14!
Of course, they don't use F14s anymore, and the Pentagon recently announced they were destroying mothballed F14s to keep Iran from getting spare parts on the black market.

Way to keep up with the times, Cnet.
Posted by Macaresafer (44 comments )
Reply Link Flag
F14s at Fallon
Sorry, Macaresafer, but F14s are still being used (among others)as aggressors at NAS Fallon, regardless of the Pentagon announcements you've read. While they are not being used in active squadrons, they do represent the adversaries our fleet pilots are likely to encounter. I live only about three miles from the base and see (and HEAR) them go over my house on departure every day starting just before 8AM. F14s and F18s make great alarm clocks!
Posted by baldguy61 (63 comments )
Link Flag
No More Dog Fighting.... Sorry!
Sorry, but the dog fighting days are long over. Now you are going to fire a missle 50 miles away and still hit the plane.

I can't wait until pilots are a thing of the past and the robots lead the way...
Posted by SiXiam (69 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Wrong
Most air-air kills are still done with short to medium range missles with ranges far less than 50 miles.

Armchair theories like that were what lead to such horrible design decisions like leaving the gun off the original F-4 in Vietnam.

You're making Colonel John Boyd roll in his grave.
Posted by smilin:) (889 comments )
Link Flag
How's life in the 1950s?
Here in the 21st century we've learned that technology is great, but there will always be times when the fighting is done at close quarters.


Don't be so eager to see robots fighting our battles. Two big problems with that: First, if you've got a President who ignores the Constitution (sound familiar?) and the robots won't question his orders. Second, run the software that controls those robots on Windows and it's just a matter of time before an enemy can take control of our robots.
Posted by Macaresafer (44 comments )
Link Flag
"no matter what goes wrong with that bomb,"
"We can guarantee that no matter what goes wrong with that bomb," Upham said, "that it won't land on someone's Winnebago."

Hehe riiiight. It's been a few years but I was there when they broke off the days operations to investigate why a practice bomb went through the range observation shack. I suppose it wasn't a Winnebago though.
Posted by smilin:) (889 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Colonel John Boyd can go....
This is not Vietnam.... it's what more than 40yrs latter.

Leave the stupid gun off the fighters and focus on your medium and long range missiles.

The robots are coming and the pilots are done... get over it.
Posted by SiXiam (69 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Don't take the guns
If the missiles fail, then what would you do without the guns? I think there will always be a need for guns on the plane. The F4 proved that to the higher ups back when it was in service.
Posted by Michael00360 (58 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Take away the guns on the fighters...
They don't need them.

Besides if your missiles fail, then your buddy can take the shot.

Machine guns fail also... same solution.
Posted by SiXiam (69 comments )
Link Flag
yes itis correctly said that if missiles are fail,then what would we do without the guns.
==============
shirley
<a href:"http://www.caravanmarket.com.au >caravans</a>
Posted by shellyk0011 (4 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.