ie8 fix

Half a century of hard drives

By Michael Kanellos
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
September 11, 2006 4:00 AM PDT

Hard drives radically changed the way the world stores data. And for a brief period, at least one was a tourist attraction as well.

Crown Zellerbach, at one time a major paper producer in San Francisco, was the first company to install a RAMAC (Random Access Method of Accounting and Control) machine, the first IBM computer with a then-newfangled piece of storage technology called a hard drive, according to Jim Porter, president of analysis firm Disk/Trend. The RAMAC--officially announced on Sept. 13, 1956--weighed 1 ton and stored 5MB of data on 50 spinning platters, 24 inches in diameter.

Hard drive hall of fame

Here's a brief look at some notable hard drives in history.

Year Drive
1956 IBM 350. Consists of 50 disks, each 24 inches in diameter.
1962 IBM comes up a storage system based on packs of six 14-inch disks. Each pack holds 2MB. Commercially, this is when drives take off.
1979 IBM develops an 8-inch drive.
1980 The 5.25-inch "Winchester" drive makes its debut. Its design plays a key role in the development of the PC market.
1983 Rodine issues a 10MB 3.25-inch drive. It's still the standard form factor for desktops.
1988 PrairieTek releases its 2.5-inch 20MB drive, the size of which remains the mainstay in notebooks.
1991 Integrated Peripherals debuts its 1.8-inch drive. Drives this size aren't destined to go mainstream until the debut of Apple Computer's first iPod, more than 10 years later.
1992 Hewlett-Packard produces a 1.3-inch drive. It doesn't make a major bang, though drive manufacturers are now thinking about bringing it back.
1999 IBM releases a 1-inch microdrive with 340MB of capacity. That capacity has since expanded to 8GB.
2004 Toshiba shrinks the drive to 0.85 inches in diameter. Many believe that this is the smallest size drive that will be mass-made.

Porter worked at Crown, which got the RAMAC because the company delivered a lot of computer card stock to IBM.

"Any time we had a business guest, they wanted to see it, so I'd take them three levels below Market Street to the computer room. You could see the head assembly moving back and forth. It put on a good show," Porter recalled. "I showed it off dozens of times."

A lot has changed in the last 50 years. Manufacturers now sell drives that hold 750GB, or 150,000 times more data than the RAMAC, but they weigh only a few ounces and measure just 3.5 inches across. Drives that can hold a terabyte will be announced late this year or early next year.

"The hard drive has advanced about 65 million times in areal density since the RAMAC, and we're still, in my estimation, three orders of magnitude from any truly fundamental limits," said Mark Kryder, chief technical officer of drive maker Seagate Technology.

Hard drives, moreover, have become pervasive. Between 1992 and 2003, roughly 1.5 billon drives shipped, capable of holding 41,400 exabytes, according to the "How Much Information?" study from the University of California at Berkeley. An exabyte is a billion gigabytes. Five exabytes would be enough to store all human speech since the dawn of time through 2002, according to the study. More data is stored on hard drives than on optical drives, paper or other media, according to the study.

This year, about 450 million to 460 million drives will leave factories, according to Disk/Trend.

The growth, in part, has derived from the seemingly never-ending demand for servers, PCs and data storage--as well as by a successful effort by drive makers to diversify outside of the PC market. High-end TVs come with built-in drives, while Toyota Motor and Mercedes-Benz are planning to embed hard drive-based navigation and entertainment systems into luxury cars, according to Bill Healy, senior vice president of product strategy and marketing at Hitachi Global Storage Technologies.

TiVo-like digital video recorders wouldn't be possible without hard drives; home servers stocked with videos and music could be the next must-have item. Drives are also replacing tape drives for more permanent data storage, Healy added.

"I don't remember a time when the money was rolling in. It has always been a tough field, hasn't it?"
--Al Shugart, founder, Seagate Technology

The realities of the drive industry--high capital costs, rapid technology changes, lots of competition, penny-pinching customers, short product life spans--have always made survival tough.

At the mid-1980s peak, 76 companies, including outfits such as Seiko and Citizen Watch, were churning out drives, according to Disk/Trend.

"Now, if you count very carefully, you'll find eight--and some of those are very small," Porter said. The top three makers--Seagate, Western Digital and Hitachi--account for about 75 percent of drives shipped. Life at the top, though, isn't easy. Although Seagate and Western Digital are currently profitable, Hitachi has experienced some unprofitable quarters recently, and margins for all companies remain tight.

"I don't remember a time when the money was rolling in," joked Al Shugart, who was one of the engineers on the RAMAC and went on to found Seagate. "It has always been a tough field, hasn't it?"

Much of the credit for the design of the drive goes to Reynold Johnson. IBM sent him to San Jose, Calif., in 1952 to develop a magnetic storage system in which data could be recorded or retrieved directly from any part of the medium. In tape systems, you need to rewind or fast-forward to get to a particular point of data.

At the time, many thought of devising a magnetic cylinder. The problem with cylinders, though, is surface area: A cylinder capable of holding 5MB of data with the materials at the time would have been at least 17 feet long. Johnson came up with the idea of stacking magnetic disks, said Al Hoagland, who runs the Magnetic Disk Heritage Center and worked on the RAMAC with Johnson. (For the record, the RAMAC 305 was the computer system that contained the first drive. The 350 was the name of the actual drive array attached to the RAMAC 305.)

Next page: A hard-drive future? 

Video

Looking back 50 years
On Sept. 13, 1956, IBM announces the world's first hard drive, the RAMAC, and explains in this silent film its invention.

Photos

Making the first disk drive
IBM completed the RAMAC 50 years ago. Compare its stack of 50 platters to today's 1-inchers.


