June 6, 2007 4:00 AM PDT
Tech seeing red over green-card proposal
- Related Stories
-
Work bill would create new ID database
May 21, 2007 -
Senators propose infinite H-1Bs for advanced degree holders
May 15, 2007 -
Does H-1B surge mean cap should be raised?
April 4, 2007 -
Senate bill gives Americans preference for tech jobs
April 3, 2007 -
Some H-1B workers underpaid, federal auditors say
June 23, 2006 -
H-1B limit reached for next year
June 2, 2006 -
H-1B visas hit roadblock in Congress
March 31, 2006
The prospect of unpredictable competition for a fixed number of immigrant visas based on an applicant's educational background and work history, which would replace the current employer-sponsored green card system, is drawing stiff opposition from technology lobbying groups that are pressing senators to preserve the current system.
Groups like Compete America, an alliance mostly composed of high-tech trade associations and individual companies, say the practice would chip away at the predictability of the current process for recruiting and hiring foreigners and leave too much control over the talent-screening process in the government's hands. The current proposal would hand out visas based on a point system that grades factors like education levels, family ties, English prowess and whether an occupation is considered "in-demand."
"The best the government can hope to do is select a pool of generically potentially qualified candidates, whereas a company knowing exactly what it needs, exactly what skills and exactly what kind of individual can best deliver is going to be far better able to make the right match," Lowell Sachs, Sun Microsystems' senior manager for federal government affairs, said in a telephone interview. Sun is one of the core members of Compete America.
In a change that would be akin to long-standing systems in Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom, the proposed merit-based system would eventually allocate about 380,000 green cards each year to foreigners with the highest scores--up to 100 points--based on certain criteria. The bill is called the Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Reform Act of 2007 (PDF).
How the point system works
Let's say a 40-year-old doctor from Germany with 10 years of work experience and midlevel English skills wants to emigrate to the United States, where his sister is a legal permanent resident. Out of 100 possible points, his score would be:20 -- Specialty Occupation
20 -- Masters degree
8 -- "STEM" education
10 -- Midlevel English skills
4 -- Sibling of U.S. legal permanent resident
Total: 62 points
Supporters of the idea, including the Bush administration and key Senate Democrats like Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), say the overhaul is necessary in order to ensure that both "high-skill" and "low-skill" workers have a chance at obtaining permanent residency in the United States and to reward well-educated, English-speaking foreigners capable of working in specialty and high-demand fields.
The system works through simple addition, with up to 100 points allocated for categories such as occupation type and language fluency. An example: someone with a master's degree would automatically receive 20 points; people with English fluency would receive 15; and people in occupations found to have grown the largest amount in the past decade by the Department of Labor would receive 16 points. (The most recent survey, which offered projections between 2004 and 2014, ran the gamut, including computer scientists, registered nurses, food preparers and waiters, janitors and maids, retail salespeople, receptionists, office clerks and truck drivers.)
What that means is a brilliant 40-year-old computer programmer who a company like Google or Apple views as crucial to the success of a forthcoming product could easily score less than a new nursing school graduate with zero work experience (younger workers get an extra three points). That's even more likely to happen if the programmer isn't proficient in English and the nurse is (an extra 15 points), or if the programmer doesn't have formal education in a science, technology, engineering or math field (which could potentially add an extra eight points to the nurse's score).
Uncertainty over "high demand" jobs
Some immigration experts said it's not entirely clear whether the system proposed by the Senate bill would do more to harm or help technology employers.
After all, the system would award bonus points to foreigners who have worked in science, technology, engineering or math occupations in the United States for at least one year and to those seeking occupations in designated high-demand fields, which include computer software engineering and systems analysis.
"In actual use, probably most of the jobs for which companies are hiring high-tech workers and most of the workers would probably score high enough," said Doris Meissner, a senior fellow with the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington think tank, and commissioner of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service during the Clinton administration.
Still, she added: "If the person they want doesn't score high enough, they would not be able to reach the person, even though that is who they have identified and selected to fill a particular job. It adds another layer of complexity and procedure, and most important, it adds uncertainty. Employers don't like that."
Another worry is that the government could change its mind about the definition of "specialty" (worth 20 points) or "in-demand" (worth 16 points) occupations. Because it's unclear which occupations will fall into those categories if and when the law takes effect, it's a "much bigger wild card than anyone is comfortable with," said Bob Sakaniwa, associate director of advocacy for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, which is part of Compete America and does not support the Senate bill as written.
