October 24, 2006 4:00 AM PDT
Newsmaker: Time to make security software a lot easier
See all Newsmakers- Related Stories
-
Securing consumer-friendly smart phones
October 17, 2006 -
More security bang for fewer bucks
August 29, 2006 -
Microsoft's antivirus package makes a splash
August 11, 2006 -
Security firms squabble over mobile threats
July 24, 2006 -
AOL security product ready for testing
July 17, 2006 -
Is your cell phone due for an antivirus shot?
February 24, 2006 -
Symbian sells 'one phone per second'
February 14, 2006 -
New pests target Symbian-based gadgets
January 20, 2006
(continued from previous page)
What's the key difference between getting security software from a store and getting it from a service provider for the consumer?
Siilasmaa: The service provider business means that your ISP will offer you a security solution that they can continuously adapt to the requirements of their customers, through what we call "profiles."
For example, online gamers could be a profile, and the ISP can change the configuration behind the online gamer profile. When (you're playing) "World of Warcraft," and you need to open a particular port on the firewall to enable that game to work properly, the ISP can do that. You just find, when you install the product, that it works, and you don't even know that somebody has changed this online gaming profile.
Who pays you the cost of the security software?
Siilasmaa: The ISP is our partner and our customer. The ISP may finance it by charging their customers, or they may bundle the security service into their broadband access.
You believe that's the way of the future, instead of retail?
Siilasmaa: Well, all the customer surveys we have done--very conclusively and with a high margin--prove that the people who buy security from the service provider feel it's significantly more convenient and easier for them on an ongoing basis.
Another area F-Secure likes to talk about is the threat to mobile phones. Is this a real threat, or is this hype?
Siilasmaa: Probably a bit of both, in the sense that it's so difficult to communicate exactly what the level of threat is. There has been mobile malware for a little bit over two years. The number of different viruses is over 300 today--a significantly faster growth than we saw on the PC side in the early days.
All the virus samples we get come from either mobile operators or mobile device manufacturers. So, basically all the samples--with the possible exception of less than five--have actually been in the wild.
Almost all of these viruses are for Symbian operating systems. When you have a Symbian device, you are vulnerable if you allow the malware to be installed. It will typically arrive in an MMS message or over a Bluetooth connection, at which time you see a message asking you to approve the download and installation of the application.
Do you own a Symbian phone?
Siilasmaa: Sure, and I have never received a virus.
Is mobile antivirus the next big business opportunity?
Siilasmaa: We believe that it's an important platform.
Microsoft is stirring up the security industry. It's launched OneCare in the U.S., it's going to launch it in Europe and it'll have enterprise products as well. Does that concern you at all, or are you basically saying, "Bring it on!"
Siilasmaa: We obviously say, "Bring it on." At the same time, we are naturally concerned about pricing. If Microsoft starts to offer their solutions at significantly reduced prices to gain market share, and then raises prices again after a few years, that obviously is a business issue all the companies have to tackle. Otherwise, Microsoft is a welcome addition, and even if they achieve a significant market share, they won't be as big as Symantec is today.
So you've seen how they entered the U.S. market--$50 (to cover) three PCs?
Siilasmaa: That's fine, it is a good business for everybody concerned.
See more CNET content tagged:
F-Secure Corp., drill, security company, convenience, security






problems in almost 6 years, and no extra cost.
Viruses exists for *nix/Mac but they are more like Polar Bears trying to exist in Africa.
But then my point was, while your Fanboying how great osX is; don't forget to thank the generations of Unix developers who made your osX possible.
The one piece that is still way too difficult to use is encryption software. The only ease of use encryption I have seen, is Windows EFS, but then it is too simplistic. If you are logged in as that user, you have encrypted access.
- How much did F-secure pay for this advert?
- by mgreere October 24, 2006 11:10 AM PDT
- nt
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)