March 21, 2005 11:11 AM PST

Time Warner settles fraud charges over online ads

Related Stories

SEC eyes $400 million in AOL revenue

March 28, 2003

Year in review: AOL troubles

December 16, 2002

SEC probe overshadows AOL profit

July 24, 2002
Time Warner has agreed to pay a $300 million civil penalty to settle charges from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the company "materially" overstated online ad revenue and the number of its Internet subscribers.

Time Warner, which was also charged with aiding and abetting securities fraud, will pay the penalty without admitting or denying the charges.

The media giant also restated about $500 million in advertising revenue it reported during the fourth quarter of 2000 through 2002 due to alleged inflated numbers. That is in addition to the $190 million in revenue the company restated in 2002, due to accounting irregularities.

Time Warner will hire an independent investigator to determine whether its historical accounting for certain transactions adhered to standard accounting principles. The media giant said further restatements may be necessary, depending on the independent examiner's conclusions, which are expected 180 days after beginning the review.

These latest actions by the SEC stem from an investigation that began several years ago into the accounting practices of the company's America Online unit.

"Our complaint against AOL Time Warner details a wide array of wrongdoing, including fraudulent round-trip transactions to inflate online advertising revenues, fraudulent inflation of AOL subscriber numbers, misapplication of accounting principles relating to AOL Europe, and participation in frauds against the shareholders of three other companies," Stephen Cutler, director of the SEC's enforcement division, said in a statement. "Some of the misconduct occurred while the ink on a prior commission cease-and-desist order was barely dry. Such an institutional failure calls for strong sanctions."

Among the allegations, the SEC claimed that AOL essentially paid some of its customers' advertising bills to boost revenue; inflated the number of its subscribers by counting bulk subscriptions to corporate customers, even though it knew a number of them would not likely pan out; failed to consolidate its financial results with those of its AOL Europe joint venture, in a move to improve its financial picture; and violated its cease-and-desist order of May 2000.

AOL, nonetheless, said it was pleased to resolve that aspect of the SEC's investigation.

"We're committed to cooperating with the independent examiner as well as fulfilling all of our other obligations under the settlement," Dick Parsons, AOL chief executive, said in a statement.

In detailing its allegations, the SEC claimed that AOL funded its own online ad revenue by providing certain customers with the means to pay for advertising on its site that they would not otherwise have

CONTINUED:
Page 1 | 2
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.