See more CNET content tagged:
occupation,
proposal,
food,
hiring,
skill





The Tech companies are nothing but a bunch of slave oversee'ers. They should be ashamed to keep a class of people in indentured servitude.
The h-1b program itself is being used to outsource jobs. More high-tech jobs are being removed by the h-1b program than could ever be created by the program.
It is a fact, that Indian IT Outsourcing companies use a huge number of h-1b visas to train their (Indian only) engineers, and then send them back home to continue outsourcing whole departments.
You cannot discriminate in the hiring by race, creed, or NATIONALITY.
When Indian companies only consider h-1b candidates (and then only from from India), for jobs based in the United States, it is a clear case of discrimination.
Prejudice in hiring decisions is a crime in the United States, it violates Federal Civil Rights laws. When companies are found to have violated such laws the punishment can include criminal sentences.
The main question is, if there is a job in the United States, do Indian IT companies (that are h-1b dependent) even consider a non-Indian candidate?
So far all evidence, and all the numbers point to a the startling fact, U.S. engineering candidates are barred from applying for U.S. jobs created by Indian IT companies.
Some of these Indian IT companies have U.S. staff that is 90% or more Indian, and almost all here on h-1b visas.
In open testimony before congress, a U.S. Citizen and job applicant tried to get an interview with for an open position in the United States. She was told that she could not apply for the job, just (and only because) because she could not be hired under an h-1b Visa.
Congress is merely asking questions, and India is protesting way-to-loudly. Something aweful (a complete disregard for Civil Rights) is being coverd up by the whole Indian IT industry and the Indian government.
There is no equality in the hiring practices of these h-1b dependent Indian IT companies, either you are Indian or you are not, that is the hiring criteria for an Engineer at an h-1b dependent Indian IT company for a job based in the United States.
This clearly is discrimination, this is prejudice, this is wrong, and against U.S. law.
The american people have the right to know when companies are destroying the very fabric of our society, by planting the seeds of racism, prejudice, and discrimination.
India threatens us with trade sanctions unless allow their companies to continue to discrimate. Call their bluff, India needs trade with the U.S. more than the reverse. Further what good is trade, if it leads to riots, protest, and civil unrest. Discrimination, more than any other, is something that we all agree needs to be eliminated.
The Senators are merely asking questions. Clearly though, we need to subpoena these companies. This is the biggest case of open-discrimination, bigotry, and prejudice in the United States today.
Karmal Nath (the Indian Commerce Minister) and NASSCOM (the Indian Service Companies group) knows Indian IT companies discriminate against U.S. citizens. They know that that Indian IT companies practice discrimination in the United States. And they are trying to black-mail the U.S. into letting it continue.
I also notice that some of the fastest growing job categories (from the "survey") are all but excluded from present HB-1 and NAFTA visa classes. That will become a bottleneck in the near future.
Perhaps a point value based on mutual temporary worker exchanges could be added. Some people like to see the world and work at the same time, but don't intend to settle down. For every american who gets a job outside the country, a foreign worker can temporarily take their place. For instance, I know Canada has a stripper shortage right now - how about an exchange of people with brains for people with booty?
Special interests (the above greedy suckers and those they are in bed with and take money from) want to degrade workers pay and leave this nation without sovereignty and dumb us down to mexico's level. It all comes down to: do you want a United States, or do you want this amnesty with increased immigration plan.
I that the government is still espousing that there are too few engineers in this country...that's strange because I sat in a room with 91 engineers in all disiplines and background, all looking for work for more than a year all being told that while our experience was stellar a more qualified candidate was chosen. That candidate most often was foreign. We all came to the same conclusion...There ARE plenty of engineers in America but they are not willing to work for minimum wage. After the unemployment runs out you are no longer counted.....What wrong with this picture?
In short, they have no business working in high tech.
Few Americans with the background and up to date skill stay unemployed and under paid for long.
Most of this whining are from people who can't understand why they can't get a job with their l33t VB and HTML skills, but know nothing substantial. It must be the immigrants fault.
You want a real high tech job? You need to invest in serious education and work your ass off. If you want a job that requires little skill or brains, go get an MBA or something.
- Calculate your points at www.ready4greencard.com
-
by nihar15
June 12, 2007 6:48 AM PDT
- Looks like someone has already created a website to calculate your points under the new immigration policy. See how many points you earn

-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 31 Comments >>www.ready4greencard.com