A brief history of hard drives
Hitachi Global Storage Technologies has collected pictures from hard-drive history.


New hard-drive technologies
Patterned media, heat-assisted recording could help drive makers keep adding capacity.


Related stories
News around the Web
Credits

Editors: Mike Ricciuti, Zoë Slocum
Design: Mitjahm Simmons
Production: Jessica Kashiwabara


20 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
What about speed, silly?
Miniaturization and capacity are very nice, but this article completely missed the biggest for frustration for me and many users: speed. If you look at a graph of the last decade's jumps in processor speed and compare that rate of improvement with HD performance, it's pretty stark. Way too many tasks are disk-bound. Time to remove this bottleneck!
Posted by kaigironsha (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Overcoming Disk I/O limitations
Disk drives read very quickly from contiguous files - e.g. windows swap or paging file. That is why the swap file uses reserved space on disk drive usually set equal to 1.5 times the DRAM. Yet they are quite slow for true random access across non-contiguous, particularly highly fragmented files. Disk drives may not disappear if there cost in terms of Gb/$ remains lower than other others. Disks as tapes are considered secondary memory. However, the primary memory - i.e. SRAM and DRAM -are likely to more towards other non-volatile technologies or so-called "universal" memory. See my other post on that subject.
Posted by robertpotter (2 comments )
Link Flag
new technology?
Isn't it past time to put old Tom Edison's phonograph back in the attic, and develop new technology for storage? It wasn't that long ago that SRI's (Static Ram Interfaces ) were eschewed because of their 32K limit. Now we have multi-gig USB flash drives. I say, put Ol' Tom's Graphanola back in the attic where it belongs, and go static. No more mechanical failures, noisy operation, sudden outages. Just think: storage with no moving parts to wear out....
Posted by bumalong (10 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Samsung's Recent Tiny 32 Gb Flash Chip
The memory would replace hard disks sooner than what was expected.

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200609/200609110023.html" target="_newWindow">http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200609/200609110023.html</a>
Posted by baechul (2 comments )
Link Flag
Samsung Develops Tiny 32 Gb Flash Chip
The memory would replace hard disks sooner than what was expected.

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200609/200609110023.html" target="_newWindow">http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200609/200609110023.html</a>
Posted by baechul (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Platters of bits...
The first computer I used that had hard disks was the IBM 1130, with its removable single-platter cartridge; by then the 14 inch platters held about ten Mbytes. Another fifteen years, and washing-machine-size boxes with multi-platter packs were the norm. I still have an eight-platter pack in my "archives". I think it held 750 Mbytes. Now..my pocket flash "drive" holds about that much. I expect someday newborns will get a pea-sized thing installed in the Mastoid bone: cell phone/PDA/computer, and who knows what else besides.
Posted by vanrock70 (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Microdrives in the iPod Mini
"Apple also became the first company to adopt 1-inch microdrives on a wide scale with the iPod Nano"

Not so, it was the iPod mini. The Nano uses only flash as the article linked during this paragraph points out.

I'm looking forward to those 100tb per square inch drives... :)
Posted by chrisgarty (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
iPod Mini not Nano
The iPod Mini, not the nano had a 1 inch hard drive inside.
Posted by fjdulles (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Thanks for the catch
You're right. We have amended the story to include the iPod Mini. Thank you for alerting us to this.
Posted by KarenSaid (17 comments )
Link Flag
Perpendicular recording doesn't stack bits on to of each other.
As the link in this article about perpendicular recording explains,
perpendicular recording doesn't stack bits oon top of each other.
Rather, the magnetic domains are flipped on their side relative to
how they were oriented in older drives, which turns out to allow
them to be safetly packed closer together.
Posted by fjdulles (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
5 MB HD
If memory serves me I purchased a WD 5 MB in 1982 foe $499 plus shipping for my TRS 80. It used the same connection as the 5.25" floppies.
Posted by wtortorici (102 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Oh, by the way...
Radio Shack's DOS did not support the hard drive. The DOS was from a company in Boulder CO. I think it was called Quick DOS.
Posted by wtortorici (102 comments )
Link Flag
Old HD days are nubered
It is high time for newer faster more reliable technology. There is a great need to move beyond the popular (but old) hard drive technology we currently now use.
Posted by Stan Johnson (322 comments )
Reply Link Flag
"universal" memory to replace existing technologies over time
I think that "universal" memories will be next disruptiuve technology because they plan to provide equivalent or faster, recording and reading thoroughput and be non-volatile. These may include miniturized core-based memory and other nano derived technologies. The storage capacities available in new universal memories will limit replacable applications and will occure in this order: 1) SRAM, 2) Dynamic RAM, 3) Flash memory, and 4) Hard disk memory.
Posted by robertpotter (2 comments )
Link Flag
Univac Options
I worked on Univac 1108 gear in the early 70's and it still had a drum as local high speed storage, the Fastrand drum for next fastest (it address methaod of position, head (or track) and sector was still the method used to assign storage, and a then new 550Mb drive unit that had 24 inch platters in a 3 by 3 by 4 foot enclosure.
Posted by grmells (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Univac Options
I worked on Univac 1108 gear in the early 70's and it still had a drum as local high speed storage, the Fastrand drum for next fastest (it address methaod of position, head (or track) and sector was still the method used to assign storage, and a then new 550Mb drive unit that had 24 inch platters in a 3 by 3 by 4 foot enclosure.
Posted by grmells (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Memory failure
You must be having a memory failure if you say that the drives were 550Mb. Even 50Mb would be unlikely for that time.
Posted by aabcdefghij987654321 (1721 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

CONTINUED: A hard-drive future?…
Page 1 | 2