October 20, 2006 10:49 AM PDT

Taking the bling out of your engine

How much platinum there is in a Volkswagen Passat diesel? If you guessed $238 dollars worth, you'd be right.

Nanostellar is trying to reduce it. The company has produced a platinum alloy that can substitute for the pure material inside catalytic converters, according to CEO Pankaj Dhingra.

The company recently began regular production of 250 kilograms of the alloy a week. Although that's not enough to serve large car manufacturers, consistent production could help convince auto makers to adopt the material.

Platinum sprinkled in the catalytic converter captures gases like carbon monoxide and turns them into less dangerous compounds, such as carbon dioxide. Unfortunately, the high temperatures generated in engine causes the platinum to separate from the substrate of the converter and clump together. That causes the performance of the converter to degrade over time.

Thus, car manufacturers have to put in excess platinum. The presence of platinum has also made catalytic converters a target for thieves.

Nanostellar's alloys adhere better to the converter, so particles can't clump together, which in the end results in lower costs. Platinum currently costs around $1,100 an ounce, down from $1,300 in the recent past, he said. Substituting one of the company's alloys for pure platinum can reduce the platinum budget in a Passat by $56 to $107 dollars. (A Jeep Liberty has about $170 worth of platinum.).

That won't make an appreciable dent in the sticker price of a Passat, but for a car manufacturer it adds up.

"Last year, $2 billion in platinum was used in diesel engines," Dhingra said.

Additionally, the alloy reduces diesel emissions without fuel additives. The company's first alloys targeted reducing carbon monoxide; these compounds can reduce carbon monoxide emissions by 50 percent or more, depending on how much is used. In the future, it will work to reduce nitrogen gases. The company employs computational models to attempt to figure out what combination of precious metal atoms and other elements will result in a property with desired properties.

Japan, Europe and the U.S. have passed, or are in the process of passing, tighter regulations on diesel emissions, which expand the market for these type of materials.

The company has signed deals with manufacturers of aftermarket catalytic converters, and is negotiating with car manufacturers to have its material integrated into production cars.

Getting the material onto production lines will also require expanding production facilities. The company will need about ten times its current 250 kilograms grams a week to produce enough alloy for 4,000 to 5,000 engines a year, he said.

Nanostellar was founded by William Miller, a Stanford University professor who also has served as CEO of SRI International; Jonathan Woo, a expert on quantum mechanics and molecular modeling, and K.J. Cho, a nanotechnology expert. Investors include 3i, which put money in the company in 2004.

See more CNET content tagged:
automobile company, carbon, emission, converter, material


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Funky math?
"The company currently can produce 250 kilograms grams a week. It will need ten times that capacity to produce enough alloy for 4,000 to 5,000 engines a year, he said."

Umm.. huh? 10 times 250kg/week works out to 130,000kg/year. If that's only enough for 5,000 engines a year then that would mean they are putting 26kg (about 55 pounds) of this platinum alloy in each and every car!

Earlier in the article it mentions a figure of $170 worth of platinum at a cost of $1100 an ounce, or roughly 0.15 ounces worth of platinum per car. This works out to something like 43 *grams* of platinum. Quite a long way off 26 KILOgrams!

Using the above numbers, the companies current production of 250kg/week works out to roughly 300,000 engines per year. Even taking into account some loses for various reasons it would seem that they still are making more than enough of this alloy to allow for some test-runs from major car manufacturers.
Posted by Hoser McMoose (182 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Cnet is bad with units..
I'm sure what they meant was 4000 to 5000 engines per week. Either that or they meant the company can produce 250kg/yr.
I often notice this type of error in Cnet articles. One I often notice is using the unit watts or killowatts per year. This is a unit that makes no sense in practical use. The reader has no idea whether they mean kw-hrs/year or just kw. The difference between the two is about a factor of 8800.
Posted by skrubol (181 comments )
Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.